Groundwater Nitrate Concentration Reductions in a Riparian Buffer Enrolled in the NC Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program

Riparian buffers have been used for many years as a best management practice to decrease the effects of nonpoint pollution from watersheds. The NC Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (NC CREP) has established buffers to treat groundwater nitrate‐nitrogen (NO3−‐N) from agricultural sources in mu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Water Resources Association 2014-06, Vol.50 (3), p.653-664
Hauptverfasser: Wiseman, Jacob D., Burchell, Michael R., Grabow, Garry L., Osmond, Deanna L., Messer, T.L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 664
container_issue 3
container_start_page 653
container_title Journal of the American Water Resources Association
container_volume 50
creator Wiseman, Jacob D.
Burchell, Michael R.
Grabow, Garry L.
Osmond, Deanna L.
Messer, T.L.
description Riparian buffers have been used for many years as a best management practice to decrease the effects of nonpoint pollution from watersheds. The NC Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (NC CREP) has established buffers to treat groundwater nitrate‐nitrogen (NO3−‐N) from agricultural sources in multiple river basins. A maturing 46 m wide riparian buffer enrolled in NC CREP was studied to determine its effectiveness in reducing groundwater NO3−‐N concentrations from a cattle pasture fertilized with poultry litter. Three monitoring blocks that included groundwater quality wells, water table wells, and soil redox probes, were established in the buffer. NO3−‐N concentrations decreased significantly across the buffer in all of the monitoring blocks with mean reductions of 76‐92%. Many biological processes, including denitrification and plant uptake, may have been responsible for the observed NO3−‐N reductions but could not be differentiated in this study. However, mean reductions in Cl− concentrations ranged from 48‐65% through the blocks, which indicated that dilution was an important factor in observed NO3−‐N reductions. These findings should be carefully considered for future buffer enrollments when assigning nitrogen removal credits.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jawr.12209
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1536930531</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3337133951</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3629-c816e57601e50cf70c07d92d7af6d0e397628630d3b04afe85e468ea4d57b2a93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFPwjAYhhejiYhe_AVNvJkM23Vt1yMuihKChqhwa8r2TYZjw3YTOfjf7UQ82kufpM_7Nnk975zgHnHnaqk3pkeCAMsDr0MEC3zCo-jQMZbUD0U4O_ZOrF1iTBiJaMf7GpiqKdONrsGgcV4bByiuygTKlvOqRBNIm6Qli_ISaTTJ19rkukTXTZa51E1pqqKAtH2tF4DGcVtgwXzs8y2D8xba9a5cM3o01avRq1PvKNOFhbPfu-s93948xXf-6GFwH_dHvqY8kH4SEQ5McEyA4SQTOMEilUEqdMZTDFQKHkSc4pTOcagziBiEPAIdpkzMAy1p17vY9a5N9d6ArdWyakzpvlSEUS4pZpQ463JnJaay1kCm1iZfabNVBKt2XtXOq37mdTLZyZu8gO0_phr2p5N9xt9lclvD519GmzfFBRVMTccDFYXDF0lnAyXpN-7IjZM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1536930531</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Groundwater Nitrate Concentration Reductions in a Riparian Buffer Enrolled in the NC Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Wiseman, Jacob D. ; Burchell, Michael R. ; Grabow, Garry L. ; Osmond, Deanna L. ; Messer, T.L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wiseman, Jacob D. ; Burchell, Michael R. ; Grabow, Garry L. ; Osmond, Deanna L. ; Messer, T.L.</creatorcontrib><description>Riparian buffers have been used for many years as a best management practice to decrease the effects of nonpoint pollution from watersheds. The NC Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (NC CREP) has established buffers to treat groundwater nitrate‐nitrogen (NO3−‐N) from agricultural sources in multiple river basins. A maturing 46 m wide riparian buffer enrolled in NC CREP was studied to determine its effectiveness in reducing groundwater NO3−‐N concentrations from a cattle pasture fertilized with poultry litter. Three monitoring blocks that included groundwater quality wells, water table wells, and soil redox probes, were established in the buffer. NO3−‐N concentrations decreased significantly across the buffer in all of the monitoring blocks with mean reductions of 76‐92%. Many biological processes, including denitrification and plant uptake, may have been responsible for the observed NO3−‐N reductions but could not be differentiated in this study. However, mean reductions in Cl− concentrations ranged from 48‐65% through the blocks, which indicated that dilution was an important factor in observed NO3−‐N reductions. These findings should be carefully considered for future buffer enrollments when assigning nitrogen removal credits.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1093-474X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1752-1688</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jawr.12209</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Middleburg: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Best management practices ; CREP ; denitrification ; dilution ; nitrate ; Nitrates ; nitrogen ; Nonpoint source pollution ; riparian buffer ; Riparian buffers ; Water quality ; Watershed management</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2014-06, Vol.50 (3), p.653-664</ispartof><rights>2014 American Water Resources Association</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Jun 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3629-c816e57601e50cf70c07d92d7af6d0e397628630d3b04afe85e468ea4d57b2a93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3629-c816e57601e50cf70c07d92d7af6d0e397628630d3b04afe85e468ea4d57b2a93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjawr.12209$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjawr.12209$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wiseman, Jacob D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burchell, Michael R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grabow, Garry L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osmond, Deanna L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Messer, T.L.</creatorcontrib><title>Groundwater Nitrate Concentration Reductions in a Riparian Buffer Enrolled in the NC Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program</title><title>Journal of the American Water Resources Association</title><addtitle>J Am Water Resour Assoc</addtitle><description>Riparian buffers have been used for many years as a best management practice to decrease the effects of nonpoint pollution from watersheds. The NC Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (NC CREP) has established buffers to treat groundwater nitrate‐nitrogen (NO3−‐N) from agricultural sources in multiple river basins. A maturing 46 m wide riparian buffer enrolled in NC CREP was studied to determine its effectiveness in reducing groundwater NO3−‐N concentrations from a cattle pasture fertilized with poultry litter. Three monitoring blocks that included groundwater quality wells, water table wells, and soil redox probes, were established in the buffer. NO3−‐N concentrations decreased significantly across the buffer in all of the monitoring blocks with mean reductions of 76‐92%. Many biological processes, including denitrification and plant uptake, may have been responsible for the observed NO3−‐N reductions but could not be differentiated in this study. However, mean reductions in Cl− concentrations ranged from 48‐65% through the blocks, which indicated that dilution was an important factor in observed NO3−‐N reductions. These findings should be carefully considered for future buffer enrollments when assigning nitrogen removal credits.</description><subject>Best management practices</subject><subject>CREP</subject><subject>denitrification</subject><subject>dilution</subject><subject>nitrate</subject><subject>Nitrates</subject><subject>nitrogen</subject><subject>Nonpoint source pollution</subject><subject>riparian buffer</subject><subject>Riparian buffers</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Watershed management</subject><issn>1093-474X</issn><issn>1752-1688</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEFPwjAYhhejiYhe_AVNvJkM23Vt1yMuihKChqhwa8r2TYZjw3YTOfjf7UQ82kufpM_7Nnk975zgHnHnaqk3pkeCAMsDr0MEC3zCo-jQMZbUD0U4O_ZOrF1iTBiJaMf7GpiqKdONrsGgcV4bByiuygTKlvOqRBNIm6Qli_ISaTTJ19rkukTXTZa51E1pqqKAtH2tF4DGcVtgwXzs8y2D8xba9a5cM3o01avRq1PvKNOFhbPfu-s93948xXf-6GFwH_dHvqY8kH4SEQ5McEyA4SQTOMEilUEqdMZTDFQKHkSc4pTOcagziBiEPAIdpkzMAy1p17vY9a5N9d6ArdWyakzpvlSEUS4pZpQ463JnJaay1kCm1iZfabNVBKt2XtXOq37mdTLZyZu8gO0_phr2p5N9xt9lclvD519GmzfFBRVMTccDFYXDF0lnAyXpN-7IjZM</recordid><startdate>201406</startdate><enddate>201406</enddate><creator>Wiseman, Jacob D.</creator><creator>Burchell, Michael R.</creator><creator>Grabow, Garry L.</creator><creator>Osmond, Deanna L.</creator><creator>Messer, T.L.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201406</creationdate><title>Groundwater Nitrate Concentration Reductions in a Riparian Buffer Enrolled in the NC Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program</title><author>Wiseman, Jacob D. ; Burchell, Michael R. ; Grabow, Garry L. ; Osmond, Deanna L. ; Messer, T.L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3629-c816e57601e50cf70c07d92d7af6d0e397628630d3b04afe85e468ea4d57b2a93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Best management practices</topic><topic>CREP</topic><topic>denitrification</topic><topic>dilution</topic><topic>nitrate</topic><topic>Nitrates</topic><topic>nitrogen</topic><topic>Nonpoint source pollution</topic><topic>riparian buffer</topic><topic>Riparian buffers</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Watershed management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wiseman, Jacob D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burchell, Michael R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grabow, Garry L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osmond, Deanna L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Messer, T.L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Water Resources Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wiseman, Jacob D.</au><au>Burchell, Michael R.</au><au>Grabow, Garry L.</au><au>Osmond, Deanna L.</au><au>Messer, T.L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Groundwater Nitrate Concentration Reductions in a Riparian Buffer Enrolled in the NC Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Water Resources Association</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Water Resour Assoc</addtitle><date>2014-06</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>653</spage><epage>664</epage><pages>653-664</pages><issn>1093-474X</issn><eissn>1752-1688</eissn><abstract>Riparian buffers have been used for many years as a best management practice to decrease the effects of nonpoint pollution from watersheds. The NC Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (NC CREP) has established buffers to treat groundwater nitrate‐nitrogen (NO3−‐N) from agricultural sources in multiple river basins. A maturing 46 m wide riparian buffer enrolled in NC CREP was studied to determine its effectiveness in reducing groundwater NO3−‐N concentrations from a cattle pasture fertilized with poultry litter. Three monitoring blocks that included groundwater quality wells, water table wells, and soil redox probes, were established in the buffer. NO3−‐N concentrations decreased significantly across the buffer in all of the monitoring blocks with mean reductions of 76‐92%. Many biological processes, including denitrification and plant uptake, may have been responsible for the observed NO3−‐N reductions but could not be differentiated in this study. However, mean reductions in Cl− concentrations ranged from 48‐65% through the blocks, which indicated that dilution was an important factor in observed NO3−‐N reductions. These findings should be carefully considered for future buffer enrollments when assigning nitrogen removal credits.</abstract><cop>Middleburg</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/jawr.12209</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1093-474X
ispartof Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2014-06, Vol.50 (3), p.653-664
issn 1093-474X
1752-1688
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1536930531
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Best management practices
CREP
denitrification
dilution
nitrate
Nitrates
nitrogen
Nonpoint source pollution
riparian buffer
Riparian buffers
Water quality
Watershed management
title Groundwater Nitrate Concentration Reductions in a Riparian Buffer Enrolled in the NC Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T11%3A03%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Groundwater%20Nitrate%20Concentration%20Reductions%20in%20a%20Riparian%20Buffer%20Enrolled%20in%20the%20NC%20Conservation%20Reserve%20Enhancement%20Program&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Water%20Resources%20Association&rft.au=Wiseman,%20Jacob%20D.&rft.date=2014-06&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=653&rft.epage=664&rft.pages=653-664&rft.issn=1093-474X&rft.eissn=1752-1688&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jawr.12209&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3337133951%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1536930531&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true