Comparison of non-linear models to describe the lactation curves of milk yield and composition in Iranian Holsteins

In order to describe the lactation curves of milk yield (MY) and composition, six non-linear mathematical equations (Wood, Dhanoa, Sikka, Nelder, Hayashi and Dijkstra) were used. Data were 5 535 995 test-day records for MY, fat (FC) and protein (PC) contents and somatic cell score (SCS) from the fir...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of agricultural science 2014-04, Vol.152 (2), p.309-324
1. Verfasser: HOSSEIN-ZADEH, N. GHAVI
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 324
container_issue 2
container_start_page 309
container_title The Journal of agricultural science
container_volume 152
creator HOSSEIN-ZADEH, N. GHAVI
description In order to describe the lactation curves of milk yield (MY) and composition, six non-linear mathematical equations (Wood, Dhanoa, Sikka, Nelder, Hayashi and Dijkstra) were used. Data were 5 535 995 test-day records for MY, fat (FC) and protein (PC) contents and somatic cell score (SCS) from the first three lactations of Iranian Holstein cows that were collected on 2547 dairy herds in the period from 2000 to 2011 by the Animal Breeding Center of Iran. Each model was fitted to monthly production records of dairy cows using the NLIN and MODEL procedures in SAS and the parameters were estimated. The models were tested for goodness of fit using root-mean-square error (RMSE), Durbin–Watson statistic (DW) and Akaike's information criterion (AIC). The Wood and Dhanoa models provided the best fit of the lactation curve for MY in the first and second parities due to the lower values of RMSE and AIC than other models; but the Dijkstra model showed the best fit of milk lactation curve for third-parity dairy cows, FC, PC and SCS in the first three parities because of the lowest values of RMSE and AIC. Also, In general, the Sikka model did not fit the production data as well as the other equations. The results showed that the Dijkstra equation was able to estimate the time to the peak and peak MY more accurately than the other equations. However, the Wood equation provided more accurate predictions of peak MY at second- and third parities than the other equations. For first lactation FC, the Dijkstra equation was able to estimate the minimum FC and for second- and third-parity FC, the Wood equation provided more accurate predictions of minimum FC. For first- and second-lactation PC, the Dijkstra equation was able to estimate the minimum PC but for third parity, the minimum value of PC was predicted more accurately by the Wood model. The Dhanoa and Dijkstra equations for first lactation SCS and the Dhanoa equation for second- and third- lactation SCS were able to estimate the minimum SCS more accurately than the other equations. Overall, evaluation of different equations used in the current study indicated the potential of the non-linear functions for fitting monthly productive records of Holstein cows.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0021859613000415
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1521055053</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0021859613000415</cupid><sourcerecordid>3294805301</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-fe8617f9a392e77f13ab7503b638f75e582d45b067b12a04073fc846de4d90c43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wFtAPK5ONslm9yhFbaHgQT0v2Xxo6m5Sk63gvze1RQTxMjnM8z4zGYTOCVwRIOL6EaAkNW8qQgGAEX6AJoRVTcFzPUSTbbvY9o_RSUqrzAho6glKszCsZXQpeBws9sEXvfNGRjwEbfqEx4C1SSq6zuDx1eBeqlGOLuNqEz9M2qYG17_hT2d6jaXXWGVlSO4bch4vovROejwPfRqN8-kUHVnZJ3O2f6fo-e72aTYvlg_3i9nNslCUibGwpq6IsI2kTWmEsITKTnCgXUVrK7jhdakZ76ASHSklMBDUqppV2jDdgGJ0ii523nUM7xuTxnYVNtHnkS3hJQHOgdNMkR2lYkgpGtuuoxtk_GwJtNvbtn9umzOXe7NMSvY2_1C59BMsa1ozaMrM0b1bDl10-sX8WuFf-xe0wohu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1521055053</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of non-linear models to describe the lactation curves of milk yield and composition in Iranian Holsteins</title><source>Cambridge Journals - Connect here FIRST to enable access</source><creator>HOSSEIN-ZADEH, N. GHAVI</creator><creatorcontrib>HOSSEIN-ZADEH, N. GHAVI</creatorcontrib><description>In order to describe the lactation curves of milk yield (MY) and composition, six non-linear mathematical equations (Wood, Dhanoa, Sikka, Nelder, Hayashi and Dijkstra) were used. Data were 5 535 995 test-day records for MY, fat (FC) and protein (PC) contents and somatic cell score (SCS) from the first three lactations of Iranian Holstein cows that were collected on 2547 dairy herds in the period from 2000 to 2011 by the Animal Breeding Center of Iran. Each model was fitted to monthly production records of dairy cows using the NLIN and MODEL procedures in SAS and the parameters were estimated. The models were tested for goodness of fit using root-mean-square error (RMSE), Durbin–Watson statistic (DW) and Akaike's information criterion (AIC). The Wood and Dhanoa models provided the best fit of the lactation curve for MY in the first and second parities due to the lower values of RMSE and AIC than other models; but the Dijkstra model showed the best fit of milk lactation curve for third-parity dairy cows, FC, PC and SCS in the first three parities because of the lowest values of RMSE and AIC. Also, In general, the Sikka model did not fit the production data as well as the other equations. The results showed that the Dijkstra equation was able to estimate the time to the peak and peak MY more accurately than the other equations. However, the Wood equation provided more accurate predictions of peak MY at second- and third parities than the other equations. For first lactation FC, the Dijkstra equation was able to estimate the minimum FC and for second- and third-parity FC, the Wood equation provided more accurate predictions of minimum FC. For first- and second-lactation PC, the Dijkstra equation was able to estimate the minimum PC but for third parity, the minimum value of PC was predicted more accurately by the Wood model. The Dhanoa and Dijkstra equations for first lactation SCS and the Dhanoa equation for second- and third- lactation SCS were able to estimate the minimum SCS more accurately than the other equations. Overall, evaluation of different equations used in the current study indicated the potential of the non-linear functions for fitting monthly productive records of Holstein cows.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8596</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-5146</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0021859613000415</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JASIAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Agricultural management ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Animal breeding ; Animal Research Papers ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cattle ; Comparative studies ; Dairy cattle ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Mathematical models ; Milk ; Nonlinear equations</subject><ispartof>The Journal of agricultural science, 2014-04, Vol.152 (2), p.309-324</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-fe8617f9a392e77f13ab7503b638f75e582d45b067b12a04073fc846de4d90c43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-fe8617f9a392e77f13ab7503b638f75e582d45b067b12a04073fc846de4d90c43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0021859613000415/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,27901,27902,55603</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28384092$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>HOSSEIN-ZADEH, N. GHAVI</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of non-linear models to describe the lactation curves of milk yield and composition in Iranian Holsteins</title><title>The Journal of agricultural science</title><addtitle>J. Agric. Sci</addtitle><description>In order to describe the lactation curves of milk yield (MY) and composition, six non-linear mathematical equations (Wood, Dhanoa, Sikka, Nelder, Hayashi and Dijkstra) were used. Data were 5 535 995 test-day records for MY, fat (FC) and protein (PC) contents and somatic cell score (SCS) from the first three lactations of Iranian Holstein cows that were collected on 2547 dairy herds in the period from 2000 to 2011 by the Animal Breeding Center of Iran. Each model was fitted to monthly production records of dairy cows using the NLIN and MODEL procedures in SAS and the parameters were estimated. The models were tested for goodness of fit using root-mean-square error (RMSE), Durbin–Watson statistic (DW) and Akaike's information criterion (AIC). The Wood and Dhanoa models provided the best fit of the lactation curve for MY in the first and second parities due to the lower values of RMSE and AIC than other models; but the Dijkstra model showed the best fit of milk lactation curve for third-parity dairy cows, FC, PC and SCS in the first three parities because of the lowest values of RMSE and AIC. Also, In general, the Sikka model did not fit the production data as well as the other equations. The results showed that the Dijkstra equation was able to estimate the time to the peak and peak MY more accurately than the other equations. However, the Wood equation provided more accurate predictions of peak MY at second- and third parities than the other equations. For first lactation FC, the Dijkstra equation was able to estimate the minimum FC and for second- and third-parity FC, the Wood equation provided more accurate predictions of minimum FC. For first- and second-lactation PC, the Dijkstra equation was able to estimate the minimum PC but for third parity, the minimum value of PC was predicted more accurately by the Wood model. The Dhanoa and Dijkstra equations for first lactation SCS and the Dhanoa equation for second- and third- lactation SCS were able to estimate the minimum SCS more accurately than the other equations. Overall, evaluation of different equations used in the current study indicated the potential of the non-linear functions for fitting monthly productive records of Holstein cows.</description><subject>Agricultural management</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Animal breeding</subject><subject>Animal Research Papers</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Dairy cattle</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Milk</subject><subject>Nonlinear equations</subject><issn>0021-8596</issn><issn>1469-5146</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wFtAPK5ONslm9yhFbaHgQT0v2Xxo6m5Sk63gvze1RQTxMjnM8z4zGYTOCVwRIOL6EaAkNW8qQgGAEX6AJoRVTcFzPUSTbbvY9o_RSUqrzAho6glKszCsZXQpeBws9sEXvfNGRjwEbfqEx4C1SSq6zuDx1eBeqlGOLuNqEz9M2qYG17_hT2d6jaXXWGVlSO4bch4vovROejwPfRqN8-kUHVnZJ3O2f6fo-e72aTYvlg_3i9nNslCUibGwpq6IsI2kTWmEsITKTnCgXUVrK7jhdakZ76ASHSklMBDUqppV2jDdgGJ0ii523nUM7xuTxnYVNtHnkS3hJQHOgdNMkR2lYkgpGtuuoxtk_GwJtNvbtn9umzOXe7NMSvY2_1C59BMsa1ozaMrM0b1bDl10-sX8WuFf-xe0wohu</recordid><startdate>20140401</startdate><enddate>20140401</enddate><creator>HOSSEIN-ZADEH, N. GHAVI</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140401</creationdate><title>Comparison of non-linear models to describe the lactation curves of milk yield and composition in Iranian Holsteins</title><author>HOSSEIN-ZADEH, N. GHAVI</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-fe8617f9a392e77f13ab7503b638f75e582d45b067b12a04073fc846de4d90c43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Agricultural management</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Animal breeding</topic><topic>Animal Research Papers</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Dairy cattle</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Milk</topic><topic>Nonlinear equations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>HOSSEIN-ZADEH, N. GHAVI</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep (ProQuest)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of agricultural science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>HOSSEIN-ZADEH, N. GHAVI</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of non-linear models to describe the lactation curves of milk yield and composition in Iranian Holsteins</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of agricultural science</jtitle><addtitle>J. Agric. Sci</addtitle><date>2014-04-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>152</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>309</spage><epage>324</epage><pages>309-324</pages><issn>0021-8596</issn><eissn>1469-5146</eissn><coden>JASIAB</coden><abstract>In order to describe the lactation curves of milk yield (MY) and composition, six non-linear mathematical equations (Wood, Dhanoa, Sikka, Nelder, Hayashi and Dijkstra) were used. Data were 5 535 995 test-day records for MY, fat (FC) and protein (PC) contents and somatic cell score (SCS) from the first three lactations of Iranian Holstein cows that were collected on 2547 dairy herds in the period from 2000 to 2011 by the Animal Breeding Center of Iran. Each model was fitted to monthly production records of dairy cows using the NLIN and MODEL procedures in SAS and the parameters were estimated. The models were tested for goodness of fit using root-mean-square error (RMSE), Durbin–Watson statistic (DW) and Akaike's information criterion (AIC). The Wood and Dhanoa models provided the best fit of the lactation curve for MY in the first and second parities due to the lower values of RMSE and AIC than other models; but the Dijkstra model showed the best fit of milk lactation curve for third-parity dairy cows, FC, PC and SCS in the first three parities because of the lowest values of RMSE and AIC. Also, In general, the Sikka model did not fit the production data as well as the other equations. The results showed that the Dijkstra equation was able to estimate the time to the peak and peak MY more accurately than the other equations. However, the Wood equation provided more accurate predictions of peak MY at second- and third parities than the other equations. For first lactation FC, the Dijkstra equation was able to estimate the minimum FC and for second- and third-parity FC, the Wood equation provided more accurate predictions of minimum FC. For first- and second-lactation PC, the Dijkstra equation was able to estimate the minimum PC but for third parity, the minimum value of PC was predicted more accurately by the Wood model. The Dhanoa and Dijkstra equations for first lactation SCS and the Dhanoa equation for second- and third- lactation SCS were able to estimate the minimum SCS more accurately than the other equations. Overall, evaluation of different equations used in the current study indicated the potential of the non-linear functions for fitting monthly productive records of Holstein cows.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0021859613000415</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8596
ispartof The Journal of agricultural science, 2014-04, Vol.152 (2), p.309-324
issn 0021-8596
1469-5146
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1521055053
source Cambridge Journals - Connect here FIRST to enable access
subjects Agricultural management
Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Animal breeding
Animal Research Papers
Biological and medical sciences
Cattle
Comparative studies
Dairy cattle
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Mathematical models
Milk
Nonlinear equations
title Comparison of non-linear models to describe the lactation curves of milk yield and composition in Iranian Holsteins
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T07%3A12%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20non-linear%20models%20to%20describe%20the%20lactation%20curves%20of%20milk%20yield%20and%20composition%20in%20Iranian%20Holsteins&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20agricultural%20science&rft.au=HOSSEIN-ZADEH,%20N.%20GHAVI&rft.date=2014-04-01&rft.volume=152&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=309&rft.epage=324&rft.pages=309-324&rft.issn=0021-8596&rft.eissn=1469-5146&rft.coden=JASIAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0021859613000415&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3294805301%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1521055053&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0021859613000415&rfr_iscdi=true