Tort Liability Expands for Project Architects in California
For decades the architecture and engineering community has enjoyed and relied upon certain legal protections afforded them when confronted with third-party lawsuits. Courts around the country today are almost equally divided on whether the protections from the economic loss rule should extend to des...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Civil engineering (New York, N.Y. 1983) N.Y. 1983), 2014-09, Vol.84 (9), p.88 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Magazinearticle |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 88 |
container_title | Civil engineering (New York, N.Y. 1983) |
container_volume | 84 |
creator | Loulakis, Michael C McLaughlin, Lauren P |
description | For decades the architecture and engineering community has enjoyed and relied upon certain legal protections afforded them when confronted with third-party lawsuits. Courts around the country today are almost equally divided on whether the protections from the economic loss rule should extend to design professionals. This month architecture and engineering community consider a noteworthy decision by the California Supreme Court that expands the potential liability of project architects beyond those directly involved in the construction project (such as contractors). The court found that architects owe a duty of care to the ultimate purchasers of buildings and therefore can be liable for economic losses to those parties even if there is no contractual privity with those parties. |
format | Magazinearticle |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1566647572</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3448284401</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p113t-e6cef16ac27bfe8a653a78dd1c10d219df1c5b5329750ff09fd593b3a59cbe2e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjctKAzEARYNYcGz9h4DrQB7NC1dlqA8YqIu6LnlihmEyJino3zugq3vgwLk3oKNMEYSFUregw0pxJDHd34H7WkeMsZIKd-DpnEuDQzI2Tan9wOP3YmZfYcwFvpc8BtfgobjP1FaqMM2wN1Na7ZzMDmyimWp4-N8t-Hg-nvtXNJxe3vrDgBZCWENBuBCJMI5KG4MygjMjlffEEewp0T4Sxy1nVEuOY8Q6eq6ZZYZrZwMNbAse_7pLyV_XUNtlzNcyr5cXwoUQe8klZb90cUUc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><pqid>1566647572</pqid></control><display><type>magazinearticle</type><title>Tort Liability Expands for Project Architects in California</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Loulakis, Michael C ; McLaughlin, Lauren P</creator><creatorcontrib>Loulakis, Michael C ; McLaughlin, Lauren P</creatorcontrib><description>For decades the architecture and engineering community has enjoyed and relied upon certain legal protections afforded them when confronted with third-party lawsuits. Courts around the country today are almost equally divided on whether the protections from the economic loss rule should extend to design professionals. This month architecture and engineering community consider a noteworthy decision by the California Supreme Court that expands the potential liability of project architects beyond those directly involved in the construction project (such as contractors). The court found that architects owe a duty of care to the ultimate purchasers of buildings and therefore can be liable for economic losses to those parties even if there is no contractual privity with those parties.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-7024</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2381-0688</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CIEGAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Architects ; Architectural engineering ; Architecture ; Construction ; Liability ; Projects ; State court decisions ; Torts</subject><ispartof>Civil engineering (New York, N.Y. 1983), 2014-09, Vol.84 (9), p.88</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Society of Civil Engineers Sep 2014</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>777,781</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Loulakis, Michael C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLaughlin, Lauren P</creatorcontrib><title>Tort Liability Expands for Project Architects in California</title><title>Civil engineering (New York, N.Y. 1983)</title><description>For decades the architecture and engineering community has enjoyed and relied upon certain legal protections afforded them when confronted with third-party lawsuits. Courts around the country today are almost equally divided on whether the protections from the economic loss rule should extend to design professionals. This month architecture and engineering community consider a noteworthy decision by the California Supreme Court that expands the potential liability of project architects beyond those directly involved in the construction project (such as contractors). The court found that architects owe a duty of care to the ultimate purchasers of buildings and therefore can be liable for economic losses to those parties even if there is no contractual privity with those parties.</description><subject>Architects</subject><subject>Architectural engineering</subject><subject>Architecture</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Liability</subject><subject>Projects</subject><subject>State court decisions</subject><subject>Torts</subject><issn>0885-7024</issn><issn>2381-0688</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><recordid>eNotjctKAzEARYNYcGz9h4DrQB7NC1dlqA8YqIu6LnlihmEyJino3zugq3vgwLk3oKNMEYSFUregw0pxJDHd34H7WkeMsZIKd-DpnEuDQzI2Tan9wOP3YmZfYcwFvpc8BtfgobjP1FaqMM2wN1Na7ZzMDmyimWp4-N8t-Hg-nvtXNJxe3vrDgBZCWENBuBCJMI5KG4MygjMjlffEEewp0T4Sxy1nVEuOY8Q6eq6ZZYZrZwMNbAse_7pLyV_XUNtlzNcyr5cXwoUQe8klZb90cUUc</recordid><startdate>20140901</startdate><enddate>20140901</enddate><creator>Loulakis, Michael C</creator><creator>McLaughlin, Lauren P</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140901</creationdate><title>Tort Liability Expands for Project Architects in California</title><author>Loulakis, Michael C ; McLaughlin, Lauren P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p113t-e6cef16ac27bfe8a653a78dd1c10d219df1c5b5329750ff09fd593b3a59cbe2e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><prefilter>magazinearticle</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Architects</topic><topic>Architectural engineering</topic><topic>Architecture</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Liability</topic><topic>Projects</topic><topic>State court decisions</topic><topic>Torts</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Loulakis, Michael C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLaughlin, Lauren P</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Civil engineering (New York, N.Y. 1983)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Loulakis, Michael C</au><au>McLaughlin, Lauren P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tort Liability Expands for Project Architects in California</atitle><jtitle>Civil engineering (New York, N.Y. 1983)</jtitle><date>2014-09-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>88</spage><pages>88-</pages><issn>0885-7024</issn><eissn>2381-0688</eissn><coden>CIEGAG</coden><abstract>For decades the architecture and engineering community has enjoyed and relied upon certain legal protections afforded them when confronted with third-party lawsuits. Courts around the country today are almost equally divided on whether the protections from the economic loss rule should extend to design professionals. This month architecture and engineering community consider a noteworthy decision by the California Supreme Court that expands the potential liability of project architects beyond those directly involved in the construction project (such as contractors). The court found that architects owe a duty of care to the ultimate purchasers of buildings and therefore can be liable for economic losses to those parties even if there is no contractual privity with those parties.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0885-7024 |
ispartof | Civil engineering (New York, N.Y. 1983), 2014-09, Vol.84 (9), p.88 |
issn | 0885-7024 2381-0688 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1566647572 |
source | Business Source Complete |
subjects | Architects Architectural engineering Architecture Construction Liability Projects State court decisions Torts |
title | Tort Liability Expands for Project Architects in California |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T22%3A15%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tort%20Liability%20Expands%20for%20Project%20Architects%20in%20California&rft.jtitle=Civil%20engineering%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.%201983)&rft.au=Loulakis,%20Michael%20C&rft.date=2014-09-01&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=88&rft.pages=88-&rft.issn=0885-7024&rft.eissn=2381-0688&rft.coden=CIEGAG&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3448284401%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1566647572&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |