AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY AND GROWTH IN TURKEY

This paper investigates the growth experience of one country in detail in order to enhance our understanding of important factors that affect economic growth. Using a two-sector model, we identify low productivity growth in the agricultural sector as the main reason for the divergence of income per...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Macroeconomic dynamics 2014-07, Vol.18 (5), p.998-1017
Hauptverfasser: Imrohoroglu, Ayse, Imrohoroglu, Selahattin, Üngör, Murat
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1017
container_issue 5
container_start_page 998
container_title Macroeconomic dynamics
container_volume 18
creator Imrohoroglu, Ayse
Imrohoroglu, Selahattin
Üngör, Murat
description This paper investigates the growth experience of one country in detail in order to enhance our understanding of important factors that affect economic growth. Using a two-sector model, we identify low productivity growth in the agricultural sector as the main reason for the divergence of income per capita between Turkey and its peer countries between 1968 and 2005. An extended model that incorporates distortions in the use of intermediate goods in producing agricultural output indicates that policies that have different effects across sectors and across time may be important in explaining the growth experience of countries.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S1365100512000727
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1540088520</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1365100512000727</cupid><sourcerecordid>3349456551</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-53ad388dd29a3cbbde744346278b253fee3523e4e496599cee0203744cbbece03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLw0AUhQdRsFZ_gLuA69Q7rySzDGlNg6GRmChdDXncSIu1ddIu-u-d0C4EcXUPnO-cC4eQewoTCtR_fKXckxRAUgYAPvMvyIgKT7kBSO_Samu7g39Nbvp-DUA9ztSITMI4T6IyLco8TJ2XPJuWUZG8JcXSCRdTJ86z92LuJAvHAs-z5S256qrPHu_Od0zKp1kRzd00i5MoTN1GCH_vSl61PAjalqmKN3Xdoi8EFx7zg5pJ3iFyyTgKFMqTSjWIwIBbxrLYIPAxeTj17sz2-4D9Xq-3B_NlX2oqBUAQSDZQ9EQ1Ztv3Bju9M6tNZY6agh5m0X9msRl-zlSb2qzaD_xV_W_qB2s6Xi0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1540088520</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY AND GROWTH IN TURKEY</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Imrohoroglu, Ayse ; Imrohoroglu, Selahattin ; Üngör, Murat</creator><creatorcontrib>Imrohoroglu, Ayse ; Imrohoroglu, Selahattin ; Üngör, Murat</creatorcontrib><description>This paper investigates the growth experience of one country in detail in order to enhance our understanding of important factors that affect economic growth. Using a two-sector model, we identify low productivity growth in the agricultural sector as the main reason for the divergence of income per capita between Turkey and its peer countries between 1968 and 2005. An extended model that incorporates distortions in the use of intermediate goods in producing agricultural output indicates that policies that have different effects across sectors and across time may be important in explaining the growth experience of countries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1365-1005</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8056</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1365100512000727</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Agricultural production ; Agriculture ; Analysis ; Central banks ; Economic growth ; Economic theory ; Employment ; GDP ; Gross Domestic Product ; Human capital ; Investigations ; Macroeconomics ; Monetary policy ; Peers ; Per capita ; Productivity ; Stagnation ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Macroeconomic dynamics, 2014-07, Vol.18 (5), p.998-1017</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-53ad388dd29a3cbbde744346278b253fee3523e4e496599cee0203744cbbece03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-53ad388dd29a3cbbde744346278b253fee3523e4e496599cee0203744cbbece03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1365100512000727/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27923,27924,55627</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Imrohoroglu, Ayse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imrohoroglu, Selahattin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Üngör, Murat</creatorcontrib><title>AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY AND GROWTH IN TURKEY</title><title>Macroeconomic dynamics</title><addtitle>Macroecon. Dynam</addtitle><description>This paper investigates the growth experience of one country in detail in order to enhance our understanding of important factors that affect economic growth. Using a two-sector model, we identify low productivity growth in the agricultural sector as the main reason for the divergence of income per capita between Turkey and its peer countries between 1968 and 2005. An extended model that incorporates distortions in the use of intermediate goods in producing agricultural output indicates that policies that have different effects across sectors and across time may be important in explaining the growth experience of countries.</description><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Central banks</subject><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>GDP</subject><subject>Gross Domestic Product</subject><subject>Human capital</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Macroeconomics</subject><subject>Monetary policy</subject><subject>Peers</subject><subject>Per capita</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Stagnation</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1365-1005</issn><issn>1469-8056</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLw0AUhQdRsFZ_gLuA69Q7rySzDGlNg6GRmChdDXncSIu1ddIu-u-d0C4EcXUPnO-cC4eQewoTCtR_fKXckxRAUgYAPvMvyIgKT7kBSO_Samu7g39Nbvp-DUA9ztSITMI4T6IyLco8TJ2XPJuWUZG8JcXSCRdTJ86z92LuJAvHAs-z5S256qrPHu_Od0zKp1kRzd00i5MoTN1GCH_vSl61PAjalqmKN3Xdoi8EFx7zg5pJ3iFyyTgKFMqTSjWIwIBbxrLYIPAxeTj17sz2-4D9Xq-3B_NlX2oqBUAQSDZQ9EQ1Ztv3Bju9M6tNZY6agh5m0X9msRl-zlSb2qzaD_xV_W_qB2s6Xi0</recordid><startdate>20140701</startdate><enddate>20140701</enddate><creator>Imrohoroglu, Ayse</creator><creator>Imrohoroglu, Selahattin</creator><creator>Üngör, Murat</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140701</creationdate><title>AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY AND GROWTH IN TURKEY</title><author>Imrohoroglu, Ayse ; Imrohoroglu, Selahattin ; Üngör, Murat</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-53ad388dd29a3cbbde744346278b253fee3523e4e496599cee0203744cbbece03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Central banks</topic><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>GDP</topic><topic>Gross Domestic Product</topic><topic>Human capital</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Macroeconomics</topic><topic>Monetary policy</topic><topic>Peers</topic><topic>Per capita</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Stagnation</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Imrohoroglu, Ayse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imrohoroglu, Selahattin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Üngör, Murat</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Macroeconomic dynamics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Imrohoroglu, Ayse</au><au>Imrohoroglu, Selahattin</au><au>Üngör, Murat</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY AND GROWTH IN TURKEY</atitle><jtitle>Macroeconomic dynamics</jtitle><addtitle>Macroecon. Dynam</addtitle><date>2014-07-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>998</spage><epage>1017</epage><pages>998-1017</pages><issn>1365-1005</issn><eissn>1469-8056</eissn><abstract>This paper investigates the growth experience of one country in detail in order to enhance our understanding of important factors that affect economic growth. Using a two-sector model, we identify low productivity growth in the agricultural sector as the main reason for the divergence of income per capita between Turkey and its peer countries between 1968 and 2005. An extended model that incorporates distortions in the use of intermediate goods in producing agricultural output indicates that policies that have different effects across sectors and across time may be important in explaining the growth experience of countries.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1365100512000727</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1365-1005
ispartof Macroeconomic dynamics, 2014-07, Vol.18 (5), p.998-1017
issn 1365-1005
1469-8056
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1540088520
source Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Agricultural production
Agriculture
Analysis
Central banks
Economic growth
Economic theory
Employment
GDP
Gross Domestic Product
Human capital
Investigations
Macroeconomics
Monetary policy
Peers
Per capita
Productivity
Stagnation
Studies
title AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY AND GROWTH IN TURKEY
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T06%3A05%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=AGRICULTURAL%20PRODUCTIVITY%20AND%20GROWTH%20IN%20TURKEY&rft.jtitle=Macroeconomic%20dynamics&rft.au=Imrohoroglu,%20Ayse&rft.date=2014-07-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=998&rft.epage=1017&rft.pages=998-1017&rft.issn=1365-1005&rft.eissn=1469-8056&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1365100512000727&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3349456551%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1540088520&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1365100512000727&rfr_iscdi=true