Forest transpiration—targeted through xylem sap flux assessment versus hydrological modeling

The assessment of forest transpiration rates is crucial for determining plant-available soil water consumption and drought risk of trees. Xylem sap flux measurements have been used increasingly to quantify stand transpiration in forest ecosystems. Here, we compare this empirical approach with hydrol...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of forest research 2014, Vol.133 (4), p.677-690
Hauptverfasser: Baumgarten, Manuela, Weis, Wendelin, Kühn, Angelika, May, Katharina, Matyssek, Rainer
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 690
container_issue 4
container_start_page 677
container_title European journal of forest research
container_volume 133
creator Baumgarten, Manuela
Weis, Wendelin
Kühn, Angelika
May, Katharina
Matyssek, Rainer
description The assessment of forest transpiration rates is crucial for determining plant-available soil water consumption and drought risk of trees. Xylem sap flux measurements have been used increasingly to quantify stand transpiration in forest ecosystems. Here, we compare this empirical approach with hydrological modeling on the basis of a stand transpiration dataset of adult beech (Fagus sylvatica), which was acquired across Bavaria, Germany, at eight forest sites. Xylem sap flux sensors were installed in five dominant trees each. Two tree to stand upscaling approaches, related to site-specific (1) sapwood area or (2) to leaf area index, were compared. The outcome was examined each in relation to process-based stand hydrological modeling, using LWF-BROOK90. Distinct relationships between tree diameter at breast height (1.30 m) and sapwood area-weighted sap flux along the radial profile became apparent across the study sites, confirming a generic allometric basis for stand-level upscaling of transpiration. The two upscaling approaches did not differ in outcome, representatively covering stand structure for comparison with modeling. Differential analysis yielded high agreement between the empirical and modeling approaches throughout most of the study period, although LWF-BROOK90 tended to overestimate sap flux measurements under low soil moisture. The two empirical approaches proved reliable for even-aged beech stands, as performance under high stand-structural heterogeneity awaits clarification. Findings advance stand-level hydrological modeling regarding coverage of stomatal behavior during temporary limitation in water availability.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10342-014-0796-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1545398705</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3374820411</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-808a7185c2f08fd158ef0b9d17bbfe4c9cb9cc9578f90c51e308ad9376e405943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kLFOwzAQhiMEEqXwAExYYg6cEye2R1RRQKrEAF2xHMdOU6Vx8SWIbjwET8iTkCoIMTHdDd_3n-6PonMKVxSAXyOFlCUxUBYDl3nMDqIJzWkSs5zzw989l8fRCeIaIBFSiEn0MvfBYke6oFvc1kF3tW-_Pj47HSrb2ZJ0q-D7akXed43dENRb4pr-nWhEi7ixbUfebMAeyWpXBt_4qja6IRtf2qZuq9PoyOkG7dnPnEbL-e3z7D5ePN49zG4WsWGp7GIBQnMqMpM4EK6kmbAOCllSXhTOMiNNIY2RGRdOgsmoTQehlCnPLYNMsnQaXY652-Bf--EhtfZ9aIeTimYsS6XgkA0UHSkTPGKwTm1DvdFhpyiofY1qrFENNap9jWqfnIwODmxb2fAn-R_pYpSc9kpXoUa1fEoGAIAmecpE-g10x4F4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1545398705</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Forest transpiration—targeted through xylem sap flux assessment versus hydrological modeling</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Baumgarten, Manuela ; Weis, Wendelin ; Kühn, Angelika ; May, Katharina ; Matyssek, Rainer</creator><creatorcontrib>Baumgarten, Manuela ; Weis, Wendelin ; Kühn, Angelika ; May, Katharina ; Matyssek, Rainer</creatorcontrib><description>The assessment of forest transpiration rates is crucial for determining plant-available soil water consumption and drought risk of trees. Xylem sap flux measurements have been used increasingly to quantify stand transpiration in forest ecosystems. Here, we compare this empirical approach with hydrological modeling on the basis of a stand transpiration dataset of adult beech (Fagus sylvatica), which was acquired across Bavaria, Germany, at eight forest sites. Xylem sap flux sensors were installed in five dominant trees each. Two tree to stand upscaling approaches, related to site-specific (1) sapwood area or (2) to leaf area index, were compared. The outcome was examined each in relation to process-based stand hydrological modeling, using LWF-BROOK90. Distinct relationships between tree diameter at breast height (1.30 m) and sapwood area-weighted sap flux along the radial profile became apparent across the study sites, confirming a generic allometric basis for stand-level upscaling of transpiration. The two upscaling approaches did not differ in outcome, representatively covering stand structure for comparison with modeling. Differential analysis yielded high agreement between the empirical and modeling approaches throughout most of the study period, although LWF-BROOK90 tended to overestimate sap flux measurements under low soil moisture. The two empirical approaches proved reliable for even-aged beech stands, as performance under high stand-structural heterogeneity awaits clarification. Findings advance stand-level hydrological modeling regarding coverage of stomatal behavior during temporary limitation in water availability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1612-4669</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1612-4677</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10342-014-0796-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Air pollution ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Climate change ; data collection ; Drought ; Environmental risk ; Fagus sylvatica ; Flowers &amp; plants ; Fluctuations ; Forest ecosystems ; Forestry ; Forests ; Heterogeneity ; Hydrologic modeling ; hydrologic models ; leaf area index ; Life Sciences ; Moisture content ; Original Paper ; Plant Ecology ; Plant Sciences ; risk ; sap flow ; sapwood ; Soil moisture ; Soil water ; Soils ; stand structure ; stomatal movement ; Transpiration ; tree and stand measurements ; Trees ; Water availability ; Water consumption</subject><ispartof>European journal of forest research, 2014, Vol.133 (4), p.677-690</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-808a7185c2f08fd158ef0b9d17bbfe4c9cb9cc9578f90c51e308ad9376e405943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-808a7185c2f08fd158ef0b9d17bbfe4c9cb9cc9578f90c51e308ad9376e405943</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10342-014-0796-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10342-014-0796-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baumgarten, Manuela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weis, Wendelin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kühn, Angelika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>May, Katharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matyssek, Rainer</creatorcontrib><title>Forest transpiration—targeted through xylem sap flux assessment versus hydrological modeling</title><title>European journal of forest research</title><addtitle>Eur J Forest Res</addtitle><description>The assessment of forest transpiration rates is crucial for determining plant-available soil water consumption and drought risk of trees. Xylem sap flux measurements have been used increasingly to quantify stand transpiration in forest ecosystems. Here, we compare this empirical approach with hydrological modeling on the basis of a stand transpiration dataset of adult beech (Fagus sylvatica), which was acquired across Bavaria, Germany, at eight forest sites. Xylem sap flux sensors were installed in five dominant trees each. Two tree to stand upscaling approaches, related to site-specific (1) sapwood area or (2) to leaf area index, were compared. The outcome was examined each in relation to process-based stand hydrological modeling, using LWF-BROOK90. Distinct relationships between tree diameter at breast height (1.30 m) and sapwood area-weighted sap flux along the radial profile became apparent across the study sites, confirming a generic allometric basis for stand-level upscaling of transpiration. The two upscaling approaches did not differ in outcome, representatively covering stand structure for comparison with modeling. Differential analysis yielded high agreement between the empirical and modeling approaches throughout most of the study period, although LWF-BROOK90 tended to overestimate sap flux measurements under low soil moisture. The two empirical approaches proved reliable for even-aged beech stands, as performance under high stand-structural heterogeneity awaits clarification. Findings advance stand-level hydrological modeling regarding coverage of stomatal behavior during temporary limitation in water availability.</description><subject>Air pollution</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>data collection</subject><subject>Drought</subject><subject>Environmental risk</subject><subject>Fagus sylvatica</subject><subject>Flowers &amp; plants</subject><subject>Fluctuations</subject><subject>Forest ecosystems</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Hydrologic modeling</subject><subject>hydrologic models</subject><subject>leaf area index</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Moisture content</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Plant Ecology</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>risk</subject><subject>sap flow</subject><subject>sapwood</subject><subject>Soil moisture</subject><subject>Soil water</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>stand structure</subject><subject>stomatal movement</subject><subject>Transpiration</subject><subject>tree and stand measurements</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Water availability</subject><subject>Water consumption</subject><issn>1612-4669</issn><issn>1612-4677</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kLFOwzAQhiMEEqXwAExYYg6cEye2R1RRQKrEAF2xHMdOU6Vx8SWIbjwET8iTkCoIMTHdDd_3n-6PonMKVxSAXyOFlCUxUBYDl3nMDqIJzWkSs5zzw989l8fRCeIaIBFSiEn0MvfBYke6oFvc1kF3tW-_Pj47HSrb2ZJ0q-D7akXed43dENRb4pr-nWhEi7ixbUfebMAeyWpXBt_4qja6IRtf2qZuq9PoyOkG7dnPnEbL-e3z7D5ePN49zG4WsWGp7GIBQnMqMpM4EK6kmbAOCllSXhTOMiNNIY2RGRdOgsmoTQehlCnPLYNMsnQaXY652-Bf--EhtfZ9aIeTimYsS6XgkA0UHSkTPGKwTm1DvdFhpyiofY1qrFENNap9jWqfnIwODmxb2fAn-R_pYpSc9kpXoUa1fEoGAIAmecpE-g10x4F4</recordid><startdate>2014</startdate><enddate>2014</enddate><creator>Baumgarten, Manuela</creator><creator>Weis, Wendelin</creator><creator>Kühn, Angelika</creator><creator>May, Katharina</creator><creator>Matyssek, Rainer</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2014</creationdate><title>Forest transpiration—targeted through xylem sap flux assessment versus hydrological modeling</title><author>Baumgarten, Manuela ; Weis, Wendelin ; Kühn, Angelika ; May, Katharina ; Matyssek, Rainer</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-808a7185c2f08fd158ef0b9d17bbfe4c9cb9cc9578f90c51e308ad9376e405943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Air pollution</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>data collection</topic><topic>Drought</topic><topic>Environmental risk</topic><topic>Fagus sylvatica</topic><topic>Flowers &amp; plants</topic><topic>Fluctuations</topic><topic>Forest ecosystems</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Hydrologic modeling</topic><topic>hydrologic models</topic><topic>leaf area index</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Moisture content</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Plant Ecology</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>risk</topic><topic>sap flow</topic><topic>sapwood</topic><topic>Soil moisture</topic><topic>Soil water</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>stand structure</topic><topic>stomatal movement</topic><topic>Transpiration</topic><topic>tree and stand measurements</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Water availability</topic><topic>Water consumption</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baumgarten, Manuela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weis, Wendelin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kühn, Angelika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>May, Katharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matyssek, Rainer</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>European journal of forest research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baumgarten, Manuela</au><au>Weis, Wendelin</au><au>Kühn, Angelika</au><au>May, Katharina</au><au>Matyssek, Rainer</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Forest transpiration—targeted through xylem sap flux assessment versus hydrological modeling</atitle><jtitle>European journal of forest research</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Forest Res</stitle><date>2014</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>133</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>677</spage><epage>690</epage><pages>677-690</pages><issn>1612-4669</issn><eissn>1612-4677</eissn><abstract>The assessment of forest transpiration rates is crucial for determining plant-available soil water consumption and drought risk of trees. Xylem sap flux measurements have been used increasingly to quantify stand transpiration in forest ecosystems. Here, we compare this empirical approach with hydrological modeling on the basis of a stand transpiration dataset of adult beech (Fagus sylvatica), which was acquired across Bavaria, Germany, at eight forest sites. Xylem sap flux sensors were installed in five dominant trees each. Two tree to stand upscaling approaches, related to site-specific (1) sapwood area or (2) to leaf area index, were compared. The outcome was examined each in relation to process-based stand hydrological modeling, using LWF-BROOK90. Distinct relationships between tree diameter at breast height (1.30 m) and sapwood area-weighted sap flux along the radial profile became apparent across the study sites, confirming a generic allometric basis for stand-level upscaling of transpiration. The two upscaling approaches did not differ in outcome, representatively covering stand structure for comparison with modeling. Differential analysis yielded high agreement between the empirical and modeling approaches throughout most of the study period, although LWF-BROOK90 tended to overestimate sap flux measurements under low soil moisture. The two empirical approaches proved reliable for even-aged beech stands, as performance under high stand-structural heterogeneity awaits clarification. Findings advance stand-level hydrological modeling regarding coverage of stomatal behavior during temporary limitation in water availability.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s10342-014-0796-4</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1612-4669
ispartof European journal of forest research, 2014, Vol.133 (4), p.677-690
issn 1612-4669
1612-4677
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1545398705
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Air pollution
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Climate change
data collection
Drought
Environmental risk
Fagus sylvatica
Flowers & plants
Fluctuations
Forest ecosystems
Forestry
Forests
Heterogeneity
Hydrologic modeling
hydrologic models
leaf area index
Life Sciences
Moisture content
Original Paper
Plant Ecology
Plant Sciences
risk
sap flow
sapwood
Soil moisture
Soil water
Soils
stand structure
stomatal movement
Transpiration
tree and stand measurements
Trees
Water availability
Water consumption
title Forest transpiration—targeted through xylem sap flux assessment versus hydrological modeling
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T22%3A31%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Forest%20transpiration%E2%80%94targeted%20through%20xylem%20sap%20flux%20assessment%20versus%20hydrological%20modeling&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20forest%20research&rft.au=Baumgarten,%20Manuela&rft.date=2014&rft.volume=133&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=677&rft.epage=690&rft.pages=677-690&rft.issn=1612-4669&rft.eissn=1612-4677&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10342-014-0796-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3374820411%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1545398705&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true