Secrecy

Although expansions of state secrecy and the countervailing leaks of classified documents imbue the anthropology of secrecy with urgent relevance, secrecy has a long-standing status as a paradigmatically anthropological topic. In the ethnographic record, initiatory secrets often stand for the quiddi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annual review of anthropology 2014-01, Vol.43 (1), p.53-69
1. Verfasser: Jones, Graham M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 69
container_issue 1
container_start_page 53
container_title Annual review of anthropology
container_volume 43
creator Jones, Graham M
description Although expansions of state secrecy and the countervailing leaks of classified documents imbue the anthropology of secrecy with urgent relevance, secrecy has a long-standing status as a paradigmatically anthropological topic. In the ethnographic record, initiatory secrets often stand for the quiddity of culture, and the revelation of concealed realities is an organizing trope in much ethnographic writing. While situating research on secrecy as a reflection of epistemological and ethical dimensions of cultural anthropology more broadly, this review simultaneously explores parallels between different anthropological traditions by focusing on descriptions of the media through which social relations involving secrecy are transacted. Attending to ethnographic accounts of the way secrets travel across different media and coexist simultaneously in various mediated states provides both a novel intellectual framework for surveying recent research and a basis for conceptualizing the anthropology of secrecy itself as a practice that involves intermedial and transmedial knowledge flows.
doi_str_mv 10.1146/annurev-anthro-102313-030058
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1622310098</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>43049562</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43049562</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a462t-e856b2e6347a167957704914a65f5dd6cdb0a7122627e3e96469222294defb073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkD1PwzAQhi0EglL4CUwwsBjOX-dYYqkqvqRKDMBsOYkjWqVJsRNQ_z2uXDGwccsN977v3T2EXDG4YUzireu6Mfgv6rrhI_SUARdMUBAAqjggE6akopIbOCQTgEJSVBpOyGmMKwAQKHBCjl99FXy1PSNHjWujP9_3KXl_uH-bP9HFy-PzfLagTiIfqC8UltyjkNox1EZpDdIw6VA1qq6xqktwmnGOXHvhDUo0PJWRtW9K0GJKrnPuJvSfo4-DXS9j5dvWdb4fo2UamSxEYSBJL_9IV_0YunSdZcjTqwCmSKq7rKpCH2Pwjd2E5dqFrWVgd5TsnpLNlGymZDOlZL_I9lUc-vDrlSK9pZCn-SzPdymuTTlL_x3_t-MHkLN7aw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1622310098</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Secrecy</title><source>Annual Reviews Complete A-Z List</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Jones, Graham M</creator><creatorcontrib>Jones, Graham M</creatorcontrib><description>Although expansions of state secrecy and the countervailing leaks of classified documents imbue the anthropology of secrecy with urgent relevance, secrecy has a long-standing status as a paradigmatically anthropological topic. In the ethnographic record, initiatory secrets often stand for the quiddity of culture, and the revelation of concealed realities is an organizing trope in much ethnographic writing. While situating research on secrecy as a reflection of epistemological and ethical dimensions of cultural anthropology more broadly, this review simultaneously explores parallels between different anthropological traditions by focusing on descriptions of the media through which social relations involving secrecy are transacted. Attending to ethnographic accounts of the way secrets travel across different media and coexist simultaneously in various mediated states provides both a novel intellectual framework for surveying recent research and a basis for conceptualizing the anthropology of secrecy itself as a practice that involves intermedial and transmedial knowledge flows.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0084-6570</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-4290</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1146/annurev-anthro-102313-030058</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ARAPCW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Palo Alto: Annual Reviews</publisher><subject>Anthropology ; concealment ; Cultural anthropology ; Cultural studies ; Epistemology ; Ethical epistemology ; Ethics ; Ethnography ; Interpersonal relations ; Knowledge ; Linguistic anthropology ; Media ; public secret ; Religious rituals ; revelation ; Rituals ; Scholarship ; Secrecy ; Secret societies ; Social anthropology ; Social interaction ; Tradition ; Traditions</subject><ispartof>Annual review of anthropology, 2014-01, Vol.43 (1), p.53-69</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2014 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved 2014</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT © 2013 ANNUAL REVIEWS</rights><rights>Copyright Annual Reviews, Inc. 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a462t-e856b2e6347a167957704914a65f5dd6cdb0a7122627e3e96469222294defb073</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a462t-e856b2e6347a167957704914a65f5dd6cdb0a7122627e3e96469222294defb073</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102313-030058?crawler=true&amp;mimetype=application/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gannualreviews$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102313-030058$$EHTML$$P50$$Gannualreviews$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>70,314,780,784,803,4182,27924,27925,33774,58017,58250,78254,78255</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jones, Graham M</creatorcontrib><title>Secrecy</title><title>Annual review of anthropology</title><description>Although expansions of state secrecy and the countervailing leaks of classified documents imbue the anthropology of secrecy with urgent relevance, secrecy has a long-standing status as a paradigmatically anthropological topic. In the ethnographic record, initiatory secrets often stand for the quiddity of culture, and the revelation of concealed realities is an organizing trope in much ethnographic writing. While situating research on secrecy as a reflection of epistemological and ethical dimensions of cultural anthropology more broadly, this review simultaneously explores parallels between different anthropological traditions by focusing on descriptions of the media through which social relations involving secrecy are transacted. Attending to ethnographic accounts of the way secrets travel across different media and coexist simultaneously in various mediated states provides both a novel intellectual framework for surveying recent research and a basis for conceptualizing the anthropology of secrecy itself as a practice that involves intermedial and transmedial knowledge flows.</description><subject>Anthropology</subject><subject>concealment</subject><subject>Cultural anthropology</subject><subject>Cultural studies</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Ethical epistemology</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Ethnography</subject><subject>Interpersonal relations</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Linguistic anthropology</subject><subject>Media</subject><subject>public secret</subject><subject>Religious rituals</subject><subject>revelation</subject><subject>Rituals</subject><subject>Scholarship</subject><subject>Secrecy</subject><subject>Secret societies</subject><subject>Social anthropology</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>Tradition</subject><subject>Traditions</subject><issn>0084-6570</issn><issn>1545-4290</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkD1PwzAQhi0EglL4CUwwsBjOX-dYYqkqvqRKDMBsOYkjWqVJsRNQ_z2uXDGwccsN977v3T2EXDG4YUzireu6Mfgv6rrhI_SUARdMUBAAqjggE6akopIbOCQTgEJSVBpOyGmMKwAQKHBCjl99FXy1PSNHjWujP9_3KXl_uH-bP9HFy-PzfLagTiIfqC8UltyjkNox1EZpDdIw6VA1qq6xqktwmnGOXHvhDUo0PJWRtW9K0GJKrnPuJvSfo4-DXS9j5dvWdb4fo2UamSxEYSBJL_9IV_0YunSdZcjTqwCmSKq7rKpCH2Pwjd2E5dqFrWVgd5TsnpLNlGymZDOlZL_I9lUc-vDrlSK9pZCn-SzPdymuTTlL_x3_t-MHkLN7aw</recordid><startdate>20140101</startdate><enddate>20140101</enddate><creator>Jones, Graham M</creator><general>Annual Reviews</general><general>Annual Reviews, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140101</creationdate><title>Secrecy</title><author>Jones, Graham M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a462t-e856b2e6347a167957704914a65f5dd6cdb0a7122627e3e96469222294defb073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Anthropology</topic><topic>concealment</topic><topic>Cultural anthropology</topic><topic>Cultural studies</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Ethical epistemology</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Ethnography</topic><topic>Interpersonal relations</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Linguistic anthropology</topic><topic>Media</topic><topic>public secret</topic><topic>Religious rituals</topic><topic>revelation</topic><topic>Rituals</topic><topic>Scholarship</topic><topic>Secrecy</topic><topic>Secret societies</topic><topic>Social anthropology</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>Tradition</topic><topic>Traditions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jones, Graham M</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Annual review of anthropology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jones, Graham M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Secrecy</atitle><jtitle>Annual review of anthropology</jtitle><date>2014-01-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>53</spage><epage>69</epage><pages>53-69</pages><issn>0084-6570</issn><eissn>1545-4290</eissn><coden>ARAPCW</coden><abstract>Although expansions of state secrecy and the countervailing leaks of classified documents imbue the anthropology of secrecy with urgent relevance, secrecy has a long-standing status as a paradigmatically anthropological topic. In the ethnographic record, initiatory secrets often stand for the quiddity of culture, and the revelation of concealed realities is an organizing trope in much ethnographic writing. While situating research on secrecy as a reflection of epistemological and ethical dimensions of cultural anthropology more broadly, this review simultaneously explores parallels between different anthropological traditions by focusing on descriptions of the media through which social relations involving secrecy are transacted. Attending to ethnographic accounts of the way secrets travel across different media and coexist simultaneously in various mediated states provides both a novel intellectual framework for surveying recent research and a basis for conceptualizing the anthropology of secrecy itself as a practice that involves intermedial and transmedial knowledge flows.</abstract><cop>Palo Alto</cop><pub>Annual Reviews</pub><doi>10.1146/annurev-anthro-102313-030058</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0084-6570
ispartof Annual review of anthropology, 2014-01, Vol.43 (1), p.53-69
issn 0084-6570
1545-4290
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1622310098
source Annual Reviews Complete A-Z List; Sociological Abstracts; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Anthropology
concealment
Cultural anthropology
Cultural studies
Epistemology
Ethical epistemology
Ethics
Ethnography
Interpersonal relations
Knowledge
Linguistic anthropology
Media
public secret
Religious rituals
revelation
Rituals
Scholarship
Secrecy
Secret societies
Social anthropology
Social interaction
Tradition
Traditions
title Secrecy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T14%3A50%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Secrecy&rft.jtitle=Annual%20review%20of%20anthropology&rft.au=Jones,%20Graham%20M&rft.date=2014-01-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=53&rft.epage=69&rft.pages=53-69&rft.issn=0084-6570&rft.eissn=1545-4290&rft.coden=ARAPCW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102313-030058&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E43049562%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1622310098&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=43049562&rfr_iscdi=true