Tort Liability Expands for Project Architects in California

For decades the architecture and engineering community has enjoyed and relied upon certain legal protections afforded them when confronted with third-party lawsuits. Courts around the country today are almost equally divided on whether the protections from the economic loss rule should extend to des...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Civil engineering (New York, N.Y. 1983) N.Y. 1983), 2014-09, Vol.84 (9), p.88
Hauptverfasser: Loulakis, Michael C, McLaughlin, Lauren P
Format: Magazinearticle
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 9
container_start_page 88
container_title Civil engineering (New York, N.Y. 1983)
container_volume 84
creator Loulakis, Michael C
McLaughlin, Lauren P
description For decades the architecture and engineering community has enjoyed and relied upon certain legal protections afforded them when confronted with third-party lawsuits. Courts around the country today are almost equally divided on whether the protections from the economic loss rule should extend to design professionals. This month architecture and engineering community consider a noteworthy decision by the California Supreme Court that expands the potential liability of project architects beyond those directly involved in the construction project (such as contractors). The court found that architects owe a duty of care to the ultimate purchasers of buildings and therefore can be liable for economic losses to those parties even if there is no contractual privity with those parties.
format Magazinearticle
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1566647572</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3448284401</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p113t-e6cef16ac27bfe8a653a78dd1c10d219df1c5b5329750ff09fd593b3a59cbe2e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjctKAzEARYNYcGz9h4DrQB7NC1dlqA8YqIu6LnlihmEyJino3zugq3vgwLk3oKNMEYSFUregw0pxJDHd34H7WkeMsZIKd-DpnEuDQzI2Tan9wOP3YmZfYcwFvpc8BtfgobjP1FaqMM2wN1Na7ZzMDmyimWp4-N8t-Hg-nvtXNJxe3vrDgBZCWENBuBCJMI5KG4MygjMjlffEEewp0T4Sxy1nVEuOY8Q6eq6ZZYZrZwMNbAse_7pLyV_XUNtlzNcyr5cXwoUQe8klZb90cUUc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><pqid>1566647572</pqid></control><display><type>magazinearticle</type><title>Tort Liability Expands for Project Architects in California</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Loulakis, Michael C ; McLaughlin, Lauren P</creator><creatorcontrib>Loulakis, Michael C ; McLaughlin, Lauren P</creatorcontrib><description>For decades the architecture and engineering community has enjoyed and relied upon certain legal protections afforded them when confronted with third-party lawsuits. Courts around the country today are almost equally divided on whether the protections from the economic loss rule should extend to design professionals. This month architecture and engineering community consider a noteworthy decision by the California Supreme Court that expands the potential liability of project architects beyond those directly involved in the construction project (such as contractors). The court found that architects owe a duty of care to the ultimate purchasers of buildings and therefore can be liable for economic losses to those parties even if there is no contractual privity with those parties.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-7024</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2381-0688</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CIEGAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Architects ; Architectural engineering ; Architecture ; Construction ; Liability ; Projects ; State court decisions ; Torts</subject><ispartof>Civil engineering (New York, N.Y. 1983), 2014-09, Vol.84 (9), p.88</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Society of Civil Engineers Sep 2014</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>777,781</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Loulakis, Michael C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLaughlin, Lauren P</creatorcontrib><title>Tort Liability Expands for Project Architects in California</title><title>Civil engineering (New York, N.Y. 1983)</title><description>For decades the architecture and engineering community has enjoyed and relied upon certain legal protections afforded them when confronted with third-party lawsuits. Courts around the country today are almost equally divided on whether the protections from the economic loss rule should extend to design professionals. This month architecture and engineering community consider a noteworthy decision by the California Supreme Court that expands the potential liability of project architects beyond those directly involved in the construction project (such as contractors). The court found that architects owe a duty of care to the ultimate purchasers of buildings and therefore can be liable for economic losses to those parties even if there is no contractual privity with those parties.</description><subject>Architects</subject><subject>Architectural engineering</subject><subject>Architecture</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Liability</subject><subject>Projects</subject><subject>State court decisions</subject><subject>Torts</subject><issn>0885-7024</issn><issn>2381-0688</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><recordid>eNotjctKAzEARYNYcGz9h4DrQB7NC1dlqA8YqIu6LnlihmEyJino3zugq3vgwLk3oKNMEYSFUregw0pxJDHd34H7WkeMsZIKd-DpnEuDQzI2Tan9wOP3YmZfYcwFvpc8BtfgobjP1FaqMM2wN1Na7ZzMDmyimWp4-N8t-Hg-nvtXNJxe3vrDgBZCWENBuBCJMI5KG4MygjMjlffEEewp0T4Sxy1nVEuOY8Q6eq6ZZYZrZwMNbAse_7pLyV_XUNtlzNcyr5cXwoUQe8klZb90cUUc</recordid><startdate>20140901</startdate><enddate>20140901</enddate><creator>Loulakis, Michael C</creator><creator>McLaughlin, Lauren P</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140901</creationdate><title>Tort Liability Expands for Project Architects in California</title><author>Loulakis, Michael C ; McLaughlin, Lauren P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p113t-e6cef16ac27bfe8a653a78dd1c10d219df1c5b5329750ff09fd593b3a59cbe2e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><prefilter>magazinearticle</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Architects</topic><topic>Architectural engineering</topic><topic>Architecture</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Liability</topic><topic>Projects</topic><topic>State court decisions</topic><topic>Torts</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Loulakis, Michael C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLaughlin, Lauren P</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Civil engineering (New York, N.Y. 1983)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Loulakis, Michael C</au><au>McLaughlin, Lauren P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tort Liability Expands for Project Architects in California</atitle><jtitle>Civil engineering (New York, N.Y. 1983)</jtitle><date>2014-09-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>88</spage><pages>88-</pages><issn>0885-7024</issn><eissn>2381-0688</eissn><coden>CIEGAG</coden><abstract>For decades the architecture and engineering community has enjoyed and relied upon certain legal protections afforded them when confronted with third-party lawsuits. Courts around the country today are almost equally divided on whether the protections from the economic loss rule should extend to design professionals. This month architecture and engineering community consider a noteworthy decision by the California Supreme Court that expands the potential liability of project architects beyond those directly involved in the construction project (such as contractors). The court found that architects owe a duty of care to the ultimate purchasers of buildings and therefore can be liable for economic losses to those parties even if there is no contractual privity with those parties.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0885-7024
ispartof Civil engineering (New York, N.Y. 1983), 2014-09, Vol.84 (9), p.88
issn 0885-7024
2381-0688
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1566647572
source Business Source Complete
subjects Architects
Architectural engineering
Architecture
Construction
Liability
Projects
State court decisions
Torts
title Tort Liability Expands for Project Architects in California
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T22%3A15%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tort%20Liability%20Expands%20for%20Project%20Architects%20in%20California&rft.jtitle=Civil%20engineering%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.%201983)&rft.au=Loulakis,%20Michael%20C&rft.date=2014-09-01&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=88&rft.pages=88-&rft.issn=0885-7024&rft.eissn=2381-0688&rft.coden=CIEGAG&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3448284401%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1566647572&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true