Is more less? Propensity to diversify via M&A and market reactions

Mergers and acquisitions (M&As) could lead to a firm diversifying into new industries, and the impact of this may be related to the firm's prior diversification. Using a panel of 1030 M&A transactions from 2000 to 2010, we find that previously diversified firms are more likely to pursue...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International review of financial analysis 2014-07, Vol.34, p.76-88
Hauptverfasser: Hornstein, Abigail S., Nguyen, Zachary
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 88
container_issue
container_start_page 76
container_title International review of financial analysis
container_volume 34
creator Hornstein, Abigail S.
Nguyen, Zachary
description Mergers and acquisitions (M&As) could lead to a firm diversifying into new industries, and the impact of this may be related to the firm's prior diversification. Using a panel of 1030 M&A transactions from 2000 to 2010, we find that previously diversified firms are more likely to pursue industrially diversifying M&As. Both previous and contemporary diversification measures are not associated with the firm's cumulative abnormal returns (CARs) at time of announcement but have a lasting effect on various performance measures up to two years later. We find evidence supporting both a diversification discount and premium, which can be predicted by the sign of the CAR at the time of announcement. This suggests that while diversification is necessary to explain firm value, it is not sufficient. •Previously diversified firms are more likely to pursue industrially diversifying M&A.•Prior and contemporary diversification is not associated with announcement CARs.•Evidence supports both a diversification discount and premium.•CARs reflect market sentiment and predict market valuations up to two years later.•CARs do not help predict future firm operating performance.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.irfa.2014.05.014
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1564767380</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1057521914000866</els_id><sourcerecordid>3442493101</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-2382726a7a305e2d2889e400ff471e95fcdf152dff610dfdc75d5f0e5ef32f403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LxDAUxIMouK5-AU8BwVvrS9o0LQiyLv5ZWNGDnkNIXiB1t1mT7sJ-e1vq2dO8w_zmDUPINYOcAavu2txHp3MOrMxB5IOckBmrZZHVIJvT4QYhM8FZc04uUmoBQIhKzsjjKtFtiEg3mNID_Yhhh13y_ZH2gVp_wJi8O9KD1_TtdkF1Z-lWx2_saURteh-6dEnOnN4kvPrTOfl6fvpcvmbr95fVcrHOTNHwPuNFzSWvtNQFCOSW13WDJYBzpWTYCGesY4Jb5yoG1lkjhRUOUKAruCuhmJObKXcXw88eU6_asI_d8FIxUZWykkU9uvjkMjGkFNGpXfRD5aNioMatVKvGrdS4lQKhBhmg-wnCof_BY1TJeOwMWh_R9MoG_x_-C36LcU4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1564767380</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is more less? Propensity to diversify via M&amp;A and market reactions</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Hornstein, Abigail S. ; Nguyen, Zachary</creator><creatorcontrib>Hornstein, Abigail S. ; Nguyen, Zachary</creatorcontrib><description>Mergers and acquisitions (M&amp;As) could lead to a firm diversifying into new industries, and the impact of this may be related to the firm's prior diversification. Using a panel of 1030 M&amp;A transactions from 2000 to 2010, we find that previously diversified firms are more likely to pursue industrially diversifying M&amp;As. Both previous and contemporary diversification measures are not associated with the firm's cumulative abnormal returns (CARs) at time of announcement but have a lasting effect on various performance measures up to two years later. We find evidence supporting both a diversification discount and premium, which can be predicted by the sign of the CAR at the time of announcement. This suggests that while diversification is necessary to explain firm value, it is not sufficient. •Previously diversified firms are more likely to pursue industrially diversifying M&amp;A.•Prior and contemporary diversification is not associated with announcement CARs.•Evidence supports both a diversification discount and premium.•CARs reflect market sentiment and predict market valuations up to two years later.•CARs do not help predict future firm operating performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1057-5219</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-8079</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2014.05.014</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Greenwich: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Abnormal returns ; Acquisitions &amp; mergers ; Business valuation ; Diversification ; Event study ; M&amp;A ; Operating performance ; Studies</subject><ispartof>International review of financial analysis, 2014-07, Vol.34, p.76-88</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jul 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-2382726a7a305e2d2889e400ff471e95fcdf152dff610dfdc75d5f0e5ef32f403</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-2382726a7a305e2d2889e400ff471e95fcdf152dff610dfdc75d5f0e5ef32f403</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2014.05.014$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hornstein, Abigail S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Zachary</creatorcontrib><title>Is more less? Propensity to diversify via M&amp;A and market reactions</title><title>International review of financial analysis</title><description>Mergers and acquisitions (M&amp;As) could lead to a firm diversifying into new industries, and the impact of this may be related to the firm's prior diversification. Using a panel of 1030 M&amp;A transactions from 2000 to 2010, we find that previously diversified firms are more likely to pursue industrially diversifying M&amp;As. Both previous and contemporary diversification measures are not associated with the firm's cumulative abnormal returns (CARs) at time of announcement but have a lasting effect on various performance measures up to two years later. We find evidence supporting both a diversification discount and premium, which can be predicted by the sign of the CAR at the time of announcement. This suggests that while diversification is necessary to explain firm value, it is not sufficient. •Previously diversified firms are more likely to pursue industrially diversifying M&amp;A.•Prior and contemporary diversification is not associated with announcement CARs.•Evidence supports both a diversification discount and premium.•CARs reflect market sentiment and predict market valuations up to two years later.•CARs do not help predict future firm operating performance.</description><subject>Abnormal returns</subject><subject>Acquisitions &amp; mergers</subject><subject>Business valuation</subject><subject>Diversification</subject><subject>Event study</subject><subject>M&amp;A</subject><subject>Operating performance</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1057-5219</issn><issn>1873-8079</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9LxDAUxIMouK5-AU8BwVvrS9o0LQiyLv5ZWNGDnkNIXiB1t1mT7sJ-e1vq2dO8w_zmDUPINYOcAavu2txHp3MOrMxB5IOckBmrZZHVIJvT4QYhM8FZc04uUmoBQIhKzsjjKtFtiEg3mNID_Yhhh13y_ZH2gVp_wJi8O9KD1_TtdkF1Z-lWx2_saURteh-6dEnOnN4kvPrTOfl6fvpcvmbr95fVcrHOTNHwPuNFzSWvtNQFCOSW13WDJYBzpWTYCGesY4Jb5yoG1lkjhRUOUKAruCuhmJObKXcXw88eU6_asI_d8FIxUZWykkU9uvjkMjGkFNGpXfRD5aNioMatVKvGrdS4lQKhBhmg-wnCof_BY1TJeOwMWh_R9MoG_x_-C36LcU4</recordid><startdate>20140701</startdate><enddate>20140701</enddate><creator>Hornstein, Abigail S.</creator><creator>Nguyen, Zachary</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140701</creationdate><title>Is more less? Propensity to diversify via M&amp;A and market reactions</title><author>Hornstein, Abigail S. ; Nguyen, Zachary</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-2382726a7a305e2d2889e400ff471e95fcdf152dff610dfdc75d5f0e5ef32f403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Abnormal returns</topic><topic>Acquisitions &amp; mergers</topic><topic>Business valuation</topic><topic>Diversification</topic><topic>Event study</topic><topic>M&amp;A</topic><topic>Operating performance</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hornstein, Abigail S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Zachary</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International review of financial analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hornstein, Abigail S.</au><au>Nguyen, Zachary</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is more less? Propensity to diversify via M&amp;A and market reactions</atitle><jtitle>International review of financial analysis</jtitle><date>2014-07-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>34</volume><spage>76</spage><epage>88</epage><pages>76-88</pages><issn>1057-5219</issn><eissn>1873-8079</eissn><abstract>Mergers and acquisitions (M&amp;As) could lead to a firm diversifying into new industries, and the impact of this may be related to the firm's prior diversification. Using a panel of 1030 M&amp;A transactions from 2000 to 2010, we find that previously diversified firms are more likely to pursue industrially diversifying M&amp;As. Both previous and contemporary diversification measures are not associated with the firm's cumulative abnormal returns (CARs) at time of announcement but have a lasting effect on various performance measures up to two years later. We find evidence supporting both a diversification discount and premium, which can be predicted by the sign of the CAR at the time of announcement. This suggests that while diversification is necessary to explain firm value, it is not sufficient. •Previously diversified firms are more likely to pursue industrially diversifying M&amp;A.•Prior and contemporary diversification is not associated with announcement CARs.•Evidence supports both a diversification discount and premium.•CARs reflect market sentiment and predict market valuations up to two years later.•CARs do not help predict future firm operating performance.</abstract><cop>Greenwich</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.irfa.2014.05.014</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1057-5219
ispartof International review of financial analysis, 2014-07, Vol.34, p.76-88
issn 1057-5219
1873-8079
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1564767380
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Abnormal returns
Acquisitions & mergers
Business valuation
Diversification
Event study
M&A
Operating performance
Studies
title Is more less? Propensity to diversify via M&A and market reactions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T01%3A04%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20more%20less?%20Propensity%20to%20diversify%20via%20M&A%20and%20market%20reactions&rft.jtitle=International%20review%20of%20financial%20analysis&rft.au=Hornstein,%20Abigail%20S.&rft.date=2014-07-01&rft.volume=34&rft.spage=76&rft.epage=88&rft.pages=76-88&rft.issn=1057-5219&rft.eissn=1873-8079&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.irfa.2014.05.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3442493101%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1564767380&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1057521914000866&rfr_iscdi=true