C-OnSite^sup ^ for intraoperative 3D control of pedicular screw positions

Two-dimensional image guidance and navigation can help to reduce the number of misplaced pedicle screws, but do not completely prevent misplacement. This experimental, retrospective, non-inferiority study was designed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of a novel 3D imaging technique versus conven...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta neurochirurgica 2014-09, Vol.156 (9), p.1799
Hauptverfasser: Kantelhardt, Sven Rainer, Keric, Naureen, Conrad, Jens, Nimer, Amr, Woo, Raymund, Varich, Laura, Giese, Alf
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1799
container_title Acta neurochirurgica
container_volume 156
creator Kantelhardt, Sven Rainer
Keric, Naureen
Conrad, Jens
Nimer, Amr
Woo, Raymund
Varich, Laura
Giese, Alf
description Two-dimensional image guidance and navigation can help to reduce the number of misplaced pedicle screws, but do not completely prevent misplacement. This experimental, retrospective, non-inferiority study was designed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of a novel 3D imaging technique versus conventional postoperative CT-scan, for intra-operative determination of pedicle screw position accuracy. The capacity of C-OnSite to intraoperatively assess screw placement was evaluated in 28 clinical cases and 23 deliberately misplaced screws in a cadaver model, and compared to placement accuracy determined by standard CT. The position of each implant, as viewed by both modalities, was graded by three neurosurgeons, one orthopaedic-surgeon and one radiologist. The intermodal variance determined the difference between CT- and C-OnSite results for each observer, while the inter-observer variance measured the difference between ratings of the same modality by different observers. C-OnSite successfully assessed 120/138 screws (25/28 cases). Mean procedural fluoroscopy time was 132±51s, and 40±16s per C-OnSite scan. The average inter-modality variance was ,15 % with mismatches >1° between C-OnSite and the gold-standard imaging technique in only 2 % of the comparisons. Average inter-observer variances were about similar (12 % for CT and 18 % for C-OnSite), with deviations of >1° reaching 1 % for CT and 3 % for C-OnSite. Individual variances between experienced only observers differed even less. C-OnSite is a feasible, reliable and intuitive means of intraoperatively visualizing pedicle screw positions and might render the majority of postoperative CTs superfluous. C-OnSite might help avoid re-operations for screw re-positioning.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00701-014-2111-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1554136714</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3406260811</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_15541367143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNirsKwjAUhoMoeH0AtwPO0Zw2tjp7QScHnZVSU4iUnpiTKvj0ZvABXP7b9wsxRTVHpfIFR1EoFWqZIKL8dMRArXUio6huzCrSLMlWfTFkfsSW5DodiONGnpqzDebKrYMrVOTBNsEX5Iwvgn0ZSLdQUpyoBqrAmbst27rwwKU3b3DENlhqeCx6VVGzmfx8JGb73WVzkM7TszUcbg9qfRPRDZdLjWmWo07_e30B83JC7Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1554136714</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>C-OnSite^sup ^ for intraoperative 3D control of pedicular screw positions</title><source>SpringerNature Complete Journals</source><creator>Kantelhardt, Sven Rainer ; Keric, Naureen ; Conrad, Jens ; Nimer, Amr ; Woo, Raymund ; Varich, Laura ; Giese, Alf</creator><creatorcontrib>Kantelhardt, Sven Rainer ; Keric, Naureen ; Conrad, Jens ; Nimer, Amr ; Woo, Raymund ; Varich, Laura ; Giese, Alf</creatorcontrib><description>Two-dimensional image guidance and navigation can help to reduce the number of misplaced pedicle screws, but do not completely prevent misplacement. This experimental, retrospective, non-inferiority study was designed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of a novel 3D imaging technique versus conventional postoperative CT-scan, for intra-operative determination of pedicle screw position accuracy. The capacity of C-OnSite to intraoperatively assess screw placement was evaluated in 28 clinical cases and 23 deliberately misplaced screws in a cadaver model, and compared to placement accuracy determined by standard CT. The position of each implant, as viewed by both modalities, was graded by three neurosurgeons, one orthopaedic-surgeon and one radiologist. The intermodal variance determined the difference between CT- and C-OnSite results for each observer, while the inter-observer variance measured the difference between ratings of the same modality by different observers. C-OnSite successfully assessed 120/138 screws (25/28 cases). Mean procedural fluoroscopy time was 132±51s, and 40±16s per C-OnSite scan. The average inter-modality variance was ,15 % with mismatches &gt;1° between C-OnSite and the gold-standard imaging technique in only 2 % of the comparisons. Average inter-observer variances were about similar (12 % for CT and 18 % for C-OnSite), with deviations of &gt;1° reaching 1 % for CT and 3 % for C-OnSite. Individual variances between experienced only observers differed even less. C-OnSite is a feasible, reliable and intuitive means of intraoperatively visualizing pedicle screw positions and might render the majority of postoperative CTs superfluous. C-OnSite might help avoid re-operations for screw re-positioning.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-6268</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0942-0940</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00701-014-2111-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Wien: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><ispartof>Acta neurochirurgica, 2014-09, Vol.156 (9), p.1799</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Wien 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kantelhardt, Sven Rainer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keric, Naureen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conrad, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nimer, Amr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woo, Raymund</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varich, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giese, Alf</creatorcontrib><title>C-OnSite^sup ^ for intraoperative 3D control of pedicular screw positions</title><title>Acta neurochirurgica</title><description>Two-dimensional image guidance and navigation can help to reduce the number of misplaced pedicle screws, but do not completely prevent misplacement. This experimental, retrospective, non-inferiority study was designed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of a novel 3D imaging technique versus conventional postoperative CT-scan, for intra-operative determination of pedicle screw position accuracy. The capacity of C-OnSite to intraoperatively assess screw placement was evaluated in 28 clinical cases and 23 deliberately misplaced screws in a cadaver model, and compared to placement accuracy determined by standard CT. The position of each implant, as viewed by both modalities, was graded by three neurosurgeons, one orthopaedic-surgeon and one radiologist. The intermodal variance determined the difference between CT- and C-OnSite results for each observer, while the inter-observer variance measured the difference between ratings of the same modality by different observers. C-OnSite successfully assessed 120/138 screws (25/28 cases). Mean procedural fluoroscopy time was 132±51s, and 40±16s per C-OnSite scan. The average inter-modality variance was ,15 % with mismatches &gt;1° between C-OnSite and the gold-standard imaging technique in only 2 % of the comparisons. Average inter-observer variances were about similar (12 % for CT and 18 % for C-OnSite), with deviations of &gt;1° reaching 1 % for CT and 3 % for C-OnSite. Individual variances between experienced only observers differed even less. C-OnSite is a feasible, reliable and intuitive means of intraoperatively visualizing pedicle screw positions and might render the majority of postoperative CTs superfluous. C-OnSite might help avoid re-operations for screw re-positioning.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><issn>0001-6268</issn><issn>0942-0940</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqNirsKwjAUhoMoeH0AtwPO0Zw2tjp7QScHnZVSU4iUnpiTKvj0ZvABXP7b9wsxRTVHpfIFR1EoFWqZIKL8dMRArXUio6huzCrSLMlWfTFkfsSW5DodiONGnpqzDebKrYMrVOTBNsEX5Iwvgn0ZSLdQUpyoBqrAmbst27rwwKU3b3DENlhqeCx6VVGzmfx8JGb73WVzkM7TszUcbg9qfRPRDZdLjWmWo07_e30B83JC7Q</recordid><startdate>20140901</startdate><enddate>20140901</enddate><creator>Kantelhardt, Sven Rainer</creator><creator>Keric, Naureen</creator><creator>Conrad, Jens</creator><creator>Nimer, Amr</creator><creator>Woo, Raymund</creator><creator>Varich, Laura</creator><creator>Giese, Alf</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140901</creationdate><title>C-OnSite^sup ^ for intraoperative 3D control of pedicular screw positions</title><author>Kantelhardt, Sven Rainer ; Keric, Naureen ; Conrad, Jens ; Nimer, Amr ; Woo, Raymund ; Varich, Laura ; Giese, Alf</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_15541367143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kantelhardt, Sven Rainer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keric, Naureen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conrad, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nimer, Amr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woo, Raymund</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varich, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giese, Alf</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Acta neurochirurgica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kantelhardt, Sven Rainer</au><au>Keric, Naureen</au><au>Conrad, Jens</au><au>Nimer, Amr</au><au>Woo, Raymund</au><au>Varich, Laura</au><au>Giese, Alf</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>C-OnSite^sup ^ for intraoperative 3D control of pedicular screw positions</atitle><jtitle>Acta neurochirurgica</jtitle><date>2014-09-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>156</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1799</spage><pages>1799-</pages><issn>0001-6268</issn><eissn>0942-0940</eissn><abstract>Two-dimensional image guidance and navigation can help to reduce the number of misplaced pedicle screws, but do not completely prevent misplacement. This experimental, retrospective, non-inferiority study was designed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of a novel 3D imaging technique versus conventional postoperative CT-scan, for intra-operative determination of pedicle screw position accuracy. The capacity of C-OnSite to intraoperatively assess screw placement was evaluated in 28 clinical cases and 23 deliberately misplaced screws in a cadaver model, and compared to placement accuracy determined by standard CT. The position of each implant, as viewed by both modalities, was graded by three neurosurgeons, one orthopaedic-surgeon and one radiologist. The intermodal variance determined the difference between CT- and C-OnSite results for each observer, while the inter-observer variance measured the difference between ratings of the same modality by different observers. C-OnSite successfully assessed 120/138 screws (25/28 cases). Mean procedural fluoroscopy time was 132±51s, and 40±16s per C-OnSite scan. The average inter-modality variance was ,15 % with mismatches &gt;1° between C-OnSite and the gold-standard imaging technique in only 2 % of the comparisons. Average inter-observer variances were about similar (12 % for CT and 18 % for C-OnSite), with deviations of &gt;1° reaching 1 % for CT and 3 % for C-OnSite. Individual variances between experienced only observers differed even less. C-OnSite is a feasible, reliable and intuitive means of intraoperatively visualizing pedicle screw positions and might render the majority of postoperative CTs superfluous. C-OnSite might help avoid re-operations for screw re-positioning.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Wien</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1007/s00701-014-2111-z</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-6268
ispartof Acta neurochirurgica, 2014-09, Vol.156 (9), p.1799
issn 0001-6268
0942-0940
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1554136714
source SpringerNature Complete Journals
title C-OnSite^sup ^ for intraoperative 3D control of pedicular screw positions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T07%3A05%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=C-OnSite%5Esup%20%5E%20for%20intraoperative%203D%20control%20of%20pedicular%20screw%20positions&rft.jtitle=Acta%20neurochirurgica&rft.au=Kantelhardt,%20Sven%20Rainer&rft.date=2014-09-01&rft.volume=156&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1799&rft.pages=1799-&rft.issn=0001-6268&rft.eissn=0942-0940&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00701-014-2111-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3406260811%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1554136714&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true