Institutional environment for entrepreneurship in rapidly emerging major economies: the case of Brazil, China, India, and Korea

The country institutional profile (CIP) construct has become the most widely used conceptualization of institutional environment for entrepreneurship. This construct is frequently employed to study institutional forces influencing entrepreneurial activity at the national level. However, relatively l...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International entrepreneurship and management journal 2014-06, Vol.10 (2), p.367-384
Hauptverfasser: Gupta, Vishal K., Guo, Chun, Canever, Mario, Yim, Hyung Rok, Sraw, Gaganjeet Kaur, Liu, Ming
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 384
container_issue 2
container_start_page 367
container_title International entrepreneurship and management journal
container_volume 10
creator Gupta, Vishal K.
Guo, Chun
Canever, Mario
Yim, Hyung Rok
Sraw, Gaganjeet Kaur
Liu, Ming
description The country institutional profile (CIP) construct has become the most widely used conceptualization of institutional environment for entrepreneurship. This construct is frequently employed to study institutional forces influencing entrepreneurial activity at the national level. However, relatively little is known about the cross-national equivalence of the construct. Moreover, the institutional environment for entrepreneurship in emerging economies remains largely under-explored. To address these issues, in the current study, we used the most frequently utilized CIP scale to collect data from 809 young adults in four rapidly emerging countries: Brazil, China, India, and South Korea. We examined the invariance of the CIP construct and unraveled differences in perceived institutional profiles among these rapidly emerging economies. Results support the CIP construct as largely invariant in the four REME countries and revealed important differences in specific aspects of institutional environments in these countries. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11365-012-0221-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1524328052</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3303524121</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-19f1c30558b31a22b1aafd359eab7f04b1513d0dda7cf4dbca9d80723abcc61c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD9PwzAUxCMEEqXwAdgssRLws-smYYOKPxWVWGC2XmyndZXYwU6RysJXx6UMLEz3nvS7k-6y7BzoFVBaXEcAPhU5BZZTxiAvD7IRCCFyqHh5-HNP8gIqOM5OYlxTygtRlaPsa-7iYIfNYL3Dlhj3YYN3nXEDaXxI_xBMH4wzmxBXtifWkYC91e2WmM6EpXVL0uF6hyrvfGdNvCHDyhCF0RDfkLuAn7a9JLOVdXhJ5k7bJOg0efbB4Gl21GAbzdmvjrO3h_vX2VO-eHmcz24XueIlHVKLBhSnQpQ1B2SsBsRGc1EZrIuGTmoQwDXVGgvVTHStsNIlLRjHWqlpso6zi31uH_z7xsRBrv0mpMpRgmATzkoqWKJgT6ngYwymkX2wHYatBCp3O8v9zjLtLHc7yzJ52N4TE-uWJvxJ_tf0DeF4gls</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1524328052</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Institutional environment for entrepreneurship in rapidly emerging major economies: the case of Brazil, China, India, and Korea</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Gupta, Vishal K. ; Guo, Chun ; Canever, Mario ; Yim, Hyung Rok ; Sraw, Gaganjeet Kaur ; Liu, Ming</creator><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Vishal K. ; Guo, Chun ; Canever, Mario ; Yim, Hyung Rok ; Sraw, Gaganjeet Kaur ; Liu, Ming</creatorcontrib><description>The country institutional profile (CIP) construct has become the most widely used conceptualization of institutional environment for entrepreneurship. This construct is frequently employed to study institutional forces influencing entrepreneurial activity at the national level. However, relatively little is known about the cross-national equivalence of the construct. Moreover, the institutional environment for entrepreneurship in emerging economies remains largely under-explored. To address these issues, in the current study, we used the most frequently utilized CIP scale to collect data from 809 young adults in four rapidly emerging countries: Brazil, China, India, and South Korea. We examined the invariance of the CIP construct and unraveled differences in perceived institutional profiles among these rapidly emerging economies. Results support the CIP construct as largely invariant in the four REME countries and revealed important differences in specific aspects of institutional environments in these countries. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1554-7191</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-1938</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11365-012-0221-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Business and Management ; Economic development ; Economic growth ; Emerging markets ; Emerging Markets/Globalization ; Entrepreneurs ; Entrepreneurship ; GDP ; Gross Domestic Product ; Management ; Society ; Studies ; Trade restrictions</subject><ispartof>International entrepreneurship and management journal, 2014-06, Vol.10 (2), p.367-384</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-19f1c30558b31a22b1aafd359eab7f04b1513d0dda7cf4dbca9d80723abcc61c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-19f1c30558b31a22b1aafd359eab7f04b1513d0dda7cf4dbca9d80723abcc61c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11365-012-0221-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11365-012-0221-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Vishal K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Chun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canever, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yim, Hyung Rok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sraw, Gaganjeet Kaur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ming</creatorcontrib><title>Institutional environment for entrepreneurship in rapidly emerging major economies: the case of Brazil, China, India, and Korea</title><title>International entrepreneurship and management journal</title><addtitle>Int Entrep Manag J</addtitle><description>The country institutional profile (CIP) construct has become the most widely used conceptualization of institutional environment for entrepreneurship. This construct is frequently employed to study institutional forces influencing entrepreneurial activity at the national level. However, relatively little is known about the cross-national equivalence of the construct. Moreover, the institutional environment for entrepreneurship in emerging economies remains largely under-explored. To address these issues, in the current study, we used the most frequently utilized CIP scale to collect data from 809 young adults in four rapidly emerging countries: Brazil, China, India, and South Korea. We examined the invariance of the CIP construct and unraveled differences in perceived institutional profiles among these rapidly emerging economies. Results support the CIP construct as largely invariant in the four REME countries and revealed important differences in specific aspects of institutional environments in these countries. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.</description><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Emerging markets</subject><subject>Emerging Markets/Globalization</subject><subject>Entrepreneurs</subject><subject>Entrepreneurship</subject><subject>GDP</subject><subject>Gross Domestic Product</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Trade restrictions</subject><issn>1554-7191</issn><issn>1555-1938</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kD9PwzAUxCMEEqXwAdgssRLws-smYYOKPxWVWGC2XmyndZXYwU6RysJXx6UMLEz3nvS7k-6y7BzoFVBaXEcAPhU5BZZTxiAvD7IRCCFyqHh5-HNP8gIqOM5OYlxTygtRlaPsa-7iYIfNYL3Dlhj3YYN3nXEDaXxI_xBMH4wzmxBXtifWkYC91e2WmM6EpXVL0uF6hyrvfGdNvCHDyhCF0RDfkLuAn7a9JLOVdXhJ5k7bJOg0efbB4Gl21GAbzdmvjrO3h_vX2VO-eHmcz24XueIlHVKLBhSnQpQ1B2SsBsRGc1EZrIuGTmoQwDXVGgvVTHStsNIlLRjHWqlpso6zi31uH_z7xsRBrv0mpMpRgmATzkoqWKJgT6ngYwymkX2wHYatBCp3O8v9zjLtLHc7yzJ52N4TE-uWJvxJ_tf0DeF4gls</recordid><startdate>20140601</startdate><enddate>20140601</enddate><creator>Gupta, Vishal K.</creator><creator>Guo, Chun</creator><creator>Canever, Mario</creator><creator>Yim, Hyung Rok</creator><creator>Sraw, Gaganjeet Kaur</creator><creator>Liu, Ming</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X5</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8A3</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140601</creationdate><title>Institutional environment for entrepreneurship in rapidly emerging major economies: the case of Brazil, China, India, and Korea</title><author>Gupta, Vishal K. ; Guo, Chun ; Canever, Mario ; Yim, Hyung Rok ; Sraw, Gaganjeet Kaur ; Liu, Ming</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-19f1c30558b31a22b1aafd359eab7f04b1513d0dda7cf4dbca9d80723abcc61c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Emerging markets</topic><topic>Emerging Markets/Globalization</topic><topic>Entrepreneurs</topic><topic>Entrepreneurship</topic><topic>GDP</topic><topic>Gross Domestic Product</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Trade restrictions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Vishal K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Chun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canever, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yim, Hyung Rok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sraw, Gaganjeet Kaur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ming</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>International entrepreneurship and management journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gupta, Vishal K.</au><au>Guo, Chun</au><au>Canever, Mario</au><au>Yim, Hyung Rok</au><au>Sraw, Gaganjeet Kaur</au><au>Liu, Ming</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Institutional environment for entrepreneurship in rapidly emerging major economies: the case of Brazil, China, India, and Korea</atitle><jtitle>International entrepreneurship and management journal</jtitle><stitle>Int Entrep Manag J</stitle><date>2014-06-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>367</spage><epage>384</epage><pages>367-384</pages><issn>1554-7191</issn><eissn>1555-1938</eissn><abstract>The country institutional profile (CIP) construct has become the most widely used conceptualization of institutional environment for entrepreneurship. This construct is frequently employed to study institutional forces influencing entrepreneurial activity at the national level. However, relatively little is known about the cross-national equivalence of the construct. Moreover, the institutional environment for entrepreneurship in emerging economies remains largely under-explored. To address these issues, in the current study, we used the most frequently utilized CIP scale to collect data from 809 young adults in four rapidly emerging countries: Brazil, China, India, and South Korea. We examined the invariance of the CIP construct and unraveled differences in perceived institutional profiles among these rapidly emerging economies. Results support the CIP construct as largely invariant in the four REME countries and revealed important differences in specific aspects of institutional environments in these countries. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11365-012-0221-8</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1554-7191
ispartof International entrepreneurship and management journal, 2014-06, Vol.10 (2), p.367-384
issn 1554-7191
1555-1938
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1524328052
source SpringerLink Journals
subjects Business and Management
Economic development
Economic growth
Emerging markets
Emerging Markets/Globalization
Entrepreneurs
Entrepreneurship
GDP
Gross Domestic Product
Management
Society
Studies
Trade restrictions
title Institutional environment for entrepreneurship in rapidly emerging major economies: the case of Brazil, China, India, and Korea
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T17%3A00%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Institutional%20environment%20for%20entrepreneurship%20in%20rapidly%20emerging%20major%20economies:%20the%20case%20of%20Brazil,%20China,%20India,%20and%20Korea&rft.jtitle=International%20entrepreneurship%20and%20management%20journal&rft.au=Gupta,%20Vishal%20K.&rft.date=2014-06-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=367&rft.epage=384&rft.pages=367-384&rft.issn=1554-7191&rft.eissn=1555-1938&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11365-012-0221-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3303524121%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1524328052&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true