Does the patch fit the stoma? A study on peristoma geometry and patch use in laryngectomised patients

Clin. Otolaryngol. 2011, 36, 235–241 Objective:  To determine the geometry of (peri)stomas of laryngectomised patients in relation to patch use. This data will enable improvement of tracheostoma interfaces, specifically addressing patients currently unable to use stoma patches. The low use of Heat‐a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical otolaryngology 2011-06, Vol.36 (3), p.235-241
Hauptverfasser: van der Houwen, E.B., van Kalkeren, T.A., Post, W.J., Hilgers, F.J.M., van der Laan, B.F.A.M., Verkerke, G.J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 241
container_issue 3
container_start_page 235
container_title Clinical otolaryngology
container_volume 36
creator van der Houwen, E.B.
van Kalkeren, T.A.
Post, W.J.
Hilgers, F.J.M.
van der Laan, B.F.A.M.
Verkerke, G.J.
description Clin. Otolaryngol. 2011, 36, 235–241 Objective:  To determine the geometry of (peri)stomas of laryngectomised patients in relation to patch use. This data will enable improvement of tracheostoma interfaces, specifically addressing patients currently unable to use stoma patches. The low use of Heat‐and‐Moisture‐Exchange (HME) filters and (hands‐free) speech valves, although very important to the quality of life of laryngectomised patients, is mainly attributed to poor fit of the adhesive patches to the stoma site. Current patch shapes are not based upon an objective (peri)stoma geometry because this geometry is unknown. Design:  Observational anthropometric study of the (peri)stoma of laryngectomised patients. Setting:  Ten hospitals or institutes in eight countries. Participants:  About 191 laryngectomised patients, at least 1 year post operative. Main outcome measures:  (Peri)stomas were photographed and measured. Patients completed a questionnaire on patch‐use. Concavity of commercially available patches was measured. Results:  In countries with a financial reimbursement system 58% of the patients use patches, compares to only 9% in other countries. Patches stay in situ for an average of 33.3 h. Patch and non‐patch users differ on five out of ten measured geometrical parameters. Most striking differences are that patch users have much shallower peristomas (13 versus 18 mm), and stomas far more parallel to the anterior neck plane. The deepest commercially available patch is only 7 mm deep. Conclusions:  This study provides detailed (peri)stoma geometry data of a divers population, and for the first time in relation to patch‐use. It reveals a serious mismatch between patients and patches. With these data new patches can be developed that could dramatically improve rehabilitation after laryngectomy.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2011.02307.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1545969204</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3377597721</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3797-adb3e7920d7719e1093c4da0b80f3e462053e0f1ed4dc4dc755e62bf4ddd7c1d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkFFLwzAUhYMoOKf_IeBza9KkTfsgMqZuwlAQxb2FrLndWrd2Ji2u_960HXs2LznJOd9NOAhhSnzq1l3hU8ETj_M48gNCqU8CRoR_OEOjk3F-0iK-RFfWFoRwl6IjBI8VWFxvAO9VnW5wltf9ydbVTj3giRONbnFV4j2YvL_Fa6h2UJsWq1IfscYCzku8VaYt15C6WG6hN3Moa3uNLjK1tXBz3Mfo8_npYzr3Fm-zl-lk4aVMJMJTesVAJAHRQtAEKElYyrUiq5hkDHgUkJAByShorp2RijCEKFhlXGstUqrZGN0Oc_em-mnA1rKoGlO6JyUNeZhEbjZ3qXhIpaay1kAm9ybfua9LSmRXqixk15fsupNdqbIvVR4cej-gv_kW2n9zcvo26ZTjvYF3VcLhxCvzLSPBRCi_XmdyGc0WSzJ_lyH7A5GjjYM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1545969204</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does the patch fit the stoma? A study on peristoma geometry and patch use in laryngectomised patients</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>van der Houwen, E.B. ; van Kalkeren, T.A. ; Post, W.J. ; Hilgers, F.J.M. ; van der Laan, B.F.A.M. ; Verkerke, G.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>van der Houwen, E.B. ; van Kalkeren, T.A. ; Post, W.J. ; Hilgers, F.J.M. ; van der Laan, B.F.A.M. ; Verkerke, G.J.</creatorcontrib><description>Clin. Otolaryngol. 2011, 36, 235–241 Objective:  To determine the geometry of (peri)stomas of laryngectomised patients in relation to patch use. This data will enable improvement of tracheostoma interfaces, specifically addressing patients currently unable to use stoma patches. The low use of Heat‐and‐Moisture‐Exchange (HME) filters and (hands‐free) speech valves, although very important to the quality of life of laryngectomised patients, is mainly attributed to poor fit of the adhesive patches to the stoma site. Current patch shapes are not based upon an objective (peri)stoma geometry because this geometry is unknown. Design:  Observational anthropometric study of the (peri)stoma of laryngectomised patients. Setting:  Ten hospitals or institutes in eight countries. Participants:  About 191 laryngectomised patients, at least 1 year post operative. Main outcome measures:  (Peri)stomas were photographed and measured. Patients completed a questionnaire on patch‐use. Concavity of commercially available patches was measured. Results:  In countries with a financial reimbursement system 58% of the patients use patches, compares to only 9% in other countries. Patches stay in situ for an average of 33.3 h. Patch and non‐patch users differ on five out of ten measured geometrical parameters. Most striking differences are that patch users have much shallower peristomas (13 versus 18 mm), and stomas far more parallel to the anterior neck plane. The deepest commercially available patch is only 7 mm deep. Conclusions:  This study provides detailed (peri)stoma geometry data of a divers population, and for the first time in relation to patch‐use. It reveals a serious mismatch between patients and patches. With these data new patches can be developed that could dramatically improve rehabilitation after laryngectomy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1749-4478</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1749-4486</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2011.02307.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Medical research ; Ostomy</subject><ispartof>Clinical otolaryngology, 2011-06, Vol.36 (3), p.235-241</ispartof><rights>2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3797-adb3e7920d7719e1093c4da0b80f3e462053e0f1ed4dc4dc755e62bf4ddd7c1d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3797-adb3e7920d7719e1093c4da0b80f3e462053e0f1ed4dc4dc755e62bf4ddd7c1d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1749-4486.2011.02307.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1749-4486.2011.02307.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>van der Houwen, E.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Kalkeren, T.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Post, W.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hilgers, F.J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Laan, B.F.A.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verkerke, G.J.</creatorcontrib><title>Does the patch fit the stoma? A study on peristoma geometry and patch use in laryngectomised patients</title><title>Clinical otolaryngology</title><description>Clin. Otolaryngol. 2011, 36, 235–241 Objective:  To determine the geometry of (peri)stomas of laryngectomised patients in relation to patch use. This data will enable improvement of tracheostoma interfaces, specifically addressing patients currently unable to use stoma patches. The low use of Heat‐and‐Moisture‐Exchange (HME) filters and (hands‐free) speech valves, although very important to the quality of life of laryngectomised patients, is mainly attributed to poor fit of the adhesive patches to the stoma site. Current patch shapes are not based upon an objective (peri)stoma geometry because this geometry is unknown. Design:  Observational anthropometric study of the (peri)stoma of laryngectomised patients. Setting:  Ten hospitals or institutes in eight countries. Participants:  About 191 laryngectomised patients, at least 1 year post operative. Main outcome measures:  (Peri)stomas were photographed and measured. Patients completed a questionnaire on patch‐use. Concavity of commercially available patches was measured. Results:  In countries with a financial reimbursement system 58% of the patients use patches, compares to only 9% in other countries. Patches stay in situ for an average of 33.3 h. Patch and non‐patch users differ on five out of ten measured geometrical parameters. Most striking differences are that patch users have much shallower peristomas (13 versus 18 mm), and stomas far more parallel to the anterior neck plane. The deepest commercially available patch is only 7 mm deep. Conclusions:  This study provides detailed (peri)stoma geometry data of a divers population, and for the first time in relation to patch‐use. It reveals a serious mismatch between patients and patches. With these data new patches can be developed that could dramatically improve rehabilitation after laryngectomy.</description><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Ostomy</subject><issn>1749-4478</issn><issn>1749-4486</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkFFLwzAUhYMoOKf_IeBza9KkTfsgMqZuwlAQxb2FrLndWrd2Ji2u_960HXs2LznJOd9NOAhhSnzq1l3hU8ETj_M48gNCqU8CRoR_OEOjk3F-0iK-RFfWFoRwl6IjBI8VWFxvAO9VnW5wltf9ydbVTj3giRONbnFV4j2YvL_Fa6h2UJsWq1IfscYCzku8VaYt15C6WG6hN3Moa3uNLjK1tXBz3Mfo8_npYzr3Fm-zl-lk4aVMJMJTesVAJAHRQtAEKElYyrUiq5hkDHgUkJAByShorp2RijCEKFhlXGstUqrZGN0Oc_em-mnA1rKoGlO6JyUNeZhEbjZ3qXhIpaay1kAm9ybfua9LSmRXqixk15fsupNdqbIvVR4cej-gv_kW2n9zcvo26ZTjvYF3VcLhxCvzLSPBRCi_XmdyGc0WSzJ_lyH7A5GjjYM</recordid><startdate>201106</startdate><enddate>201106</enddate><creator>van der Houwen, E.B.</creator><creator>van Kalkeren, T.A.</creator><creator>Post, W.J.</creator><creator>Hilgers, F.J.M.</creator><creator>van der Laan, B.F.A.M.</creator><creator>Verkerke, G.J.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201106</creationdate><title>Does the patch fit the stoma? A study on peristoma geometry and patch use in laryngectomised patients</title><author>van der Houwen, E.B. ; van Kalkeren, T.A. ; Post, W.J. ; Hilgers, F.J.M. ; van der Laan, B.F.A.M. ; Verkerke, G.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3797-adb3e7920d7719e1093c4da0b80f3e462053e0f1ed4dc4dc755e62bf4ddd7c1d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Ostomy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van der Houwen, E.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Kalkeren, T.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Post, W.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hilgers, F.J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Laan, B.F.A.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verkerke, G.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Clinical otolaryngology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van der Houwen, E.B.</au><au>van Kalkeren, T.A.</au><au>Post, W.J.</au><au>Hilgers, F.J.M.</au><au>van der Laan, B.F.A.M.</au><au>Verkerke, G.J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does the patch fit the stoma? A study on peristoma geometry and patch use in laryngectomised patients</atitle><jtitle>Clinical otolaryngology</jtitle><date>2011-06</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>235</spage><epage>241</epage><pages>235-241</pages><issn>1749-4478</issn><eissn>1749-4486</eissn><abstract>Clin. Otolaryngol. 2011, 36, 235–241 Objective:  To determine the geometry of (peri)stomas of laryngectomised patients in relation to patch use. This data will enable improvement of tracheostoma interfaces, specifically addressing patients currently unable to use stoma patches. The low use of Heat‐and‐Moisture‐Exchange (HME) filters and (hands‐free) speech valves, although very important to the quality of life of laryngectomised patients, is mainly attributed to poor fit of the adhesive patches to the stoma site. Current patch shapes are not based upon an objective (peri)stoma geometry because this geometry is unknown. Design:  Observational anthropometric study of the (peri)stoma of laryngectomised patients. Setting:  Ten hospitals or institutes in eight countries. Participants:  About 191 laryngectomised patients, at least 1 year post operative. Main outcome measures:  (Peri)stomas were photographed and measured. Patients completed a questionnaire on patch‐use. Concavity of commercially available patches was measured. Results:  In countries with a financial reimbursement system 58% of the patients use patches, compares to only 9% in other countries. Patches stay in situ for an average of 33.3 h. Patch and non‐patch users differ on five out of ten measured geometrical parameters. Most striking differences are that patch users have much shallower peristomas (13 versus 18 mm), and stomas far more parallel to the anterior neck plane. The deepest commercially available patch is only 7 mm deep. Conclusions:  This study provides detailed (peri)stoma geometry data of a divers population, and for the first time in relation to patch‐use. It reveals a serious mismatch between patients and patches. With these data new patches can be developed that could dramatically improve rehabilitation after laryngectomy.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1749-4486.2011.02307.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1749-4478
ispartof Clinical otolaryngology, 2011-06, Vol.36 (3), p.235-241
issn 1749-4478
1749-4486
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1545969204
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Medical research
Ostomy
title Does the patch fit the stoma? A study on peristoma geometry and patch use in laryngectomised patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T23%3A38%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20the%20patch%20fit%20the%20stoma?%20A%20study%20on%20peristoma%20geometry%20and%20patch%20use%20in%20laryngectomised%20patients&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20otolaryngology&rft.au=van%20der%20Houwen,%20E.B.&rft.date=2011-06&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=235&rft.epage=241&rft.pages=235-241&rft.issn=1749-4478&rft.eissn=1749-4486&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1749-4486.2011.02307.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3377597721%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1545969204&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true