Yield Effects of Two Southern Leaf Blight Resistance Loci in Maize Hybrids

ABSTRACT In this study we examined the effects of two quantitative trait loci (QTL) for southern leaf blight (SLB) resistance on several agronomic traits including disease resistance and yield. B73–3B and B73–6A are two near‐isogenic lines (NILs) in the background of the maize (Zea mays L.) inbred B...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Crop science 2014-05, Vol.54 (3), p.882-894
Hauptverfasser: Santa‐Cruz, Jose H., Kump, Kristen L., Arellano, Consuelo, Goodman, Major M., Krakowsky, Matthew D., Holland, James B., Balint‐Kurti, Peter J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 894
container_issue 3
container_start_page 882
container_title Crop science
container_volume 54
creator Santa‐Cruz, Jose H.
Kump, Kristen L.
Arellano, Consuelo
Goodman, Major M.
Krakowsky, Matthew D.
Holland, James B.
Balint‐Kurti, Peter J.
description ABSTRACT In this study we examined the effects of two quantitative trait loci (QTL) for southern leaf blight (SLB) resistance on several agronomic traits including disease resistance and yield. B73–3B and B73–6A are two near‐isogenic lines (NILs) in the background of the maize (Zea mays L.) inbred B73, each carrying one introgression (called 3B and 6A respectively) encompassing a QTL for SLB resistance. Sets of isohybrid triplets were developed by crossing B73, B73–3B, and B73–6A to several inbred lines. A subset of these triplets for which the B73–3B and/or B73–6A hybrid was significantly more SLB resistant than the B73 check hybrid was selected and assessed in multi‐environment yield trials with and without disease. In the presence of SLB, 3B was associated with an approximately 3% yield increase over B73. 6A was associated with a yield advantage in the presence of SLB in specific pedigrees where the 6A resistance phenotype was highly expressed. Results suggested that both introgressions might confer a yield cost in the absence of SLB, but only introgression 6A was associated with a statistically significant reduction. We present evidence to suggest that the yield cost is associated with the resistance phenotype rather than with linkage drag.
doi_str_mv 10.2135/cropsci2013.08.0553
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1524886489</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3305244871</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3403-b8e6e2b150ea3a7a47bd4eacb482a6f29bd012748e6f284879e659dcf69e52f33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1Lw0AURQdRsFZ_gZsB16nzmUyWGlpbiVTaCroaJpM3dkpsaial1F9val24dPXgcs99cBC6pmTAKJe3tqk3wXpGKB8QNSBS8hPUo4LLiMSSn6IeIZRGVPHXc3QRwooQkqSJ7KHHNw9ViYfOgW0Drh1e7Go8r7ftEpo1zsE4fF_592WLZxB8aM3aAs5r67Ff4yfjvwCP90Xjy3CJzpypAlz93j56GQ0X2TjKpw-T7C6PLBeER4WCGFhBJQHDTWJEUpQCjC2EYiZ2LC1KQlkiuppjSqgkhVimpXVxCpI5zvvo5ri7aerPLYRWr-pts-5eaiqZUCoWKu1a_Njq3ITQgNObxn-YZq8p0Qdp-o80TZQ-SOuo0ZHa-Qr2_0F0Ns9YNps-z7PJISfqZ-gbcHl11Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1524886489</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Yield Effects of Two Southern Leaf Blight Resistance Loci in Maize Hybrids</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Santa‐Cruz, Jose H. ; Kump, Kristen L. ; Arellano, Consuelo ; Goodman, Major M. ; Krakowsky, Matthew D. ; Holland, James B. ; Balint‐Kurti, Peter J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Santa‐Cruz, Jose H. ; Kump, Kristen L. ; Arellano, Consuelo ; Goodman, Major M. ; Krakowsky, Matthew D. ; Holland, James B. ; Balint‐Kurti, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT In this study we examined the effects of two quantitative trait loci (QTL) for southern leaf blight (SLB) resistance on several agronomic traits including disease resistance and yield. B73–3B and B73–6A are two near‐isogenic lines (NILs) in the background of the maize (Zea mays L.) inbred B73, each carrying one introgression (called 3B and 6A respectively) encompassing a QTL for SLB resistance. Sets of isohybrid triplets were developed by crossing B73, B73–3B, and B73–6A to several inbred lines. A subset of these triplets for which the B73–3B and/or B73–6A hybrid was significantly more SLB resistant than the B73 check hybrid was selected and assessed in multi‐environment yield trials with and without disease. In the presence of SLB, 3B was associated with an approximately 3% yield increase over B73. 6A was associated with a yield advantage in the presence of SLB in specific pedigrees where the 6A resistance phenotype was highly expressed. Results suggested that both introgressions might confer a yield cost in the absence of SLB, but only introgression 6A was associated with a statistically significant reduction. We present evidence to suggest that the yield cost is associated with the resistance phenotype rather than with linkage drag.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0011-183X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0653</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2013.08.0553</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CRPSAY</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison: The Crop Science Society of America, Inc</publisher><subject>Corn ; Crop diseases ; Disease resistance ; Gene mapping ; Genes ; Genomics ; Genotype &amp; phenotype ; Hybrids ; Inbreeding</subject><ispartof>Crop science, 2014-05, Vol.54 (3), p.882-894</ispartof><rights>Copyright © by the Crop Science Society of America, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy May/Jun 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3403-b8e6e2b150ea3a7a47bd4eacb482a6f29bd012748e6f284879e659dcf69e52f33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3403-b8e6e2b150ea3a7a47bd4eacb482a6f29bd012748e6f284879e659dcf69e52f33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2135%2Fcropsci2013.08.0553$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2135%2Fcropsci2013.08.0553$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Santa‐Cruz, Jose H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kump, Kristen L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arellano, Consuelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodman, Major M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krakowsky, Matthew D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holland, James B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balint‐Kurti, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><title>Yield Effects of Two Southern Leaf Blight Resistance Loci in Maize Hybrids</title><title>Crop science</title><description>ABSTRACT In this study we examined the effects of two quantitative trait loci (QTL) for southern leaf blight (SLB) resistance on several agronomic traits including disease resistance and yield. B73–3B and B73–6A are two near‐isogenic lines (NILs) in the background of the maize (Zea mays L.) inbred B73, each carrying one introgression (called 3B and 6A respectively) encompassing a QTL for SLB resistance. Sets of isohybrid triplets were developed by crossing B73, B73–3B, and B73–6A to several inbred lines. A subset of these triplets for which the B73–3B and/or B73–6A hybrid was significantly more SLB resistant than the B73 check hybrid was selected and assessed in multi‐environment yield trials with and without disease. In the presence of SLB, 3B was associated with an approximately 3% yield increase over B73. 6A was associated with a yield advantage in the presence of SLB in specific pedigrees where the 6A resistance phenotype was highly expressed. Results suggested that both introgressions might confer a yield cost in the absence of SLB, but only introgression 6A was associated with a statistically significant reduction. We present evidence to suggest that the yield cost is associated with the resistance phenotype rather than with linkage drag.</description><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Crop diseases</subject><subject>Disease resistance</subject><subject>Gene mapping</subject><subject>Genes</subject><subject>Genomics</subject><subject>Genotype &amp; phenotype</subject><subject>Hybrids</subject><subject>Inbreeding</subject><issn>0011-183X</issn><issn>1435-0653</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1Lw0AURQdRsFZ_gZsB16nzmUyWGlpbiVTaCroaJpM3dkpsaial1F9val24dPXgcs99cBC6pmTAKJe3tqk3wXpGKB8QNSBS8hPUo4LLiMSSn6IeIZRGVPHXc3QRwooQkqSJ7KHHNw9ViYfOgW0Drh1e7Go8r7ftEpo1zsE4fF_592WLZxB8aM3aAs5r67Ff4yfjvwCP90Xjy3CJzpypAlz93j56GQ0X2TjKpw-T7C6PLBeER4WCGFhBJQHDTWJEUpQCjC2EYiZ2LC1KQlkiuppjSqgkhVimpXVxCpI5zvvo5ri7aerPLYRWr-pts-5eaiqZUCoWKu1a_Njq3ITQgNObxn-YZq8p0Qdp-o80TZQ-SOuo0ZHa-Qr2_0F0Ns9YNps-z7PJISfqZ-gbcHl11Q</recordid><startdate>201405</startdate><enddate>201405</enddate><creator>Santa‐Cruz, Jose H.</creator><creator>Kump, Kristen L.</creator><creator>Arellano, Consuelo</creator><creator>Goodman, Major M.</creator><creator>Krakowsky, Matthew D.</creator><creator>Holland, James B.</creator><creator>Balint‐Kurti, Peter J.</creator><general>The Crop Science Society of America, Inc</general><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201405</creationdate><title>Yield Effects of Two Southern Leaf Blight Resistance Loci in Maize Hybrids</title><author>Santa‐Cruz, Jose H. ; Kump, Kristen L. ; Arellano, Consuelo ; Goodman, Major M. ; Krakowsky, Matthew D. ; Holland, James B. ; Balint‐Kurti, Peter J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3403-b8e6e2b150ea3a7a47bd4eacb482a6f29bd012748e6f284879e659dcf69e52f33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Crop diseases</topic><topic>Disease resistance</topic><topic>Gene mapping</topic><topic>Genes</topic><topic>Genomics</topic><topic>Genotype &amp; phenotype</topic><topic>Hybrids</topic><topic>Inbreeding</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Santa‐Cruz, Jose H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kump, Kristen L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arellano, Consuelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodman, Major M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krakowsky, Matthew D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holland, James B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balint‐Kurti, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Crop science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Santa‐Cruz, Jose H.</au><au>Kump, Kristen L.</au><au>Arellano, Consuelo</au><au>Goodman, Major M.</au><au>Krakowsky, Matthew D.</au><au>Holland, James B.</au><au>Balint‐Kurti, Peter J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Yield Effects of Two Southern Leaf Blight Resistance Loci in Maize Hybrids</atitle><jtitle>Crop science</jtitle><date>2014-05</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>882</spage><epage>894</epage><pages>882-894</pages><issn>0011-183X</issn><eissn>1435-0653</eissn><coden>CRPSAY</coden><abstract>ABSTRACT In this study we examined the effects of two quantitative trait loci (QTL) for southern leaf blight (SLB) resistance on several agronomic traits including disease resistance and yield. B73–3B and B73–6A are two near‐isogenic lines (NILs) in the background of the maize (Zea mays L.) inbred B73, each carrying one introgression (called 3B and 6A respectively) encompassing a QTL for SLB resistance. Sets of isohybrid triplets were developed by crossing B73, B73–3B, and B73–6A to several inbred lines. A subset of these triplets for which the B73–3B and/or B73–6A hybrid was significantly more SLB resistant than the B73 check hybrid was selected and assessed in multi‐environment yield trials with and without disease. In the presence of SLB, 3B was associated with an approximately 3% yield increase over B73. 6A was associated with a yield advantage in the presence of SLB in specific pedigrees where the 6A resistance phenotype was highly expressed. Results suggested that both introgressions might confer a yield cost in the absence of SLB, but only introgression 6A was associated with a statistically significant reduction. We present evidence to suggest that the yield cost is associated with the resistance phenotype rather than with linkage drag.</abstract><cop>Madison</cop><pub>The Crop Science Society of America, Inc</pub><doi>10.2135/cropsci2013.08.0553</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0011-183X
ispartof Crop science, 2014-05, Vol.54 (3), p.882-894
issn 0011-183X
1435-0653
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1524886489
source Wiley-Blackwell Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Corn
Crop diseases
Disease resistance
Gene mapping
Genes
Genomics
Genotype & phenotype
Hybrids
Inbreeding
title Yield Effects of Two Southern Leaf Blight Resistance Loci in Maize Hybrids
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T06%3A01%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Yield%20Effects%20of%20Two%20Southern%20Leaf%20Blight%20Resistance%20Loci%20in%20Maize%20Hybrids&rft.jtitle=Crop%20science&rft.au=Santa%E2%80%90Cruz,%20Jose%20H.&rft.date=2014-05&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=882&rft.epage=894&rft.pages=882-894&rft.issn=0011-183X&rft.eissn=1435-0653&rft.coden=CRPSAY&rft_id=info:doi/10.2135/cropsci2013.08.0553&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3305244871%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1524886489&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true