Nationalist Planning for Autarky and State Hegemony : Development Strategy Under Nehru
In a revisionist interpretation, this article finds the position of mainstream economists to be in error in relation to the impact of economic theory on the economic strategy incorporated in the Second Five Year Plan. In place of "the power of (economic) theory", it suggests a "theory...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Indian economic review 1997-01, Vol.32 (1), p.13-38 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 38 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 13 |
| container_title | Indian economic review |
| container_volume | 32 |
| creator | NAYAR, BALDEV RAJ |
| description | In a revisionist interpretation, this article finds the position of mainstream economists to be in error in relation to the impact of economic theory on the economic strategy incorporated in the Second Five Year Plan. In place of "the power of (economic) theory", it suggests a "theory of power" as a more appropriate explanation for the strategy. Similarly, it finds the position of Marxist scholars and activists also to be mistaken in maintaining that the economic strategy had been designed on behalf of the capitalist class in order to build capitalism. Instead, it suggests that the origins of the strategy were ideological, intended to build socialism; the strategy was contingently facilitated by a ruling coalition usually associated with an "intermediate regime". |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1554040240</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24010467</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24010467</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g810-53cf4bf99edc7008065cc823e1dfc5cb78f36407c27bf4b7aefec79058ac256e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkE1LxDAURbtQcBz9CULAdeG1TZrW3TB-jDCMgqPbkqYvtbVNapIK_fcTGFd3cQ4X7r2IVgBJGdOcw1V07VwPwGiepavo6yB8Z7QYOufJ-yC07nRLlLFkM3thfxYidEM-vPBIdtjiaPRCHsgj_uFgphG1D9AG2i7kUzdoyQG_7XwTXSoxOLz9z3V0fH46bnfx_u3ldbvZx22RQMwyqWityhIbyQEKyJmURZph0ijJZM0LleUUuEx5HUQuUKHkJbBCyJTlmK2j-3PtZM3vjM5XvZltWOOqhDEKFFIKwbo7W73zxlaT7UZhlyqgBMIl2QlXfFXr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1554040240</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nationalist Planning for Autarky and State Hegemony : Development Strategy Under Nehru</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>NAYAR, BALDEV RAJ</creator><creatorcontrib>NAYAR, BALDEV RAJ</creatorcontrib><description>In a revisionist interpretation, this article finds the position of mainstream economists to be in error in relation to the impact of economic theory on the economic strategy incorporated in the Second Five Year Plan. In place of "the power of (economic) theory", it suggests a "theory of power" as a more appropriate explanation for the strategy. Similarly, it finds the position of Marxist scholars and activists also to be mistaken in maintaining that the economic strategy had been designed on behalf of the capitalist class in order to build capitalism. Instead, it suggests that the origins of the strategy were ideological, intended to build socialism; the strategy was contingently facilitated by a ruling coalition usually associated with an "intermediate regime".</description><identifier>ISSN: 0019-4670</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Delhi: Delhi School of Economics</publisher><subject>Capitalism ; Cottage industries ; Economic development ; Economic models ; Economic theory ; Heavy industry ; Marxian economics ; Nationalism ; Public sector ; Socialism</subject><ispartof>Indian economic review, 1997-01, Vol.32 (1), p.13-38</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24010467$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24010467$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,804,27873,58021,58254</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>NAYAR, BALDEV RAJ</creatorcontrib><title>Nationalist Planning for Autarky and State Hegemony : Development Strategy Under Nehru</title><title>Indian economic review</title><description>In a revisionist interpretation, this article finds the position of mainstream economists to be in error in relation to the impact of economic theory on the economic strategy incorporated in the Second Five Year Plan. In place of "the power of (economic) theory", it suggests a "theory of power" as a more appropriate explanation for the strategy. Similarly, it finds the position of Marxist scholars and activists also to be mistaken in maintaining that the economic strategy had been designed on behalf of the capitalist class in order to build capitalism. Instead, it suggests that the origins of the strategy were ideological, intended to build socialism; the strategy was contingently facilitated by a ruling coalition usually associated with an "intermediate regime".</description><subject>Capitalism</subject><subject>Cottage industries</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Heavy industry</subject><subject>Marxian economics</subject><subject>Nationalism</subject><subject>Public sector</subject><subject>Socialism</subject><issn>0019-4670</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNotkE1LxDAURbtQcBz9CULAdeG1TZrW3TB-jDCMgqPbkqYvtbVNapIK_fcTGFd3cQ4X7r2IVgBJGdOcw1V07VwPwGiepavo6yB8Z7QYOufJ-yC07nRLlLFkM3thfxYidEM-vPBIdtjiaPRCHsgj_uFgphG1D9AG2i7kUzdoyQG_7XwTXSoxOLz9z3V0fH46bnfx_u3ldbvZx22RQMwyqWityhIbyQEKyJmURZph0ijJZM0LleUUuEx5HUQuUKHkJbBCyJTlmK2j-3PtZM3vjM5XvZltWOOqhDEKFFIKwbo7W73zxlaT7UZhlyqgBMIl2QlXfFXr</recordid><startdate>19970101</startdate><enddate>19970101</enddate><creator>NAYAR, BALDEV RAJ</creator><general>Delhi School of Economics</general><general>University of Delhi, School of Economics</general><scope>HFIND</scope><scope>IZSXY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970101</creationdate><title>Nationalist Planning for Autarky and State Hegemony : Development Strategy Under Nehru</title><author>NAYAR, BALDEV RAJ</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g810-53cf4bf99edc7008065cc823e1dfc5cb78f36407c27bf4b7aefec79058ac256e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Capitalism</topic><topic>Cottage industries</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Heavy industry</topic><topic>Marxian economics</topic><topic>Nationalism</topic><topic>Public sector</topic><topic>Socialism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>NAYAR, BALDEV RAJ</creatorcontrib><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 16</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 30</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>Indian economic review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>NAYAR, BALDEV RAJ</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nationalist Planning for Autarky and State Hegemony : Development Strategy Under Nehru</atitle><jtitle>Indian economic review</jtitle><date>1997-01-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>13</spage><epage>38</epage><pages>13-38</pages><issn>0019-4670</issn><abstract>In a revisionist interpretation, this article finds the position of mainstream economists to be in error in relation to the impact of economic theory on the economic strategy incorporated in the Second Five Year Plan. In place of "the power of (economic) theory", it suggests a "theory of power" as a more appropriate explanation for the strategy. Similarly, it finds the position of Marxist scholars and activists also to be mistaken in maintaining that the economic strategy had been designed on behalf of the capitalist class in order to build capitalism. Instead, it suggests that the origins of the strategy were ideological, intended to build socialism; the strategy was contingently facilitated by a ruling coalition usually associated with an "intermediate regime".</abstract><cop>Delhi</cop><pub>Delhi School of Economics</pub><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0019-4670 |
| ispartof | Indian economic review, 1997-01, Vol.32 (1), p.13-38 |
| issn | 0019-4670 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1554040240 |
| source | Periodicals Index Online; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
| subjects | Capitalism Cottage industries Economic development Economic models Economic theory Heavy industry Marxian economics Nationalism Public sector Socialism |
| title | Nationalist Planning for Autarky and State Hegemony : Development Strategy Under Nehru |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T22%3A02%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nationalist%20Planning%20for%20Autarky%20and%20State%20Hegemony%20:%20Development%20Strategy%20Under%20Nehru&rft.jtitle=Indian%20economic%20review&rft.au=NAYAR,%20BALDEV%20RAJ&rft.date=1997-01-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=13&rft.epage=38&rft.pages=13-38&rft.issn=0019-4670&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24010467%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1554040240&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24010467&rfr_iscdi=true |