Re-viewing student teamwork: preparation for the 'real world' or bundles of situated social practices?

Research in Australian business education continues to emphasise the importance of students learning teamwork as an integral part of the undergraduate curriculum. However, entrenched conceptual and practical confusion as to what the term 'teamwork' means and how it ought to be enacted rema...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Studies in continuing education 2014-01, Vol.36 (3), p.290-303
Hauptverfasser: Sykes, Christopher, Moerman, Lee, Gibbons, Belinda, Dean, Bonnie Amelia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 303
container_issue 3
container_start_page 290
container_title Studies in continuing education
container_volume 36
creator Sykes, Christopher
Moerman, Lee
Gibbons, Belinda
Dean, Bonnie Amelia
description Research in Australian business education continues to emphasise the importance of students learning teamwork as an integral part of the undergraduate curriculum. However, entrenched conceptual and practical confusion as to what the term 'teamwork' means and how it ought to be enacted remains a vexed issue capable of distorting and diminishing teamwork, learning and related pedagogy. In this paper, we critically re-examine the view that developing teamwork in an undergraduate business degree equips students for work in the real world. By focusing on the 'real world' metaphor-in-use in a cross-disciplinary business capstone subject, we interrogate the spatio-temporal dimensions of teamwork and its realist conceptions and performance. The research draws upon the perceptions of interviewed academics conducting teamwork activities in undergraduate business courses and the lived experiences of the authors. The findings highlight how the use of multiple models of teamwork, constructed by competing discourses and linked to the dualities and invocations constructed by 'the real world' metaphor, further exacerbate confusion. We suggest re-viewing and re-valuing student teamwork as the performance of situated, social practices opening new spaces for student teamwork, learning and pedagogical practice.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/0158037X.2014.904784
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1611001307</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1041225</ericid><informt_id>10.3316/aeipt.205151</informt_id><sourcerecordid>3459951851</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-b4da262d19efbb6ff50d16593fb834cdcaf0d1caf057027d8dc5f2b1a099767c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9rFTEUxYMo-Kx-A4WAi67m9d5MJjPjpthSrVIQRKG7kMmfNnXeZEwyln57M0516SaBe37n3Msh5DXCHqGDE8Cmg7q93jNAvu-Btx1_QnbIW6iQieunZLci1co8Jy9SugOADkW_I-6rrX55e--nG5ryYuyUabbqcB_ij3d0jnZWUWUfJupCpPnW0uNo1UiLPppjWmbDMpnRJhocTT4vKltDU9C-QHNUOntt0-lL8sypMdlXj_8R-f7h4tv5ZXX15eOn8_dXleadyNXAjWKCGeytGwbhXAMGRdPXbuhqro1WrgzWt2mBtaYzunFsQAV934pW10fk7ZY7x_BzsSnLu7DEqayUKBABsIa2UHyjdAwpRevkHP1BxQeJINdG5d9G5dqo3BottjebzUav_1kuPiNwZKwp-tmmx4PPUlk_Z3mb85ykUVlJP5UKVyXEG2mCX5fVNYpHkkGDDZaQ0y1kw9WfomVWD2OILqpJ-yTr_575G23In8U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1611001307</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Re-viewing student teamwork: preparation for the 'real world' or bundles of situated social practices?</title><source>Education Source</source><creator>Sykes, Christopher ; Moerman, Lee ; Gibbons, Belinda ; Dean, Bonnie Amelia</creator><creatorcontrib>Sykes, Christopher ; Moerman, Lee ; Gibbons, Belinda ; Dean, Bonnie Amelia</creatorcontrib><description>Research in Australian business education continues to emphasise the importance of students learning teamwork as an integral part of the undergraduate curriculum. However, entrenched conceptual and practical confusion as to what the term 'teamwork' means and how it ought to be enacted remains a vexed issue capable of distorting and diminishing teamwork, learning and related pedagogy. In this paper, we critically re-examine the view that developing teamwork in an undergraduate business degree equips students for work in the real world. By focusing on the 'real world' metaphor-in-use in a cross-disciplinary business capstone subject, we interrogate the spatio-temporal dimensions of teamwork and its realist conceptions and performance. The research draws upon the perceptions of interviewed academics conducting teamwork activities in undergraduate business courses and the lived experiences of the authors. The findings highlight how the use of multiple models of teamwork, constructed by competing discourses and linked to the dualities and invocations constructed by 'the real world' metaphor, further exacerbate confusion. We suggest re-viewing and re-valuing student teamwork as the performance of situated, social practices opening new spaces for student teamwork, learning and pedagogical practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0158-037X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-126X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/0158037X.2014.904784</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sydney: Routledge</publisher><subject>Academic degrees ; Australia ; Business Administration Education ; Business education ; Case Studies ; collaborative learning ; College students ; Cooperative Learning ; Educational Practices ; Employment potential ; Experiential Learning ; Foreign Countries ; Graduate attributes ; Higher education ; Learning ; Metaphor ; Metaphors ; Pedagogy ; practice-based ; Semi Structured Interviews ; student teamwork ; Teamwork ; Transfer of Training ; Undergraduate Students ; Undergraduate Study ; Work based learning</subject><ispartof>Studies in continuing education, 2014-01, Vol.36 (3), p.290-303</ispartof><rights>2014 Taylor &amp; Francis 2014</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd. 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-b4da262d19efbb6ff50d16593fb834cdcaf0d1caf057027d8dc5f2b1a099767c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-b4da262d19efbb6ff50d16593fb834cdcaf0d1caf057027d8dc5f2b1a099767c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1041225$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sykes, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moerman, Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibbons, Belinda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dean, Bonnie Amelia</creatorcontrib><title>Re-viewing student teamwork: preparation for the 'real world' or bundles of situated social practices?</title><title>Studies in continuing education</title><description>Research in Australian business education continues to emphasise the importance of students learning teamwork as an integral part of the undergraduate curriculum. However, entrenched conceptual and practical confusion as to what the term 'teamwork' means and how it ought to be enacted remains a vexed issue capable of distorting and diminishing teamwork, learning and related pedagogy. In this paper, we critically re-examine the view that developing teamwork in an undergraduate business degree equips students for work in the real world. By focusing on the 'real world' metaphor-in-use in a cross-disciplinary business capstone subject, we interrogate the spatio-temporal dimensions of teamwork and its realist conceptions and performance. The research draws upon the perceptions of interviewed academics conducting teamwork activities in undergraduate business courses and the lived experiences of the authors. The findings highlight how the use of multiple models of teamwork, constructed by competing discourses and linked to the dualities and invocations constructed by 'the real world' metaphor, further exacerbate confusion. We suggest re-viewing and re-valuing student teamwork as the performance of situated, social practices opening new spaces for student teamwork, learning and pedagogical practice.</description><subject>Academic degrees</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Business Administration Education</subject><subject>Business education</subject><subject>Case Studies</subject><subject>collaborative learning</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Cooperative Learning</subject><subject>Educational Practices</subject><subject>Employment potential</subject><subject>Experiential Learning</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Graduate attributes</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Metaphor</subject><subject>Metaphors</subject><subject>Pedagogy</subject><subject>practice-based</subject><subject>Semi Structured Interviews</subject><subject>student teamwork</subject><subject>Teamwork</subject><subject>Transfer of Training</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><subject>Undergraduate Study</subject><subject>Work based learning</subject><issn>0158-037X</issn><issn>1470-126X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9rFTEUxYMo-Kx-A4WAi67m9d5MJjPjpthSrVIQRKG7kMmfNnXeZEwyln57M0516SaBe37n3Msh5DXCHqGDE8Cmg7q93jNAvu-Btx1_QnbIW6iQieunZLci1co8Jy9SugOADkW_I-6rrX55e--nG5ryYuyUabbqcB_ij3d0jnZWUWUfJupCpPnW0uNo1UiLPppjWmbDMpnRJhocTT4vKltDU9C-QHNUOntt0-lL8sypMdlXj_8R-f7h4tv5ZXX15eOn8_dXleadyNXAjWKCGeytGwbhXAMGRdPXbuhqro1WrgzWt2mBtaYzunFsQAV934pW10fk7ZY7x_BzsSnLu7DEqayUKBABsIa2UHyjdAwpRevkHP1BxQeJINdG5d9G5dqo3BottjebzUav_1kuPiNwZKwp-tmmx4PPUlk_Z3mb85ykUVlJP5UKVyXEG2mCX5fVNYpHkkGDDZaQ0y1kw9WfomVWD2OILqpJ-yTr_575G23In8U</recordid><startdate>20140101</startdate><enddate>20140101</enddate><creator>Sykes, Christopher</creator><creator>Moerman, Lee</creator><creator>Gibbons, Belinda</creator><creator>Dean, Bonnie Amelia</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140101</creationdate><title>Re-viewing student teamwork: preparation for the 'real world' or bundles of situated social practices?</title><author>Sykes, Christopher ; Moerman, Lee ; Gibbons, Belinda ; Dean, Bonnie Amelia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-b4da262d19efbb6ff50d16593fb834cdcaf0d1caf057027d8dc5f2b1a099767c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Academic degrees</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Business Administration Education</topic><topic>Business education</topic><topic>Case Studies</topic><topic>collaborative learning</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Cooperative Learning</topic><topic>Educational Practices</topic><topic>Employment potential</topic><topic>Experiential Learning</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Graduate attributes</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Metaphor</topic><topic>Metaphors</topic><topic>Pedagogy</topic><topic>practice-based</topic><topic>Semi Structured Interviews</topic><topic>student teamwork</topic><topic>Teamwork</topic><topic>Transfer of Training</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><topic>Undergraduate Study</topic><topic>Work based learning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sykes, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moerman, Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibbons, Belinda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dean, Bonnie Amelia</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Studies in continuing education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sykes, Christopher</au><au>Moerman, Lee</au><au>Gibbons, Belinda</au><au>Dean, Bonnie Amelia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1041225</ericid><atitle>Re-viewing student teamwork: preparation for the 'real world' or bundles of situated social practices?</atitle><jtitle>Studies in continuing education</jtitle><date>2014-01-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>290</spage><epage>303</epage><pages>290-303</pages><issn>0158-037X</issn><eissn>1470-126X</eissn><abstract>Research in Australian business education continues to emphasise the importance of students learning teamwork as an integral part of the undergraduate curriculum. However, entrenched conceptual and practical confusion as to what the term 'teamwork' means and how it ought to be enacted remains a vexed issue capable of distorting and diminishing teamwork, learning and related pedagogy. In this paper, we critically re-examine the view that developing teamwork in an undergraduate business degree equips students for work in the real world. By focusing on the 'real world' metaphor-in-use in a cross-disciplinary business capstone subject, we interrogate the spatio-temporal dimensions of teamwork and its realist conceptions and performance. The research draws upon the perceptions of interviewed academics conducting teamwork activities in undergraduate business courses and the lived experiences of the authors. The findings highlight how the use of multiple models of teamwork, constructed by competing discourses and linked to the dualities and invocations constructed by 'the real world' metaphor, further exacerbate confusion. We suggest re-viewing and re-valuing student teamwork as the performance of situated, social practices opening new spaces for student teamwork, learning and pedagogical practice.</abstract><cop>Sydney</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/0158037X.2014.904784</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0158-037X
ispartof Studies in continuing education, 2014-01, Vol.36 (3), p.290-303
issn 0158-037X
1470-126X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1611001307
source Education Source
subjects Academic degrees
Australia
Business Administration Education
Business education
Case Studies
collaborative learning
College students
Cooperative Learning
Educational Practices
Employment potential
Experiential Learning
Foreign Countries
Graduate attributes
Higher education
Learning
Metaphor
Metaphors
Pedagogy
practice-based
Semi Structured Interviews
student teamwork
Teamwork
Transfer of Training
Undergraduate Students
Undergraduate Study
Work based learning
title Re-viewing student teamwork: preparation for the 'real world' or bundles of situated social practices?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T11%3A17%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Re-viewing%20student%20teamwork:%20preparation%20for%20the%20'real%20world'%20or%20bundles%20of%20situated%20social%20practices?&rft.jtitle=Studies%20in%20continuing%20education&rft.au=Sykes,%20Christopher&rft.date=2014-01-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=290&rft.epage=303&rft.pages=290-303&rft.issn=0158-037X&rft.eissn=1470-126X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/0158037X.2014.904784&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_eric_%3E3459951851%3C/proquest_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1611001307&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1041225&rft_informt_id=10.3316/aeipt.205151&rfr_iscdi=true