Body composition and feed intake of reproducing and growing mice divergently selected for heat loss1
Changes in maintenance energy requirements and in feed efficiency have been achieved by divergent selection for heat loss in mice in 3 replicates, creating high heat loss, high maintenance (MH) and low heat loss, low maintenance (ML) lines and an unselected control (MC). However, feed intake has mai...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of animal science 2014-05, Vol.92 (5), p.1886-1894 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1894 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1886 |
container_title | Journal of animal science |
container_volume | 92 |
creator | Bhatnagar, A. S. Nielsen, M. K. |
description | Changes in maintenance energy requirements and in feed efficiency have been achieved by divergent selection for heat loss in mice in 3 replicates, creating high heat loss, high maintenance (MH) and low heat loss, low maintenance (ML) lines and an unselected control (MC). However, feed intake has mainly been measured in mature animals and not during growth or reproduction. Additionally, there is evidence that reducing maintenance energy will increase fat content, an undesirable result. To evaluate if selection has altered body composition and lifecycle feed intake, mating pairs were continuously mated and maintained for up to 1 yr unless culled. Offspring pairs were sampled from each line at each parity and maintained from 21 to 49 d of age. Feed intake was recorded for mating pairs throughout the year and on offspring pairs. Body weight was recorded on all animals at culling as well as percent fat, total fat, and total lean, measured by dual X-ray densitometry. Average daily gain was also recorded for offspring. Energy partitioning was achieved using 2 approaches: Approach I regressed energy intake of the pair on sum of daily metabolic weight and total gain to obtain maintenance (bsubm) and growth (bsubg) coefficients for each line, replicate, feeding period, and sex (offspring pairs only); Approach II calculated bsubm for each pair assuming constant energy values for lean and fat gain. Energy coefficients and body composition traits were evaluated for effect of selection (MH vs. ML) and asymmetry of selection ([MH + ML]/2 vs. MC). Both MC mating and offspring pairs tended to have greater BW than the average of the selection lines (P < 0.08). Males of offspring pairs weighed more than females (P < 0.01), while females of mating pairs weighed more than males (P < 0.01). Line was insignificant (P > 0.15) for body composition traits. Using Approach I, MH mice had a greater bsubm than ML mice for mating pairs (P = 0.03) but not offspring pairs (P = 0.50). For Approach II, MH had a greater bsubm than ML mice for both mating (P = 0.01) and offspring pairs (P = 0.01). The effect of selection for heat loss on body composition was smaller than previously reported and unlikely to outweigh the benefit of reduced feed intake, which was shown to be maintained throughout an entire lifecycle that included reproducing animals. Additionally, the reduction in energy intake seems primarily due to reduced maintenance energy costs, validating the success of the selection proce |
doi_str_mv | 10.2527/jas.2013-7143 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1537970164</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3340803901</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1104-1056b41eeb32e6e7798b82ad6b80099b956a8936c111b1ce01e3f19ed504d10e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkE1PwzAMhiMEEmNw5B6Jc4edNG1zhIkvaRIXOEdp446MrhlJB9q_p2WcbMmP7VcPY9cIC6FEebuxaSEAZVZiLk_YDJVQmcRCnrIZgMCsqlCcs4uUNgAolFYz5u6DO_AmbHch-cGHntve8ZbIcd8P9pN4aHmkXQxu3_h-_Tdex_Az9VvfEHf-m-Ka-qE78EQdNcO424bIP8gOvAsp4SU7a22X6Oq_ztn748Pb8jlbvT69LO9WWYMIeYagijpHoloKKqgsdVVXwrqirgC0rrUqbKVlMdJYY0OAJFvU5BTkDoHknN0c745xv_aUBrMJ-9iPLw0qWeoSsMhHKjtSTRzDRWrNLvqtjQeDYCaRZhRpJpFmEil_AdA2Zl8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1537970164</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Body composition and feed intake of reproducing and growing mice divergently selected for heat loss1</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals</source><creator>Bhatnagar, A. S. ; Nielsen, M. K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bhatnagar, A. S. ; Nielsen, M. K.</creatorcontrib><description>Changes in maintenance energy requirements and in feed efficiency have been achieved by divergent selection for heat loss in mice in 3 replicates, creating high heat loss, high maintenance (MH) and low heat loss, low maintenance (ML) lines and an unselected control (MC). However, feed intake has mainly been measured in mature animals and not during growth or reproduction. Additionally, there is evidence that reducing maintenance energy will increase fat content, an undesirable result. To evaluate if selection has altered body composition and lifecycle feed intake, mating pairs were continuously mated and maintained for up to 1 yr unless culled. Offspring pairs were sampled from each line at each parity and maintained from 21 to 49 d of age. Feed intake was recorded for mating pairs throughout the year and on offspring pairs. Body weight was recorded on all animals at culling as well as percent fat, total fat, and total lean, measured by dual X-ray densitometry. Average daily gain was also recorded for offspring. Energy partitioning was achieved using 2 approaches: Approach I regressed energy intake of the pair on sum of daily metabolic weight and total gain to obtain maintenance (bsubm) and growth (bsubg) coefficients for each line, replicate, feeding period, and sex (offspring pairs only); Approach II calculated bsubm for each pair assuming constant energy values for lean and fat gain. Energy coefficients and body composition traits were evaluated for effect of selection (MH vs. ML) and asymmetry of selection ([MH + ML]/2 vs. MC). Both MC mating and offspring pairs tended to have greater BW than the average of the selection lines (P < 0.08). Males of offspring pairs weighed more than females (P < 0.01), while females of mating pairs weighed more than males (P < 0.01). Line was insignificant (P > 0.15) for body composition traits. Using Approach I, MH mice had a greater bsubm than ML mice for mating pairs (P = 0.03) but not offspring pairs (P = 0.50). For Approach II, MH had a greater bsubm than ML mice for both mating (P = 0.01) and offspring pairs (P = 0.01). The effect of selection for heat loss on body composition was smaller than previously reported and unlikely to outweigh the benefit of reduced feed intake, which was shown to be maintained throughout an entire lifecycle that included reproducing animals. Additionally, the reduction in energy intake seems primarily due to reduced maintenance energy costs, validating the success of the selection procedure. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2527/jas.2013-7143</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Energy ; Feeds ; Heat ; Rodents</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2014-05, Vol.92 (5), p.1886-1894</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Society of Animal Science May 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1104-1056b41eeb32e6e7798b82ad6b80099b956a8936c111b1ce01e3f19ed504d10e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1104-1056b41eeb32e6e7798b82ad6b80099b956a8936c111b1ce01e3f19ed504d10e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bhatnagar, A. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, M. K.</creatorcontrib><title>Body composition and feed intake of reproducing and growing mice divergently selected for heat loss1</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description>Changes in maintenance energy requirements and in feed efficiency have been achieved by divergent selection for heat loss in mice in 3 replicates, creating high heat loss, high maintenance (MH) and low heat loss, low maintenance (ML) lines and an unselected control (MC). However, feed intake has mainly been measured in mature animals and not during growth or reproduction. Additionally, there is evidence that reducing maintenance energy will increase fat content, an undesirable result. To evaluate if selection has altered body composition and lifecycle feed intake, mating pairs were continuously mated and maintained for up to 1 yr unless culled. Offspring pairs were sampled from each line at each parity and maintained from 21 to 49 d of age. Feed intake was recorded for mating pairs throughout the year and on offspring pairs. Body weight was recorded on all animals at culling as well as percent fat, total fat, and total lean, measured by dual X-ray densitometry. Average daily gain was also recorded for offspring. Energy partitioning was achieved using 2 approaches: Approach I regressed energy intake of the pair on sum of daily metabolic weight and total gain to obtain maintenance (bsubm) and growth (bsubg) coefficients for each line, replicate, feeding period, and sex (offspring pairs only); Approach II calculated bsubm for each pair assuming constant energy values for lean and fat gain. Energy coefficients and body composition traits were evaluated for effect of selection (MH vs. ML) and asymmetry of selection ([MH + ML]/2 vs. MC). Both MC mating and offspring pairs tended to have greater BW than the average of the selection lines (P < 0.08). Males of offspring pairs weighed more than females (P < 0.01), while females of mating pairs weighed more than males (P < 0.01). Line was insignificant (P > 0.15) for body composition traits. Using Approach I, MH mice had a greater bsubm than ML mice for mating pairs (P = 0.03) but not offspring pairs (P = 0.50). For Approach II, MH had a greater bsubm than ML mice for both mating (P = 0.01) and offspring pairs (P = 0.01). The effect of selection for heat loss on body composition was smaller than previously reported and unlikely to outweigh the benefit of reduced feed intake, which was shown to be maintained throughout an entire lifecycle that included reproducing animals. Additionally, the reduction in energy intake seems primarily due to reduced maintenance energy costs, validating the success of the selection procedure. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Feeds</subject><subject>Heat</subject><subject>Rodents</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNotkE1PwzAMhiMEEmNw5B6Jc4edNG1zhIkvaRIXOEdp446MrhlJB9q_p2WcbMmP7VcPY9cIC6FEebuxaSEAZVZiLk_YDJVQmcRCnrIZgMCsqlCcs4uUNgAolFYz5u6DO_AmbHch-cGHntve8ZbIcd8P9pN4aHmkXQxu3_h-_Tdex_Az9VvfEHf-m-Ka-qE78EQdNcO424bIP8gOvAsp4SU7a22X6Oq_ztn748Pb8jlbvT69LO9WWYMIeYagijpHoloKKqgsdVVXwrqirgC0rrUqbKVlMdJYY0OAJFvU5BTkDoHknN0c745xv_aUBrMJ-9iPLw0qWeoSsMhHKjtSTRzDRWrNLvqtjQeDYCaRZhRpJpFmEil_AdA2Zl8</recordid><startdate>20140501</startdate><enddate>20140501</enddate><creator>Bhatnagar, A. S.</creator><creator>Nielsen, M. K.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140501</creationdate><title>Body composition and feed intake of reproducing and growing mice divergently selected for heat loss1</title><author>Bhatnagar, A. S. ; Nielsen, M. K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1104-1056b41eeb32e6e7798b82ad6b80099b956a8936c111b1ce01e3f19ed504d10e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Feeds</topic><topic>Heat</topic><topic>Rodents</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bhatnagar, A. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, M. K.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career and Technical Education (ProQuest Database)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Agriculture & Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bhatnagar, A. S.</au><au>Nielsen, M. K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Body composition and feed intake of reproducing and growing mice divergently selected for heat loss1</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2014-05-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>92</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1886</spage><epage>1894</epage><pages>1886-1894</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>Changes in maintenance energy requirements and in feed efficiency have been achieved by divergent selection for heat loss in mice in 3 replicates, creating high heat loss, high maintenance (MH) and low heat loss, low maintenance (ML) lines and an unselected control (MC). However, feed intake has mainly been measured in mature animals and not during growth or reproduction. Additionally, there is evidence that reducing maintenance energy will increase fat content, an undesirable result. To evaluate if selection has altered body composition and lifecycle feed intake, mating pairs were continuously mated and maintained for up to 1 yr unless culled. Offspring pairs were sampled from each line at each parity and maintained from 21 to 49 d of age. Feed intake was recorded for mating pairs throughout the year and on offspring pairs. Body weight was recorded on all animals at culling as well as percent fat, total fat, and total lean, measured by dual X-ray densitometry. Average daily gain was also recorded for offspring. Energy partitioning was achieved using 2 approaches: Approach I regressed energy intake of the pair on sum of daily metabolic weight and total gain to obtain maintenance (bsubm) and growth (bsubg) coefficients for each line, replicate, feeding period, and sex (offspring pairs only); Approach II calculated bsubm for each pair assuming constant energy values for lean and fat gain. Energy coefficients and body composition traits were evaluated for effect of selection (MH vs. ML) and asymmetry of selection ([MH + ML]/2 vs. MC). Both MC mating and offspring pairs tended to have greater BW than the average of the selection lines (P < 0.08). Males of offspring pairs weighed more than females (P < 0.01), while females of mating pairs weighed more than males (P < 0.01). Line was insignificant (P > 0.15) for body composition traits. Using Approach I, MH mice had a greater bsubm than ML mice for mating pairs (P = 0.03) but not offspring pairs (P = 0.50). For Approach II, MH had a greater bsubm than ML mice for both mating (P = 0.01) and offspring pairs (P = 0.01). The effect of selection for heat loss on body composition was smaller than previously reported and unlikely to outweigh the benefit of reduced feed intake, which was shown to be maintained throughout an entire lifecycle that included reproducing animals. Additionally, the reduction in energy intake seems primarily due to reduced maintenance energy costs, validating the success of the selection procedure. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Champaign</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.2527/jas.2013-7143</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8812 |
ispartof | Journal of animal science, 2014-05, Vol.92 (5), p.1886-1894 |
issn | 0021-8812 1525-3163 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1537970164 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals |
subjects | Energy Feeds Heat Rodents |
title | Body composition and feed intake of reproducing and growing mice divergently selected for heat loss1 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T18%3A09%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Body%20composition%20and%20feed%20intake%20of%20reproducing%20and%20growing%20mice%20divergently%20selected%20for%20heat%20loss1&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Bhatnagar,%20A.%20S.&rft.date=2014-05-01&rft.volume=92&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1886&rft.epage=1894&rft.pages=1886-1894&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527/jas.2013-7143&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3340803901%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1537970164&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |