Electrostatic precipitation is a novel way of maintaining visual field clarity during laparoscopic surgery: a prospective double-blind randomized controlled pilot study
Background Ultravision™ is a new device that utilizes electrostatic precipitation to clear surgical smoke. The aim was to evaluate its performance during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods Patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomized into “active (device on)” or “control (devi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Surgical endoscopy 2014-07, Vol.28 (7), p.2057-2065 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2065 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 2057 |
container_title | Surgical endoscopy |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Ansell, James Warren, Neil Wall, Pete Cocks, Kim Goddard, Stuart Whiston, Richard Stechman, Michael Scott-Coombes, David Torkington, Jared |
description | Background
Ultravision™ is a new device that utilizes electrostatic precipitation to clear surgical smoke. The aim was to evaluate its performance during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Methods
Patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomized into “active (device on)” or “control (device off).” Three operating surgeons scored the percentage effective visibility and three reviewers scored the percentage of the procedure where smoke was present. All assessors also used a 5-point scale (1 = imperceptible/excellent and 5 = very annoying/bad) to rate visual impairment. Secondary outcomes were the number of smoke-related pauses, camera cleaning, and pneumoperitoneum reductions. Mean results are presented with 95 % confidence intervals (CI).
Results
In 30 patients (active 13, control 17), the effective visibility was 89.2 % (83.3–95.0) for active cases and 71.2 % (65.7–76.7) for controls. The proportion of the procedure where smoke was present was 41.1 % (33.8–48.3) for active cases and 61.5 % (49.0–74.1) for controls. Operating surgeons rated the visual impairment as 2.2 (1.7–2.6) for active cases and 3.2 (2.8–3.5) for controls. Reviewers rated the visual impairment as 2.3 (2.0–2.5) for active cases and 3.2 (2.8–3.7) for controls. In the active group, 23 % of procedures were paused to allow smoke clearance compared to 94 % of control cases. Camera cleaning was not needed in 85 % of active procedures and 35 % of controls. The pneumoperitoneum was reduced in 0 % of active cases and 88 % of controls.
Conclusions
Ultravision™ improves visibility during laparoscopic surgery and reduces delays in surgery for smoke clearance and camera cleaning. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00464-014-3427-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1538516139</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3341199511</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-5e05fb0628ae58beae48a3a5d76725a5516a7b42e16d50a64410323d6c1bd96b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctu1TAURS0EoreFD2CCLDE2-JkHM1QVqFSJCYwtJz6pXPnGxk4uCl_EZ3KiWxATBpZfe69z7E3IK8HfCs7bd5Vz3WjGhWZKy5Z1T8hBaCWZlKJ7Sg68V5zJttcX5LLWB47yXpjn5EJq03IuxIH8uokwLiXVxS1hpLnAGHLYN2mmoVJH53SCSH-4jaaJHl2YFxxhvqenUFcX6RQgejpGV8KyUb-W_S667BA6pozQupZ7KNt7hGU8zFgwnID6tA4R2BDD7Glxs0_H8BMQlWZsKEZc5hDTQuuy-u0FeTa5WOHl43xFvn28-Xr9md19-XR7_eGOjVrLhRngZhp4IzsHphvAge6ccsa3TSuNM0Y0rh20BNF4w12jteBKKt-MYvB9M6gr8ubMxVa_r1AX-5DWMmNJK4zq0C9UjypxVo34oFpgsrmEoyubFdzu2dhzNhazsXs2tkPP60fyOhzB_3X8CQMF8iyoef9EKP-U_i_1N-lpnh4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1538516139</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Electrostatic precipitation is a novel way of maintaining visual field clarity during laparoscopic surgery: a prospective double-blind randomized controlled pilot study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Ansell, James ; Warren, Neil ; Wall, Pete ; Cocks, Kim ; Goddard, Stuart ; Whiston, Richard ; Stechman, Michael ; Scott-Coombes, David ; Torkington, Jared</creator><creatorcontrib>Ansell, James ; Warren, Neil ; Wall, Pete ; Cocks, Kim ; Goddard, Stuart ; Whiston, Richard ; Stechman, Michael ; Scott-Coombes, David ; Torkington, Jared</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Ultravision™ is a new device that utilizes electrostatic precipitation to clear surgical smoke. The aim was to evaluate its performance during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Methods
Patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomized into “active (device on)” or “control (device off).” Three operating surgeons scored the percentage effective visibility and three reviewers scored the percentage of the procedure where smoke was present. All assessors also used a 5-point scale (1 = imperceptible/excellent and 5 = very annoying/bad) to rate visual impairment. Secondary outcomes were the number of smoke-related pauses, camera cleaning, and pneumoperitoneum reductions. Mean results are presented with 95 % confidence intervals (CI).
Results
In 30 patients (active 13, control 17), the effective visibility was 89.2 % (83.3–95.0) for active cases and 71.2 % (65.7–76.7) for controls. The proportion of the procedure where smoke was present was 41.1 % (33.8–48.3) for active cases and 61.5 % (49.0–74.1) for controls. Operating surgeons rated the visual impairment as 2.2 (1.7–2.6) for active cases and 3.2 (2.8–3.5) for controls. Reviewers rated the visual impairment as 2.3 (2.0–2.5) for active cases and 3.2 (2.8–3.7) for controls. In the active group, 23 % of procedures were paused to allow smoke clearance compared to 94 % of control cases. Camera cleaning was not needed in 85 % of active procedures and 35 % of controls. The pneumoperitoneum was reduced in 0 % of active cases and 88 % of controls.
Conclusions
Ultravision™ improves visibility during laparoscopic surgery and reduces delays in surgery for smoke clearance and camera cleaning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0930-2794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2218</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3427-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24570011</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Abdomen ; Abdominal Surgery ; Adult ; Air Pollutants, Occupational ; Cameras ; Cholecystectomy ; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - instrumentation ; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - methods ; Double-Blind Method ; Equipment Contamination ; Female ; Gastroenterology ; Gynecology ; Hepatology ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Operating Rooms ; Operative Time ; Patients ; Performance evaluation ; Pilot Projects ; Proctology ; Prospective Studies ; R&D ; Research & development ; Smoke ; Static Electricity ; Surgeons ; Surgery ; Vision, Ocular ; Visual impairment</subject><ispartof>Surgical endoscopy, 2014-07, Vol.28 (7), p.2057-2065</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-5e05fb0628ae58beae48a3a5d76725a5516a7b42e16d50a64410323d6c1bd96b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-5e05fb0628ae58beae48a3a5d76725a5516a7b42e16d50a64410323d6c1bd96b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00464-014-3427-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00464-014-3427-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24570011$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ansell, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warren, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wall, Pete</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cocks, Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goddard, Stuart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whiston, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stechman, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott-Coombes, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torkington, Jared</creatorcontrib><title>Electrostatic precipitation is a novel way of maintaining visual field clarity during laparoscopic surgery: a prospective double-blind randomized controlled pilot study</title><title>Surgical endoscopy</title><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><description>Background
Ultravision™ is a new device that utilizes electrostatic precipitation to clear surgical smoke. The aim was to evaluate its performance during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Methods
Patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomized into “active (device on)” or “control (device off).” Three operating surgeons scored the percentage effective visibility and three reviewers scored the percentage of the procedure where smoke was present. All assessors also used a 5-point scale (1 = imperceptible/excellent and 5 = very annoying/bad) to rate visual impairment. Secondary outcomes were the number of smoke-related pauses, camera cleaning, and pneumoperitoneum reductions. Mean results are presented with 95 % confidence intervals (CI).
Results
In 30 patients (active 13, control 17), the effective visibility was 89.2 % (83.3–95.0) for active cases and 71.2 % (65.7–76.7) for controls. The proportion of the procedure where smoke was present was 41.1 % (33.8–48.3) for active cases and 61.5 % (49.0–74.1) for controls. Operating surgeons rated the visual impairment as 2.2 (1.7–2.6) for active cases and 3.2 (2.8–3.5) for controls. Reviewers rated the visual impairment as 2.3 (2.0–2.5) for active cases and 3.2 (2.8–3.7) for controls. In the active group, 23 % of procedures were paused to allow smoke clearance compared to 94 % of control cases. Camera cleaning was not needed in 85 % of active procedures and 35 % of controls. The pneumoperitoneum was reduced in 0 % of active cases and 88 % of controls.
Conclusions
Ultravision™ improves visibility during laparoscopic surgery and reduces delays in surgery for smoke clearance and camera cleaning.</description><subject>Abdomen</subject><subject>Abdominal Surgery</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Air Pollutants, Occupational</subject><subject>Cameras</subject><subject>Cholecystectomy</subject><subject>Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - instrumentation</subject><subject>Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - methods</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Equipment Contamination</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Operating Rooms</subject><subject>Operative Time</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Proctology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Smoke</subject><subject>Static Electricity</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Vision, Ocular</subject><subject>Visual impairment</subject><issn>0930-2794</issn><issn>1432-2218</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kctu1TAURS0EoreFD2CCLDE2-JkHM1QVqFSJCYwtJz6pXPnGxk4uCl_EZ3KiWxATBpZfe69z7E3IK8HfCs7bd5Vz3WjGhWZKy5Z1T8hBaCWZlKJ7Sg68V5zJttcX5LLWB47yXpjn5EJq03IuxIH8uokwLiXVxS1hpLnAGHLYN2mmoVJH53SCSH-4jaaJHl2YFxxhvqenUFcX6RQgejpGV8KyUb-W_S667BA6pozQupZ7KNt7hGU8zFgwnID6tA4R2BDD7Glxs0_H8BMQlWZsKEZc5hDTQuuy-u0FeTa5WOHl43xFvn28-Xr9md19-XR7_eGOjVrLhRngZhp4IzsHphvAge6ccsa3TSuNM0Y0rh20BNF4w12jteBKKt-MYvB9M6gr8ubMxVa_r1AX-5DWMmNJK4zq0C9UjypxVo34oFpgsrmEoyubFdzu2dhzNhazsXs2tkPP60fyOhzB_3X8CQMF8iyoef9EKP-U_i_1N-lpnh4</recordid><startdate>20140701</startdate><enddate>20140701</enddate><creator>Ansell, James</creator><creator>Warren, Neil</creator><creator>Wall, Pete</creator><creator>Cocks, Kim</creator><creator>Goddard, Stuart</creator><creator>Whiston, Richard</creator><creator>Stechman, Michael</creator><creator>Scott-Coombes, David</creator><creator>Torkington, Jared</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140701</creationdate><title>Electrostatic precipitation is a novel way of maintaining visual field clarity during laparoscopic surgery: a prospective double-blind randomized controlled pilot study</title><author>Ansell, James ; Warren, Neil ; Wall, Pete ; Cocks, Kim ; Goddard, Stuart ; Whiston, Richard ; Stechman, Michael ; Scott-Coombes, David ; Torkington, Jared</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-5e05fb0628ae58beae48a3a5d76725a5516a7b42e16d50a64410323d6c1bd96b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Abdomen</topic><topic>Abdominal Surgery</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Air Pollutants, Occupational</topic><topic>Cameras</topic><topic>Cholecystectomy</topic><topic>Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - instrumentation</topic><topic>Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - methods</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Equipment Contamination</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Operating Rooms</topic><topic>Operative Time</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Proctology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Smoke</topic><topic>Static Electricity</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Vision, Ocular</topic><topic>Visual impairment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ansell, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warren, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wall, Pete</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cocks, Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goddard, Stuart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whiston, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stechman, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott-Coombes, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torkington, Jared</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ansell, James</au><au>Warren, Neil</au><au>Wall, Pete</au><au>Cocks, Kim</au><au>Goddard, Stuart</au><au>Whiston, Richard</au><au>Stechman, Michael</au><au>Scott-Coombes, David</au><au>Torkington, Jared</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Electrostatic precipitation is a novel way of maintaining visual field clarity during laparoscopic surgery: a prospective double-blind randomized controlled pilot study</atitle><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle><stitle>Surg Endosc</stitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><date>2014-07-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>2057</spage><epage>2065</epage><pages>2057-2065</pages><issn>0930-2794</issn><eissn>1432-2218</eissn><abstract>Background
Ultravision™ is a new device that utilizes electrostatic precipitation to clear surgical smoke. The aim was to evaluate its performance during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Methods
Patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomized into “active (device on)” or “control (device off).” Three operating surgeons scored the percentage effective visibility and three reviewers scored the percentage of the procedure where smoke was present. All assessors also used a 5-point scale (1 = imperceptible/excellent and 5 = very annoying/bad) to rate visual impairment. Secondary outcomes were the number of smoke-related pauses, camera cleaning, and pneumoperitoneum reductions. Mean results are presented with 95 % confidence intervals (CI).
Results
In 30 patients (active 13, control 17), the effective visibility was 89.2 % (83.3–95.0) for active cases and 71.2 % (65.7–76.7) for controls. The proportion of the procedure where smoke was present was 41.1 % (33.8–48.3) for active cases and 61.5 % (49.0–74.1) for controls. Operating surgeons rated the visual impairment as 2.2 (1.7–2.6) for active cases and 3.2 (2.8–3.5) for controls. Reviewers rated the visual impairment as 2.3 (2.0–2.5) for active cases and 3.2 (2.8–3.7) for controls. In the active group, 23 % of procedures were paused to allow smoke clearance compared to 94 % of control cases. Camera cleaning was not needed in 85 % of active procedures and 35 % of controls. The pneumoperitoneum was reduced in 0 % of active cases and 88 % of controls.
Conclusions
Ultravision™ improves visibility during laparoscopic surgery and reduces delays in surgery for smoke clearance and camera cleaning.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>24570011</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00464-014-3427-8</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0930-2794 |
ispartof | Surgical endoscopy, 2014-07, Vol.28 (7), p.2057-2065 |
issn | 0930-2794 1432-2218 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1538516139 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Abdomen Abdominal Surgery Adult Air Pollutants, Occupational Cameras Cholecystectomy Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - instrumentation Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - methods Double-Blind Method Equipment Contamination Female Gastroenterology Gynecology Hepatology Hospitals Humans Laparoscopy Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Operating Rooms Operative Time Patients Performance evaluation Pilot Projects Proctology Prospective Studies R&D Research & development Smoke Static Electricity Surgeons Surgery Vision, Ocular Visual impairment |
title | Electrostatic precipitation is a novel way of maintaining visual field clarity during laparoscopic surgery: a prospective double-blind randomized controlled pilot study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T20%3A45%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Electrostatic%20precipitation%20is%20a%20novel%20way%20of%20maintaining%20visual%20field%20clarity%20during%20laparoscopic%20surgery:%20a%20prospective%20double-blind%20randomized%20controlled%20pilot%20study&rft.jtitle=Surgical%20endoscopy&rft.au=Ansell,%20James&rft.date=2014-07-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=2057&rft.epage=2065&rft.pages=2057-2065&rft.issn=0930-2794&rft.eissn=1432-2218&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00464-014-3427-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3341199511%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1538516139&rft_id=info:pmid/24570011&rfr_iscdi=true |