Journal rankings: do they matter?
In this article, Dickson examines whether journal rankings matter in actuarial science.. Dickson argues that it is better to have a high ranking than a low one It is also an achievement for a relatively new journal to achieve the same ranking as more established journals that have published some ver...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of actuarial science 2014-09, Vol.8 (2), p.215-216 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 216 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 215 |
| container_title | Annals of actuarial science |
| container_volume | 8 |
| creator | Dickson, David C.M. |
| description | In this article, Dickson examines whether journal rankings matter in actuarial science.. Dickson argues that it is better to have a high ranking than a low one It is also an achievement for a relatively new journal to achieve the same ranking as more established journals that have published some very important papers over the years. One effect of journal rankings is that many researchers initially submit their papers to highly ranked journals. In fields where there are huge numbers of researchers, this can lead to large numbers of submissions (and very high rejection rates). Dickson concludes that whether journal rankings matter depends on your perspective. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1748499514000141 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1556110100</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1748499514000141</cupid><sourcerecordid>3413393761</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-b4cb4ca157d8769d4b5e7284607affba6d4351f59464bccc4eae4fd020cba9e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UE1Lw0AQXUTBUvsDvEU8R2eS2U3Wi0jxk4IH9Rz2KzW1Sepueui_NyE5CCIMzDDz3uPNY-wc4QoBs-s3zCgnKTkSACDhEZsNq5gDJMfTPNxP2SKETY8BkpCncsYuXtq9b9Q28qr5qpp1uIlsG3Wf7hDVquucvz1jJ6XaBreY-px9PNy_L5_i1evj8_JuFZsUky7WZPpSyDObZ0Ja0txlSU4CMlWWWglLKceSSxKkjTHklKPSQgJGK-lEOmeXo-7Ot997F7piM1oLBXIusP8UoEfhiDK-DcG7stj5qlb-UCAUQxjFnzB6TjpxVK19Zdful_S_rB8VT17l</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1556110100</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Journal rankings: do they matter?</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Dickson, David C.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dickson, David C.M.</creatorcontrib><description>In this article, Dickson examines whether journal rankings matter in actuarial science.. Dickson argues that it is better to have a high ranking than a low one It is also an achievement for a relatively new journal to achieve the same ranking as more established journals that have published some very important papers over the years. One effect of journal rankings is that many researchers initially submit their papers to highly ranked journals. In fields where there are huge numbers of researchers, this can lead to large numbers of submissions (and very high rejection rates). Dickson concludes that whether journal rankings matter depends on your perspective.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1748-4995</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-5002</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1748499514000141</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Actuarial science ; Guest Editorial ; Ratings & rankings ; Risk assessment</subject><ispartof>Annals of actuarial science, 2014-09, Vol.8 (2), p.215-216</ispartof><rights>Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1748499514000141/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,27903,27904,55606</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dickson, David C.M.</creatorcontrib><title>Journal rankings: do they matter?</title><title>Annals of actuarial science</title><addtitle>Ann. actuar. sci</addtitle><description>In this article, Dickson examines whether journal rankings matter in actuarial science.. Dickson argues that it is better to have a high ranking than a low one It is also an achievement for a relatively new journal to achieve the same ranking as more established journals that have published some very important papers over the years. One effect of journal rankings is that many researchers initially submit their papers to highly ranked journals. In fields where there are huge numbers of researchers, this can lead to large numbers of submissions (and very high rejection rates). Dickson concludes that whether journal rankings matter depends on your perspective.</description><subject>Actuarial science</subject><subject>Guest Editorial</subject><subject>Ratings & rankings</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><issn>1748-4995</issn><issn>1748-5002</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UE1Lw0AQXUTBUvsDvEU8R2eS2U3Wi0jxk4IH9Rz2KzW1Sepueui_NyE5CCIMzDDz3uPNY-wc4QoBs-s3zCgnKTkSACDhEZsNq5gDJMfTPNxP2SKETY8BkpCncsYuXtq9b9Q28qr5qpp1uIlsG3Wf7hDVquucvz1jJ6XaBreY-px9PNy_L5_i1evj8_JuFZsUky7WZPpSyDObZ0Ja0txlSU4CMlWWWglLKceSSxKkjTHklKPSQgJGK-lEOmeXo-7Ot997F7piM1oLBXIusP8UoEfhiDK-DcG7stj5qlb-UCAUQxjFnzB6TjpxVK19Zdful_S_rB8VT17l</recordid><startdate>20140901</startdate><enddate>20140901</enddate><creator>Dickson, David C.M.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8A9</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140901</creationdate><title>Journal rankings: do they matter?</title><author>Dickson, David C.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-b4cb4ca157d8769d4b5e7284607affba6d4351f59464bccc4eae4fd020cba9e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Actuarial science</topic><topic>Guest Editorial</topic><topic>Ratings & rankings</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dickson, David C.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Annals of actuarial science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dickson, David C.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Journal rankings: do they matter?</atitle><jtitle>Annals of actuarial science</jtitle><addtitle>Ann. actuar. sci</addtitle><date>2014-09-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>215</spage><epage>216</epage><pages>215-216</pages><issn>1748-4995</issn><eissn>1748-5002</eissn><abstract>In this article, Dickson examines whether journal rankings matter in actuarial science.. Dickson argues that it is better to have a high ranking than a low one It is also an achievement for a relatively new journal to achieve the same ranking as more established journals that have published some very important papers over the years. One effect of journal rankings is that many researchers initially submit their papers to highly ranked journals. In fields where there are huge numbers of researchers, this can lead to large numbers of submissions (and very high rejection rates). Dickson concludes that whether journal rankings matter depends on your perspective.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1748499514000141</doi><tpages>2</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1748-4995 |
| ispartof | Annals of actuarial science, 2014-09, Vol.8 (2), p.215-216 |
| issn | 1748-4995 1748-5002 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1556110100 |
| source | Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
| subjects | Actuarial science Guest Editorial Ratings & rankings Risk assessment |
| title | Journal rankings: do they matter? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T19%3A46%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Journal%20rankings:%20do%20they%20matter?&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20actuarial%20science&rft.au=Dickson,%20David%20C.M.&rft.date=2014-09-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=215&rft.epage=216&rft.pages=215-216&rft.issn=1748-4995&rft.eissn=1748-5002&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1748499514000141&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3413393761%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1556110100&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1748499514000141&rfr_iscdi=true |