Re-viewing student teamwork: preparation for the 'real world' or bundles of situated social practices?
Research in Australian business education continues to emphasise the importance of students learning teamwork as an integral part of the undergraduate curriculum. However, entrenched conceptual and practical confusion as to what the term 'teamwork' means and how it ought to be enacted rema...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Studies in continuing education 2014-01, Vol.36 (3), p.290-303 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 303 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 290 |
container_title | Studies in continuing education |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Sykes, Christopher Moerman, Lee Gibbons, Belinda Dean, Bonnie Amelia |
description | Research in Australian business education continues to emphasise the importance of students learning teamwork as an integral part of the undergraduate curriculum. However, entrenched conceptual and practical confusion as to what the term 'teamwork' means and how it ought to be enacted remains a vexed issue capable of distorting and diminishing teamwork, learning and related pedagogy. In this paper, we critically re-examine the view that developing teamwork in an undergraduate business degree equips students for work in the real world. By focusing on the 'real world' metaphor-in-use in a cross-disciplinary business capstone subject, we interrogate the spatio-temporal dimensions of teamwork and its realist conceptions and performance. The research draws upon the perceptions of interviewed academics conducting teamwork activities in undergraduate business courses and the lived experiences of the authors. The findings highlight how the use of multiple models of teamwork, constructed by competing discourses and linked to the dualities and invocations constructed by 'the real world' metaphor, further exacerbate confusion. We suggest re-viewing and re-valuing student teamwork as the performance of situated, social practices opening new spaces for student teamwork, learning and pedagogical practice. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/0158037X.2014.904784 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1611001307</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1041225</ericid><informt_id>10.3316/aeipt.205151</informt_id><sourcerecordid>3459951851</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-b4da262d19efbb6ff50d16593fb834cdcaf0d1caf057027d8dc5f2b1a099767c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9rFTEUxYMo-Kx-A4WAi67m9d5MJjPjpthSrVIQRKG7kMmfNnXeZEwyln57M0516SaBe37n3Msh5DXCHqGDE8Cmg7q93jNAvu-Btx1_QnbIW6iQieunZLci1co8Jy9SugOADkW_I-6rrX55e--nG5ryYuyUabbqcB_ij3d0jnZWUWUfJupCpPnW0uNo1UiLPppjWmbDMpnRJhocTT4vKltDU9C-QHNUOntt0-lL8sypMdlXj_8R-f7h4tv5ZXX15eOn8_dXleadyNXAjWKCGeytGwbhXAMGRdPXbuhqro1WrgzWt2mBtaYzunFsQAV934pW10fk7ZY7x_BzsSnLu7DEqayUKBABsIa2UHyjdAwpRevkHP1BxQeJINdG5d9G5dqo3BottjebzUav_1kuPiNwZKwp-tmmx4PPUlk_Z3mb85ykUVlJP5UKVyXEG2mCX5fVNYpHkkGDDZaQ0y1kw9WfomVWD2OILqpJ-yTr_575G23In8U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1611001307</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Re-viewing student teamwork: preparation for the 'real world' or bundles of situated social practices?</title><source>Education Source</source><creator>Sykes, Christopher ; Moerman, Lee ; Gibbons, Belinda ; Dean, Bonnie Amelia</creator><creatorcontrib>Sykes, Christopher ; Moerman, Lee ; Gibbons, Belinda ; Dean, Bonnie Amelia</creatorcontrib><description>Research in Australian business education continues to emphasise the importance of students learning teamwork as an integral part of the undergraduate curriculum. However, entrenched conceptual and practical confusion as to what the term 'teamwork' means and how it ought to be enacted remains a vexed issue capable of distorting and diminishing teamwork, learning and related pedagogy. In this paper, we critically re-examine the view that developing teamwork in an undergraduate business degree equips students for work in the real world. By focusing on the 'real world' metaphor-in-use in a cross-disciplinary business capstone subject, we interrogate the spatio-temporal dimensions of teamwork and its realist conceptions and performance. The research draws upon the perceptions of interviewed academics conducting teamwork activities in undergraduate business courses and the lived experiences of the authors. The findings highlight how the use of multiple models of teamwork, constructed by competing discourses and linked to the dualities and invocations constructed by 'the real world' metaphor, further exacerbate confusion. We suggest re-viewing and re-valuing student teamwork as the performance of situated, social practices opening new spaces for student teamwork, learning and pedagogical practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0158-037X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-126X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/0158037X.2014.904784</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sydney: Routledge</publisher><subject>Academic degrees ; Australia ; Business Administration Education ; Business education ; Case Studies ; collaborative learning ; College students ; Cooperative Learning ; Educational Practices ; Employment potential ; Experiential Learning ; Foreign Countries ; Graduate attributes ; Higher education ; Learning ; Metaphor ; Metaphors ; Pedagogy ; practice-based ; Semi Structured Interviews ; student teamwork ; Teamwork ; Transfer of Training ; Undergraduate Students ; Undergraduate Study ; Work based learning</subject><ispartof>Studies in continuing education, 2014-01, Vol.36 (3), p.290-303</ispartof><rights>2014 Taylor & Francis 2014</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Ltd. 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-b4da262d19efbb6ff50d16593fb834cdcaf0d1caf057027d8dc5f2b1a099767c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-b4da262d19efbb6ff50d16593fb834cdcaf0d1caf057027d8dc5f2b1a099767c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1041225$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sykes, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moerman, Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibbons, Belinda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dean, Bonnie Amelia</creatorcontrib><title>Re-viewing student teamwork: preparation for the 'real world' or bundles of situated social practices?</title><title>Studies in continuing education</title><description>Research in Australian business education continues to emphasise the importance of students learning teamwork as an integral part of the undergraduate curriculum. However, entrenched conceptual and practical confusion as to what the term 'teamwork' means and how it ought to be enacted remains a vexed issue capable of distorting and diminishing teamwork, learning and related pedagogy. In this paper, we critically re-examine the view that developing teamwork in an undergraduate business degree equips students for work in the real world. By focusing on the 'real world' metaphor-in-use in a cross-disciplinary business capstone subject, we interrogate the spatio-temporal dimensions of teamwork and its realist conceptions and performance. The research draws upon the perceptions of interviewed academics conducting teamwork activities in undergraduate business courses and the lived experiences of the authors. The findings highlight how the use of multiple models of teamwork, constructed by competing discourses and linked to the dualities and invocations constructed by 'the real world' metaphor, further exacerbate confusion. We suggest re-viewing and re-valuing student teamwork as the performance of situated, social practices opening new spaces for student teamwork, learning and pedagogical practice.</description><subject>Academic degrees</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Business Administration Education</subject><subject>Business education</subject><subject>Case Studies</subject><subject>collaborative learning</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Cooperative Learning</subject><subject>Educational Practices</subject><subject>Employment potential</subject><subject>Experiential Learning</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Graduate attributes</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Metaphor</subject><subject>Metaphors</subject><subject>Pedagogy</subject><subject>practice-based</subject><subject>Semi Structured Interviews</subject><subject>student teamwork</subject><subject>Teamwork</subject><subject>Transfer of Training</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><subject>Undergraduate Study</subject><subject>Work based learning</subject><issn>0158-037X</issn><issn>1470-126X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9rFTEUxYMo-Kx-A4WAi67m9d5MJjPjpthSrVIQRKG7kMmfNnXeZEwyln57M0516SaBe37n3Msh5DXCHqGDE8Cmg7q93jNAvu-Btx1_QnbIW6iQieunZLci1co8Jy9SugOADkW_I-6rrX55e--nG5ryYuyUabbqcB_ij3d0jnZWUWUfJupCpPnW0uNo1UiLPppjWmbDMpnRJhocTT4vKltDU9C-QHNUOntt0-lL8sypMdlXj_8R-f7h4tv5ZXX15eOn8_dXleadyNXAjWKCGeytGwbhXAMGRdPXbuhqro1WrgzWt2mBtaYzunFsQAV934pW10fk7ZY7x_BzsSnLu7DEqayUKBABsIa2UHyjdAwpRevkHP1BxQeJINdG5d9G5dqo3BottjebzUav_1kuPiNwZKwp-tmmx4PPUlk_Z3mb85ykUVlJP5UKVyXEG2mCX5fVNYpHkkGDDZaQ0y1kw9WfomVWD2OILqpJ-yTr_575G23In8U</recordid><startdate>20140101</startdate><enddate>20140101</enddate><creator>Sykes, Christopher</creator><creator>Moerman, Lee</creator><creator>Gibbons, Belinda</creator><creator>Dean, Bonnie Amelia</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140101</creationdate><title>Re-viewing student teamwork: preparation for the 'real world' or bundles of situated social practices?</title><author>Sykes, Christopher ; Moerman, Lee ; Gibbons, Belinda ; Dean, Bonnie Amelia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-b4da262d19efbb6ff50d16593fb834cdcaf0d1caf057027d8dc5f2b1a099767c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Academic degrees</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Business Administration Education</topic><topic>Business education</topic><topic>Case Studies</topic><topic>collaborative learning</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Cooperative Learning</topic><topic>Educational Practices</topic><topic>Employment potential</topic><topic>Experiential Learning</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Graduate attributes</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Metaphor</topic><topic>Metaphors</topic><topic>Pedagogy</topic><topic>practice-based</topic><topic>Semi Structured Interviews</topic><topic>student teamwork</topic><topic>Teamwork</topic><topic>Transfer of Training</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><topic>Undergraduate Study</topic><topic>Work based learning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sykes, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moerman, Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibbons, Belinda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dean, Bonnie Amelia</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Studies in continuing education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sykes, Christopher</au><au>Moerman, Lee</au><au>Gibbons, Belinda</au><au>Dean, Bonnie Amelia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1041225</ericid><atitle>Re-viewing student teamwork: preparation for the 'real world' or bundles of situated social practices?</atitle><jtitle>Studies in continuing education</jtitle><date>2014-01-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>290</spage><epage>303</epage><pages>290-303</pages><issn>0158-037X</issn><eissn>1470-126X</eissn><abstract>Research in Australian business education continues to emphasise the importance of students learning teamwork as an integral part of the undergraduate curriculum. However, entrenched conceptual and practical confusion as to what the term 'teamwork' means and how it ought to be enacted remains a vexed issue capable of distorting and diminishing teamwork, learning and related pedagogy. In this paper, we critically re-examine the view that developing teamwork in an undergraduate business degree equips students for work in the real world. By focusing on the 'real world' metaphor-in-use in a cross-disciplinary business capstone subject, we interrogate the spatio-temporal dimensions of teamwork and its realist conceptions and performance. The research draws upon the perceptions of interviewed academics conducting teamwork activities in undergraduate business courses and the lived experiences of the authors. The findings highlight how the use of multiple models of teamwork, constructed by competing discourses and linked to the dualities and invocations constructed by 'the real world' metaphor, further exacerbate confusion. We suggest re-viewing and re-valuing student teamwork as the performance of situated, social practices opening new spaces for student teamwork, learning and pedagogical practice.</abstract><cop>Sydney</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/0158037X.2014.904784</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0158-037X |
ispartof | Studies in continuing education, 2014-01, Vol.36 (3), p.290-303 |
issn | 0158-037X 1470-126X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1611001307 |
source | Education Source |
subjects | Academic degrees Australia Business Administration Education Business education Case Studies collaborative learning College students Cooperative Learning Educational Practices Employment potential Experiential Learning Foreign Countries Graduate attributes Higher education Learning Metaphor Metaphors Pedagogy practice-based Semi Structured Interviews student teamwork Teamwork Transfer of Training Undergraduate Students Undergraduate Study Work based learning |
title | Re-viewing student teamwork: preparation for the 'real world' or bundles of situated social practices? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T11%3A17%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Re-viewing%20student%20teamwork:%20preparation%20for%20the%20'real%20world'%20or%20bundles%20of%20situated%20social%20practices?&rft.jtitle=Studies%20in%20continuing%20education&rft.au=Sykes,%20Christopher&rft.date=2014-01-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=290&rft.epage=303&rft.pages=290-303&rft.issn=0158-037X&rft.eissn=1470-126X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/0158037X.2014.904784&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_eric_%3E3459951851%3C/proquest_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1611001307&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1041225&rft_informt_id=10.3316/aeipt.205151&rfr_iscdi=true |