The 2011 Brisbane Floods: Causes, Impacts and Implications
On 13th January 2011 major flooding occurred throughout most of the Brisbane River catchment, most severely in Toowoomba and the Lockyer Creek catchment (where 23 people drowned), the Bremer River catchment and in Brisbane, the state capital of Queensland. Some 56,200 claims have been received by in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Water (Basel) 2011-12, Vol.3 (4), p.1149-1173 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1173 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1149 |
container_title | Water (Basel) |
container_volume | 3 |
creator | Van den Honert, Robin C. McAneney, John |
description | On 13th January 2011 major flooding occurred throughout most of the Brisbane River catchment, most severely in Toowoomba and the Lockyer Creek catchment (where 23 people drowned), the Bremer River catchment and in Brisbane, the state capital of Queensland. Some 56,200 claims have been received by insurers with payouts totalling $2.55 billion. This paper backgrounds weather and climatic factors implicated in the flooding and the historical flood experience of Brisbane. We examine the time history of water releases from the Wivenhoe dam, which have been accused of aggravating damage downstream. The dam was built in response to even worse flooding in 1974 and now serves as Brisbane’s main water supply. In our analysis, the dam operators made sub-optimal decisions by neglecting forecasts of further rainfall and assuming a ‘no rainfall’ scenario. Questions have also been raised about the availability of insurance cover for riverine flood, and the Queensland government’s decision not to insure its infrastructure. These and other questions have led to Federal and State government inquiries. We argue that insurance is a form of risk transfer for the residual risk following risk management efforts and cannot in itself be a solution for poor land-use planning. With this in mind, we discuss the need for risk-related insurance premiums to encourage flood risk mitigating behaviours by all actors, and for transparency in the availability of flood maps. Examples of good flood risk management to arise from this flood are described. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/w3041149 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1540781342</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3350897751</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-c6309504fee8f7c29e10e39dc0a8fe6ac36337de95b242a232d74e4407a867d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkEFLw0AUhBdRsNSCPyHgxYPRt_tekt3eNFgtFLzUc9huXjAlTeJugvjvTamCc5k5fMzACHEt4R7RwMMXAklJ5kzMFGQYE5E8_5cvxSKEPUwio3UCM7HcfnCkQMroyddhZ1uOVk3XlWEZ5XYMHO6i9aG3bgiRbctjbmpnh7prw5W4qGwTePHrc_G-et7mr_Hm7WWdP25ih4aG2KUIJgGqmHWVOWVYAqMpHVhdcWodpohZySbZKVJWoSozYiLIrE6zknAubk69ve8-Rw5Dse9G306ThUwmTEskNVG3J8r5LgTPVdH7-mD9dyGhOJ5T_J2DP3-7Uvw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1540781342</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The 2011 Brisbane Floods: Causes, Impacts and Implications</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Van den Honert, Robin C. ; McAneney, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Van den Honert, Robin C. ; McAneney, John</creatorcontrib><description>On 13th January 2011 major flooding occurred throughout most of the Brisbane River catchment, most severely in Toowoomba and the Lockyer Creek catchment (where 23 people drowned), the Bremer River catchment and in Brisbane, the state capital of Queensland. Some 56,200 claims have been received by insurers with payouts totalling $2.55 billion. This paper backgrounds weather and climatic factors implicated in the flooding and the historical flood experience of Brisbane. We examine the time history of water releases from the Wivenhoe dam, which have been accused of aggravating damage downstream. The dam was built in response to even worse flooding in 1974 and now serves as Brisbane’s main water supply. In our analysis, the dam operators made sub-optimal decisions by neglecting forecasts of further rainfall and assuming a ‘no rainfall’ scenario. Questions have also been raised about the availability of insurance cover for riverine flood, and the Queensland government’s decision not to insure its infrastructure. These and other questions have led to Federal and State government inquiries. We argue that insurance is a form of risk transfer for the residual risk following risk management efforts and cannot in itself be a solution for poor land-use planning. With this in mind, we discuss the need for risk-related insurance premiums to encourage flood risk mitigating behaviours by all actors, and for transparency in the availability of flood maps. Examples of good flood risk management to arise from this flood are described.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2073-4441</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2073-4441</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/w3041149</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Creeks & streams ; Dams ; Floods ; Land use planning ; Rivers ; Water supply</subject><ispartof>Water (Basel), 2011-12, Vol.3 (4), p.1149-1173</ispartof><rights>Copyright MDPI AG 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-c6309504fee8f7c29e10e39dc0a8fe6ac36337de95b242a232d74e4407a867d43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-c6309504fee8f7c29e10e39dc0a8fe6ac36337de95b242a232d74e4407a867d43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7072-9126</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Van den Honert, Robin C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McAneney, John</creatorcontrib><title>The 2011 Brisbane Floods: Causes, Impacts and Implications</title><title>Water (Basel)</title><description>On 13th January 2011 major flooding occurred throughout most of the Brisbane River catchment, most severely in Toowoomba and the Lockyer Creek catchment (where 23 people drowned), the Bremer River catchment and in Brisbane, the state capital of Queensland. Some 56,200 claims have been received by insurers with payouts totalling $2.55 billion. This paper backgrounds weather and climatic factors implicated in the flooding and the historical flood experience of Brisbane. We examine the time history of water releases from the Wivenhoe dam, which have been accused of aggravating damage downstream. The dam was built in response to even worse flooding in 1974 and now serves as Brisbane’s main water supply. In our analysis, the dam operators made sub-optimal decisions by neglecting forecasts of further rainfall and assuming a ‘no rainfall’ scenario. Questions have also been raised about the availability of insurance cover for riverine flood, and the Queensland government’s decision not to insure its infrastructure. These and other questions have led to Federal and State government inquiries. We argue that insurance is a form of risk transfer for the residual risk following risk management efforts and cannot in itself be a solution for poor land-use planning. With this in mind, we discuss the need for risk-related insurance premiums to encourage flood risk mitigating behaviours by all actors, and for transparency in the availability of flood maps. Examples of good flood risk management to arise from this flood are described.</description><subject>Creeks & streams</subject><subject>Dams</subject><subject>Floods</subject><subject>Land use planning</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Water supply</subject><issn>2073-4441</issn><issn>2073-4441</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkEFLw0AUhBdRsNSCPyHgxYPRt_tekt3eNFgtFLzUc9huXjAlTeJugvjvTamCc5k5fMzACHEt4R7RwMMXAklJ5kzMFGQYE5E8_5cvxSKEPUwio3UCM7HcfnCkQMroyddhZ1uOVk3XlWEZ5XYMHO6i9aG3bgiRbctjbmpnh7prw5W4qGwTePHrc_G-et7mr_Hm7WWdP25ih4aG2KUIJgGqmHWVOWVYAqMpHVhdcWodpohZySbZKVJWoSozYiLIrE6zknAubk69ve8-Rw5Dse9G306ThUwmTEskNVG3J8r5LgTPVdH7-mD9dyGhOJ5T_J2DP3-7Uvw</recordid><startdate>20111209</startdate><enddate>20111209</enddate><creator>Van den Honert, Robin C.</creator><creator>McAneney, John</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7072-9126</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20111209</creationdate><title>The 2011 Brisbane Floods: Causes, Impacts and Implications</title><author>Van den Honert, Robin C. ; McAneney, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-c6309504fee8f7c29e10e39dc0a8fe6ac36337de95b242a232d74e4407a867d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Creeks & streams</topic><topic>Dams</topic><topic>Floods</topic><topic>Land use planning</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Water supply</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Van den Honert, Robin C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McAneney, John</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Water (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Van den Honert, Robin C.</au><au>McAneney, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The 2011 Brisbane Floods: Causes, Impacts and Implications</atitle><jtitle>Water (Basel)</jtitle><date>2011-12-09</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1149</spage><epage>1173</epage><pages>1149-1173</pages><issn>2073-4441</issn><eissn>2073-4441</eissn><abstract>On 13th January 2011 major flooding occurred throughout most of the Brisbane River catchment, most severely in Toowoomba and the Lockyer Creek catchment (where 23 people drowned), the Bremer River catchment and in Brisbane, the state capital of Queensland. Some 56,200 claims have been received by insurers with payouts totalling $2.55 billion. This paper backgrounds weather and climatic factors implicated in the flooding and the historical flood experience of Brisbane. We examine the time history of water releases from the Wivenhoe dam, which have been accused of aggravating damage downstream. The dam was built in response to even worse flooding in 1974 and now serves as Brisbane’s main water supply. In our analysis, the dam operators made sub-optimal decisions by neglecting forecasts of further rainfall and assuming a ‘no rainfall’ scenario. Questions have also been raised about the availability of insurance cover for riverine flood, and the Queensland government’s decision not to insure its infrastructure. These and other questions have led to Federal and State government inquiries. We argue that insurance is a form of risk transfer for the residual risk following risk management efforts and cannot in itself be a solution for poor land-use planning. With this in mind, we discuss the need for risk-related insurance premiums to encourage flood risk mitigating behaviours by all actors, and for transparency in the availability of flood maps. Examples of good flood risk management to arise from this flood are described.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/w3041149</doi><tpages>25</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7072-9126</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2073-4441 |
ispartof | Water (Basel), 2011-12, Vol.3 (4), p.1149-1173 |
issn | 2073-4441 2073-4441 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1540781342 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Creeks & streams Dams Floods Land use planning Rivers Water supply |
title | The 2011 Brisbane Floods: Causes, Impacts and Implications |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T03%3A47%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%202011%20Brisbane%20Floods:%20Causes,%20Impacts%20and%20Implications&rft.jtitle=Water%20(Basel)&rft.au=Van%20den%20Honert,%20Robin%20C.&rft.date=2011-12-09&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1149&rft.epage=1173&rft.pages=1149-1173&rft.issn=2073-4441&rft.eissn=2073-4441&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/w3041149&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3350897751%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1540781342&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |