Stress Intensity Factor vs. Transversal Deflection - How to Determine the Damage Severity?

This article compare two methods to determine the severity of a damage occurring in cantilever; the first method is well-known in the literature and base on an approach from fracture mechanics, while the second is contrived by the authors and base on the transversal deflection under small loads. Fir...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Romanian Journal of Acoustics and Vibration 2014-01, Vol.11 (1), p.25
Hauptverfasser: Gillich, Gilbert-Rainer, Minda, Andrea Amalia, Praisach, Zeno-Iosif, Protocsil, Carla
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 25
container_title Romanian Journal of Acoustics and Vibration
container_volume 11
creator Gillich, Gilbert-Rainer
Minda, Andrea Amalia
Praisach, Zeno-Iosif
Protocsil, Carla
description This article compare two methods to determine the severity of a damage occurring in cantilever; the first method is well-known in the literature and base on an approach from fracture mechanics, while the second is contrived by the authors and base on the transversal deflection under small loads. First, this article demonstrate the relation existing between the stiffness reduction due to damage (ie the value of the transversal deflection) and the change of the natural frequencies, exemplified for three shapes of the transversal cross-section. It is proofed that the relation is valid for all three cases, square, hexagon and circle, the damage depth being accurate determined. Afterwards, the results are compared with that provided by numerous researchers, which used the fracture mechanics approach; a good concordance can be found, with the mention that the method developed by the authors is more accurate. This is justified by the fact that their method does not introduce empirical relations, being based on the formulized physical phenomena alone.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1551389403</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3393743121</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p183t-96aea21fc83bf83f5e2596970c07c36041af0220561d41f4de45bff2b9b187d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj81KAzEYRYMoONS-Q8B1JP-TrERaawsFF2033ZTMzBedMk1qklZ8ewd0deHAPZd7gyquKSdUKHaLKqaMJDU38h5Ncz5SSrnV0lhZof2mJMgZr0KBkPvygxeuLTHha37C2-RCvkLKbsBz8AO0pY8BE7yM37jEkRVIpz4ALp-A5-7kPgBvYGyMoucHdOfdkGH6nxO0W7xuZ0uyfn9bzV7W5MyMKMRqB44z3xrReCO8Aq6stjVtad0KTSVznnJOlWadZF52IFXjPW9sw0zdSTFBj3_ec4pfF8jlcIyXFMbJA1OKifEnFeIXAYBPfw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1551389403</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stress Intensity Factor vs. Transversal Deflection - How to Determine the Damage Severity?</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Gillich, Gilbert-Rainer ; Minda, Andrea Amalia ; Praisach, Zeno-Iosif ; Protocsil, Carla</creator><creatorcontrib>Gillich, Gilbert-Rainer ; Minda, Andrea Amalia ; Praisach, Zeno-Iosif ; Protocsil, Carla</creatorcontrib><description>This article compare two methods to determine the severity of a damage occurring in cantilever; the first method is well-known in the literature and base on an approach from fracture mechanics, while the second is contrived by the authors and base on the transversal deflection under small loads. First, this article demonstrate the relation existing between the stiffness reduction due to damage (ie the value of the transversal deflection) and the change of the natural frequencies, exemplified for three shapes of the transversal cross-section. It is proofed that the relation is valid for all three cases, square, hexagon and circle, the damage depth being accurate determined. Afterwards, the results are compared with that provided by numerous researchers, which used the fracture mechanics approach; a good concordance can be found, with the mention that the method developed by the authors is more accurate. This is justified by the fact that their method does not introduce empirical relations, being based on the formulized physical phenomena alone.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1584-7284</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2602-0351</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bucharest: Romanian Acoustic Society</publisher><ispartof>Romanian Journal of Acoustics and Vibration, 2014-01, Vol.11 (1), p.25</ispartof><rights>Copyright Romanian Acoustic Society 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gillich, Gilbert-Rainer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minda, Andrea Amalia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Praisach, Zeno-Iosif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Protocsil, Carla</creatorcontrib><title>Stress Intensity Factor vs. Transversal Deflection - How to Determine the Damage Severity?</title><title>Romanian Journal of Acoustics and Vibration</title><description>This article compare two methods to determine the severity of a damage occurring in cantilever; the first method is well-known in the literature and base on an approach from fracture mechanics, while the second is contrived by the authors and base on the transversal deflection under small loads. First, this article demonstrate the relation existing between the stiffness reduction due to damage (ie the value of the transversal deflection) and the change of the natural frequencies, exemplified for three shapes of the transversal cross-section. It is proofed that the relation is valid for all three cases, square, hexagon and circle, the damage depth being accurate determined. Afterwards, the results are compared with that provided by numerous researchers, which used the fracture mechanics approach; a good concordance can be found, with the mention that the method developed by the authors is more accurate. This is justified by the fact that their method does not introduce empirical relations, being based on the formulized physical phenomena alone.</description><issn>1584-7284</issn><issn>2602-0351</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNotj81KAzEYRYMoONS-Q8B1JP-TrERaawsFF2033ZTMzBedMk1qklZ8ewd0deHAPZd7gyquKSdUKHaLKqaMJDU38h5Ncz5SSrnV0lhZof2mJMgZr0KBkPvygxeuLTHha37C2-RCvkLKbsBz8AO0pY8BE7yM37jEkRVIpz4ALp-A5-7kPgBvYGyMoucHdOfdkGH6nxO0W7xuZ0uyfn9bzV7W5MyMKMRqB44z3xrReCO8Aq6stjVtad0KTSVznnJOlWadZF52IFXjPW9sw0zdSTFBj3_ec4pfF8jlcIyXFMbJA1OKifEnFeIXAYBPfw</recordid><startdate>20140101</startdate><enddate>20140101</enddate><creator>Gillich, Gilbert-Rainer</creator><creator>Minda, Andrea Amalia</creator><creator>Praisach, Zeno-Iosif</creator><creator>Protocsil, Carla</creator><general>Romanian Acoustic Society</general><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140101</creationdate><title>Stress Intensity Factor vs. Transversal Deflection - How to Determine the Damage Severity?</title><author>Gillich, Gilbert-Rainer ; Minda, Andrea Amalia ; Praisach, Zeno-Iosif ; Protocsil, Carla</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p183t-96aea21fc83bf83f5e2596970c07c36041af0220561d41f4de45bff2b9b187d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gillich, Gilbert-Rainer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minda, Andrea Amalia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Praisach, Zeno-Iosif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Protocsil, Carla</creatorcontrib><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>Romanian Journal of Acoustics and Vibration</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gillich, Gilbert-Rainer</au><au>Minda, Andrea Amalia</au><au>Praisach, Zeno-Iosif</au><au>Protocsil, Carla</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stress Intensity Factor vs. Transversal Deflection - How to Determine the Damage Severity?</atitle><jtitle>Romanian Journal of Acoustics and Vibration</jtitle><date>2014-01-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>25</spage><pages>25-</pages><issn>1584-7284</issn><eissn>2602-0351</eissn><abstract>This article compare two methods to determine the severity of a damage occurring in cantilever; the first method is well-known in the literature and base on an approach from fracture mechanics, while the second is contrived by the authors and base on the transversal deflection under small loads. First, this article demonstrate the relation existing between the stiffness reduction due to damage (ie the value of the transversal deflection) and the change of the natural frequencies, exemplified for three shapes of the transversal cross-section. It is proofed that the relation is valid for all three cases, square, hexagon and circle, the damage depth being accurate determined. Afterwards, the results are compared with that provided by numerous researchers, which used the fracture mechanics approach; a good concordance can be found, with the mention that the method developed by the authors is more accurate. This is justified by the fact that their method does not introduce empirical relations, being based on the formulized physical phenomena alone.</abstract><cop>Bucharest</cop><pub>Romanian Acoustic Society</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1584-7284
ispartof Romanian Journal of Acoustics and Vibration, 2014-01, Vol.11 (1), p.25
issn 1584-7284
2602-0351
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1551389403
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
title Stress Intensity Factor vs. Transversal Deflection - How to Determine the Damage Severity?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T10%3A16%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stress%20Intensity%20Factor%20vs.%20Transversal%20Deflection%20-%20How%20to%20Determine%20the%20Damage%20Severity?&rft.jtitle=Romanian%20Journal%20of%20Acoustics%20and%20Vibration&rft.au=Gillich,%20Gilbert-Rainer&rft.date=2014-01-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=25&rft.pages=25-&rft.issn=1584-7284&rft.eissn=2602-0351&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3393743121%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1551389403&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true