Tensions Between Constituency and Regional Members of the Scottish Parliament Under Mixed-Member Proportional Representation: A Failure of the New Politics
About a decade after devolution in the UK created a Scottish Parliament elected by mixed-member proportional (MMP) representation, tensions between those representatives elected by the two different routes (single-member constituency and multimember region) remained. This article shows how controver...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Parliamentary affairs 2014-04, Vol.67 (2), p.358 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 358 |
container_title | Parliamentary affairs |
container_volume | 67 |
creator | Lundberg, Thomas Carl |
description | About a decade after devolution in the UK created a Scottish Parliament elected by mixed-member proportional (MMP) representation, tensions between those representatives elected by the two different routes (single-member constituency and multimember region) remained. This article shows how controversies in 2008 over the level of office allowances, as well as the wording of the code of conduct, demonstrate that Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) held differing views on the constituency role of MSPs, and that the partisan animosity between the Scottish National Party (SNP) and Scottish Labour has been exacerbated by the competition at the constituency level facilitated by MMP. This deeply partisan outcome, while reflecting the successful operation of rational choice logic on the part of individual politicians, worked against the larger attempt to engineer a less adversarial post-devolution politics in Scotland. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1545859096</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3376810561</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_15458590963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNzM1Kw0AUhuFBFIw_93DAdWCSJqFxp8XiphJqXZcx-WqnTGfinBOq1-LNGqnuXR2-w8N7opKsqHSaF9P8VCVaT7I0z2t9ri6Yd1rrIqurRH2t4NkGz3QPOQCeZuMQKwN8-0nGd7TE2wiMowX2r4hMYUOyBT23QcTylhoTnTV7eKEX3yHSwn6gS4-cmhj6EOWYWKKP4FGan8ct3dHcWDdE_EWfcKAmOCu25St1tjGOcf17L9XN_GE1e0z7GN4HsKx3YYhjltdZWZTTstZ1Nfmf-gZfaVwA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1545859096</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tensions Between Constituency and Regional Members of the Scottish Parliament Under Mixed-Member Proportional Representation: A Failure of the New Politics</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><creator>Lundberg, Thomas Carl</creator><creatorcontrib>Lundberg, Thomas Carl</creatorcontrib><description>About a decade after devolution in the UK created a Scottish Parliament elected by mixed-member proportional (MMP) representation, tensions between those representatives elected by the two different routes (single-member constituency and multimember region) remained. This article shows how controversies in 2008 over the level of office allowances, as well as the wording of the code of conduct, demonstrate that Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) held differing views on the constituency role of MSPs, and that the partisan animosity between the Scottish National Party (SNP) and Scottish Labour has been exacerbated by the competition at the constituency level facilitated by MMP. This deeply partisan outcome, while reflecting the successful operation of rational choice logic on the part of individual politicians, worked against the larger attempt to engineer a less adversarial post-devolution politics in Scotland.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-2290</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2482</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PLAFAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</publisher><subject>Competition ; Failure ; Members of Parliament ; Political parties ; Political representation ; Tension</subject><ispartof>Parliamentary affairs, 2014-04, Vol.67 (2), p.358</ispartof><rights>Copyright Oxford Publishing Limited(England) Apr 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lundberg, Thomas Carl</creatorcontrib><title>Tensions Between Constituency and Regional Members of the Scottish Parliament Under Mixed-Member Proportional Representation: A Failure of the New Politics</title><title>Parliamentary affairs</title><description>About a decade after devolution in the UK created a Scottish Parliament elected by mixed-member proportional (MMP) representation, tensions between those representatives elected by the two different routes (single-member constituency and multimember region) remained. This article shows how controversies in 2008 over the level of office allowances, as well as the wording of the code of conduct, demonstrate that Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) held differing views on the constituency role of MSPs, and that the partisan animosity between the Scottish National Party (SNP) and Scottish Labour has been exacerbated by the competition at the constituency level facilitated by MMP. This deeply partisan outcome, while reflecting the successful operation of rational choice logic on the part of individual politicians, worked against the larger attempt to engineer a less adversarial post-devolution politics in Scotland.</description><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Failure</subject><subject>Members of Parliament</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Political representation</subject><subject>Tension</subject><issn>0031-2290</issn><issn>1460-2482</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNzM1Kw0AUhuFBFIw_93DAdWCSJqFxp8XiphJqXZcx-WqnTGfinBOq1-LNGqnuXR2-w8N7opKsqHSaF9P8VCVaT7I0z2t9ri6Yd1rrIqurRH2t4NkGz3QPOQCeZuMQKwN8-0nGd7TE2wiMowX2r4hMYUOyBT23QcTylhoTnTV7eKEX3yHSwn6gS4-cmhj6EOWYWKKP4FGan8ct3dHcWDdE_EWfcKAmOCu25St1tjGOcf17L9XN_GE1e0z7GN4HsKx3YYhjltdZWZTTstZ1Nfmf-gZfaVwA</recordid><startdate>20140401</startdate><enddate>20140401</enddate><creator>Lundberg, Thomas Carl</creator><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140401</creationdate><title>Tensions Between Constituency and Regional Members of the Scottish Parliament Under Mixed-Member Proportional Representation: A Failure of the New Politics</title><author>Lundberg, Thomas Carl</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_15458590963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Failure</topic><topic>Members of Parliament</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Political representation</topic><topic>Tension</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lundberg, Thomas Carl</creatorcontrib><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Parliamentary affairs</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lundberg, Thomas Carl</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tensions Between Constituency and Regional Members of the Scottish Parliament Under Mixed-Member Proportional Representation: A Failure of the New Politics</atitle><jtitle>Parliamentary affairs</jtitle><date>2014-04-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>358</spage><pages>358-</pages><issn>0031-2290</issn><eissn>1460-2482</eissn><coden>PLAFAL</coden><abstract>About a decade after devolution in the UK created a Scottish Parliament elected by mixed-member proportional (MMP) representation, tensions between those representatives elected by the two different routes (single-member constituency and multimember region) remained. This article shows how controversies in 2008 over the level of office allowances, as well as the wording of the code of conduct, demonstrate that Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) held differing views on the constituency role of MSPs, and that the partisan animosity between the Scottish National Party (SNP) and Scottish Labour has been exacerbated by the competition at the constituency level facilitated by MMP. This deeply partisan outcome, while reflecting the successful operation of rational choice logic on the part of individual politicians, worked against the larger attempt to engineer a less adversarial post-devolution politics in Scotland.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0031-2290 |
ispartof | Parliamentary affairs, 2014-04, Vol.67 (2), p.358 |
issn | 0031-2290 1460-2482 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1545859096 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Oxford Journals Online; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete |
subjects | Competition Failure Members of Parliament Political parties Political representation Tension |
title | Tensions Between Constituency and Regional Members of the Scottish Parliament Under Mixed-Member Proportional Representation: A Failure of the New Politics |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T19%3A09%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tensions%20Between%20Constituency%20and%20Regional%20Members%20of%20the%20Scottish%20Parliament%20Under%20Mixed-Member%20Proportional%20Representation:%20A%20Failure%20of%20the%20New%20Politics&rft.jtitle=Parliamentary%20affairs&rft.au=Lundberg,%20Thomas%20Carl&rft.date=2014-04-01&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=358&rft.pages=358-&rft.issn=0031-2290&rft.eissn=1460-2482&rft.coden=PLAFAL&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3376810561%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1545859096&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |