Bulk Crosslinking Copolymerization: Comparison of Different Modeling Approaches

The predictions of four different models of crosslinking copolymerization,Kinetic Monte Carlo (KMC), statistic/kinetic Flory/Tobita (FT) model, and two kinetic approaches based on population balance equations (PBE) (solved with generating functions (GF) and numerical fractionation (MRNF), respective...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Macromolecular reaction engineering 2014-10, Vol.8 (10), p.678-695
Hauptverfasser: Lazzari, Stefano, Hamzehlou, Shaghayegh, Reyes, Yuri, Leiza, Jose Ramon, Costa, Mário Rui P. F. N., Dias, Rolando C. S., Storti, Giuseppe
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 695
container_issue 10
container_start_page 678
container_title Macromolecular reaction engineering
container_volume 8
creator Lazzari, Stefano
Hamzehlou, Shaghayegh
Reyes, Yuri
Leiza, Jose Ramon
Costa, Mário Rui P. F. N.
Dias, Rolando C. S.
Storti, Giuseppe
description The predictions of four different models of crosslinking copolymerization,Kinetic Monte Carlo (KMC), statistic/kinetic Flory/Tobita (FT) model, and two kinetic approaches based on population balance equations (PBE) (solved with generating functions (GF) and numerical fractionation (MRNF), respectively), were compared. The approaches underlying more restrictive assumptions but asking for less computational effort, FT and MRNF, lead to very satisfactory predictions in terms of average properties (sol and gel fractions, degrees of polymerizations, crosslinking densities). On the other hand, fully detailed models (KMC) as well as more computationally demanding numerical solutions of the detailed PBE (GF) become necessary when the chain length distributions are required. The present paper compares the predictions of different modeling approaches on a bulk crosslinking copolymerization scheme. Models based on average properties match the predictions of more detailed models in terms of average predictions, but not for chain length distributions. As a result, guidelines for the most‐suitable usage of such models are provided.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/mren.201400005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1612096487</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3461794461</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4495-82568f18f02ecf786f06cb2d3c7e4cb1177f245d5c4e924c4b15b43b9fdeffd93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kElPwzAQhS0EEqVw5RyJc8B7HG6llILURSC2m5XFBrdJHOxUUH49rooyl1n0vnnSA-AcwUsEIb6qnWouMUQUhmIHYIAEx7EgRBz2M34_Bifer4IgVDoAy5tNtY7GznpfmWZtmo9obFtbbWvlzG_WGdtch0vdZs5420RWR7dGaxW8umhuS1XtkFHbOpsVn8qfgiOdVV6d_fcheLmbPI_v49ly-jAezeKC0pTFAjMuNBIaYlXoRHANeZHjkhSJokWOUJJoTFnJCqpSTAuaI5ZTkqe6VFqXKRmCi_3fYPy1Ub6TK7txTbCUiCMMU05FElTpXvVtKrWVrTN15rYSQblLTO4Sk31icv40WfRbYOM9a3ynfno2c2vJE5Iw-baYSkbmCy4ekXwlf4Zwcfs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1612096487</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bulk Crosslinking Copolymerization: Comparison of Different Modeling Approaches</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Lazzari, Stefano ; Hamzehlou, Shaghayegh ; Reyes, Yuri ; Leiza, Jose Ramon ; Costa, Mário Rui P. F. N. ; Dias, Rolando C. S. ; Storti, Giuseppe</creator><creatorcontrib>Lazzari, Stefano ; Hamzehlou, Shaghayegh ; Reyes, Yuri ; Leiza, Jose Ramon ; Costa, Mário Rui P. F. N. ; Dias, Rolando C. S. ; Storti, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><description>The predictions of four different models of crosslinking copolymerization,Kinetic Monte Carlo (KMC), statistic/kinetic Flory/Tobita (FT) model, and two kinetic approaches based on population balance equations (PBE) (solved with generating functions (GF) and numerical fractionation (MRNF), respectively), were compared. The approaches underlying more restrictive assumptions but asking for less computational effort, FT and MRNF, lead to very satisfactory predictions in terms of average properties (sol and gel fractions, degrees of polymerizations, crosslinking densities). On the other hand, fully detailed models (KMC) as well as more computationally demanding numerical solutions of the detailed PBE (GF) become necessary when the chain length distributions are required. The present paper compares the predictions of different modeling approaches on a bulk crosslinking copolymerization scheme. Models based on average properties match the predictions of more detailed models in terms of average predictions, but not for chain length distributions. As a result, guidelines for the most‐suitable usage of such models are provided.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1862-832X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1862-8338</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/mren.201400005</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Weinheim: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Crosslinking ; Modeling ; Monte Carlo ; Polymerization ; Population Balances</subject><ispartof>Macromolecular reaction engineering, 2014-10, Vol.8 (10), p.678-695</ispartof><rights>2014 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA, Weinheim</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4495-82568f18f02ecf786f06cb2d3c7e4cb1177f245d5c4e924c4b15b43b9fdeffd93</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fmren.201400005$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fmren.201400005$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lazzari, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamzehlou, Shaghayegh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reyes, Yuri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leiza, Jose Ramon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa, Mário Rui P. F. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dias, Rolando C. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Storti, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><title>Bulk Crosslinking Copolymerization: Comparison of Different Modeling Approaches</title><title>Macromolecular reaction engineering</title><addtitle>Macromol. React. Eng</addtitle><description>The predictions of four different models of crosslinking copolymerization,Kinetic Monte Carlo (KMC), statistic/kinetic Flory/Tobita (FT) model, and two kinetic approaches based on population balance equations (PBE) (solved with generating functions (GF) and numerical fractionation (MRNF), respectively), were compared. The approaches underlying more restrictive assumptions but asking for less computational effort, FT and MRNF, lead to very satisfactory predictions in terms of average properties (sol and gel fractions, degrees of polymerizations, crosslinking densities). On the other hand, fully detailed models (KMC) as well as more computationally demanding numerical solutions of the detailed PBE (GF) become necessary when the chain length distributions are required. The present paper compares the predictions of different modeling approaches on a bulk crosslinking copolymerization scheme. Models based on average properties match the predictions of more detailed models in terms of average predictions, but not for chain length distributions. As a result, guidelines for the most‐suitable usage of such models are provided.</description><subject>Crosslinking</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Monte Carlo</subject><subject>Polymerization</subject><subject>Population Balances</subject><issn>1862-832X</issn><issn>1862-8338</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kElPwzAQhS0EEqVw5RyJc8B7HG6llILURSC2m5XFBrdJHOxUUH49rooyl1n0vnnSA-AcwUsEIb6qnWouMUQUhmIHYIAEx7EgRBz2M34_Bifer4IgVDoAy5tNtY7GznpfmWZtmo9obFtbbWvlzG_WGdtch0vdZs5420RWR7dGaxW8umhuS1XtkFHbOpsVn8qfgiOdVV6d_fcheLmbPI_v49ly-jAezeKC0pTFAjMuNBIaYlXoRHANeZHjkhSJokWOUJJoTFnJCqpSTAuaI5ZTkqe6VFqXKRmCi_3fYPy1Ub6TK7txTbCUiCMMU05FElTpXvVtKrWVrTN15rYSQblLTO4Sk31icv40WfRbYOM9a3ynfno2c2vJE5Iw-baYSkbmCy4ekXwlf4Zwcfs</recordid><startdate>201410</startdate><enddate>201410</enddate><creator>Lazzari, Stefano</creator><creator>Hamzehlou, Shaghayegh</creator><creator>Reyes, Yuri</creator><creator>Leiza, Jose Ramon</creator><creator>Costa, Mário Rui P. F. N.</creator><creator>Dias, Rolando C. S.</creator><creator>Storti, Giuseppe</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201410</creationdate><title>Bulk Crosslinking Copolymerization: Comparison of Different Modeling Approaches</title><author>Lazzari, Stefano ; Hamzehlou, Shaghayegh ; Reyes, Yuri ; Leiza, Jose Ramon ; Costa, Mário Rui P. F. N. ; Dias, Rolando C. S. ; Storti, Giuseppe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4495-82568f18f02ecf786f06cb2d3c7e4cb1177f245d5c4e924c4b15b43b9fdeffd93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Crosslinking</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Monte Carlo</topic><topic>Polymerization</topic><topic>Population Balances</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lazzari, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamzehlou, Shaghayegh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reyes, Yuri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leiza, Jose Ramon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa, Mário Rui P. F. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dias, Rolando C. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Storti, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><jtitle>Macromolecular reaction engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lazzari, Stefano</au><au>Hamzehlou, Shaghayegh</au><au>Reyes, Yuri</au><au>Leiza, Jose Ramon</au><au>Costa, Mário Rui P. F. N.</au><au>Dias, Rolando C. S.</au><au>Storti, Giuseppe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bulk Crosslinking Copolymerization: Comparison of Different Modeling Approaches</atitle><jtitle>Macromolecular reaction engineering</jtitle><addtitle>Macromol. React. Eng</addtitle><date>2014-10</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>678</spage><epage>695</epage><pages>678-695</pages><issn>1862-832X</issn><eissn>1862-8338</eissn><abstract>The predictions of four different models of crosslinking copolymerization,Kinetic Monte Carlo (KMC), statistic/kinetic Flory/Tobita (FT) model, and two kinetic approaches based on population balance equations (PBE) (solved with generating functions (GF) and numerical fractionation (MRNF), respectively), were compared. The approaches underlying more restrictive assumptions but asking for less computational effort, FT and MRNF, lead to very satisfactory predictions in terms of average properties (sol and gel fractions, degrees of polymerizations, crosslinking densities). On the other hand, fully detailed models (KMC) as well as more computationally demanding numerical solutions of the detailed PBE (GF) become necessary when the chain length distributions are required. The present paper compares the predictions of different modeling approaches on a bulk crosslinking copolymerization scheme. Models based on average properties match the predictions of more detailed models in terms of average predictions, but not for chain length distributions. As a result, guidelines for the most‐suitable usage of such models are provided.</abstract><cop>Weinheim</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/mren.201400005</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1862-832X
ispartof Macromolecular reaction engineering, 2014-10, Vol.8 (10), p.678-695
issn 1862-832X
1862-8338
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1612096487
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Crosslinking
Modeling
Monte Carlo
Polymerization
Population Balances
title Bulk Crosslinking Copolymerization: Comparison of Different Modeling Approaches
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T00%3A08%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bulk%20Crosslinking%20Copolymerization:%20Comparison%20of%20Different%20Modeling%20Approaches&rft.jtitle=Macromolecular%20reaction%20engineering&rft.au=Lazzari,%20Stefano&rft.date=2014-10&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=678&rft.epage=695&rft.pages=678-695&rft.issn=1862-832X&rft.eissn=1862-8338&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/mren.201400005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E3461794461%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1612096487&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true