Forest transpiration—targeted through xylem sap flux assessment versus hydrological modeling
The assessment of forest transpiration rates is crucial for determining plant-available soil water consumption and drought risk of trees. Xylem sap flux measurements have been used increasingly to quantify stand transpiration in forest ecosystems. Here, we compare this empirical approach with hydrol...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of forest research 2014, Vol.133 (4), p.677-690 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 690 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 677 |
container_title | European journal of forest research |
container_volume | 133 |
creator | Baumgarten, Manuela Weis, Wendelin Kühn, Angelika May, Katharina Matyssek, Rainer |
description | The assessment of forest transpiration rates is crucial for determining plant-available soil water consumption and drought risk of trees. Xylem sap flux measurements have been used increasingly to quantify stand transpiration in forest ecosystems. Here, we compare this empirical approach with hydrological modeling on the basis of a stand transpiration dataset of adult beech (Fagus sylvatica), which was acquired across Bavaria, Germany, at eight forest sites. Xylem sap flux sensors were installed in five dominant trees each. Two tree to stand upscaling approaches, related to site-specific (1) sapwood area or (2) to leaf area index, were compared. The outcome was examined each in relation to process-based stand hydrological modeling, using LWF-BROOK90. Distinct relationships between tree diameter at breast height (1.30 m) and sapwood area-weighted sap flux along the radial profile became apparent across the study sites, confirming a generic allometric basis for stand-level upscaling of transpiration. The two upscaling approaches did not differ in outcome, representatively covering stand structure for comparison with modeling. Differential analysis yielded high agreement between the empirical and modeling approaches throughout most of the study period, although LWF-BROOK90 tended to overestimate sap flux measurements under low soil moisture. The two empirical approaches proved reliable for even-aged beech stands, as performance under high stand-structural heterogeneity awaits clarification. Findings advance stand-level hydrological modeling regarding coverage of stomatal behavior during temporary limitation in water availability. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10342-014-0796-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1545398705</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3374820411</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-808a7185c2f08fd158ef0b9d17bbfe4c9cb9cc9578f90c51e308ad9376e405943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kLFOwzAQhiMEEqXwAExYYg6cEye2R1RRQKrEAF2xHMdOU6Vx8SWIbjwET8iTkCoIMTHdDd_3n-6PonMKVxSAXyOFlCUxUBYDl3nMDqIJzWkSs5zzw989l8fRCeIaIBFSiEn0MvfBYke6oFvc1kF3tW-_Pj47HSrb2ZJ0q-D7akXed43dENRb4pr-nWhEi7ixbUfebMAeyWpXBt_4qja6IRtf2qZuq9PoyOkG7dnPnEbL-e3z7D5ePN49zG4WsWGp7GIBQnMqMpM4EK6kmbAOCllSXhTOMiNNIY2RGRdOgsmoTQehlCnPLYNMsnQaXY652-Bf--EhtfZ9aIeTimYsS6XgkA0UHSkTPGKwTm1DvdFhpyiofY1qrFENNap9jWqfnIwODmxb2fAn-R_pYpSc9kpXoUa1fEoGAIAmecpE-g10x4F4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1545398705</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Forest transpiration—targeted through xylem sap flux assessment versus hydrological modeling</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Baumgarten, Manuela ; Weis, Wendelin ; Kühn, Angelika ; May, Katharina ; Matyssek, Rainer</creator><creatorcontrib>Baumgarten, Manuela ; Weis, Wendelin ; Kühn, Angelika ; May, Katharina ; Matyssek, Rainer</creatorcontrib><description>The assessment of forest transpiration rates is crucial for determining plant-available soil water consumption and drought risk of trees. Xylem sap flux measurements have been used increasingly to quantify stand transpiration in forest ecosystems. Here, we compare this empirical approach with hydrological modeling on the basis of a stand transpiration dataset of adult beech (Fagus sylvatica), which was acquired across Bavaria, Germany, at eight forest sites. Xylem sap flux sensors were installed in five dominant trees each. Two tree to stand upscaling approaches, related to site-specific (1) sapwood area or (2) to leaf area index, were compared. The outcome was examined each in relation to process-based stand hydrological modeling, using LWF-BROOK90. Distinct relationships between tree diameter at breast height (1.30 m) and sapwood area-weighted sap flux along the radial profile became apparent across the study sites, confirming a generic allometric basis for stand-level upscaling of transpiration. The two upscaling approaches did not differ in outcome, representatively covering stand structure for comparison with modeling. Differential analysis yielded high agreement between the empirical and modeling approaches throughout most of the study period, although LWF-BROOK90 tended to overestimate sap flux measurements under low soil moisture. The two empirical approaches proved reliable for even-aged beech stands, as performance under high stand-structural heterogeneity awaits clarification. Findings advance stand-level hydrological modeling regarding coverage of stomatal behavior during temporary limitation in water availability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1612-4669</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1612-4677</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10342-014-0796-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Air pollution ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Climate change ; data collection ; Drought ; Environmental risk ; Fagus sylvatica ; Flowers & plants ; Fluctuations ; Forest ecosystems ; Forestry ; Forests ; Heterogeneity ; Hydrologic modeling ; hydrologic models ; leaf area index ; Life Sciences ; Moisture content ; Original Paper ; Plant Ecology ; Plant Sciences ; risk ; sap flow ; sapwood ; Soil moisture ; Soil water ; Soils ; stand structure ; stomatal movement ; Transpiration ; tree and stand measurements ; Trees ; Water availability ; Water consumption</subject><ispartof>European journal of forest research, 2014, Vol.133 (4), p.677-690</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-808a7185c2f08fd158ef0b9d17bbfe4c9cb9cc9578f90c51e308ad9376e405943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-808a7185c2f08fd158ef0b9d17bbfe4c9cb9cc9578f90c51e308ad9376e405943</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10342-014-0796-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10342-014-0796-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baumgarten, Manuela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weis, Wendelin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kühn, Angelika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>May, Katharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matyssek, Rainer</creatorcontrib><title>Forest transpiration—targeted through xylem sap flux assessment versus hydrological modeling</title><title>European journal of forest research</title><addtitle>Eur J Forest Res</addtitle><description>The assessment of forest transpiration rates is crucial for determining plant-available soil water consumption and drought risk of trees. Xylem sap flux measurements have been used increasingly to quantify stand transpiration in forest ecosystems. Here, we compare this empirical approach with hydrological modeling on the basis of a stand transpiration dataset of adult beech (Fagus sylvatica), which was acquired across Bavaria, Germany, at eight forest sites. Xylem sap flux sensors were installed in five dominant trees each. Two tree to stand upscaling approaches, related to site-specific (1) sapwood area or (2) to leaf area index, were compared. The outcome was examined each in relation to process-based stand hydrological modeling, using LWF-BROOK90. Distinct relationships between tree diameter at breast height (1.30 m) and sapwood area-weighted sap flux along the radial profile became apparent across the study sites, confirming a generic allometric basis for stand-level upscaling of transpiration. The two upscaling approaches did not differ in outcome, representatively covering stand structure for comparison with modeling. Differential analysis yielded high agreement between the empirical and modeling approaches throughout most of the study period, although LWF-BROOK90 tended to overestimate sap flux measurements under low soil moisture. The two empirical approaches proved reliable for even-aged beech stands, as performance under high stand-structural heterogeneity awaits clarification. Findings advance stand-level hydrological modeling regarding coverage of stomatal behavior during temporary limitation in water availability.</description><subject>Air pollution</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>data collection</subject><subject>Drought</subject><subject>Environmental risk</subject><subject>Fagus sylvatica</subject><subject>Flowers & plants</subject><subject>Fluctuations</subject><subject>Forest ecosystems</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Hydrologic modeling</subject><subject>hydrologic models</subject><subject>leaf area index</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Moisture content</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Plant Ecology</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>risk</subject><subject>sap flow</subject><subject>sapwood</subject><subject>Soil moisture</subject><subject>Soil water</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>stand structure</subject><subject>stomatal movement</subject><subject>Transpiration</subject><subject>tree and stand measurements</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Water availability</subject><subject>Water consumption</subject><issn>1612-4669</issn><issn>1612-4677</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kLFOwzAQhiMEEqXwAExYYg6cEye2R1RRQKrEAF2xHMdOU6Vx8SWIbjwET8iTkCoIMTHdDd_3n-6PonMKVxSAXyOFlCUxUBYDl3nMDqIJzWkSs5zzw989l8fRCeIaIBFSiEn0MvfBYke6oFvc1kF3tW-_Pj47HSrb2ZJ0q-D7akXed43dENRb4pr-nWhEi7ixbUfebMAeyWpXBt_4qja6IRtf2qZuq9PoyOkG7dnPnEbL-e3z7D5ePN49zG4WsWGp7GIBQnMqMpM4EK6kmbAOCllSXhTOMiNNIY2RGRdOgsmoTQehlCnPLYNMsnQaXY652-Bf--EhtfZ9aIeTimYsS6XgkA0UHSkTPGKwTm1DvdFhpyiofY1qrFENNap9jWqfnIwODmxb2fAn-R_pYpSc9kpXoUa1fEoGAIAmecpE-g10x4F4</recordid><startdate>2014</startdate><enddate>2014</enddate><creator>Baumgarten, Manuela</creator><creator>Weis, Wendelin</creator><creator>Kühn, Angelika</creator><creator>May, Katharina</creator><creator>Matyssek, Rainer</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2014</creationdate><title>Forest transpiration—targeted through xylem sap flux assessment versus hydrological modeling</title><author>Baumgarten, Manuela ; Weis, Wendelin ; Kühn, Angelika ; May, Katharina ; Matyssek, Rainer</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-808a7185c2f08fd158ef0b9d17bbfe4c9cb9cc9578f90c51e308ad9376e405943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Air pollution</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>data collection</topic><topic>Drought</topic><topic>Environmental risk</topic><topic>Fagus sylvatica</topic><topic>Flowers & plants</topic><topic>Fluctuations</topic><topic>Forest ecosystems</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Hydrologic modeling</topic><topic>hydrologic models</topic><topic>leaf area index</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Moisture content</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Plant Ecology</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>risk</topic><topic>sap flow</topic><topic>sapwood</topic><topic>Soil moisture</topic><topic>Soil water</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>stand structure</topic><topic>stomatal movement</topic><topic>Transpiration</topic><topic>tree and stand measurements</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Water availability</topic><topic>Water consumption</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baumgarten, Manuela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weis, Wendelin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kühn, Angelika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>May, Katharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matyssek, Rainer</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>European journal of forest research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baumgarten, Manuela</au><au>Weis, Wendelin</au><au>Kühn, Angelika</au><au>May, Katharina</au><au>Matyssek, Rainer</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Forest transpiration—targeted through xylem sap flux assessment versus hydrological modeling</atitle><jtitle>European journal of forest research</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Forest Res</stitle><date>2014</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>133</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>677</spage><epage>690</epage><pages>677-690</pages><issn>1612-4669</issn><eissn>1612-4677</eissn><abstract>The assessment of forest transpiration rates is crucial for determining plant-available soil water consumption and drought risk of trees. Xylem sap flux measurements have been used increasingly to quantify stand transpiration in forest ecosystems. Here, we compare this empirical approach with hydrological modeling on the basis of a stand transpiration dataset of adult beech (Fagus sylvatica), which was acquired across Bavaria, Germany, at eight forest sites. Xylem sap flux sensors were installed in five dominant trees each. Two tree to stand upscaling approaches, related to site-specific (1) sapwood area or (2) to leaf area index, were compared. The outcome was examined each in relation to process-based stand hydrological modeling, using LWF-BROOK90. Distinct relationships between tree diameter at breast height (1.30 m) and sapwood area-weighted sap flux along the radial profile became apparent across the study sites, confirming a generic allometric basis for stand-level upscaling of transpiration. The two upscaling approaches did not differ in outcome, representatively covering stand structure for comparison with modeling. Differential analysis yielded high agreement between the empirical and modeling approaches throughout most of the study period, although LWF-BROOK90 tended to overestimate sap flux measurements under low soil moisture. The two empirical approaches proved reliable for even-aged beech stands, as performance under high stand-structural heterogeneity awaits clarification. Findings advance stand-level hydrological modeling regarding coverage of stomatal behavior during temporary limitation in water availability.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s10342-014-0796-4</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1612-4669 |
ispartof | European journal of forest research, 2014, Vol.133 (4), p.677-690 |
issn | 1612-4669 1612-4677 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1545398705 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Air pollution Biomedical and Life Sciences Climate change data collection Drought Environmental risk Fagus sylvatica Flowers & plants Fluctuations Forest ecosystems Forestry Forests Heterogeneity Hydrologic modeling hydrologic models leaf area index Life Sciences Moisture content Original Paper Plant Ecology Plant Sciences risk sap flow sapwood Soil moisture Soil water Soils stand structure stomatal movement Transpiration tree and stand measurements Trees Water availability Water consumption |
title | Forest transpiration—targeted through xylem sap flux assessment versus hydrological modeling |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T22%3A31%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Forest%20transpiration%E2%80%94targeted%20through%20xylem%20sap%20flux%20assessment%20versus%20hydrological%20modeling&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20forest%20research&rft.au=Baumgarten,%20Manuela&rft.date=2014&rft.volume=133&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=677&rft.epage=690&rft.pages=677-690&rft.issn=1612-4669&rft.eissn=1612-4677&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10342-014-0796-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3374820411%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1545398705&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |