The 2011 Brisbane Floods: Causes, Impacts and Implications

On 13th January 2011 major flooding occurred throughout most of the Brisbane River catchment, most severely in Toowoomba and the Lockyer Creek catchment (where 23 people drowned), the Bremer River catchment and in Brisbane, the state capital of Queensland. Some 56,200 claims have been received by in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water (Basel) 2011-12, Vol.3 (4), p.1149-1173
Hauptverfasser: Van den Honert, Robin C., McAneney, John
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1173
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1149
container_title Water (Basel)
container_volume 3
creator Van den Honert, Robin C.
McAneney, John
description On 13th January 2011 major flooding occurred throughout most of the Brisbane River catchment, most severely in Toowoomba and the Lockyer Creek catchment (where 23 people drowned), the Bremer River catchment and in Brisbane, the state capital of Queensland. Some 56,200 claims have been received by insurers with payouts totalling $2.55 billion. This paper backgrounds weather and climatic factors implicated in the flooding and the historical flood experience of Brisbane. We examine the time history of water releases from the Wivenhoe dam, which have been accused of aggravating damage downstream. The dam was built in response to even worse flooding in 1974 and now serves as Brisbane’s main water supply. In our analysis, the dam operators made sub-optimal decisions by neglecting forecasts of further rainfall and assuming a ‘no rainfall’ scenario. Questions have also been raised about the availability of insurance cover for riverine flood, and the Queensland government’s decision not to insure its infrastructure. These and other questions have led to Federal and State government inquiries. We argue that insurance is a form of risk transfer for the residual risk following risk management efforts and cannot in itself be a solution for poor land-use planning. With this in mind, we discuss the need for risk-related insurance premiums to encourage flood risk mitigating behaviours by all actors, and for transparency in the availability of flood maps. Examples of good flood risk management to arise from this flood are described.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/w3041149
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1540781342</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3350897751</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-c6309504fee8f7c29e10e39dc0a8fe6ac36337de95b242a232d74e4407a867d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkEFLw0AUhBdRsNSCPyHgxYPRt_tekt3eNFgtFLzUc9huXjAlTeJugvjvTamCc5k5fMzACHEt4R7RwMMXAklJ5kzMFGQYE5E8_5cvxSKEPUwio3UCM7HcfnCkQMroyddhZ1uOVk3XlWEZ5XYMHO6i9aG3bgiRbctjbmpnh7prw5W4qGwTePHrc_G-et7mr_Hm7WWdP25ih4aG2KUIJgGqmHWVOWVYAqMpHVhdcWodpohZySbZKVJWoSozYiLIrE6zknAubk69ve8-Rw5Dse9G306ThUwmTEskNVG3J8r5LgTPVdH7-mD9dyGhOJ5T_J2DP3-7Uvw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1540781342</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The 2011 Brisbane Floods: Causes, Impacts and Implications</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Van den Honert, Robin C. ; McAneney, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Van den Honert, Robin C. ; McAneney, John</creatorcontrib><description>On 13th January 2011 major flooding occurred throughout most of the Brisbane River catchment, most severely in Toowoomba and the Lockyer Creek catchment (where 23 people drowned), the Bremer River catchment and in Brisbane, the state capital of Queensland. Some 56,200 claims have been received by insurers with payouts totalling $2.55 billion. This paper backgrounds weather and climatic factors implicated in the flooding and the historical flood experience of Brisbane. We examine the time history of water releases from the Wivenhoe dam, which have been accused of aggravating damage downstream. The dam was built in response to even worse flooding in 1974 and now serves as Brisbane’s main water supply. In our analysis, the dam operators made sub-optimal decisions by neglecting forecasts of further rainfall and assuming a ‘no rainfall’ scenario. Questions have also been raised about the availability of insurance cover for riverine flood, and the Queensland government’s decision not to insure its infrastructure. These and other questions have led to Federal and State government inquiries. We argue that insurance is a form of risk transfer for the residual risk following risk management efforts and cannot in itself be a solution for poor land-use planning. With this in mind, we discuss the need for risk-related insurance premiums to encourage flood risk mitigating behaviours by all actors, and for transparency in the availability of flood maps. Examples of good flood risk management to arise from this flood are described.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2073-4441</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2073-4441</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/w3041149</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Creeks &amp; streams ; Dams ; Floods ; Land use planning ; Rivers ; Water supply</subject><ispartof>Water (Basel), 2011-12, Vol.3 (4), p.1149-1173</ispartof><rights>Copyright MDPI AG 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-c6309504fee8f7c29e10e39dc0a8fe6ac36337de95b242a232d74e4407a867d43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-c6309504fee8f7c29e10e39dc0a8fe6ac36337de95b242a232d74e4407a867d43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7072-9126</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Van den Honert, Robin C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McAneney, John</creatorcontrib><title>The 2011 Brisbane Floods: Causes, Impacts and Implications</title><title>Water (Basel)</title><description>On 13th January 2011 major flooding occurred throughout most of the Brisbane River catchment, most severely in Toowoomba and the Lockyer Creek catchment (where 23 people drowned), the Bremer River catchment and in Brisbane, the state capital of Queensland. Some 56,200 claims have been received by insurers with payouts totalling $2.55 billion. This paper backgrounds weather and climatic factors implicated in the flooding and the historical flood experience of Brisbane. We examine the time history of water releases from the Wivenhoe dam, which have been accused of aggravating damage downstream. The dam was built in response to even worse flooding in 1974 and now serves as Brisbane’s main water supply. In our analysis, the dam operators made sub-optimal decisions by neglecting forecasts of further rainfall and assuming a ‘no rainfall’ scenario. Questions have also been raised about the availability of insurance cover for riverine flood, and the Queensland government’s decision not to insure its infrastructure. These and other questions have led to Federal and State government inquiries. We argue that insurance is a form of risk transfer for the residual risk following risk management efforts and cannot in itself be a solution for poor land-use planning. With this in mind, we discuss the need for risk-related insurance premiums to encourage flood risk mitigating behaviours by all actors, and for transparency in the availability of flood maps. Examples of good flood risk management to arise from this flood are described.</description><subject>Creeks &amp; streams</subject><subject>Dams</subject><subject>Floods</subject><subject>Land use planning</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Water supply</subject><issn>2073-4441</issn><issn>2073-4441</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkEFLw0AUhBdRsNSCPyHgxYPRt_tekt3eNFgtFLzUc9huXjAlTeJugvjvTamCc5k5fMzACHEt4R7RwMMXAklJ5kzMFGQYE5E8_5cvxSKEPUwio3UCM7HcfnCkQMroyddhZ1uOVk3XlWEZ5XYMHO6i9aG3bgiRbctjbmpnh7prw5W4qGwTePHrc_G-et7mr_Hm7WWdP25ih4aG2KUIJgGqmHWVOWVYAqMpHVhdcWodpohZySbZKVJWoSozYiLIrE6zknAubk69ve8-Rw5Dse9G306ThUwmTEskNVG3J8r5LgTPVdH7-mD9dyGhOJ5T_J2DP3-7Uvw</recordid><startdate>20111209</startdate><enddate>20111209</enddate><creator>Van den Honert, Robin C.</creator><creator>McAneney, John</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7072-9126</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20111209</creationdate><title>The 2011 Brisbane Floods: Causes, Impacts and Implications</title><author>Van den Honert, Robin C. ; McAneney, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-c6309504fee8f7c29e10e39dc0a8fe6ac36337de95b242a232d74e4407a867d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Creeks &amp; streams</topic><topic>Dams</topic><topic>Floods</topic><topic>Land use planning</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Water supply</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Van den Honert, Robin C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McAneney, John</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Water (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Van den Honert, Robin C.</au><au>McAneney, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The 2011 Brisbane Floods: Causes, Impacts and Implications</atitle><jtitle>Water (Basel)</jtitle><date>2011-12-09</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1149</spage><epage>1173</epage><pages>1149-1173</pages><issn>2073-4441</issn><eissn>2073-4441</eissn><abstract>On 13th January 2011 major flooding occurred throughout most of the Brisbane River catchment, most severely in Toowoomba and the Lockyer Creek catchment (where 23 people drowned), the Bremer River catchment and in Brisbane, the state capital of Queensland. Some 56,200 claims have been received by insurers with payouts totalling $2.55 billion. This paper backgrounds weather and climatic factors implicated in the flooding and the historical flood experience of Brisbane. We examine the time history of water releases from the Wivenhoe dam, which have been accused of aggravating damage downstream. The dam was built in response to even worse flooding in 1974 and now serves as Brisbane’s main water supply. In our analysis, the dam operators made sub-optimal decisions by neglecting forecasts of further rainfall and assuming a ‘no rainfall’ scenario. Questions have also been raised about the availability of insurance cover for riverine flood, and the Queensland government’s decision not to insure its infrastructure. These and other questions have led to Federal and State government inquiries. We argue that insurance is a form of risk transfer for the residual risk following risk management efforts and cannot in itself be a solution for poor land-use planning. With this in mind, we discuss the need for risk-related insurance premiums to encourage flood risk mitigating behaviours by all actors, and for transparency in the availability of flood maps. Examples of good flood risk management to arise from this flood are described.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/w3041149</doi><tpages>25</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7072-9126</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2073-4441
ispartof Water (Basel), 2011-12, Vol.3 (4), p.1149-1173
issn 2073-4441
2073-4441
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1540781342
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Creeks & streams
Dams
Floods
Land use planning
Rivers
Water supply
title The 2011 Brisbane Floods: Causes, Impacts and Implications
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T03%3A47%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%202011%20Brisbane%20Floods:%20Causes,%20Impacts%20and%20Implications&rft.jtitle=Water%20(Basel)&rft.au=Van%20den%20Honert,%20Robin%20C.&rft.date=2011-12-09&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1149&rft.epage=1173&rft.pages=1149-1173&rft.issn=2073-4441&rft.eissn=2073-4441&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/w3041149&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3350897751%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1540781342&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true