Ethical decision making styles in the workplace: Relations to the keirsey temperament sorter
To explicate Kinston s seven‐style ethical decision typology, relationships between styles and the Keirsey Temperament Sorter were examined. All three factors underlying the ethicals styles were related in theoretically distinct ways to the character types identified by the Sorter. Overall, the ethi...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Systems Research 1994, Vol.11 (2), p.59-63 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 63 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 59 |
| container_title | Systems Research |
| container_volume | 11 |
| creator | Bloom, Amid J. Snow, Roberta M. |
| description | To explicate Kinston s seven‐style ethical decision typology, relationships between styles and the Keirsey Temperament Sorter were examined. All three factors underlying the ethicals styles were related in theoretically distinct ways to the character types identified by the Sorter. Overall, the ethical decision styles appear to be an elegant elaboration of the decision making (T‐F) distinction within the Sorter. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/sres.3850110205 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1554067009</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1554067009</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3195-b51a4909d750217656fe1482100d3005bbfd327309fb32f37821d66bcdec07083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkN1PwjAUxRujiYg--9rE5-HtSleqT0oAjV-JaDTGpOm2OymMDdsS5L93iNGnm5tzfvfjEHLMoMMA4lPv0Hd4TwBjEIPYIS0GSkVMcrFLWiA5i2TM1T458H4KDdFTokXeB2FiM1PSHDPrbV3RuZnZ6oP6sC7RU1vRMEG6qt1sUZoMz-gjliY0Rk9D_aPN0DqPaxpwvkBn5lgF6msX0B2SvcKUHo9-a5s8DwdP_avo9mF03b-4jTLOlIhSwUxXgcqlgJjJRCQFsm4vbt7KOYBI0yLnseSgipTHBZeNlCdJmjU3g4Qeb5OT7dyFqz-X6IOe1ktXNSs1E6ILiQRQjet861rZEtd64ezcuLVmoDf56U1--j8_PX4cjP_bho62tPUBv_5o42Y6kVwK_XI_0m_9m9fR5d1QX_FvVhJ2Fw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1554067009</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ethical decision making styles in the workplace: Relations to the keirsey temperament sorter</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Bloom, Amid J. ; Snow, Roberta M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bloom, Amid J. ; Snow, Roberta M.</creatorcontrib><description>To explicate Kinston s seven‐style ethical decision typology, relationships between styles and the Keirsey Temperament Sorter were examined. All three factors underlying the ethicals styles were related in theoretically distinct ways to the character types identified by the Sorter. Overall, the ethical decision styles appear to be an elegant elaboration of the decision making (T‐F) distinction within the Sorter.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0731-7239</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1092-7026</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1735</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/sres.3850110205</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>decision ; decision style ; deontological ; Ethics ; experientialist ; extroversion ; feeling ; individualist ; introversion ; intuition ; judging ; Keirsey Temperament Sorter ; legitimkt ; Myers-Briggs Type Indicator ; perceiving ; rationalist ; sensation ; systemicist ; teleological ; thinking ; transcendentalist ; workplace</subject><ispartof>Systems Research, 1994, Vol.11 (2), p.59-63</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3195-b51a4909d750217656fe1482100d3005bbfd327309fb32f37821d66bcdec07083</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27846,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bloom, Amid J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snow, Roberta M.</creatorcontrib><title>Ethical decision making styles in the workplace: Relations to the keirsey temperament sorter</title><title>Systems Research</title><addtitle>Syst. Res</addtitle><description>To explicate Kinston s seven‐style ethical decision typology, relationships between styles and the Keirsey Temperament Sorter were examined. All three factors underlying the ethicals styles were related in theoretically distinct ways to the character types identified by the Sorter. Overall, the ethical decision styles appear to be an elegant elaboration of the decision making (T‐F) distinction within the Sorter.</description><subject>decision</subject><subject>decision style</subject><subject>deontological</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>experientialist</subject><subject>extroversion</subject><subject>feeling</subject><subject>individualist</subject><subject>introversion</subject><subject>intuition</subject><subject>judging</subject><subject>Keirsey Temperament Sorter</subject><subject>legitimkt</subject><subject>Myers-Briggs Type Indicator</subject><subject>perceiving</subject><subject>rationalist</subject><subject>sensation</subject><subject>systemicist</subject><subject>teleological</subject><subject>thinking</subject><subject>transcendentalist</subject><subject>workplace</subject><issn>0731-7239</issn><issn>1092-7026</issn><issn>1099-1735</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkN1PwjAUxRujiYg--9rE5-HtSleqT0oAjV-JaDTGpOm2OymMDdsS5L93iNGnm5tzfvfjEHLMoMMA4lPv0Hd4TwBjEIPYIS0GSkVMcrFLWiA5i2TM1T458H4KDdFTokXeB2FiM1PSHDPrbV3RuZnZ6oP6sC7RU1vRMEG6qt1sUZoMz-gjliY0Rk9D_aPN0DqPaxpwvkBn5lgF6msX0B2SvcKUHo9-a5s8DwdP_avo9mF03b-4jTLOlIhSwUxXgcqlgJjJRCQFsm4vbt7KOYBI0yLnseSgipTHBZeNlCdJmjU3g4Qeb5OT7dyFqz-X6IOe1ktXNSs1E6ILiQRQjet861rZEtd64ezcuLVmoDf56U1--j8_PX4cjP_bho62tPUBv_5o42Y6kVwK_XI_0m_9m9fR5d1QX_FvVhJ2Fw</recordid><startdate>1994</startdate><enddate>1994</enddate><creator>Bloom, Amid J.</creator><creator>Snow, Roberta M.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>SMOQP</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1994</creationdate><title>Ethical decision making styles in the workplace: Relations to the keirsey temperament sorter</title><author>Bloom, Amid J. ; Snow, Roberta M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3195-b51a4909d750217656fe1482100d3005bbfd327309fb32f37821d66bcdec07083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>decision</topic><topic>decision style</topic><topic>deontological</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>experientialist</topic><topic>extroversion</topic><topic>feeling</topic><topic>individualist</topic><topic>introversion</topic><topic>intuition</topic><topic>judging</topic><topic>Keirsey Temperament Sorter</topic><topic>legitimkt</topic><topic>Myers-Briggs Type Indicator</topic><topic>perceiving</topic><topic>rationalist</topic><topic>sensation</topic><topic>systemicist</topic><topic>teleological</topic><topic>thinking</topic><topic>transcendentalist</topic><topic>workplace</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bloom, Amid J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snow, Roberta M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 46</collection><jtitle>Systems Research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bloom, Amid J.</au><au>Snow, Roberta M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ethical decision making styles in the workplace: Relations to the keirsey temperament sorter</atitle><jtitle>Systems Research</jtitle><addtitle>Syst. Res</addtitle><date>1994</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>59</spage><epage>63</epage><pages>59-63</pages><issn>0731-7239</issn><issn>1092-7026</issn><eissn>1099-1735</eissn><abstract>To explicate Kinston s seven‐style ethical decision typology, relationships between styles and the Keirsey Temperament Sorter were examined. All three factors underlying the ethicals styles were related in theoretically distinct ways to the character types identified by the Sorter. Overall, the ethical decision styles appear to be an elegant elaboration of the decision making (T‐F) distinction within the Sorter.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/sres.3850110205</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0731-7239 |
| ispartof | Systems Research, 1994, Vol.11 (2), p.59-63 |
| issn | 0731-7239 1092-7026 1099-1735 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1554067009 |
| source | Periodicals Index Online; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
| subjects | decision decision style deontological Ethics experientialist extroversion feeling individualist introversion intuition judging Keirsey Temperament Sorter legitimkt Myers-Briggs Type Indicator perceiving rationalist sensation systemicist teleological thinking transcendentalist workplace |
| title | Ethical decision making styles in the workplace: Relations to the keirsey temperament sorter |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T18%3A30%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ethical%20decision%20making%20styles%20in%20the%20workplace:%20Relations%20to%20the%20keirsey%20temperament%20sorter&rft.jtitle=Systems%20Research&rft.au=Bloom,%20Amid%20J.&rft.date=1994&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=59&rft.epage=63&rft.pages=59-63&rft.issn=0731-7239&rft.eissn=1099-1735&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/sres.3850110205&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E1554067009%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1554067009&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |