Preempt a Job or Not in EDF Scheduling of Uniprocessor Systems
The earliest-deadline-first (EDF) policy has been widely studied for the scheduling of real-time jobs for its effectiveness and simplicity. However, since each preemption incurs an additional delay to the execution of jobs, the effectiveness of EDF is affected greatly by the underlying preemption po...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on computers 2014-05, Vol.63 (5), p.1197-1206 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1206 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1197 |
container_title | IEEE transactions on computers |
container_volume | 63 |
creator | Jinkyu Lee Shin, Kang G. |
description | The earliest-deadline-first (EDF) policy has been widely studied for the scheduling of real-time jobs for its effectiveness and simplicity. However, since each preemption incurs an additional delay to the execution of jobs, the effectiveness of EDF is affected greatly by the underlying preemption policy that determines if and when a higher-priority job is allowed to preempt a currently executing lower-priority job. To address this problem, we propose a new and better (in meeting job deadlines) preemption policy of EDF, given a non-zero preemption delay. Specifically, we propose a controlled preemption (CP) policy that controls the condition of preempting jobs, whereas existing approaches focus on that of preempted jobs. We define cp-EDF in which the CP policy is applied to EDF, and analyze its schedulability. This schedulability analysis is then utilized to develop an algorithm that assigns the optimal control parameters of cp-EDF. Our in-depth evaluation has demonstrated that cp-EDF with the optimal parameter assignment improves EDF schedulability over existing preemption policies by up to 7.4%. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/TC.2012.279 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1545942944</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>6361382</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>1620041384</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-96cfdfa2dc5cc7567fa9a27a490fce95e511077fd01fb3c610c961814848a0b83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0M9LwzAUB_AgCs7pyaOXgBdBOl_SpG0ugtTNHwwVtp1Dliba0TYzaQ_7782YePD0Lh_e-74vQpcEJoSAuFuWEwqETmgujtCIcJ4nQvDsGI0ASJGIlMEpOgthAwAZBTFC9x_emHbbY4Vf3Ro7j99cj-sOTx9neKG_TDU0dfeJncWrrt56p00IUS12oTdtOEcnVjXBXPzOMVrNpsvyOZm_P72UD_NEp4T1ici0rayileZa5zzLrRKK5ooJsNoIbniMn-e2AmLXqc4IaJGRgrCCFQrWRTpGN4e9McH3YEIv2zpo0zSqM24IksRvgJG0YJFe_6MbN_guppOEMy4YFWyvbg9KexeCN1Zufd0qv5ME5L5LuSzlvksZu4z66qBrY8yfzNIsXqTpD_yybLo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1545942944</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Preempt a Job or Not in EDF Scheduling of Uniprocessor Systems</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Jinkyu Lee ; Shin, Kang G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jinkyu Lee ; Shin, Kang G.</creatorcontrib><description>The earliest-deadline-first (EDF) policy has been widely studied for the scheduling of real-time jobs for its effectiveness and simplicity. However, since each preemption incurs an additional delay to the execution of jobs, the effectiveness of EDF is affected greatly by the underlying preemption policy that determines if and when a higher-priority job is allowed to preempt a currently executing lower-priority job. To address this problem, we propose a new and better (in meeting job deadlines) preemption policy of EDF, given a non-zero preemption delay. Specifically, we propose a controlled preemption (CP) policy that controls the condition of preempting jobs, whereas existing approaches focus on that of preempted jobs. We define cp-EDF in which the CP policy is applied to EDF, and analyze its schedulability. This schedulability analysis is then utilized to develop an algorithm that assigns the optimal control parameters of cp-EDF. Our in-depth evaluation has demonstrated that cp-EDF with the optimal parameter assignment improves EDF schedulability over existing preemption policies by up to 7.4%.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-9340</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-9956</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TC.2012.279</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITCOB4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Algorithm design and analysis ; Algorithms ; Delay ; earliest-deadline-first (EDF) policy ; Meetings ; Optimization ; Policies ; Preempting ; Preemption ; Preemption policy ; Real time ; Real-time systems ; real-time uniprocessor scheduling ; schedulability analysis ; Schedules ; Scheduling ; Scheduling algorithms</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on computers, 2014-05, Vol.63 (5), p.1197-1206</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) May 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-96cfdfa2dc5cc7567fa9a27a490fce95e511077fd01fb3c610c961814848a0b83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-96cfdfa2dc5cc7567fa9a27a490fce95e511077fd01fb3c610c961814848a0b83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6361382$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,792,27903,27904,54736</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6361382$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jinkyu Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Kang G.</creatorcontrib><title>Preempt a Job or Not in EDF Scheduling of Uniprocessor Systems</title><title>IEEE transactions on computers</title><addtitle>TC</addtitle><description>The earliest-deadline-first (EDF) policy has been widely studied for the scheduling of real-time jobs for its effectiveness and simplicity. However, since each preemption incurs an additional delay to the execution of jobs, the effectiveness of EDF is affected greatly by the underlying preemption policy that determines if and when a higher-priority job is allowed to preempt a currently executing lower-priority job. To address this problem, we propose a new and better (in meeting job deadlines) preemption policy of EDF, given a non-zero preemption delay. Specifically, we propose a controlled preemption (CP) policy that controls the condition of preempting jobs, whereas existing approaches focus on that of preempted jobs. We define cp-EDF in which the CP policy is applied to EDF, and analyze its schedulability. This schedulability analysis is then utilized to develop an algorithm that assigns the optimal control parameters of cp-EDF. Our in-depth evaluation has demonstrated that cp-EDF with the optimal parameter assignment improves EDF schedulability over existing preemption policies by up to 7.4%.</description><subject>Algorithm design and analysis</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Delay</subject><subject>earliest-deadline-first (EDF) policy</subject><subject>Meetings</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Policies</subject><subject>Preempting</subject><subject>Preemption</subject><subject>Preemption policy</subject><subject>Real time</subject><subject>Real-time systems</subject><subject>real-time uniprocessor scheduling</subject><subject>schedulability analysis</subject><subject>Schedules</subject><subject>Scheduling</subject><subject>Scheduling algorithms</subject><issn>0018-9340</issn><issn>1557-9956</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0M9LwzAUB_AgCs7pyaOXgBdBOl_SpG0ugtTNHwwVtp1Dliba0TYzaQ_7782YePD0Lh_e-74vQpcEJoSAuFuWEwqETmgujtCIcJ4nQvDsGI0ASJGIlMEpOgthAwAZBTFC9x_emHbbY4Vf3Ro7j99cj-sOTx9neKG_TDU0dfeJncWrrt56p00IUS12oTdtOEcnVjXBXPzOMVrNpsvyOZm_P72UD_NEp4T1ici0rayileZa5zzLrRKK5ooJsNoIbniMn-e2AmLXqc4IaJGRgrCCFQrWRTpGN4e9McH3YEIv2zpo0zSqM24IksRvgJG0YJFe_6MbN_guppOEMy4YFWyvbg9KexeCN1Zufd0qv5ME5L5LuSzlvksZu4z66qBrY8yfzNIsXqTpD_yybLo</recordid><startdate>20140501</startdate><enddate>20140501</enddate><creator>Jinkyu Lee</creator><creator>Shin, Kang G.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140501</creationdate><title>Preempt a Job or Not in EDF Scheduling of Uniprocessor Systems</title><author>Jinkyu Lee ; Shin, Kang G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-96cfdfa2dc5cc7567fa9a27a490fce95e511077fd01fb3c610c961814848a0b83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Algorithm design and analysis</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Delay</topic><topic>earliest-deadline-first (EDF) policy</topic><topic>Meetings</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Policies</topic><topic>Preempting</topic><topic>Preemption</topic><topic>Preemption policy</topic><topic>Real time</topic><topic>Real-time systems</topic><topic>real-time uniprocessor scheduling</topic><topic>schedulability analysis</topic><topic>Schedules</topic><topic>Scheduling</topic><topic>Scheduling algorithms</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jinkyu Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Kang G.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on computers</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jinkyu Lee</au><au>Shin, Kang G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Preempt a Job or Not in EDF Scheduling of Uniprocessor Systems</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on computers</jtitle><stitle>TC</stitle><date>2014-05-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1197</spage><epage>1206</epage><pages>1197-1206</pages><issn>0018-9340</issn><eissn>1557-9956</eissn><coden>ITCOB4</coden><abstract>The earliest-deadline-first (EDF) policy has been widely studied for the scheduling of real-time jobs for its effectiveness and simplicity. However, since each preemption incurs an additional delay to the execution of jobs, the effectiveness of EDF is affected greatly by the underlying preemption policy that determines if and when a higher-priority job is allowed to preempt a currently executing lower-priority job. To address this problem, we propose a new and better (in meeting job deadlines) preemption policy of EDF, given a non-zero preemption delay. Specifically, we propose a controlled preemption (CP) policy that controls the condition of preempting jobs, whereas existing approaches focus on that of preempted jobs. We define cp-EDF in which the CP policy is applied to EDF, and analyze its schedulability. This schedulability analysis is then utilized to develop an algorithm that assigns the optimal control parameters of cp-EDF. Our in-depth evaluation has demonstrated that cp-EDF with the optimal parameter assignment improves EDF schedulability over existing preemption policies by up to 7.4%.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TC.2012.279</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 0018-9340 |
ispartof | IEEE transactions on computers, 2014-05, Vol.63 (5), p.1197-1206 |
issn | 0018-9340 1557-9956 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1545942944 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) |
subjects | Algorithm design and analysis Algorithms Delay earliest-deadline-first (EDF) policy Meetings Optimization Policies Preempting Preemption Preemption policy Real time Real-time systems real-time uniprocessor scheduling schedulability analysis Schedules Scheduling Scheduling algorithms |
title | Preempt a Job or Not in EDF Scheduling of Uniprocessor Systems |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T09%3A02%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Preempt%20a%20Job%20or%20Not%20in%20EDF%20Scheduling%20of%20Uniprocessor%20Systems&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20computers&rft.au=Jinkyu%20Lee&rft.date=2014-05-01&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1197&rft.epage=1206&rft.pages=1197-1206&rft.issn=0018-9340&rft.eissn=1557-9956&rft.coden=ITCOB4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TC.2012.279&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E1620041384%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1545942944&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=6361382&rfr_iscdi=true |