Decision-Analytic Approach for Water Sustainability Definition: A Higher Education Case Study

ABSTRACT The purpose of this paper is to describe the development of a multi‐criteria decision analysis approach that can be used to circumscribe the definition of sustainability within an organization or institution with multiple operational divisions. Although our overall definition of sustainabil...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of multi-criteria decision analysis 2014-05, Vol.21 (3-4), p.125-138
Hauptverfasser: Francis, Royce A., Reyes-Jones, Cassandra
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 138
container_issue 3-4
container_start_page 125
container_title Journal of multi-criteria decision analysis
container_volume 21
creator Francis, Royce A.
Reyes-Jones, Cassandra
description ABSTRACT The purpose of this paper is to describe the development of a multi‐criteria decision analysis approach that can be used to circumscribe the definition of sustainability within an organization or institution with multiple operational divisions. Although our overall definition of sustainability is a process, the George Washington University (GW) definition of water sustainability is articulated through construction of an objective‐value hierarchy representing GW's strategic objectives and articulation of strength of preference among the attributes in that hierarchy. This study used multi‐criteria decision analysis methods, including structured interviews with four individual stakeholders and swing weighting. Three findings are of note. First, our stakeholders' thinking about their objectives was greatly influenced by perceived constraints and mandatory obligations on institutional performance implied by contracts or tradition. Second, in considering the trade‐off weights obtained from the swing‐weighting portion of the value assessment, all stakeholders placed similar emphasis on each of the fundamental objectives. Third, because of the decentralized nature of the university, the process through which the value assessment will be achieved must be transparent and accepted by each of the stakeholders supporting sustainability decisions. This case study illustrates a decision‐analytic sustainability approach that may be applied to large‐scale infrastructure systems, stakeholder engagement and negotiation in sustainability investments or alternatives assessments. Although the commitment to reduce climate impacts has been widespread, there have been fewer publicly announced water initiatives at the university level. At the university level, GW is only one of a handful of universities with a cohesive, visible, water plan. In addition, we demonstrate an approach in which explicit structuring of fundamental sustainability objectives may increase transparency for sustainability definition construction. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/mcda.1512
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1549946320</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3388875561</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3712-7292e21bc0bc1ee24255beaaab6d590a945a3b4ee90c9e5c823993f1626623e93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kF9LwzAUxYMoOKcPfoOAz3X52y6-lW5uwtSHTQoDCWmausyunU2K9tvbMvHpHi7nd7nnAHCL0T1GiEwOOlf3mGNyBkYYCRFgGqLzQfMoEASzS3Dl3B4hNOWUjcD7zGjrbF0FcaXKzlsN4-OxqZXewaJuYKq8aeC6dV7ZSmW2tL6DM1PYyvqeeoAxXNqPXe-Z561Www4myhm49m3eXYOLQpXO3PzNMXh7nG-SZbB6XTwl8SrQNMIkiIgghuBMo0xjYwgjnGdGKZWFORdICcYVzZgxAmlhuJ4SKgQtcEjCkFAj6Bjcne72n3-1xnm5r9umD-Qk5kwIFlKCetfk5Pq2penksbEH1XQSIzlUJ4fq5FCdfE5m8SB6IjgR1nnz80-o5lOGEY24TF8WMmUh29B0K7f0FyTncjA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1549946320</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Decision-Analytic Approach for Water Sustainability Definition: A Higher Education Case Study</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Francis, Royce A. ; Reyes-Jones, Cassandra</creator><creatorcontrib>Francis, Royce A. ; Reyes-Jones, Cassandra</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT The purpose of this paper is to describe the development of a multi‐criteria decision analysis approach that can be used to circumscribe the definition of sustainability within an organization or institution with multiple operational divisions. Although our overall definition of sustainability is a process, the George Washington University (GW) definition of water sustainability is articulated through construction of an objective‐value hierarchy representing GW's strategic objectives and articulation of strength of preference among the attributes in that hierarchy. This study used multi‐criteria decision analysis methods, including structured interviews with four individual stakeholders and swing weighting. Three findings are of note. First, our stakeholders' thinking about their objectives was greatly influenced by perceived constraints and mandatory obligations on institutional performance implied by contracts or tradition. Second, in considering the trade‐off weights obtained from the swing‐weighting portion of the value assessment, all stakeholders placed similar emphasis on each of the fundamental objectives. Third, because of the decentralized nature of the university, the process through which the value assessment will be achieved must be transparent and accepted by each of the stakeholders supporting sustainability decisions. This case study illustrates a decision‐analytic sustainability approach that may be applied to large‐scale infrastructure systems, stakeholder engagement and negotiation in sustainability investments or alternatives assessments. Although the commitment to reduce climate impacts has been widespread, there have been fewer publicly announced water initiatives at the university level. At the university level, GW is only one of a handful of universities with a cohesive, visible, water plan. In addition, we demonstrate an approach in which explicit structuring of fundamental sustainability objectives may increase transparency for sustainability definition construction. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1057-9214</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1360</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/mcda.1512</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Case studies ; Colleges &amp; universities ; Decision analysis ; Higher education ; multi-criteria decision analysis ; Multiple criteria decision making ; strategic planning ; Studies ; Sustainability ; sustainability definition ; Sustainability management ; urban water sustainability</subject><ispartof>Journal of multi-criteria decision analysis, 2014-05, Vol.21 (3-4), p.125-138</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Wiley Periodicals Inc. May-Aug 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3712-7292e21bc0bc1ee24255beaaab6d590a945a3b4ee90c9e5c823993f1626623e93</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fmcda.1512$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fmcda.1512$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Francis, Royce A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reyes-Jones, Cassandra</creatorcontrib><title>Decision-Analytic Approach for Water Sustainability Definition: A Higher Education Case Study</title><title>Journal of multi-criteria decision analysis</title><addtitle>J. Multi-Crit. Decis. Anal</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT The purpose of this paper is to describe the development of a multi‐criteria decision analysis approach that can be used to circumscribe the definition of sustainability within an organization or institution with multiple operational divisions. Although our overall definition of sustainability is a process, the George Washington University (GW) definition of water sustainability is articulated through construction of an objective‐value hierarchy representing GW's strategic objectives and articulation of strength of preference among the attributes in that hierarchy. This study used multi‐criteria decision analysis methods, including structured interviews with four individual stakeholders and swing weighting. Three findings are of note. First, our stakeholders' thinking about their objectives was greatly influenced by perceived constraints and mandatory obligations on institutional performance implied by contracts or tradition. Second, in considering the trade‐off weights obtained from the swing‐weighting portion of the value assessment, all stakeholders placed similar emphasis on each of the fundamental objectives. Third, because of the decentralized nature of the university, the process through which the value assessment will be achieved must be transparent and accepted by each of the stakeholders supporting sustainability decisions. This case study illustrates a decision‐analytic sustainability approach that may be applied to large‐scale infrastructure systems, stakeholder engagement and negotiation in sustainability investments or alternatives assessments. Although the commitment to reduce climate impacts has been widespread, there have been fewer publicly announced water initiatives at the university level. At the university level, GW is only one of a handful of universities with a cohesive, visible, water plan. In addition, we demonstrate an approach in which explicit structuring of fundamental sustainability objectives may increase transparency for sustainability definition construction. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Colleges &amp; universities</subject><subject>Decision analysis</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>multi-criteria decision analysis</subject><subject>Multiple criteria decision making</subject><subject>strategic planning</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>sustainability definition</subject><subject>Sustainability management</subject><subject>urban water sustainability</subject><issn>1057-9214</issn><issn>1099-1360</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kF9LwzAUxYMoOKcPfoOAz3X52y6-lW5uwtSHTQoDCWmausyunU2K9tvbMvHpHi7nd7nnAHCL0T1GiEwOOlf3mGNyBkYYCRFgGqLzQfMoEASzS3Dl3B4hNOWUjcD7zGjrbF0FcaXKzlsN4-OxqZXewaJuYKq8aeC6dV7ZSmW2tL6DM1PYyvqeeoAxXNqPXe-Z561Www4myhm49m3eXYOLQpXO3PzNMXh7nG-SZbB6XTwl8SrQNMIkiIgghuBMo0xjYwgjnGdGKZWFORdICcYVzZgxAmlhuJ4SKgQtcEjCkFAj6Bjcne72n3-1xnm5r9umD-Qk5kwIFlKCetfk5Pq2penksbEH1XQSIzlUJ4fq5FCdfE5m8SB6IjgR1nnz80-o5lOGEY24TF8WMmUh29B0K7f0FyTncjA</recordid><startdate>201405</startdate><enddate>201405</enddate><creator>Francis, Royce A.</creator><creator>Reyes-Jones, Cassandra</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201405</creationdate><title>Decision-Analytic Approach for Water Sustainability Definition: A Higher Education Case Study</title><author>Francis, Royce A. ; Reyes-Jones, Cassandra</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3712-7292e21bc0bc1ee24255beaaab6d590a945a3b4ee90c9e5c823993f1626623e93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Colleges &amp; universities</topic><topic>Decision analysis</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>multi-criteria decision analysis</topic><topic>Multiple criteria decision making</topic><topic>strategic planning</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>sustainability definition</topic><topic>Sustainability management</topic><topic>urban water sustainability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Francis, Royce A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reyes-Jones, Cassandra</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><jtitle>Journal of multi-criteria decision analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Francis, Royce A.</au><au>Reyes-Jones, Cassandra</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Decision-Analytic Approach for Water Sustainability Definition: A Higher Education Case Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of multi-criteria decision analysis</jtitle><addtitle>J. Multi-Crit. Decis. Anal</addtitle><date>2014-05</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>125</spage><epage>138</epage><pages>125-138</pages><issn>1057-9214</issn><eissn>1099-1360</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT The purpose of this paper is to describe the development of a multi‐criteria decision analysis approach that can be used to circumscribe the definition of sustainability within an organization or institution with multiple operational divisions. Although our overall definition of sustainability is a process, the George Washington University (GW) definition of water sustainability is articulated through construction of an objective‐value hierarchy representing GW's strategic objectives and articulation of strength of preference among the attributes in that hierarchy. This study used multi‐criteria decision analysis methods, including structured interviews with four individual stakeholders and swing weighting. Three findings are of note. First, our stakeholders' thinking about their objectives was greatly influenced by perceived constraints and mandatory obligations on institutional performance implied by contracts or tradition. Second, in considering the trade‐off weights obtained from the swing‐weighting portion of the value assessment, all stakeholders placed similar emphasis on each of the fundamental objectives. Third, because of the decentralized nature of the university, the process through which the value assessment will be achieved must be transparent and accepted by each of the stakeholders supporting sustainability decisions. This case study illustrates a decision‐analytic sustainability approach that may be applied to large‐scale infrastructure systems, stakeholder engagement and negotiation in sustainability investments or alternatives assessments. Although the commitment to reduce climate impacts has been widespread, there have been fewer publicly announced water initiatives at the university level. At the university level, GW is only one of a handful of universities with a cohesive, visible, water plan. In addition, we demonstrate an approach in which explicit structuring of fundamental sustainability objectives may increase transparency for sustainability definition construction. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/mcda.1512</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1057-9214
ispartof Journal of multi-criteria decision analysis, 2014-05, Vol.21 (3-4), p.125-138
issn 1057-9214
1099-1360
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1549946320
source Wiley Journals; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects Case studies
Colleges & universities
Decision analysis
Higher education
multi-criteria decision analysis
Multiple criteria decision making
strategic planning
Studies
Sustainability
sustainability definition
Sustainability management
urban water sustainability
title Decision-Analytic Approach for Water Sustainability Definition: A Higher Education Case Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T06%3A04%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Decision-Analytic%20Approach%20for%20Water%20Sustainability%20Definition:%20A%20Higher%20Education%20Case%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20multi-criteria%20decision%20analysis&rft.au=Francis,%20Royce%20A.&rft.date=2014-05&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=125&rft.epage=138&rft.pages=125-138&rft.issn=1057-9214&rft.eissn=1099-1360&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/mcda.1512&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E3388875561%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1549946320&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true