Calling for a standard: why courts should apply a new balancing test in cell phone searches incident to arrest
Liming argues that the Supreme Court should adopt a balancing test because cell phone technology develops too swiftly to be governed by a bright-line rule. Only a balancing test properly accommodates both the relevant privacy concerns and the needs of law enforcement. He provides background on the s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American criminal law review 2014-06, Vol.51 (3), p.715 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 715 |
container_title | The American criminal law review |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Liming, Drew |
description | Liming argues that the Supreme Court should adopt a balancing test because cell phone technology develops too swiftly to be governed by a bright-line rule. Only a balancing test properly accommodates both the relevant privacy concerns and the needs of law enforcement. He provides background on the search incident to arrest exception to the Fourth Amendment and analyzes the history of cell phone searches and many of the rationales courts have used in permitting or prohibiting warrantless searches of cell phones incident to arrest. He then suggests how the Supreme Court should resolve the issue of warrantless cell phone searches and explains why a balancing test would be the best option for a rapidly developing technology like cell phones. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1609513977</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A375696911</galeid><sourcerecordid>A375696911</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g359t-9d122159145782cbfa4f9e62a6187d0b39f8fd5bf796c0470097e9fa610bcabb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptz0tLAzEQB_A9KFir3yHgSXAl2Vc23krxUSj0ol6X2Tx2U9JsTbLUfnsjFWyhBBKY_P4zzEUywaQqUpxXxVVy7f0aY1zSop4kdg7GaNshNTgEyAewApx4Qrt-j_gwuuCR74fRCATbrdlHY-UOtWDA8t9ckD4gbRGXxqBtP1iJvATHe-ljmWshbUBhQOBclDfJpQLj5e3fO00-Xp7f52_pcvW6mM-WaZeXLKRMkCwjJSNFSeuMtwoKxWSVQUVqKnCbM1UrUbaKsorjgmLMqGQqfuOWQ9vm0-Tu0Hfrhq8xDm7WcRcbRzakwqwkOaP0X3VgZKOtGoIDvtGeN7OclhWrGCFRpWdUJ610YOK-SsfyiX884-MRcqP52cD9SSCaIL9DB6P3zWL1eWofjmw7em2lj5fXXR_8IXLEfwDFX50e</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1609513977</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Calling for a standard: why courts should apply a new balancing test in cell phone searches incident to arrest</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Liming, Drew</creator><creatorcontrib>Liming, Drew</creatorcontrib><description>Liming argues that the Supreme Court should adopt a balancing test because cell phone technology develops too swiftly to be governed by a bright-line rule. Only a balancing test properly accommodates both the relevant privacy concerns and the needs of law enforcement. He provides background on the search incident to arrest exception to the Fourth Amendment and analyzes the history of cell phone searches and many of the rationales courts have used in permitting or prohibiting warrantless searches of cell phones incident to arrest. He then suggests how the Supreme Court should resolve the issue of warrantless cell phone searches and explains why a balancing test would be the best option for a rapidly developing technology like cell phones.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0164-0364</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ACLRDN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: Georgetown University Law Center</publisher><subject>Arrest ; Cellular telephones ; Law enforcement ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Right of privacy ; Search warrants ; Supreme Court decisions</subject><ispartof>The American criminal law review, 2014-06, Vol.51 (3), p.715</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Georgetown University Law Center</rights><rights>Copyright Georgetown University Law Center Summer 2014</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liming, Drew</creatorcontrib><title>Calling for a standard: why courts should apply a new balancing test in cell phone searches incident to arrest</title><title>The American criminal law review</title><description>Liming argues that the Supreme Court should adopt a balancing test because cell phone technology develops too swiftly to be governed by a bright-line rule. Only a balancing test properly accommodates both the relevant privacy concerns and the needs of law enforcement. He provides background on the search incident to arrest exception to the Fourth Amendment and analyzes the history of cell phone searches and many of the rationales courts have used in permitting or prohibiting warrantless searches of cell phones incident to arrest. He then suggests how the Supreme Court should resolve the issue of warrantless cell phone searches and explains why a balancing test would be the best option for a rapidly developing technology like cell phones.</description><subject>Arrest</subject><subject>Cellular telephones</subject><subject>Law enforcement</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Right of privacy</subject><subject>Search warrants</subject><subject>Supreme Court decisions</subject><issn>0164-0364</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><recordid>eNptz0tLAzEQB_A9KFir3yHgSXAl2Vc23krxUSj0ol6X2Tx2U9JsTbLUfnsjFWyhBBKY_P4zzEUywaQqUpxXxVVy7f0aY1zSop4kdg7GaNshNTgEyAewApx4Qrt-j_gwuuCR74fRCATbrdlHY-UOtWDA8t9ckD4gbRGXxqBtP1iJvATHe-ljmWshbUBhQOBclDfJpQLj5e3fO00-Xp7f52_pcvW6mM-WaZeXLKRMkCwjJSNFSeuMtwoKxWSVQUVqKnCbM1UrUbaKsorjgmLMqGQqfuOWQ9vm0-Tu0Hfrhq8xDm7WcRcbRzakwqwkOaP0X3VgZKOtGoIDvtGeN7OclhWrGCFRpWdUJ610YOK-SsfyiX884-MRcqP52cD9SSCaIL9DB6P3zWL1eWofjmw7em2lj5fXXR_8IXLEfwDFX50e</recordid><startdate>20140622</startdate><enddate>20140622</enddate><creator>Liming, Drew</creator><general>Georgetown University Law Center</general><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ILT</scope><scope>K7.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140622</creationdate><title>Calling for a standard: why courts should apply a new balancing test in cell phone searches incident to arrest</title><author>Liming, Drew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g359t-9d122159145782cbfa4f9e62a6187d0b39f8fd5bf796c0470097e9fa610bcabb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Arrest</topic><topic>Cellular telephones</topic><topic>Law enforcement</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Right of privacy</topic><topic>Search warrants</topic><topic>Supreme Court decisions</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liming, Drew</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>The American criminal law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liming, Drew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Calling for a standard: why courts should apply a new balancing test in cell phone searches incident to arrest</atitle><jtitle>The American criminal law review</jtitle><date>2014-06-22</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>715</spage><pages>715-</pages><issn>0164-0364</issn><coden>ACLRDN</coden><abstract>Liming argues that the Supreme Court should adopt a balancing test because cell phone technology develops too swiftly to be governed by a bright-line rule. Only a balancing test properly accommodates both the relevant privacy concerns and the needs of law enforcement. He provides background on the search incident to arrest exception to the Fourth Amendment and analyzes the history of cell phone searches and many of the rationales courts have used in permitting or prohibiting warrantless searches of cell phones incident to arrest. He then suggests how the Supreme Court should resolve the issue of warrantless cell phone searches and explains why a balancing test would be the best option for a rapidly developing technology like cell phones.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>Georgetown University Law Center</pub><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0164-0364 |
ispartof | The American criminal law review, 2014-06, Vol.51 (3), p.715 |
issn | 0164-0364 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1609513977 |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
subjects | Arrest Cellular telephones Law enforcement Laws, regulations and rules Right of privacy Search warrants Supreme Court decisions |
title | Calling for a standard: why courts should apply a new balancing test in cell phone searches incident to arrest |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T06%3A24%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Calling%20for%20a%20standard:%20why%20courts%20should%20apply%20a%20new%20balancing%20test%20in%20cell%20phone%20searches%20incident%20to%20arrest&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20criminal%20law%20review&rft.au=Liming,%20Drew&rft.date=2014-06-22&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=715&rft.pages=715-&rft.issn=0164-0364&rft.coden=ACLRDN&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA375696911%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1609513977&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A375696911&rfr_iscdi=true |