Organic and Conventional Production Systems in the Wisconsin Integrated Cropping Systems Trial: III. Yield Trends
The Wisconsin Integrated Cropping Systems Trial (WICST) at Arlington, WI, compared five production philosophies in place of fixed treatments, which can be problematic, during 1990 to 2012. Corn (Zea mays L.) was the test crop common to the five cropping systems. All five cropping systems produced po...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Agronomy journal 2014-07, Vol.106 (4), p.1509-1522 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1522 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1509 |
container_title | Agronomy journal |
container_volume | 106 |
creator | Baldock, Jon O. Hedtcke, Janet L. Posner, Joshua L. Hall, John A. |
description | The Wisconsin Integrated Cropping Systems Trial (WICST) at Arlington, WI, compared five production philosophies in place of fixed treatments, which can be problematic, during 1990 to 2012. Corn (Zea mays L.) was the test crop common to the five cropping systems. All five cropping systems produced positive, average corn yield trends ranging from 0.1 to 0.2 Mg ha−1 yr−1. The overall rates in three conventional systems exceeded those in two organic systems; but the systems nearly equalized when better technology was introduced in the organic systems. Genetic engineering did not accelerate yield improvements. Hence the difference between conventional and organic systems has been largely due to the available technology, not agroecological factors. The yield advantage for corn following alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) vs. continuous corn (the rotation effect) was 1.47 ± 0.38 Mg ha−1 with no linear or quadratic trends and with the largest values occurring in years with stresses that hindered corn development. Although all five cropping systems produced positive yield trends across two decades, that did not prove they were sustainable over the longer term. There was no clear advantage for either organic or conventional systems in regard to sustainability so the selection process should tailor the cropping system to the individual farm. The resulting picture is a dynamic agriculture with each cropping system encountering and solving challenges. Furthermore, it shows the benefits of long‐term, cropping systems trials in providing base line data, monitoring time‐trends, evaluating new technology, and examining sustainability issues. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2134/agronj14.0004 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1552012588</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3396522571</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3174-c7611b69b7cac9305057401ec5379995c39b485ee081329eee79903466cdafed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1LAzEUxIMoWD-O3gOet-Ztkt1GT6Vo3SJWtCKeljT7WlO2SU22Sv97t1Y9enrM8JuBN4ScAeumwMWFngfvFiC6jDGxRzoguExYJuQ-6bRWmoDK0kNyFOOCMQAloEPex2GunTVUu4oOvPtA11jvdE0fgq_WZivo0yY2uIzUOtq8IX2x0XgXW1W4BudBN9hmg1-trJv_wZNgdX1Ji6Lo0leLddU66Kp4Qg5muo54-nOPyfPN9WRwm9yNh8Wgf5cYDrlITJ4BTDM1zY02ijPJZC4YoJE8V0pJw9VU9CQi6wFPFSK2NuMiy0ylZ1jxY3K-610F_77G2JQLvw7tZ7EEKVMGqez1WirZUSb4GAPOylWwSx02JbByu2r5u2q5XbXlr3b8p61x8z9c9oejtD98HN-PQHynvwDKNn3U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1552012588</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Organic and Conventional Production Systems in the Wisconsin Integrated Cropping Systems Trial: III. Yield Trends</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Baldock, Jon O. ; Hedtcke, Janet L. ; Posner, Joshua L. ; Hall, John A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Baldock, Jon O. ; Hedtcke, Janet L. ; Posner, Joshua L. ; Hall, John A.</creatorcontrib><description>The Wisconsin Integrated Cropping Systems Trial (WICST) at Arlington, WI, compared five production philosophies in place of fixed treatments, which can be problematic, during 1990 to 2012. Corn (Zea mays L.) was the test crop common to the five cropping systems. All five cropping systems produced positive, average corn yield trends ranging from 0.1 to 0.2 Mg ha−1 yr−1. The overall rates in three conventional systems exceeded those in two organic systems; but the systems nearly equalized when better technology was introduced in the organic systems. Genetic engineering did not accelerate yield improvements. Hence the difference between conventional and organic systems has been largely due to the available technology, not agroecological factors. The yield advantage for corn following alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) vs. continuous corn (the rotation effect) was 1.47 ± 0.38 Mg ha−1 with no linear or quadratic trends and with the largest values occurring in years with stresses that hindered corn development. Although all five cropping systems produced positive yield trends across two decades, that did not prove they were sustainable over the longer term. There was no clear advantage for either organic or conventional systems in regard to sustainability so the selection process should tailor the cropping system to the individual farm. The resulting picture is a dynamic agriculture with each cropping system encountering and solving challenges. Furthermore, it shows the benefits of long‐term, cropping systems trials in providing base line data, monitoring time‐trends, evaluating new technology, and examining sustainability issues.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-1962</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0645</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2134/agronj14.0004</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison: The American Society of Agronomy, Inc</publisher><subject>Cropping systems</subject><ispartof>Agronomy journal, 2014-07, Vol.106 (4), p.1509-1522</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2014 by the American Society of Agronomy, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Jul/Aug 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3174-c7611b69b7cac9305057401ec5379995c39b485ee081329eee79903466cdafed3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3174-c7611b69b7cac9305057401ec5379995c39b485ee081329eee79903466cdafed3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2134%2Fagronj14.0004$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2134%2Fagronj14.0004$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baldock, Jon O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hedtcke, Janet L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Posner, Joshua L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, John A.</creatorcontrib><title>Organic and Conventional Production Systems in the Wisconsin Integrated Cropping Systems Trial: III. Yield Trends</title><title>Agronomy journal</title><description>The Wisconsin Integrated Cropping Systems Trial (WICST) at Arlington, WI, compared five production philosophies in place of fixed treatments, which can be problematic, during 1990 to 2012. Corn (Zea mays L.) was the test crop common to the five cropping systems. All five cropping systems produced positive, average corn yield trends ranging from 0.1 to 0.2 Mg ha−1 yr−1. The overall rates in three conventional systems exceeded those in two organic systems; but the systems nearly equalized when better technology was introduced in the organic systems. Genetic engineering did not accelerate yield improvements. Hence the difference between conventional and organic systems has been largely due to the available technology, not agroecological factors. The yield advantage for corn following alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) vs. continuous corn (the rotation effect) was 1.47 ± 0.38 Mg ha−1 with no linear or quadratic trends and with the largest values occurring in years with stresses that hindered corn development. Although all five cropping systems produced positive yield trends across two decades, that did not prove they were sustainable over the longer term. There was no clear advantage for either organic or conventional systems in regard to sustainability so the selection process should tailor the cropping system to the individual farm. The resulting picture is a dynamic agriculture with each cropping system encountering and solving challenges. Furthermore, it shows the benefits of long‐term, cropping systems trials in providing base line data, monitoring time‐trends, evaluating new technology, and examining sustainability issues.</description><subject>Cropping systems</subject><issn>0002-1962</issn><issn>1435-0645</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1LAzEUxIMoWD-O3gOet-Ztkt1GT6Vo3SJWtCKeljT7WlO2SU22Sv97t1Y9enrM8JuBN4ScAeumwMWFngfvFiC6jDGxRzoguExYJuQ-6bRWmoDK0kNyFOOCMQAloEPex2GunTVUu4oOvPtA11jvdE0fgq_WZivo0yY2uIzUOtq8IX2x0XgXW1W4BudBN9hmg1-trJv_wZNgdX1Ji6Lo0leLddU66Kp4Qg5muo54-nOPyfPN9WRwm9yNh8Wgf5cYDrlITJ4BTDM1zY02ijPJZC4YoJE8V0pJw9VU9CQi6wFPFSK2NuMiy0ylZ1jxY3K-610F_77G2JQLvw7tZ7EEKVMGqez1WirZUSb4GAPOylWwSx02JbByu2r5u2q5XbXlr3b8p61x8z9c9oejtD98HN-PQHynvwDKNn3U</recordid><startdate>201407</startdate><enddate>201407</enddate><creator>Baldock, Jon O.</creator><creator>Hedtcke, Janet L.</creator><creator>Posner, Joshua L.</creator><creator>Hall, John A.</creator><general>The American Society of Agronomy, Inc</general><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201407</creationdate><title>Organic and Conventional Production Systems in the Wisconsin Integrated Cropping Systems Trial: III. Yield Trends</title><author>Baldock, Jon O. ; Hedtcke, Janet L. ; Posner, Joshua L. ; Hall, John A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3174-c7611b69b7cac9305057401ec5379995c39b485ee081329eee79903466cdafed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Cropping systems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baldock, Jon O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hedtcke, Janet L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Posner, Joshua L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, John A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baldock, Jon O.</au><au>Hedtcke, Janet L.</au><au>Posner, Joshua L.</au><au>Hall, John A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Organic and Conventional Production Systems in the Wisconsin Integrated Cropping Systems Trial: III. Yield Trends</atitle><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle><date>2014-07</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>106</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1509</spage><epage>1522</epage><pages>1509-1522</pages><issn>0002-1962</issn><eissn>1435-0645</eissn><abstract>The Wisconsin Integrated Cropping Systems Trial (WICST) at Arlington, WI, compared five production philosophies in place of fixed treatments, which can be problematic, during 1990 to 2012. Corn (Zea mays L.) was the test crop common to the five cropping systems. All five cropping systems produced positive, average corn yield trends ranging from 0.1 to 0.2 Mg ha−1 yr−1. The overall rates in three conventional systems exceeded those in two organic systems; but the systems nearly equalized when better technology was introduced in the organic systems. Genetic engineering did not accelerate yield improvements. Hence the difference between conventional and organic systems has been largely due to the available technology, not agroecological factors. The yield advantage for corn following alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) vs. continuous corn (the rotation effect) was 1.47 ± 0.38 Mg ha−1 with no linear or quadratic trends and with the largest values occurring in years with stresses that hindered corn development. Although all five cropping systems produced positive yield trends across two decades, that did not prove they were sustainable over the longer term. There was no clear advantage for either organic or conventional systems in regard to sustainability so the selection process should tailor the cropping system to the individual farm. The resulting picture is a dynamic agriculture with each cropping system encountering and solving challenges. Furthermore, it shows the benefits of long‐term, cropping systems trials in providing base line data, monitoring time‐trends, evaluating new technology, and examining sustainability issues.</abstract><cop>Madison</cop><pub>The American Society of Agronomy, Inc</pub><doi>10.2134/agronj14.0004</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-1962 |
ispartof | Agronomy journal, 2014-07, Vol.106 (4), p.1509-1522 |
issn | 0002-1962 1435-0645 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1552012588 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Cropping systems |
title | Organic and Conventional Production Systems in the Wisconsin Integrated Cropping Systems Trial: III. Yield Trends |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T21%3A29%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Organic%20and%20Conventional%20Production%20Systems%20in%20the%20Wisconsin%20Integrated%20Cropping%20Systems%20Trial:%20III.%20Yield%20Trends&rft.jtitle=Agronomy%20journal&rft.au=Baldock,%20Jon%20O.&rft.date=2014-07&rft.volume=106&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1509&rft.epage=1522&rft.pages=1509-1522&rft.issn=0002-1962&rft.eissn=1435-0645&rft_id=info:doi/10.2134/agronj14.0004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3396522571%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1552012588&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |