Evaluating bee (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) diversity using Malaise traps in coffee landscapes of Costa Rica

Even though Arabica coffee (Coffea arabica Linnaeus, Rubiaceae) can self-pollinate, bees are important pollinators, without which there is lower fruit quality and yield. We studied bee diversity in coffee agroecosystems in Costa Rica during two coffee flowering seasons (2005 and 2006). Malaise traps...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian entomologist 2013-08, Vol.145 (4), p.435-453
Hauptverfasser: Ngo, H.T., Gibbs, J., Griswold, T., Packer, L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 453
container_issue 4
container_start_page 435
container_title Canadian entomologist
container_volume 145
creator Ngo, H.T.
Gibbs, J.
Griswold, T.
Packer, L.
description Even though Arabica coffee (Coffea arabica Linnaeus, Rubiaceae) can self-pollinate, bees are important pollinators, without which there is lower fruit quality and yield. We studied bee diversity in coffee agroecosystems in Costa Rica during two coffee flowering seasons (2005 and 2006). Malaise traps were used as a passive sampling method to collect bees during coffee blooms. We collected 1012 bee individuals from three different site types: nonagricultural fields and shaded and unshaded coffee farms. Unshaded coffee farms had significantly higher species richness (S) and number of bee individuals (n) than did the shaded coffee farms and nonagricultural sites. Overall bee diversity did not differ among site types but evenness (J′) was significantly lower in unshaded coffee farms. Using a more detailed community analysis, there was a significant association between functional groups and habitat type with more species and individuals of small-bodied ground-nesting bees (Lasioglossum (Dialictus) Robertson) associated with unshaded coffee farms. A large proportion (49%) of bees collected were of this subgenus, which was never before reported as common in coffee agroecosystems. Further studies should establish whether Dialictus is important in coffee pollination. We propose strategies involving conservation of native bees through simple habitat management for small-scale coffee farms that may improve crop quality and quantity. Bien que le caféier d'Arabie (Coffea arabica Linnaeus, Rubiaceae) puisse s'autopolliniser, les abeilles sont d'importants pollinisateurs sans lesquels la qualité et la production des fruits sont moindres. Nous avons étudié la diversité des abeilles dans les agroécosystèmes de caféier au Costa Rica durant deux saisons de floraison du caféier (2005 et 2006). Des pièges Malaise ont été utilisés comme méthode passive d’échantillonnage afin de récolter les abeilles durant la floraison du caféier. Nous avons récolté 1012 individus sur trois différents types de sites : des champs non-agricoles et des plantations de caféiers ombragées ou non. Les plantations de caféiers sans ombre possédaient une richesse d'espèces (S) et un nombre d'individus d'abeilles (n) significativement plus grands que les plantations de caféiers ombragées et les sites non-agricoles. La diversité globale des abeilles ne différaient pas entre les différents types de sites, mais l’équitabilité (J′) était significativement plus basse dans les plantations de caféiers sans ombre.
doi_str_mv 10.4039/tce.2013.16
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1518115348</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_4039_tce_2013_16</cupid><sourcerecordid>3281522751</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-877fb45bbf5641428dc548657adfcb0bd7bd2a80f1b0b557da722af43a1e49323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkFtLw0AQhRdRsF6e_AMLIiiSutds4lsp9QKKIAq-hcleZCVN4m5S6L93S4v44NPMwHfOYQ5CZ5RMBeHlzaDtlBHKpzTfQxNa0iLjTJB9NCGEpF2oj0N0FONXOiXl5QS5xQqaEQbffuLaWnz5sF7atusHG-AWz_rOGwtX2PiVDdEPazzGDfoMDfho8RCgj9i3WHfOJXkDrYkaehtx5_C8iwPgV6_hBB04aKI93c1j9H63eJs_ZE8v94_z2VOmeZ4PWaGUq4WsaydzQQUrjJaiyKUC43RNaqNqw6AgjqZDSmVAMQZOcKBWlJzxY3S-9e1D9z3aOFRf3RjaFFlRSQtKJRdFoq63lA5djMG6qg9-CWFdUVJtiqxSkdWmyIrmib7YeUJ6rXEBWu3jr4QpqcqS8cRlO1dY1sGbT_sn_B_fH3AWgj0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1518115348</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating bee (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) diversity using Malaise traps in coffee landscapes of Costa Rica</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Ngo, H.T. ; Gibbs, J. ; Griswold, T. ; Packer, L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ngo, H.T. ; Gibbs, J. ; Griswold, T. ; Packer, L.</creatorcontrib><description>Even though Arabica coffee (Coffea arabica Linnaeus, Rubiaceae) can self-pollinate, bees are important pollinators, without which there is lower fruit quality and yield. We studied bee diversity in coffee agroecosystems in Costa Rica during two coffee flowering seasons (2005 and 2006). Malaise traps were used as a passive sampling method to collect bees during coffee blooms. We collected 1012 bee individuals from three different site types: nonagricultural fields and shaded and unshaded coffee farms. Unshaded coffee farms had significantly higher species richness (S) and number of bee individuals (n) than did the shaded coffee farms and nonagricultural sites. Overall bee diversity did not differ among site types but evenness (J′) was significantly lower in unshaded coffee farms. Using a more detailed community analysis, there was a significant association between functional groups and habitat type with more species and individuals of small-bodied ground-nesting bees (Lasioglossum (Dialictus) Robertson) associated with unshaded coffee farms. A large proportion (49%) of bees collected were of this subgenus, which was never before reported as common in coffee agroecosystems. Further studies should establish whether Dialictus is important in coffee pollination. We propose strategies involving conservation of native bees through simple habitat management for small-scale coffee farms that may improve crop quality and quantity. Bien que le caféier d'Arabie (Coffea arabica Linnaeus, Rubiaceae) puisse s'autopolliniser, les abeilles sont d'importants pollinisateurs sans lesquels la qualité et la production des fruits sont moindres. Nous avons étudié la diversité des abeilles dans les agroécosystèmes de caféier au Costa Rica durant deux saisons de floraison du caféier (2005 et 2006). Des pièges Malaise ont été utilisés comme méthode passive d’échantillonnage afin de récolter les abeilles durant la floraison du caféier. Nous avons récolté 1012 individus sur trois différents types de sites : des champs non-agricoles et des plantations de caféiers ombragées ou non. Les plantations de caféiers sans ombre possédaient une richesse d'espèces (S) et un nombre d'individus d'abeilles (n) significativement plus grands que les plantations de caféiers ombragées et les sites non-agricoles. La diversité globale des abeilles ne différaient pas entre les différents types de sites, mais l’équitabilité (J′) était significativement plus basse dans les plantations de caféiers sans ombre. En utilisant des analyses de communauté plus détaillées, une association significative a été trouvée entre les groupes fonctionnels et le type d'habitat : plus d'espèces et d'individus de petites abeilles nichant au sol (Lasioglossum (Dialictus) Robertson) sont associés aux plantations de caféiers sans ombre. Une grande proportion (49%) des abeilles récoltées faisaient partie de ce sous-genre, qui n'a jamais été rapporté comme commun dans les agroécosystèmes de caféiers auparavant. Des études ultérieures devraient établir si Dialictus est important dans la pollinisation du caféier. Nous proposons une stratégie impliquant la conservation des abeilles natives par le biais d'une gestion de l'habitat simple qui pourrait améliorer la qualité et la quantité des récoltes pour des plantations de caféiers à petite échelle.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-347X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1918-3240</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4039/tce.2013.16</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CAENAF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Agricultural ecosystems ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Bees ; Biodiversity &amp; Evolution ; Biological and medical sciences ; Coffee ; Conservation ; Dairy farms ; Ecosystem studies ; Farms ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agroecology ; General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping ; General agronomy. Plant production ; Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development ; Habitats ; Nesting ; Plant reproduction ; Pollination ; Pollinators ; Species richness ; Synecology ; Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><ispartof>Canadian entomologist, 2013-08, Vol.145 (4), p.435-453</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2013</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Entomological Society of Canada Aug 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-877fb45bbf5641428dc548657adfcb0bd7bd2a80f1b0b557da722af43a1e49323</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-877fb45bbf5641428dc548657adfcb0bd7bd2a80f1b0b557da722af43a1e49323</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0008347X13000163/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27579923$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ngo, H.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibbs, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griswold, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Packer, L.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating bee (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) diversity using Malaise traps in coffee landscapes of Costa Rica</title><title>Canadian entomologist</title><addtitle>Can Entomol</addtitle><description>Even though Arabica coffee (Coffea arabica Linnaeus, Rubiaceae) can self-pollinate, bees are important pollinators, without which there is lower fruit quality and yield. We studied bee diversity in coffee agroecosystems in Costa Rica during two coffee flowering seasons (2005 and 2006). Malaise traps were used as a passive sampling method to collect bees during coffee blooms. We collected 1012 bee individuals from three different site types: nonagricultural fields and shaded and unshaded coffee farms. Unshaded coffee farms had significantly higher species richness (S) and number of bee individuals (n) than did the shaded coffee farms and nonagricultural sites. Overall bee diversity did not differ among site types but evenness (J′) was significantly lower in unshaded coffee farms. Using a more detailed community analysis, there was a significant association between functional groups and habitat type with more species and individuals of small-bodied ground-nesting bees (Lasioglossum (Dialictus) Robertson) associated with unshaded coffee farms. A large proportion (49%) of bees collected were of this subgenus, which was never before reported as common in coffee agroecosystems. Further studies should establish whether Dialictus is important in coffee pollination. We propose strategies involving conservation of native bees through simple habitat management for small-scale coffee farms that may improve crop quality and quantity. Bien que le caféier d'Arabie (Coffea arabica Linnaeus, Rubiaceae) puisse s'autopolliniser, les abeilles sont d'importants pollinisateurs sans lesquels la qualité et la production des fruits sont moindres. Nous avons étudié la diversité des abeilles dans les agroécosystèmes de caféier au Costa Rica durant deux saisons de floraison du caféier (2005 et 2006). Des pièges Malaise ont été utilisés comme méthode passive d’échantillonnage afin de récolter les abeilles durant la floraison du caféier. Nous avons récolté 1012 individus sur trois différents types de sites : des champs non-agricoles et des plantations de caféiers ombragées ou non. Les plantations de caféiers sans ombre possédaient une richesse d'espèces (S) et un nombre d'individus d'abeilles (n) significativement plus grands que les plantations de caféiers ombragées et les sites non-agricoles. La diversité globale des abeilles ne différaient pas entre les différents types de sites, mais l’équitabilité (J′) était significativement plus basse dans les plantations de caféiers sans ombre. En utilisant des analyses de communauté plus détaillées, une association significative a été trouvée entre les groupes fonctionnels et le type d'habitat : plus d'espèces et d'individus de petites abeilles nichant au sol (Lasioglossum (Dialictus) Robertson) sont associés aux plantations de caféiers sans ombre. Une grande proportion (49%) des abeilles récoltées faisaient partie de ce sous-genre, qui n'a jamais été rapporté comme commun dans les agroécosystèmes de caféiers auparavant. Des études ultérieures devraient établir si Dialictus est important dans la pollinisation du caféier. Nous proposons une stratégie impliquant la conservation des abeilles natives par le biais d'une gestion de l'habitat simple qui pourrait améliorer la qualité et la quantité des récoltes pour des plantations de caféiers à petite échelle.</description><subject>Agricultural ecosystems</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Bees</subject><subject>Biodiversity &amp; Evolution</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Coffee</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Dairy farms</subject><subject>Ecosystem studies</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agroecology</subject><subject>General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Nesting</subject><subject>Plant reproduction</subject><subject>Pollination</subject><subject>Pollinators</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><issn>0008-347X</issn><issn>1918-3240</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkFtLw0AQhRdRsF6e_AMLIiiSutds4lsp9QKKIAq-hcleZCVN4m5S6L93S4v44NPMwHfOYQ5CZ5RMBeHlzaDtlBHKpzTfQxNa0iLjTJB9NCGEpF2oj0N0FONXOiXl5QS5xQqaEQbffuLaWnz5sF7atusHG-AWz_rOGwtX2PiVDdEPazzGDfoMDfho8RCgj9i3WHfOJXkDrYkaehtx5_C8iwPgV6_hBB04aKI93c1j9H63eJs_ZE8v94_z2VOmeZ4PWaGUq4WsaydzQQUrjJaiyKUC43RNaqNqw6AgjqZDSmVAMQZOcKBWlJzxY3S-9e1D9z3aOFRf3RjaFFlRSQtKJRdFoq63lA5djMG6qg9-CWFdUVJtiqxSkdWmyIrmib7YeUJ6rXEBWu3jr4QpqcqS8cRlO1dY1sGbT_sn_B_fH3AWgj0</recordid><startdate>20130801</startdate><enddate>20130801</enddate><creator>Ngo, H.T.</creator><creator>Gibbs, J.</creator><creator>Griswold, T.</creator><creator>Packer, L.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Entomological Society of Canada</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130801</creationdate><title>Evaluating bee (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) diversity using Malaise traps in coffee landscapes of Costa Rica</title><author>Ngo, H.T. ; Gibbs, J. ; Griswold, T. ; Packer, L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-877fb45bbf5641428dc548657adfcb0bd7bd2a80f1b0b557da722af43a1e49323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Agricultural ecosystems</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Bees</topic><topic>Biodiversity &amp; Evolution</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Coffee</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Dairy farms</topic><topic>Ecosystem studies</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agroecology</topic><topic>General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Nesting</topic><topic>Plant reproduction</topic><topic>Pollination</topic><topic>Pollinators</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ngo, H.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibbs, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griswold, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Packer, L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Canadian entomologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ngo, H.T.</au><au>Gibbs, J.</au><au>Griswold, T.</au><au>Packer, L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating bee (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) diversity using Malaise traps in coffee landscapes of Costa Rica</atitle><jtitle>Canadian entomologist</jtitle><addtitle>Can Entomol</addtitle><date>2013-08-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>145</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>435</spage><epage>453</epage><pages>435-453</pages><issn>0008-347X</issn><eissn>1918-3240</eissn><coden>CAENAF</coden><abstract>Even though Arabica coffee (Coffea arabica Linnaeus, Rubiaceae) can self-pollinate, bees are important pollinators, without which there is lower fruit quality and yield. We studied bee diversity in coffee agroecosystems in Costa Rica during two coffee flowering seasons (2005 and 2006). Malaise traps were used as a passive sampling method to collect bees during coffee blooms. We collected 1012 bee individuals from three different site types: nonagricultural fields and shaded and unshaded coffee farms. Unshaded coffee farms had significantly higher species richness (S) and number of bee individuals (n) than did the shaded coffee farms and nonagricultural sites. Overall bee diversity did not differ among site types but evenness (J′) was significantly lower in unshaded coffee farms. Using a more detailed community analysis, there was a significant association between functional groups and habitat type with more species and individuals of small-bodied ground-nesting bees (Lasioglossum (Dialictus) Robertson) associated with unshaded coffee farms. A large proportion (49%) of bees collected were of this subgenus, which was never before reported as common in coffee agroecosystems. Further studies should establish whether Dialictus is important in coffee pollination. We propose strategies involving conservation of native bees through simple habitat management for small-scale coffee farms that may improve crop quality and quantity. Bien que le caféier d'Arabie (Coffea arabica Linnaeus, Rubiaceae) puisse s'autopolliniser, les abeilles sont d'importants pollinisateurs sans lesquels la qualité et la production des fruits sont moindres. Nous avons étudié la diversité des abeilles dans les agroécosystèmes de caféier au Costa Rica durant deux saisons de floraison du caféier (2005 et 2006). Des pièges Malaise ont été utilisés comme méthode passive d’échantillonnage afin de récolter les abeilles durant la floraison du caféier. Nous avons récolté 1012 individus sur trois différents types de sites : des champs non-agricoles et des plantations de caféiers ombragées ou non. Les plantations de caféiers sans ombre possédaient une richesse d'espèces (S) et un nombre d'individus d'abeilles (n) significativement plus grands que les plantations de caféiers ombragées et les sites non-agricoles. La diversité globale des abeilles ne différaient pas entre les différents types de sites, mais l’équitabilité (J′) était significativement plus basse dans les plantations de caféiers sans ombre. En utilisant des analyses de communauté plus détaillées, une association significative a été trouvée entre les groupes fonctionnels et le type d'habitat : plus d'espèces et d'individus de petites abeilles nichant au sol (Lasioglossum (Dialictus) Robertson) sont associés aux plantations de caféiers sans ombre. Une grande proportion (49%) des abeilles récoltées faisaient partie de ce sous-genre, qui n'a jamais été rapporté comme commun dans les agroécosystèmes de caféiers auparavant. Des études ultérieures devraient établir si Dialictus est important dans la pollinisation du caféier. Nous proposons une stratégie impliquant la conservation des abeilles natives par le biais d'une gestion de l'habitat simple qui pourrait améliorer la qualité et la quantité des récoltes pour des plantations de caféiers à petite échelle.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.4039/tce.2013.16</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-347X
ispartof Canadian entomologist, 2013-08, Vol.145 (4), p.435-453
issn 0008-347X
1918-3240
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1518115348
source Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Agricultural ecosystems
Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Bees
Biodiversity & Evolution
Biological and medical sciences
Coffee
Conservation
Dairy farms
Ecosystem studies
Farms
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General agroecology
General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping
General agronomy. Plant production
Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development
Habitats
Nesting
Plant reproduction
Pollination
Pollinators
Species richness
Synecology
Terrestrial ecosystems
title Evaluating bee (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) diversity using Malaise traps in coffee landscapes of Costa Rica
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T15%3A49%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20bee%20(Hymenoptera:%20Apoidea)%20diversity%20using%20Malaise%20traps%20in%20coffee%20landscapes%20of%20Costa%20Rica&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20entomologist&rft.au=Ngo,%20H.T.&rft.date=2013-08-01&rft.volume=145&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=435&rft.epage=453&rft.pages=435-453&rft.issn=0008-347X&rft.eissn=1918-3240&rft.coden=CAENAF&rft_id=info:doi/10.4039/tce.2013.16&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3281522751%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1518115348&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_4039_tce_2013_16&rfr_iscdi=true