Tensions Between Constituency and Regional Members of the Scottish Parliament Under Mixed-Member Proportional Representation: A Failure of the New Politics

About a decade after devolution in the UK created a Scottish Parliament elected by mixed-member proportional (MMP) representation, tensions between those representatives elected by the two different routes (single-member constituency and multimember region) remained. This article shows how controver...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Parliamentary affairs 2014-04, Vol.67 (2), p.358
1. Verfasser: Lundberg, Thomas Carl
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 358
container_title Parliamentary affairs
container_volume 67
creator Lundberg, Thomas Carl
description About a decade after devolution in the UK created a Scottish Parliament elected by mixed-member proportional (MMP) representation, tensions between those representatives elected by the two different routes (single-member constituency and multimember region) remained. This article shows how controversies in 2008 over the level of office allowances, as well as the wording of the code of conduct, demonstrate that Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) held differing views on the constituency role of MSPs, and that the partisan animosity between the Scottish National Party (SNP) and Scottish Labour has been exacerbated by the competition at the constituency level facilitated by MMP. This deeply partisan outcome, while reflecting the successful operation of rational choice logic on the part of individual politicians, worked against the larger attempt to engineer a less adversarial post-devolution politics in Scotland.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1545859096</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3376810561</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_15458590963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNzM1Kw0AUhuFBFIw_93DAdWCSJqFxp8XiphJqXZcx-WqnTGfinBOq1-LNGqnuXR2-w8N7opKsqHSaF9P8VCVaT7I0z2t9ri6Yd1rrIqurRH2t4NkGz3QPOQCeZuMQKwN8-0nGd7TE2wiMowX2r4hMYUOyBT23QcTylhoTnTV7eKEX3yHSwn6gS4-cmhj6EOWYWKKP4FGan8ct3dHcWDdE_EWfcKAmOCu25St1tjGOcf17L9XN_GE1e0z7GN4HsKx3YYhjltdZWZTTstZ1Nfmf-gZfaVwA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1545859096</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tensions Between Constituency and Regional Members of the Scottish Parliament Under Mixed-Member Proportional Representation: A Failure of the New Politics</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><creator>Lundberg, Thomas Carl</creator><creatorcontrib>Lundberg, Thomas Carl</creatorcontrib><description>About a decade after devolution in the UK created a Scottish Parliament elected by mixed-member proportional (MMP) representation, tensions between those representatives elected by the two different routes (single-member constituency and multimember region) remained. This article shows how controversies in 2008 over the level of office allowances, as well as the wording of the code of conduct, demonstrate that Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) held differing views on the constituency role of MSPs, and that the partisan animosity between the Scottish National Party (SNP) and Scottish Labour has been exacerbated by the competition at the constituency level facilitated by MMP. This deeply partisan outcome, while reflecting the successful operation of rational choice logic on the part of individual politicians, worked against the larger attempt to engineer a less adversarial post-devolution politics in Scotland.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-2290</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2482</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PLAFAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</publisher><subject>Competition ; Failure ; Members of Parliament ; Political parties ; Political representation ; Tension</subject><ispartof>Parliamentary affairs, 2014-04, Vol.67 (2), p.358</ispartof><rights>Copyright Oxford Publishing Limited(England) Apr 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lundberg, Thomas Carl</creatorcontrib><title>Tensions Between Constituency and Regional Members of the Scottish Parliament Under Mixed-Member Proportional Representation: A Failure of the New Politics</title><title>Parliamentary affairs</title><description>About a decade after devolution in the UK created a Scottish Parliament elected by mixed-member proportional (MMP) representation, tensions between those representatives elected by the two different routes (single-member constituency and multimember region) remained. This article shows how controversies in 2008 over the level of office allowances, as well as the wording of the code of conduct, demonstrate that Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) held differing views on the constituency role of MSPs, and that the partisan animosity between the Scottish National Party (SNP) and Scottish Labour has been exacerbated by the competition at the constituency level facilitated by MMP. This deeply partisan outcome, while reflecting the successful operation of rational choice logic on the part of individual politicians, worked against the larger attempt to engineer a less adversarial post-devolution politics in Scotland.</description><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Failure</subject><subject>Members of Parliament</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Political representation</subject><subject>Tension</subject><issn>0031-2290</issn><issn>1460-2482</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNzM1Kw0AUhuFBFIw_93DAdWCSJqFxp8XiphJqXZcx-WqnTGfinBOq1-LNGqnuXR2-w8N7opKsqHSaF9P8VCVaT7I0z2t9ri6Yd1rrIqurRH2t4NkGz3QPOQCeZuMQKwN8-0nGd7TE2wiMowX2r4hMYUOyBT23QcTylhoTnTV7eKEX3yHSwn6gS4-cmhj6EOWYWKKP4FGan8ct3dHcWDdE_EWfcKAmOCu25St1tjGOcf17L9XN_GE1e0z7GN4HsKx3YYhjltdZWZTTstZ1Nfmf-gZfaVwA</recordid><startdate>20140401</startdate><enddate>20140401</enddate><creator>Lundberg, Thomas Carl</creator><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140401</creationdate><title>Tensions Between Constituency and Regional Members of the Scottish Parliament Under Mixed-Member Proportional Representation: A Failure of the New Politics</title><author>Lundberg, Thomas Carl</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_15458590963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Failure</topic><topic>Members of Parliament</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Political representation</topic><topic>Tension</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lundberg, Thomas Carl</creatorcontrib><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Parliamentary affairs</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lundberg, Thomas Carl</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tensions Between Constituency and Regional Members of the Scottish Parliament Under Mixed-Member Proportional Representation: A Failure of the New Politics</atitle><jtitle>Parliamentary affairs</jtitle><date>2014-04-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>358</spage><pages>358-</pages><issn>0031-2290</issn><eissn>1460-2482</eissn><coden>PLAFAL</coden><abstract>About a decade after devolution in the UK created a Scottish Parliament elected by mixed-member proportional (MMP) representation, tensions between those representatives elected by the two different routes (single-member constituency and multimember region) remained. This article shows how controversies in 2008 over the level of office allowances, as well as the wording of the code of conduct, demonstrate that Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) held differing views on the constituency role of MSPs, and that the partisan animosity between the Scottish National Party (SNP) and Scottish Labour has been exacerbated by the competition at the constituency level facilitated by MMP. This deeply partisan outcome, while reflecting the successful operation of rational choice logic on the part of individual politicians, worked against the larger attempt to engineer a less adversarial post-devolution politics in Scotland.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-2290
ispartof Parliamentary affairs, 2014-04, Vol.67 (2), p.358
issn 0031-2290
1460-2482
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1545859096
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Oxford Journals Online; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete
subjects Competition
Failure
Members of Parliament
Political parties
Political representation
Tension
title Tensions Between Constituency and Regional Members of the Scottish Parliament Under Mixed-Member Proportional Representation: A Failure of the New Politics
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T19%3A09%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tensions%20Between%20Constituency%20and%20Regional%20Members%20of%20the%20Scottish%20Parliament%20Under%20Mixed-Member%20Proportional%20Representation:%20A%20Failure%20of%20the%20New%20Politics&rft.jtitle=Parliamentary%20affairs&rft.au=Lundberg,%20Thomas%20Carl&rft.date=2014-04-01&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=358&rft.pages=358-&rft.issn=0031-2290&rft.eissn=1460-2482&rft.coden=PLAFAL&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3376810561%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1545859096&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true