Institutional environment for entrepreneurship in rapidly emerging major economies: the case of Brazil, China, India, and Korea
The country institutional profile (CIP) construct has become the most widely used conceptualization of institutional environment for entrepreneurship. This construct is frequently employed to study institutional forces influencing entrepreneurial activity at the national level. However, relatively l...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International entrepreneurship and management journal 2014-06, Vol.10 (2), p.367-384 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 384 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 367 |
container_title | International entrepreneurship and management journal |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Gupta, Vishal K. Guo, Chun Canever, Mario Yim, Hyung Rok Sraw, Gaganjeet Kaur Liu, Ming |
description | The country institutional profile (CIP) construct has become the most widely used conceptualization of institutional environment for entrepreneurship. This construct is frequently employed to study institutional forces influencing entrepreneurial activity at the national level. However, relatively little is known about the cross-national equivalence of the construct. Moreover, the institutional environment for entrepreneurship in emerging economies remains largely under-explored. To address these issues, in the current study, we used the most frequently utilized CIP scale to collect data from 809 young adults in four rapidly emerging countries: Brazil, China, India, and South Korea. We examined the invariance of the CIP construct and unraveled differences in perceived institutional profiles among these rapidly emerging economies. Results support the CIP construct as largely invariant in the four REME countries and revealed important differences in specific aspects of institutional environments in these countries. Implications for future research and practice are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11365-012-0221-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1524328052</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3303524121</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-19f1c30558b31a22b1aafd359eab7f04b1513d0dda7cf4dbca9d80723abcc61c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD9PwzAUxCMEEqXwAdgssRLws-smYYOKPxWVWGC2XmyndZXYwU6RysJXx6UMLEz3nvS7k-6y7BzoFVBaXEcAPhU5BZZTxiAvD7IRCCFyqHh5-HNP8gIqOM5OYlxTygtRlaPsa-7iYIfNYL3Dlhj3YYN3nXEDaXxI_xBMH4wzmxBXtifWkYC91e2WmM6EpXVL0uF6hyrvfGdNvCHDyhCF0RDfkLuAn7a9JLOVdXhJ5k7bJOg0efbB4Gl21GAbzdmvjrO3h_vX2VO-eHmcz24XueIlHVKLBhSnQpQ1B2SsBsRGc1EZrIuGTmoQwDXVGgvVTHStsNIlLRjHWqlpso6zi31uH_z7xsRBrv0mpMpRgmATzkoqWKJgT6ngYwymkX2wHYatBCp3O8v9zjLtLHc7yzJ52N4TE-uWJvxJ_tf0DeF4gls</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1524328052</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Institutional environment for entrepreneurship in rapidly emerging major economies: the case of Brazil, China, India, and Korea</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Gupta, Vishal K. ; Guo, Chun ; Canever, Mario ; Yim, Hyung Rok ; Sraw, Gaganjeet Kaur ; Liu, Ming</creator><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Vishal K. ; Guo, Chun ; Canever, Mario ; Yim, Hyung Rok ; Sraw, Gaganjeet Kaur ; Liu, Ming</creatorcontrib><description>The country institutional profile (CIP) construct has become the most widely used conceptualization of institutional environment for entrepreneurship. This construct is frequently employed to study institutional forces influencing entrepreneurial activity at the national level. However, relatively little is known about the cross-national equivalence of the construct. Moreover, the institutional environment for entrepreneurship in emerging economies remains largely under-explored. To address these issues, in the current study, we used the most frequently utilized CIP scale to collect data from 809 young adults in four rapidly emerging countries: Brazil, China, India, and South Korea. We examined the invariance of the CIP construct and unraveled differences in perceived institutional profiles among these rapidly emerging economies. Results support the CIP construct as largely invariant in the four REME countries and revealed important differences in specific aspects of institutional environments in these countries. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1554-7191</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-1938</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11365-012-0221-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Business and Management ; Economic development ; Economic growth ; Emerging markets ; Emerging Markets/Globalization ; Entrepreneurs ; Entrepreneurship ; GDP ; Gross Domestic Product ; Management ; Society ; Studies ; Trade restrictions</subject><ispartof>International entrepreneurship and management journal, 2014-06, Vol.10 (2), p.367-384</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-19f1c30558b31a22b1aafd359eab7f04b1513d0dda7cf4dbca9d80723abcc61c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-19f1c30558b31a22b1aafd359eab7f04b1513d0dda7cf4dbca9d80723abcc61c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11365-012-0221-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11365-012-0221-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Vishal K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Chun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canever, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yim, Hyung Rok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sraw, Gaganjeet Kaur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ming</creatorcontrib><title>Institutional environment for entrepreneurship in rapidly emerging major economies: the case of Brazil, China, India, and Korea</title><title>International entrepreneurship and management journal</title><addtitle>Int Entrep Manag J</addtitle><description>The country institutional profile (CIP) construct has become the most widely used conceptualization of institutional environment for entrepreneurship. This construct is frequently employed to study institutional forces influencing entrepreneurial activity at the national level. However, relatively little is known about the cross-national equivalence of the construct. Moreover, the institutional environment for entrepreneurship in emerging economies remains largely under-explored. To address these issues, in the current study, we used the most frequently utilized CIP scale to collect data from 809 young adults in four rapidly emerging countries: Brazil, China, India, and South Korea. We examined the invariance of the CIP construct and unraveled differences in perceived institutional profiles among these rapidly emerging economies. Results support the CIP construct as largely invariant in the four REME countries and revealed important differences in specific aspects of institutional environments in these countries. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.</description><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Emerging markets</subject><subject>Emerging Markets/Globalization</subject><subject>Entrepreneurs</subject><subject>Entrepreneurship</subject><subject>GDP</subject><subject>Gross Domestic Product</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Trade restrictions</subject><issn>1554-7191</issn><issn>1555-1938</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kD9PwzAUxCMEEqXwAdgssRLws-smYYOKPxWVWGC2XmyndZXYwU6RysJXx6UMLEz3nvS7k-6y7BzoFVBaXEcAPhU5BZZTxiAvD7IRCCFyqHh5-HNP8gIqOM5OYlxTygtRlaPsa-7iYIfNYL3Dlhj3YYN3nXEDaXxI_xBMH4wzmxBXtifWkYC91e2WmM6EpXVL0uF6hyrvfGdNvCHDyhCF0RDfkLuAn7a9JLOVdXhJ5k7bJOg0efbB4Gl21GAbzdmvjrO3h_vX2VO-eHmcz24XueIlHVKLBhSnQpQ1B2SsBsRGc1EZrIuGTmoQwDXVGgvVTHStsNIlLRjHWqlpso6zi31uH_z7xsRBrv0mpMpRgmATzkoqWKJgT6ngYwymkX2wHYatBCp3O8v9zjLtLHc7yzJ52N4TE-uWJvxJ_tf0DeF4gls</recordid><startdate>20140601</startdate><enddate>20140601</enddate><creator>Gupta, Vishal K.</creator><creator>Guo, Chun</creator><creator>Canever, Mario</creator><creator>Yim, Hyung Rok</creator><creator>Sraw, Gaganjeet Kaur</creator><creator>Liu, Ming</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X5</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8A3</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140601</creationdate><title>Institutional environment for entrepreneurship in rapidly emerging major economies: the case of Brazil, China, India, and Korea</title><author>Gupta, Vishal K. ; Guo, Chun ; Canever, Mario ; Yim, Hyung Rok ; Sraw, Gaganjeet Kaur ; Liu, Ming</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-19f1c30558b31a22b1aafd359eab7f04b1513d0dda7cf4dbca9d80723abcc61c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Emerging markets</topic><topic>Emerging Markets/Globalization</topic><topic>Entrepreneurs</topic><topic>Entrepreneurship</topic><topic>GDP</topic><topic>Gross Domestic Product</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Trade restrictions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Vishal K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Chun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canever, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yim, Hyung Rok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sraw, Gaganjeet Kaur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ming</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>International entrepreneurship and management journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gupta, Vishal K.</au><au>Guo, Chun</au><au>Canever, Mario</au><au>Yim, Hyung Rok</au><au>Sraw, Gaganjeet Kaur</au><au>Liu, Ming</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Institutional environment for entrepreneurship in rapidly emerging major economies: the case of Brazil, China, India, and Korea</atitle><jtitle>International entrepreneurship and management journal</jtitle><stitle>Int Entrep Manag J</stitle><date>2014-06-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>367</spage><epage>384</epage><pages>367-384</pages><issn>1554-7191</issn><eissn>1555-1938</eissn><abstract>The country institutional profile (CIP) construct has become the most widely used conceptualization of institutional environment for entrepreneurship. This construct is frequently employed to study institutional forces influencing entrepreneurial activity at the national level. However, relatively little is known about the cross-national equivalence of the construct. Moreover, the institutional environment for entrepreneurship in emerging economies remains largely under-explored. To address these issues, in the current study, we used the most frequently utilized CIP scale to collect data from 809 young adults in four rapidly emerging countries: Brazil, China, India, and South Korea. We examined the invariance of the CIP construct and unraveled differences in perceived institutional profiles among these rapidly emerging economies. Results support the CIP construct as largely invariant in the four REME countries and revealed important differences in specific aspects of institutional environments in these countries. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11365-012-0221-8</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1554-7191 |
ispartof | International entrepreneurship and management journal, 2014-06, Vol.10 (2), p.367-384 |
issn | 1554-7191 1555-1938 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1524328052 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Business and Management Economic development Economic growth Emerging markets Emerging Markets/Globalization Entrepreneurs Entrepreneurship GDP Gross Domestic Product Management Society Studies Trade restrictions |
title | Institutional environment for entrepreneurship in rapidly emerging major economies: the case of Brazil, China, India, and Korea |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T17%3A00%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Institutional%20environment%20for%20entrepreneurship%20in%20rapidly%20emerging%20major%20economies:%20the%20case%20of%20Brazil,%20China,%20India,%20and%20Korea&rft.jtitle=International%20entrepreneurship%20and%20management%20journal&rft.au=Gupta,%20Vishal%20K.&rft.date=2014-06-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=367&rft.epage=384&rft.pages=367-384&rft.issn=1554-7191&rft.eissn=1555-1938&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11365-012-0221-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3303524121%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1524328052&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |