CONTACT FORCE GUIDED VERSUS MAGNETICALLY DIRECTED ABLATION OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION: A CASE CONTROL STUDY
Methods Forty patients were studied. 20 consecutive patients (14 male, 65±8 years) underwent antral RFC pulmonary vein isolation (PVAI) (40-50W, 48°C, 15-20 s, 30mL/min flow) for persistent (14) or paroxysmal (6) AF guided by CF (Tacticath, Endosense). Patients were matched to 20 patients treated by...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2012-03, Vol.59 (13), p.E592-E592 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | E592 |
---|---|
container_issue | 13 |
container_start_page | E592 |
container_title | Journal of the American College of Cardiology |
container_volume | 59 |
creator | Noelker, Georg Gutleben, Klaus Heintze, Johannes Muntean, Bogdan Horstkotte, Dieter Vogt, Juergen |
description | Methods Forty patients were studied. 20 consecutive patients (14 male, 65±8 years) underwent antral RFC pulmonary vein isolation (PVAI) (40-50W, 48°C, 15-20 s, 30mL/min flow) for persistent (14) or paroxysmal (6) AF guided by CF (Tacticath, Endosense). Patients were matched to 20 patients treated by magnetically directed (Stereotaxis Niobe) irrigated gold-tip (Trignum G, Biotronik) (MDG) ablation (group 2) at a similar energy protocol for PVAI. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0735-1097(12)60593-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1547351870</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0735109712605932</els_id><sourcerecordid>3380315321</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2322-ddf54dfd5ff672c6c1f3a54195256b02d363ee9b7dad94ef9a4c43612e107d5d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUhoMoOKc_QQh4oxfVfDTt6oWSdd0s1BXaTthV6JJUOuc6m03Yv7ddRcEbrw7kvOc5Jw8AlxjdYoSduxS5lFkYee41JjcOYh61yBHoYcYGFmWeewx6P5FTcGbMEiHkDLDXA69-PM24n8FxnPgBnMzCUTCCL0GSzlL4zCfTIAt9HkVzOAqTwM-aJh9GPAvjKYzHkGdJyCM4DodJGHXP95BDn6cBbMlJHME0m43m5-CkyFdGX3zXPpiNg8x_sqJ40i6wJKGEWEoVzFaFYkXhuEQ6Ehc0Zzb2GGHOAhFFHaq1t3BVrjxbF15uS5s6mGiMXMUU7YOrjrupq4-dNluxrHb1ulkpMLMbCXjgoibFupSsK2NqXYhNXb7n9V5gJFqn4uBUtMIEJuLgVJBm7rGb080XPktdCyNLvZZalbWWW6Gq8l_Cwx-CXJXrUuarN73X5vdYYYhAHaRlYHIgEPoFfUaJTQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1547351870</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>CONTACT FORCE GUIDED VERSUS MAGNETICALLY DIRECTED ABLATION OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION: A CASE CONTROL STUDY</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Noelker, Georg ; Gutleben, Klaus ; Heintze, Johannes ; Muntean, Bogdan ; Horstkotte, Dieter ; Vogt, Juergen</creator><creatorcontrib>Noelker, Georg ; Gutleben, Klaus ; Heintze, Johannes ; Muntean, Bogdan ; Horstkotte, Dieter ; Vogt, Juergen</creatorcontrib><description>Methods Forty patients were studied. 20 consecutive patients (14 male, 65±8 years) underwent antral RFC pulmonary vein isolation (PVAI) (40-50W, 48°C, 15-20 s, 30mL/min flow) for persistent (14) or paroxysmal (6) AF guided by CF (Tacticath, Endosense). Patients were matched to 20 patients treated by magnetically directed (Stereotaxis Niobe) irrigated gold-tip (Trignum G, Biotronik) (MDG) ablation (group 2) at a similar energy protocol for PVAI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-1097</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-3597</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(12)60593-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Cardiac arrhythmia ; Cardiology ; Cardiovascular ; Internal Medicine ; Medical treatment</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2012-03, Vol.59 (13), p.E592-E592</ispartof><rights>American College of Cardiology Foundation</rights><rights>2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Mar 27, 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(12)60593-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Noelker, Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutleben, Klaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heintze, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muntean, Bogdan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horstkotte, Dieter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogt, Juergen</creatorcontrib><title>CONTACT FORCE GUIDED VERSUS MAGNETICALLY DIRECTED ABLATION OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION: A CASE CONTROL STUDY</title><title>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</title><description>Methods Forty patients were studied. 20 consecutive patients (14 male, 65±8 years) underwent antral RFC pulmonary vein isolation (PVAI) (40-50W, 48°C, 15-20 s, 30mL/min flow) for persistent (14) or paroxysmal (6) AF guided by CF (Tacticath, Endosense). Patients were matched to 20 patients treated by magnetically directed (Stereotaxis Niobe) irrigated gold-tip (Trignum G, Biotronik) (MDG) ablation (group 2) at a similar energy protocol for PVAI.</description><subject>Cardiac arrhythmia</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Cardiovascular</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><issn>0735-1097</issn><issn>1558-3597</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUhoMoOKc_QQh4oxfVfDTt6oWSdd0s1BXaTthV6JJUOuc6m03Yv7ddRcEbrw7kvOc5Jw8AlxjdYoSduxS5lFkYee41JjcOYh61yBHoYcYGFmWeewx6P5FTcGbMEiHkDLDXA69-PM24n8FxnPgBnMzCUTCCL0GSzlL4zCfTIAt9HkVzOAqTwM-aJh9GPAvjKYzHkGdJyCM4DodJGHXP95BDn6cBbMlJHME0m43m5-CkyFdGX3zXPpiNg8x_sqJ40i6wJKGEWEoVzFaFYkXhuEQ6Ehc0Zzb2GGHOAhFFHaq1t3BVrjxbF15uS5s6mGiMXMUU7YOrjrupq4-dNluxrHb1ulkpMLMbCXjgoibFupSsK2NqXYhNXb7n9V5gJFqn4uBUtMIEJuLgVJBm7rGb080XPktdCyNLvZZalbWWW6Gq8l_Cwx-CXJXrUuarN73X5vdYYYhAHaRlYHIgEPoFfUaJTQ</recordid><startdate>20120327</startdate><enddate>20120327</enddate><creator>Noelker, Georg</creator><creator>Gutleben, Klaus</creator><creator>Heintze, Johannes</creator><creator>Muntean, Bogdan</creator><creator>Horstkotte, Dieter</creator><creator>Vogt, Juergen</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120327</creationdate><title>CONTACT FORCE GUIDED VERSUS MAGNETICALLY DIRECTED ABLATION OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION: A CASE CONTROL STUDY</title><author>Noelker, Georg ; Gutleben, Klaus ; Heintze, Johannes ; Muntean, Bogdan ; Horstkotte, Dieter ; Vogt, Juergen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2322-ddf54dfd5ff672c6c1f3a54195256b02d363ee9b7dad94ef9a4c43612e107d5d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Cardiac arrhythmia</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Cardiovascular</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Noelker, Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutleben, Klaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heintze, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muntean, Bogdan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horstkotte, Dieter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogt, Juergen</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Noelker, Georg</au><au>Gutleben, Klaus</au><au>Heintze, Johannes</au><au>Muntean, Bogdan</au><au>Horstkotte, Dieter</au><au>Vogt, Juergen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>CONTACT FORCE GUIDED VERSUS MAGNETICALLY DIRECTED ABLATION OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION: A CASE CONTROL STUDY</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</jtitle><date>2012-03-27</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>E592</spage><epage>E592</epage><pages>E592-E592</pages><issn>0735-1097</issn><eissn>1558-3597</eissn><abstract>Methods Forty patients were studied. 20 consecutive patients (14 male, 65±8 years) underwent antral RFC pulmonary vein isolation (PVAI) (40-50W, 48°C, 15-20 s, 30mL/min flow) for persistent (14) or paroxysmal (6) AF guided by CF (Tacticath, Endosense). Patients were matched to 20 patients treated by magnetically directed (Stereotaxis Niobe) irrigated gold-tip (Trignum G, Biotronik) (MDG) ablation (group 2) at a similar energy protocol for PVAI.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/S0735-1097(12)60593-2</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0735-1097 |
ispartof | Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2012-03, Vol.59 (13), p.E592-E592 |
issn | 0735-1097 1558-3597 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1547351870 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Cardiac arrhythmia Cardiology Cardiovascular Internal Medicine Medical treatment |
title | CONTACT FORCE GUIDED VERSUS MAGNETICALLY DIRECTED ABLATION OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION: A CASE CONTROL STUDY |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T05%3A04%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=CONTACT%20FORCE%20GUIDED%20VERSUS%20MAGNETICALLY%20DIRECTED%20ABLATION%20OF%20ATRIAL%20FIBRILLATION:%20A%20CASE%20CONTROL%20STUDY&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20College%20of%20Cardiology&rft.au=Noelker,%20Georg&rft.date=2012-03-27&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=E592&rft.epage=E592&rft.pages=E592-E592&rft.issn=0735-1097&rft.eissn=1558-3597&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0735-1097(12)60593-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3380315321%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1547351870&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0735109712605932&rfr_iscdi=true |