Secrecy
Although expansions of state secrecy and the countervailing leaks of classified documents imbue the anthropology of secrecy with urgent relevance, secrecy has a long-standing status as a paradigmatically anthropological topic. In the ethnographic record, initiatory secrets often stand for the quiddi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annual review of anthropology 2014-01, Vol.43 (1), p.53-69 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 69 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 53 |
container_title | Annual review of anthropology |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Jones, Graham M |
description | Although expansions of state secrecy and the countervailing leaks of classified documents imbue the anthropology of secrecy with urgent relevance, secrecy has a long-standing status as a paradigmatically anthropological topic. In the ethnographic record, initiatory secrets often stand for the quiddity of culture, and the revelation of concealed realities is an organizing trope in much ethnographic writing. While situating research on secrecy as a reflection of epistemological and ethical dimensions of cultural anthropology more broadly, this review simultaneously explores parallels between different anthropological traditions by focusing on descriptions of the media through which social relations involving secrecy are transacted. Attending to ethnographic accounts of the way secrets travel across different media and coexist simultaneously in various mediated states provides both a novel intellectual framework for surveying recent research and a basis for conceptualizing the anthropology of secrecy itself as a practice that involves intermedial and transmedial knowledge flows. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1146/annurev-anthro-102313-030058 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1622310098</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>43049562</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43049562</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a462t-e856b2e6347a167957704914a65f5dd6cdb0a7122627e3e96469222294defb073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkD1PwzAQhi0EglL4CUwwsBjOX-dYYqkqvqRKDMBsOYkjWqVJsRNQ_z2uXDGwccsN977v3T2EXDG4YUzireu6Mfgv6rrhI_SUARdMUBAAqjggE6akopIbOCQTgEJSVBpOyGmMKwAQKHBCjl99FXy1PSNHjWujP9_3KXl_uH-bP9HFy-PzfLagTiIfqC8UltyjkNox1EZpDdIw6VA1qq6xqktwmnGOXHvhDUo0PJWRtW9K0GJKrnPuJvSfo4-DXS9j5dvWdb4fo2UamSxEYSBJL_9IV_0YunSdZcjTqwCmSKq7rKpCH2Pwjd2E5dqFrWVgd5TsnpLNlGymZDOlZL_I9lUc-vDrlSK9pZCn-SzPdymuTTlL_x3_t-MHkLN7aw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1622310098</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Secrecy</title><source>Annual Reviews Complete A-Z List</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Jones, Graham M</creator><creatorcontrib>Jones, Graham M</creatorcontrib><description>Although expansions of state secrecy and the countervailing leaks of classified documents imbue the anthropology of secrecy with urgent relevance, secrecy has a long-standing status as a paradigmatically anthropological topic. In the ethnographic record, initiatory secrets often stand for the quiddity of culture, and the revelation of concealed realities is an organizing trope in much ethnographic writing. While situating research on secrecy as a reflection of epistemological and ethical dimensions of cultural anthropology more broadly, this review simultaneously explores parallels between different anthropological traditions by focusing on descriptions of the media through which social relations involving secrecy are transacted. Attending to ethnographic accounts of the way secrets travel across different media and coexist simultaneously in various mediated states provides both a novel intellectual framework for surveying recent research and a basis for conceptualizing the anthropology of secrecy itself as a practice that involves intermedial and transmedial knowledge flows.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0084-6570</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-4290</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1146/annurev-anthro-102313-030058</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ARAPCW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Palo Alto: Annual Reviews</publisher><subject>Anthropology ; concealment ; Cultural anthropology ; Cultural studies ; Epistemology ; Ethical epistemology ; Ethics ; Ethnography ; Interpersonal relations ; Knowledge ; Linguistic anthropology ; Media ; public secret ; Religious rituals ; revelation ; Rituals ; Scholarship ; Secrecy ; Secret societies ; Social anthropology ; Social interaction ; Tradition ; Traditions</subject><ispartof>Annual review of anthropology, 2014-01, Vol.43 (1), p.53-69</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2014 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved 2014</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT © 2013 ANNUAL REVIEWS</rights><rights>Copyright Annual Reviews, Inc. 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a462t-e856b2e6347a167957704914a65f5dd6cdb0a7122627e3e96469222294defb073</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a462t-e856b2e6347a167957704914a65f5dd6cdb0a7122627e3e96469222294defb073</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102313-030058?crawler=true&mimetype=application/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gannualreviews$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102313-030058$$EHTML$$P50$$Gannualreviews$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>70,314,780,784,803,4182,27924,27925,33774,58017,58250,78254,78255</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jones, Graham M</creatorcontrib><title>Secrecy</title><title>Annual review of anthropology</title><description>Although expansions of state secrecy and the countervailing leaks of classified documents imbue the anthropology of secrecy with urgent relevance, secrecy has a long-standing status as a paradigmatically anthropological topic. In the ethnographic record, initiatory secrets often stand for the quiddity of culture, and the revelation of concealed realities is an organizing trope in much ethnographic writing. While situating research on secrecy as a reflection of epistemological and ethical dimensions of cultural anthropology more broadly, this review simultaneously explores parallels between different anthropological traditions by focusing on descriptions of the media through which social relations involving secrecy are transacted. Attending to ethnographic accounts of the way secrets travel across different media and coexist simultaneously in various mediated states provides both a novel intellectual framework for surveying recent research and a basis for conceptualizing the anthropology of secrecy itself as a practice that involves intermedial and transmedial knowledge flows.</description><subject>Anthropology</subject><subject>concealment</subject><subject>Cultural anthropology</subject><subject>Cultural studies</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Ethical epistemology</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Ethnography</subject><subject>Interpersonal relations</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Linguistic anthropology</subject><subject>Media</subject><subject>public secret</subject><subject>Religious rituals</subject><subject>revelation</subject><subject>Rituals</subject><subject>Scholarship</subject><subject>Secrecy</subject><subject>Secret societies</subject><subject>Social anthropology</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>Tradition</subject><subject>Traditions</subject><issn>0084-6570</issn><issn>1545-4290</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkD1PwzAQhi0EglL4CUwwsBjOX-dYYqkqvqRKDMBsOYkjWqVJsRNQ_z2uXDGwccsN977v3T2EXDG4YUzireu6Mfgv6rrhI_SUARdMUBAAqjggE6akopIbOCQTgEJSVBpOyGmMKwAQKHBCjl99FXy1PSNHjWujP9_3KXl_uH-bP9HFy-PzfLagTiIfqC8UltyjkNox1EZpDdIw6VA1qq6xqktwmnGOXHvhDUo0PJWRtW9K0GJKrnPuJvSfo4-DXS9j5dvWdb4fo2UamSxEYSBJL_9IV_0YunSdZcjTqwCmSKq7rKpCH2Pwjd2E5dqFrWVgd5TsnpLNlGymZDOlZL_I9lUc-vDrlSK9pZCn-SzPdymuTTlL_x3_t-MHkLN7aw</recordid><startdate>20140101</startdate><enddate>20140101</enddate><creator>Jones, Graham M</creator><general>Annual Reviews</general><general>Annual Reviews, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140101</creationdate><title>Secrecy</title><author>Jones, Graham M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a462t-e856b2e6347a167957704914a65f5dd6cdb0a7122627e3e96469222294defb073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Anthropology</topic><topic>concealment</topic><topic>Cultural anthropology</topic><topic>Cultural studies</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Ethical epistemology</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Ethnography</topic><topic>Interpersonal relations</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Linguistic anthropology</topic><topic>Media</topic><topic>public secret</topic><topic>Religious rituals</topic><topic>revelation</topic><topic>Rituals</topic><topic>Scholarship</topic><topic>Secrecy</topic><topic>Secret societies</topic><topic>Social anthropology</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>Tradition</topic><topic>Traditions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jones, Graham M</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Annual review of anthropology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jones, Graham M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Secrecy</atitle><jtitle>Annual review of anthropology</jtitle><date>2014-01-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>53</spage><epage>69</epage><pages>53-69</pages><issn>0084-6570</issn><eissn>1545-4290</eissn><coden>ARAPCW</coden><abstract>Although expansions of state secrecy and the countervailing leaks of classified documents imbue the anthropology of secrecy with urgent relevance, secrecy has a long-standing status as a paradigmatically anthropological topic. In the ethnographic record, initiatory secrets often stand for the quiddity of culture, and the revelation of concealed realities is an organizing trope in much ethnographic writing. While situating research on secrecy as a reflection of epistemological and ethical dimensions of cultural anthropology more broadly, this review simultaneously explores parallels between different anthropological traditions by focusing on descriptions of the media through which social relations involving secrecy are transacted. Attending to ethnographic accounts of the way secrets travel across different media and coexist simultaneously in various mediated states provides both a novel intellectual framework for surveying recent research and a basis for conceptualizing the anthropology of secrecy itself as a practice that involves intermedial and transmedial knowledge flows.</abstract><cop>Palo Alto</cop><pub>Annual Reviews</pub><doi>10.1146/annurev-anthro-102313-030058</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0084-6570 |
ispartof | Annual review of anthropology, 2014-01, Vol.43 (1), p.53-69 |
issn | 0084-6570 1545-4290 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1622310098 |
source | Annual Reviews Complete A-Z List; Sociological Abstracts; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Anthropology concealment Cultural anthropology Cultural studies Epistemology Ethical epistemology Ethics Ethnography Interpersonal relations Knowledge Linguistic anthropology Media public secret Religious rituals revelation Rituals Scholarship Secrecy Secret societies Social anthropology Social interaction Tradition Traditions |
title | Secrecy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T14%3A50%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Secrecy&rft.jtitle=Annual%20review%20of%20anthropology&rft.au=Jones,%20Graham%20M&rft.date=2014-01-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=53&rft.epage=69&rft.pages=53-69&rft.issn=0084-6570&rft.eissn=1545-4290&rft.coden=ARAPCW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102313-030058&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E43049562%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1622310098&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=43049562&rfr_iscdi=true |