Warehouse location with production, inventory, and distribution decisions: a case study in the lube oil industry

In this paper, a supply chain management problem from a real case study is modeled and solved. A company in Pakistan wanted to outsource part of its warehousing activity to a third party logistics (3PL) provider. Consequently, the company had to decide on where to rent space in the 3PL warehouses. K...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:4OR 2014-06, Vol.12 (2), p.175-197
Hauptverfasser: Brahimi, Nadjib, Khan, Sharfuddin A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 197
container_issue 2
container_start_page 175
container_title 4OR
container_volume 12
creator Brahimi, Nadjib
Khan, Sharfuddin A.
description In this paper, a supply chain management problem from a real case study is modeled and solved. A company in Pakistan wanted to outsource part of its warehousing activity to a third party logistics (3PL) provider. Consequently, the company had to decide on where to rent space in the 3PL warehouses. Knowing that such a strategic decision is affected by tactical and operational decisions, the problem is presented as a facility location problem integrating production, inventory, and distribution decisions. The problem is formulated as a mixed integer linear programming model which minimizes the total cost composed of location, distribution, production, and inventory costs. Several constraints specific to the situation and policy of the company were considered. A thorough analysis was done on the results obtained with respect to formulation efficiency, sensitivity analysis, and distribution of costs. In addition to the solution of the company problem, a set of 1215 problem instances was generated by varying five types of relevant costs in a full factorial manner. The solution of the generated problems always suggests to open in the same two locations and the integrality gaps averaged 0.062 % with a maximum of 0.102 %. On average, the major components of the total cost are production cost (96.6 %), transportation costs (2.7 %), and inventory holding costs (0.38 %). The total warehouse opening cost accounted for less than 0.05 % of the total costs.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10288-013-0237-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1526108262</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3309010201</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-4ec6416daee40173010cd737f4bef9e21663b9da3aeb566720d180d252cc4e923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LxDAQxYsouK5-AG8Br1udSdJ0600W_4HgRfEY0iR1s6zNmrRKv73p1oMXT_MG3u8N87LsHOESAcqriECXyxyQ5UBZmcNBNkOBPKcc8XCvq5wXAMfZSYwbAMYYh1m2e1PBrn0fLdl6rTrnW_LtujXZBW96Pe4L4tov23Y-DAuiWkOMi11wdb83G6tdTCJeE0W0Sjmx682QGNKtU2hfW-LdNu2mT9hwmh01ahvt2e-cZ693ty-rh_zp-f5xdfOUa8arLudWC47CKGs5YMkAQZuSlQ2vbVNZikKwujKKKVsXQpQUDC7B0IJqzW1F2Ty7mHLTI5-9jZ3c-D606aTEggqEJRWjCyeXDj7GYBu5C-5DhUEiyLFYORUrU7FyLFZCYujExORt3234k_wv9APZR3xv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1526108262</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Warehouse location with production, inventory, and distribution decisions: a case study in the lube oil industry</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Brahimi, Nadjib ; Khan, Sharfuddin A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Brahimi, Nadjib ; Khan, Sharfuddin A.</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, a supply chain management problem from a real case study is modeled and solved. A company in Pakistan wanted to outsource part of its warehousing activity to a third party logistics (3PL) provider. Consequently, the company had to decide on where to rent space in the 3PL warehouses. Knowing that such a strategic decision is affected by tactical and operational decisions, the problem is presented as a facility location problem integrating production, inventory, and distribution decisions. The problem is formulated as a mixed integer linear programming model which minimizes the total cost composed of location, distribution, production, and inventory costs. Several constraints specific to the situation and policy of the company were considered. A thorough analysis was done on the results obtained with respect to formulation efficiency, sensitivity analysis, and distribution of costs. In addition to the solution of the company problem, a set of 1215 problem instances was generated by varying five types of relevant costs in a full factorial manner. The solution of the generated problems always suggests to open in the same two locations and the integrality gaps averaged 0.062 % with a maximum of 0.102 %. On average, the major components of the total cost are production cost (96.6 %), transportation costs (2.7 %), and inventory holding costs (0.38 %). The total warehouse opening cost accounted for less than 0.05 % of the total costs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1619-4500</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1614-2411</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10288-013-0237-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Business and Management ; Case studies ; Costs ; Customers ; Industrial and Production Engineering ; Industry ; Integer programming ; Inventory control ; Linear programming ; Literature reviews ; Logistics ; Mathematical programming ; Operations research ; Operations Research/Decision Theory ; Optimization ; Petroleum industry ; Production planning ; Supply chain management ; Warehouses</subject><ispartof>4OR, 2014-06, Vol.12 (2), p.175-197</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-4ec6416daee40173010cd737f4bef9e21663b9da3aeb566720d180d252cc4e923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-4ec6416daee40173010cd737f4bef9e21663b9da3aeb566720d180d252cc4e923</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10288-013-0237-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10288-013-0237-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908,41471,42540,51302</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brahimi, Nadjib</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Sharfuddin A.</creatorcontrib><title>Warehouse location with production, inventory, and distribution decisions: a case study in the lube oil industry</title><title>4OR</title><addtitle>4OR-Q J Oper Res</addtitle><description>In this paper, a supply chain management problem from a real case study is modeled and solved. A company in Pakistan wanted to outsource part of its warehousing activity to a third party logistics (3PL) provider. Consequently, the company had to decide on where to rent space in the 3PL warehouses. Knowing that such a strategic decision is affected by tactical and operational decisions, the problem is presented as a facility location problem integrating production, inventory, and distribution decisions. The problem is formulated as a mixed integer linear programming model which minimizes the total cost composed of location, distribution, production, and inventory costs. Several constraints specific to the situation and policy of the company were considered. A thorough analysis was done on the results obtained with respect to formulation efficiency, sensitivity analysis, and distribution of costs. In addition to the solution of the company problem, a set of 1215 problem instances was generated by varying five types of relevant costs in a full factorial manner. The solution of the generated problems always suggests to open in the same two locations and the integrality gaps averaged 0.062 % with a maximum of 0.102 %. On average, the major components of the total cost are production cost (96.6 %), transportation costs (2.7 %), and inventory holding costs (0.38 %). The total warehouse opening cost accounted for less than 0.05 % of the total costs.</description><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Customers</subject><subject>Industrial and Production Engineering</subject><subject>Industry</subject><subject>Integer programming</subject><subject>Inventory control</subject><subject>Linear programming</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Logistics</subject><subject>Mathematical programming</subject><subject>Operations research</subject><subject>Operations Research/Decision Theory</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Petroleum industry</subject><subject>Production planning</subject><subject>Supply chain management</subject><subject>Warehouses</subject><issn>1619-4500</issn><issn>1614-2411</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9LxDAQxYsouK5-AG8Br1udSdJ0600W_4HgRfEY0iR1s6zNmrRKv73p1oMXT_MG3u8N87LsHOESAcqriECXyxyQ5UBZmcNBNkOBPKcc8XCvq5wXAMfZSYwbAMYYh1m2e1PBrn0fLdl6rTrnW_LtujXZBW96Pe4L4tov23Y-DAuiWkOMi11wdb83G6tdTCJeE0W0Sjmx682QGNKtU2hfW-LdNu2mT9hwmh01ahvt2e-cZ693ty-rh_zp-f5xdfOUa8arLudWC47CKGs5YMkAQZuSlQ2vbVNZikKwujKKKVsXQpQUDC7B0IJqzW1F2Ty7mHLTI5-9jZ3c-D606aTEggqEJRWjCyeXDj7GYBu5C-5DhUEiyLFYORUrU7FyLFZCYujExORt3234k_wv9APZR3xv</recordid><startdate>20140601</startdate><enddate>20140601</enddate><creator>Brahimi, Nadjib</creator><creator>Khan, Sharfuddin A.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140601</creationdate><title>Warehouse location with production, inventory, and distribution decisions: a case study in the lube oil industry</title><author>Brahimi, Nadjib ; Khan, Sharfuddin A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-4ec6416daee40173010cd737f4bef9e21663b9da3aeb566720d180d252cc4e923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Customers</topic><topic>Industrial and Production Engineering</topic><topic>Industry</topic><topic>Integer programming</topic><topic>Inventory control</topic><topic>Linear programming</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Logistics</topic><topic>Mathematical programming</topic><topic>Operations research</topic><topic>Operations Research/Decision Theory</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Petroleum industry</topic><topic>Production planning</topic><topic>Supply chain management</topic><topic>Warehouses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brahimi, Nadjib</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Sharfuddin A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>4OR</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brahimi, Nadjib</au><au>Khan, Sharfuddin A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Warehouse location with production, inventory, and distribution decisions: a case study in the lube oil industry</atitle><jtitle>4OR</jtitle><stitle>4OR-Q J Oper Res</stitle><date>2014-06-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>175</spage><epage>197</epage><pages>175-197</pages><issn>1619-4500</issn><eissn>1614-2411</eissn><abstract>In this paper, a supply chain management problem from a real case study is modeled and solved. A company in Pakistan wanted to outsource part of its warehousing activity to a third party logistics (3PL) provider. Consequently, the company had to decide on where to rent space in the 3PL warehouses. Knowing that such a strategic decision is affected by tactical and operational decisions, the problem is presented as a facility location problem integrating production, inventory, and distribution decisions. The problem is formulated as a mixed integer linear programming model which minimizes the total cost composed of location, distribution, production, and inventory costs. Several constraints specific to the situation and policy of the company were considered. A thorough analysis was done on the results obtained with respect to formulation efficiency, sensitivity analysis, and distribution of costs. In addition to the solution of the company problem, a set of 1215 problem instances was generated by varying five types of relevant costs in a full factorial manner. The solution of the generated problems always suggests to open in the same two locations and the integrality gaps averaged 0.062 % with a maximum of 0.102 %. On average, the major components of the total cost are production cost (96.6 %), transportation costs (2.7 %), and inventory holding costs (0.38 %). The total warehouse opening cost accounted for less than 0.05 % of the total costs.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s10288-013-0237-0</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1619-4500
ispartof 4OR, 2014-06, Vol.12 (2), p.175-197
issn 1619-4500
1614-2411
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1526108262
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Business and Management
Case studies
Costs
Customers
Industrial and Production Engineering
Industry
Integer programming
Inventory control
Linear programming
Literature reviews
Logistics
Mathematical programming
Operations research
Operations Research/Decision Theory
Optimization
Petroleum industry
Production planning
Supply chain management
Warehouses
title Warehouse location with production, inventory, and distribution decisions: a case study in the lube oil industry
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T23%3A12%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Warehouse%20location%20with%20production,%20inventory,%20and%20distribution%20decisions:%20a%20case%20study%20in%20the%20lube%20oil%20industry&rft.jtitle=4OR&rft.au=Brahimi,%20Nadjib&rft.date=2014-06-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=175&rft.epage=197&rft.pages=175-197&rft.issn=1619-4500&rft.eissn=1614-2411&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10288-013-0237-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3309010201%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1526108262&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true