CONSIDERATIONS ON TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY AND UNILATERRAL SEPARATION
The last decade of the XXth century was beneficiary of the new international environment regarding human rights and freedoms promotion. The frame within the observation of human rights and freedoms was larger than ever before, becoming a state policy together with judicial guarantees. The most impor...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Research and science today 2014-08, p.143 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 143 |
| container_title | Research and science today |
| container_volume | |
| creator | Duta, Paul |
| description | The last decade of the XXth century was beneficiary of the new international environment regarding human rights and freedoms promotion. The frame within the observation of human rights and freedoms was larger than ever before, becoming a state policy together with judicial guarantees. The most important change was in the east of the space of the conference for security and cooperation in Europe. The recommendation 1201 was a reference moment at that time in the efforts of those trying to obtain the recognition of the collective rights for the national minorities, with consequences such as the recognition of the state local autonomy on ethnical criteria. Even for the colonies, the unilateral secession was an exception. The self-determination was firstly a matter of colonial authority to apply or not; supporting unilateral self-determination by the UN took place only if it was blocked by the colonial authority. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1614660823</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3467476611</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_16146608233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0MrIw1bU0MzZiAbFNzHVNTExNORh4i4uzDIDAwszM1NySk8HJ2d8v2NPFNcgxxBPIUvD3UwhxDQryDPEP8nT0UfD0C3F1B_IiFRz9XBRC_Tx9HEHSQJlg1wBHiCYeBta0xJziVF4ozc2g7OYa4uyhW1CUX1iaWlwSn5VfWpQHlIo3NDM0MTMzsDAyNiZOFQA43jWh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1614660823</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>CONSIDERATIONS ON TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY AND UNILATERRAL SEPARATION</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Duta, Paul</creator><creatorcontrib>Duta, Paul</creatorcontrib><description>The last decade of the XXth century was beneficiary of the new international environment regarding human rights and freedoms promotion. The frame within the observation of human rights and freedoms was larger than ever before, becoming a state policy together with judicial guarantees. The most important change was in the east of the space of the conference for security and cooperation in Europe. The recommendation 1201 was a reference moment at that time in the efforts of those trying to obtain the recognition of the collective rights for the national minorities, with consequences such as the recognition of the state local autonomy on ethnical criteria. Even for the colonies, the unilateral secession was an exception. The self-determination was firstly a matter of colonial authority to apply or not; supporting unilateral self-determination by the UN took place only if it was blocked by the colonial authority.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2247-4455</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2285-9632</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Targu-Jiu: University Constantin Brancusi of Târgu-Jiu</publisher><subject>Autonomy ; Charters ; Colonies & territories ; Freedoms ; Human rights ; International law ; International relations ; Minority & ethnic groups ; Recognition ; Security ; Sovereignty ; State policy</subject><ispartof>Research and science today, 2014-08, p.143</ispartof><rights>Copyright University Constantin Brancusi of Târgu-Jiu Aug 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Duta, Paul</creatorcontrib><title>CONSIDERATIONS ON TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY AND UNILATERRAL SEPARATION</title><title>Research and science today</title><description>The last decade of the XXth century was beneficiary of the new international environment regarding human rights and freedoms promotion. The frame within the observation of human rights and freedoms was larger than ever before, becoming a state policy together with judicial guarantees. The most important change was in the east of the space of the conference for security and cooperation in Europe. The recommendation 1201 was a reference moment at that time in the efforts of those trying to obtain the recognition of the collective rights for the national minorities, with consequences such as the recognition of the state local autonomy on ethnical criteria. Even for the colonies, the unilateral secession was an exception. The self-determination was firstly a matter of colonial authority to apply or not; supporting unilateral self-determination by the UN took place only if it was blocked by the colonial authority.</description><subject>Autonomy</subject><subject>Charters</subject><subject>Colonies & territories</subject><subject>Freedoms</subject><subject>Human rights</subject><subject>International law</subject><subject>International relations</subject><subject>Minority & ethnic groups</subject><subject>Recognition</subject><subject>Security</subject><subject>Sovereignty</subject><subject>State policy</subject><issn>2247-4455</issn><issn>2285-9632</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0MrIw1bU0MzZiAbFNzHVNTExNORh4i4uzDIDAwszM1NySk8HJ2d8v2NPFNcgxxBPIUvD3UwhxDQryDPEP8nT0UfD0C3F1B_IiFRz9XBRC_Tx9HEHSQJlg1wBHiCYeBta0xJziVF4ozc2g7OYa4uyhW1CUX1iaWlwSn5VfWpQHlIo3NDM0MTMzsDAyNiZOFQA43jWh</recordid><startdate>20140801</startdate><enddate>20140801</enddate><creator>Duta, Paul</creator><general>University Constantin Brancusi of Târgu-Jiu</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140801</creationdate><title>CONSIDERATIONS ON TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY AND UNILATERRAL SEPARATION</title><author>Duta, Paul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_16146608233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Autonomy</topic><topic>Charters</topic><topic>Colonies & territories</topic><topic>Freedoms</topic><topic>Human rights</topic><topic>International law</topic><topic>International relations</topic><topic>Minority & ethnic groups</topic><topic>Recognition</topic><topic>Security</topic><topic>Sovereignty</topic><topic>State policy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Duta, Paul</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Research and science today</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Duta, Paul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>CONSIDERATIONS ON TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY AND UNILATERRAL SEPARATION</atitle><jtitle>Research and science today</jtitle><date>2014-08-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><spage>143</spage><pages>143-</pages><issn>2247-4455</issn><eissn>2285-9632</eissn><abstract>The last decade of the XXth century was beneficiary of the new international environment regarding human rights and freedoms promotion. The frame within the observation of human rights and freedoms was larger than ever before, becoming a state policy together with judicial guarantees. The most important change was in the east of the space of the conference for security and cooperation in Europe. The recommendation 1201 was a reference moment at that time in the efforts of those trying to obtain the recognition of the collective rights for the national minorities, with consequences such as the recognition of the state local autonomy on ethnical criteria. Even for the colonies, the unilateral secession was an exception. The self-determination was firstly a matter of colonial authority to apply or not; supporting unilateral self-determination by the UN took place only if it was blocked by the colonial authority.</abstract><cop>Targu-Jiu</cop><pub>University Constantin Brancusi of Târgu-Jiu</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2247-4455 |
| ispartof | Research and science today, 2014-08, p.143 |
| issn | 2247-4455 2285-9632 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1614660823 |
| source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
| subjects | Autonomy Charters Colonies & territories Freedoms Human rights International law International relations Minority & ethnic groups Recognition Security Sovereignty State policy |
| title | CONSIDERATIONS ON TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY AND UNILATERRAL SEPARATION |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T07%3A57%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=CONSIDERATIONS%20ON%20TERRITORIAL%20INTEGRITY%20AND%20UNILATERRAL%20SEPARATION&rft.jtitle=Research%20and%20science%20today&rft.au=Duta,%20Paul&rft.date=2014-08-01&rft.spage=143&rft.pages=143-&rft.issn=2247-4455&rft.eissn=2285-9632&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3467476611%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1614660823&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |