Attitudes and Stereotypes of Male and Female Nurses: The Influence of Social Roles and Ambivalent Sexism
Social role theory proposed that the gendered division of labor leads to the development of gender stereotypes that are consistent with the social roles that men and women frequently occupy. According to ambivalent sexism, gender prejudices stem in part from an unequal distribution of power and stat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian journal of behavioural science 2014-07, Vol.46 (3), p.446-455 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 455 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 446 |
container_title | Canadian journal of behavioural science |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Clow, Kimberley A. Ricciardelli, Rosemary Bartfay, Wally J. |
description | Social role theory proposed that the gendered division of labor leads to the development of gender stereotypes that are consistent with the social roles that men and women frequently occupy. According to ambivalent sexism, gender prejudices stem in part from an unequal distribution of power and status. These theories appear particularly relevant to nursing because (a) the majority of nurses in Canada are women, (b) many male nurses report stigmatizing experiences and gender-based occupational barriers, yet (c) men are overrepresented in the higher paying or more "masculine" aspects of the job. Nursing and non-nursing students (N = 145) from a small Canadian university reported their attitudes and stereotypes of male and female nurses. Regression analyses revealed that female nursing students generally reported more positive attitudes and stereotypes of both male and female nurses than did the male or female non-nursing students. Participants scoring higher (vs. lower) in benevolent sexism or lower (vs. higher) in hostile sexism reported more positive attitudes toward female nurses. In addition, participants scoring higher in hostile sexism reported more negative stereotypes of male and female nurses than did participants scoring lower in hostile sexism. The implications of men entering an occupation currently dominated by women, and how that might challenge existing justifications for inequalities in power and status, will be discussed.
La théorie du rôle social suggère que la division du travail selon les genres mène au développement de stéréotypes sexuels qui correspondent aux rôles sociaux que les femmes et les hommes accomplissent fréquemment. Selon le sexisme ambivalent, les préjugés sexistes découlent en partie d'une répartition inégale du pouvoir et du statut social. Ces théories semblent particulièrement pertinentes dans le cas des soins infirmiers, puisque a) la majorité des membres de cette profession au Canada sont des femmes; b) de nombreux infirmiers rapportent des expériences marquantes et des obstacles fondés sur le sexe; c) et pourtant, il y a une surreprésentation d'hommes dans les volets les mieux rémunérés ou les plus « masculins » du domaine. On a demandé à des étudiants en soins infirmiers et dans d'autres domaines (N = 145) d'une petite université au Canada de consigner leurs attitudes et leurs stéréotypes se rapportant aux infirmières et aux infirmiers. Des analyses de régression ont révélé que les étudiantes en soins infirmiers rapp |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/a0034248 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1548797527</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1513355188</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a319t-463e538f20562448712403f52f0734b6af97565340699082d11948b94c865b9c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKvgTxhwI8ho3pO4K8VqoSrYCu5CJk3olOnMmGTE_ntTW7eu7oPvnMs9AFwieIsgKe40hIRiKo7AAIlC5phzeQwGEEKRUwg_TsFZCOs0csboAKxGMVaxX9qQ6WaZzaP1to3bLs2ty551bX_3E7vZtS-9DzbcZ4uVzaaNq3vbGLsD562pdJ29tfXBaLQpq68kaWI2t99V2JyDE6frYC8OdQjeJw-L8VM-e32cjkezXBMkY045sYwIhyHjmFJRIEwhcQw7WBBacu1kwTgjFHIpocBLhCQVpaRGcFZKQ4bgau_b-faztyGqddv7Jp1UiCW_JMfF_xQihDEkRKKu95TxbQjeOtX5aqP9ViGodmmrv7QTerNHdadVF7ZG-1iZlIbpvU8pKFMGRbkiiqYXfwDUln1s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1513355188</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Attitudes and Stereotypes of Male and Female Nurses: The Influence of Social Roles and Ambivalent Sexism</title><source>PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Clow, Kimberley A. ; Ricciardelli, Rosemary ; Bartfay, Wally J.</creator><contributor>Roberts, William</contributor><creatorcontrib>Clow, Kimberley A. ; Ricciardelli, Rosemary ; Bartfay, Wally J. ; Roberts, William</creatorcontrib><description>Social role theory proposed that the gendered division of labor leads to the development of gender stereotypes that are consistent with the social roles that men and women frequently occupy. According to ambivalent sexism, gender prejudices stem in part from an unequal distribution of power and status. These theories appear particularly relevant to nursing because (a) the majority of nurses in Canada are women, (b) many male nurses report stigmatizing experiences and gender-based occupational barriers, yet (c) men are overrepresented in the higher paying or more "masculine" aspects of the job. Nursing and non-nursing students (N = 145) from a small Canadian university reported their attitudes and stereotypes of male and female nurses. Regression analyses revealed that female nursing students generally reported more positive attitudes and stereotypes of both male and female nurses than did the male or female non-nursing students. Participants scoring higher (vs. lower) in benevolent sexism or lower (vs. higher) in hostile sexism reported more positive attitudes toward female nurses. In addition, participants scoring higher in hostile sexism reported more negative stereotypes of male and female nurses than did participants scoring lower in hostile sexism. The implications of men entering an occupation currently dominated by women, and how that might challenge existing justifications for inequalities in power and status, will be discussed.
La théorie du rôle social suggère que la division du travail selon les genres mène au développement de stéréotypes sexuels qui correspondent aux rôles sociaux que les femmes et les hommes accomplissent fréquemment. Selon le sexisme ambivalent, les préjugés sexistes découlent en partie d'une répartition inégale du pouvoir et du statut social. Ces théories semblent particulièrement pertinentes dans le cas des soins infirmiers, puisque a) la majorité des membres de cette profession au Canada sont des femmes; b) de nombreux infirmiers rapportent des expériences marquantes et des obstacles fondés sur le sexe; c) et pourtant, il y a une surreprésentation d'hommes dans les volets les mieux rémunérés ou les plus « masculins » du domaine. On a demandé à des étudiants en soins infirmiers et dans d'autres domaines (N = 145) d'une petite université au Canada de consigner leurs attitudes et leurs stéréotypes se rapportant aux infirmières et aux infirmiers. Des analyses de régression ont révélé que les étudiantes en soins infirmiers rapportaient en général des attitudes et des stéréotypes plus positifs au sujet des infirmiers et des infirmières que les étudiants et les étudiantes d'autres domaines. Les participants ayant les scores les plus élevés au chapitre du sexisme modéré ou les scores les plus bas au chapitre du sexisme hostile rapportaient des attitudes plus favorables à l'égard des infirmières. En outre, les participants ayant les scores les plus élevés en matière de sexisme hostile présentaient des stéréotypes plus négatifs au sujet des infirmiers et des infirmières que les participants ayant les scores les plus bas pour le sexisme hostile. Les répercussions de la présence d'hommes dans une profession où les femmes sont actuellement les plus nombreuses et en quoi cette situation pourrait remettre en question les justifications actuelles des inégalités de pouvoir et de statut social font l'objet d'une discussion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-400X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2669</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/a0034248</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ottawa: Educational Publishing Foundation</publisher><subject>Ambivalence ; Attitudes ; Female ; Human ; Human Sex Differences ; Male ; Nurses ; Roles ; Sex roles ; Sexism ; Social Behavior ; Stereotyped Attitudes ; Studies ; Theories</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of behavioural science, 2014-07, Vol.46 (3), p.446-455</ispartof><rights>2014 Canadian Psychological Association</rights><rights>2014, Canadian Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright Canadian Psychological Association Jul 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a319t-463e538f20562448712403f52f0734b6af97565340699082d11948b94c865b9c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Roberts, William</contributor><creatorcontrib>Clow, Kimberley A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ricciardelli, Rosemary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartfay, Wally J.</creatorcontrib><title>Attitudes and Stereotypes of Male and Female Nurses: The Influence of Social Roles and Ambivalent Sexism</title><title>Canadian journal of behavioural science</title><description>Social role theory proposed that the gendered division of labor leads to the development of gender stereotypes that are consistent with the social roles that men and women frequently occupy. According to ambivalent sexism, gender prejudices stem in part from an unequal distribution of power and status. These theories appear particularly relevant to nursing because (a) the majority of nurses in Canada are women, (b) many male nurses report stigmatizing experiences and gender-based occupational barriers, yet (c) men are overrepresented in the higher paying or more "masculine" aspects of the job. Nursing and non-nursing students (N = 145) from a small Canadian university reported their attitudes and stereotypes of male and female nurses. Regression analyses revealed that female nursing students generally reported more positive attitudes and stereotypes of both male and female nurses than did the male or female non-nursing students. Participants scoring higher (vs. lower) in benevolent sexism or lower (vs. higher) in hostile sexism reported more positive attitudes toward female nurses. In addition, participants scoring higher in hostile sexism reported more negative stereotypes of male and female nurses than did participants scoring lower in hostile sexism. The implications of men entering an occupation currently dominated by women, and how that might challenge existing justifications for inequalities in power and status, will be discussed.
La théorie du rôle social suggère que la division du travail selon les genres mène au développement de stéréotypes sexuels qui correspondent aux rôles sociaux que les femmes et les hommes accomplissent fréquemment. Selon le sexisme ambivalent, les préjugés sexistes découlent en partie d'une répartition inégale du pouvoir et du statut social. Ces théories semblent particulièrement pertinentes dans le cas des soins infirmiers, puisque a) la majorité des membres de cette profession au Canada sont des femmes; b) de nombreux infirmiers rapportent des expériences marquantes et des obstacles fondés sur le sexe; c) et pourtant, il y a une surreprésentation d'hommes dans les volets les mieux rémunérés ou les plus « masculins » du domaine. On a demandé à des étudiants en soins infirmiers et dans d'autres domaines (N = 145) d'une petite université au Canada de consigner leurs attitudes et leurs stéréotypes se rapportant aux infirmières et aux infirmiers. Des analyses de régression ont révélé que les étudiantes en soins infirmiers rapportaient en général des attitudes et des stéréotypes plus positifs au sujet des infirmiers et des infirmières que les étudiants et les étudiantes d'autres domaines. Les participants ayant les scores les plus élevés au chapitre du sexisme modéré ou les scores les plus bas au chapitre du sexisme hostile rapportaient des attitudes plus favorables à l'égard des infirmières. En outre, les participants ayant les scores les plus élevés en matière de sexisme hostile présentaient des stéréotypes plus négatifs au sujet des infirmiers et des infirmières que les participants ayant les scores les plus bas pour le sexisme hostile. Les répercussions de la présence d'hommes dans une profession où les femmes sont actuellement les plus nombreuses et en quoi cette situation pourrait remettre en question les justifications actuelles des inégalités de pouvoir et de statut social font l'objet d'une discussion.</description><subject>Ambivalence</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Human Sex Differences</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Roles</subject><subject>Sex roles</subject><subject>Sexism</subject><subject>Social Behavior</subject><subject>Stereotyped Attitudes</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Theories</subject><issn>0008-400X</issn><issn>1879-2669</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKvgTxhwI8ho3pO4K8VqoSrYCu5CJk3olOnMmGTE_ntTW7eu7oPvnMs9AFwieIsgKe40hIRiKo7AAIlC5phzeQwGEEKRUwg_TsFZCOs0csboAKxGMVaxX9qQ6WaZzaP1to3bLs2ty551bX_3E7vZtS-9DzbcZ4uVzaaNq3vbGLsD562pdJ29tfXBaLQpq68kaWI2t99V2JyDE6frYC8OdQjeJw-L8VM-e32cjkezXBMkY045sYwIhyHjmFJRIEwhcQw7WBBacu1kwTgjFHIpocBLhCQVpaRGcFZKQ4bgau_b-faztyGqddv7Jp1UiCW_JMfF_xQihDEkRKKu95TxbQjeOtX5aqP9ViGodmmrv7QTerNHdadVF7ZG-1iZlIbpvU8pKFMGRbkiiqYXfwDUln1s</recordid><startdate>20140701</startdate><enddate>20140701</enddate><creator>Clow, Kimberley A.</creator><creator>Ricciardelli, Rosemary</creator><creator>Bartfay, Wally J.</creator><general>Educational Publishing Foundation</general><general>Canadian Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>POGQB</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRQQA</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140701</creationdate><title>Attitudes and Stereotypes of Male and Female Nurses: The Influence of Social Roles and Ambivalent Sexism</title><author>Clow, Kimberley A. ; Ricciardelli, Rosemary ; Bartfay, Wally J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a319t-463e538f20562448712403f52f0734b6af97565340699082d11948b94c865b9c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Ambivalence</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Human Sex Differences</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Roles</topic><topic>Sex roles</topic><topic>Sexism</topic><topic>Social Behavior</topic><topic>Stereotyped Attitudes</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Theories</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clow, Kimberley A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ricciardelli, Rosemary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartfay, Wally J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PsycArticles (via ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>CBCA Reference & Current Events</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Sociology & Social Sciences Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of behavioural science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clow, Kimberley A.</au><au>Ricciardelli, Rosemary</au><au>Bartfay, Wally J.</au><au>Roberts, William</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Attitudes and Stereotypes of Male and Female Nurses: The Influence of Social Roles and Ambivalent Sexism</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of behavioural science</jtitle><date>2014-07-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>446</spage><epage>455</epage><pages>446-455</pages><issn>0008-400X</issn><eissn>1879-2669</eissn><abstract>Social role theory proposed that the gendered division of labor leads to the development of gender stereotypes that are consistent with the social roles that men and women frequently occupy. According to ambivalent sexism, gender prejudices stem in part from an unequal distribution of power and status. These theories appear particularly relevant to nursing because (a) the majority of nurses in Canada are women, (b) many male nurses report stigmatizing experiences and gender-based occupational barriers, yet (c) men are overrepresented in the higher paying or more "masculine" aspects of the job. Nursing and non-nursing students (N = 145) from a small Canadian university reported their attitudes and stereotypes of male and female nurses. Regression analyses revealed that female nursing students generally reported more positive attitudes and stereotypes of both male and female nurses than did the male or female non-nursing students. Participants scoring higher (vs. lower) in benevolent sexism or lower (vs. higher) in hostile sexism reported more positive attitudes toward female nurses. In addition, participants scoring higher in hostile sexism reported more negative stereotypes of male and female nurses than did participants scoring lower in hostile sexism. The implications of men entering an occupation currently dominated by women, and how that might challenge existing justifications for inequalities in power and status, will be discussed.
La théorie du rôle social suggère que la division du travail selon les genres mène au développement de stéréotypes sexuels qui correspondent aux rôles sociaux que les femmes et les hommes accomplissent fréquemment. Selon le sexisme ambivalent, les préjugés sexistes découlent en partie d'une répartition inégale du pouvoir et du statut social. Ces théories semblent particulièrement pertinentes dans le cas des soins infirmiers, puisque a) la majorité des membres de cette profession au Canada sont des femmes; b) de nombreux infirmiers rapportent des expériences marquantes et des obstacles fondés sur le sexe; c) et pourtant, il y a une surreprésentation d'hommes dans les volets les mieux rémunérés ou les plus « masculins » du domaine. On a demandé à des étudiants en soins infirmiers et dans d'autres domaines (N = 145) d'une petite université au Canada de consigner leurs attitudes et leurs stéréotypes se rapportant aux infirmières et aux infirmiers. Des analyses de régression ont révélé que les étudiantes en soins infirmiers rapportaient en général des attitudes et des stéréotypes plus positifs au sujet des infirmiers et des infirmières que les étudiants et les étudiantes d'autres domaines. Les participants ayant les scores les plus élevés au chapitre du sexisme modéré ou les scores les plus bas au chapitre du sexisme hostile rapportaient des attitudes plus favorables à l'égard des infirmières. En outre, les participants ayant les scores les plus élevés en matière de sexisme hostile présentaient des stéréotypes plus négatifs au sujet des infirmiers et des infirmières que les participants ayant les scores les plus bas pour le sexisme hostile. Les répercussions de la présence d'hommes dans une profession où les femmes sont actuellement les plus nombreuses et en quoi cette situation pourrait remettre en question les justifications actuelles des inégalités de pouvoir et de statut social font l'objet d'une discussion.</abstract><cop>Ottawa</cop><pub>Educational Publishing Foundation</pub><doi>10.1037/a0034248</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0008-400X |
ispartof | Canadian journal of behavioural science, 2014-07, Vol.46 (3), p.446-455 |
issn | 0008-400X 1879-2669 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1548797527 |
source | PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Ambivalence Attitudes Female Human Human Sex Differences Male Nurses Roles Sex roles Sexism Social Behavior Stereotyped Attitudes Studies Theories |
title | Attitudes and Stereotypes of Male and Female Nurses: The Influence of Social Roles and Ambivalent Sexism |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T15%3A03%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Attitudes%20and%20Stereotypes%20of%20Male%20and%20Female%20Nurses:%20The%20Influence%20of%20Social%20Roles%20and%20Ambivalent%20Sexism&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20behavioural%20science&rft.au=Clow,%20Kimberley%20A.&rft.date=2014-07-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=446&rft.epage=455&rft.pages=446-455&rft.issn=0008-400X&rft.eissn=1879-2669&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/a0034248&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1513355188%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1513355188&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |