Evaluating bee (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) diversity using Malaise traps in coffee landscapes of Costa Rica
Even though Arabica coffee (Coffea arabica Linnaeus, Rubiaceae) can self-pollinate, bees are important pollinators, without which there is lower fruit quality and yield. We studied bee diversity in coffee agroecosystems in Costa Rica during two coffee flowering seasons (2005 and 2006). Malaise traps...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian entomologist 2013-08, Vol.145 (4), p.435-453 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 453 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 435 |
container_title | Canadian entomologist |
container_volume | 145 |
creator | Ngo, H.T. Gibbs, J. Griswold, T. Packer, L. |
description | Even though Arabica coffee (Coffea arabica Linnaeus, Rubiaceae) can self-pollinate, bees are important pollinators, without which there is lower fruit quality and yield. We studied bee diversity in coffee agroecosystems in Costa Rica during two coffee flowering seasons (2005 and 2006). Malaise traps were used as a passive sampling method to collect bees during coffee blooms. We collected 1012 bee individuals from three different site types: nonagricultural fields and shaded and unshaded coffee farms. Unshaded coffee farms had significantly higher species richness (S) and number of bee individuals (n) than did the shaded coffee farms and nonagricultural sites. Overall bee diversity did not differ among site types but evenness (J′) was significantly lower in unshaded coffee farms. Using a more detailed community analysis, there was a significant association between functional groups and habitat type with more species and individuals of small-bodied ground-nesting bees (Lasioglossum (Dialictus) Robertson) associated with unshaded coffee farms. A large proportion (49%) of bees collected were of this subgenus, which was never before reported as common in coffee agroecosystems. Further studies should establish whether Dialictus is important in coffee pollination. We propose strategies involving conservation of native bees through simple habitat management for small-scale coffee farms that may improve crop quality and quantity. Bien que le caféier d'Arabie (Coffea arabica Linnaeus, Rubiaceae) puisse s'autopolliniser, les abeilles sont d'importants pollinisateurs sans lesquels la qualité et la production des fruits sont moindres. Nous avons étudié la diversité des abeilles dans les agroécosystèmes de caféier au Costa Rica durant deux saisons de floraison du caféier (2005 et 2006). Des pièges Malaise ont été utilisés comme méthode passive d’échantillonnage afin de récolter les abeilles durant la floraison du caféier. Nous avons récolté 1012 individus sur trois différents types de sites : des champs non-agricoles et des plantations de caféiers ombragées ou non. Les plantations de caféiers sans ombre possédaient une richesse d'espèces (S) et un nombre d'individus d'abeilles (n) significativement plus grands que les plantations de caféiers ombragées et les sites non-agricoles. La diversité globale des abeilles ne différaient pas entre les différents types de sites, mais l’équitabilité (J′) était significativement plus basse dans les plantations de caféiers sans ombre. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4039/tce.2013.16 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1518115348</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_4039_tce_2013_16</cupid><sourcerecordid>3281522751</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-877fb45bbf5641428dc548657adfcb0bd7bd2a80f1b0b557da722af43a1e49323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkFtLw0AQhRdRsF6e_AMLIiiSutds4lsp9QKKIAq-hcleZCVN4m5S6L93S4v44NPMwHfOYQ5CZ5RMBeHlzaDtlBHKpzTfQxNa0iLjTJB9NCGEpF2oj0N0FONXOiXl5QS5xQqaEQbffuLaWnz5sF7atusHG-AWz_rOGwtX2PiVDdEPazzGDfoMDfho8RCgj9i3WHfOJXkDrYkaehtx5_C8iwPgV6_hBB04aKI93c1j9H63eJs_ZE8v94_z2VOmeZ4PWaGUq4WsaydzQQUrjJaiyKUC43RNaqNqw6AgjqZDSmVAMQZOcKBWlJzxY3S-9e1D9z3aOFRf3RjaFFlRSQtKJRdFoq63lA5djMG6qg9-CWFdUVJtiqxSkdWmyIrmib7YeUJ6rXEBWu3jr4QpqcqS8cRlO1dY1sGbT_sn_B_fH3AWgj0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1518115348</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating bee (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) diversity using Malaise traps in coffee landscapes of Costa Rica</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Ngo, H.T. ; Gibbs, J. ; Griswold, T. ; Packer, L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ngo, H.T. ; Gibbs, J. ; Griswold, T. ; Packer, L.</creatorcontrib><description>Even though Arabica coffee (Coffea arabica Linnaeus, Rubiaceae) can self-pollinate, bees are important pollinators, without which there is lower fruit quality and yield. We studied bee diversity in coffee agroecosystems in Costa Rica during two coffee flowering seasons (2005 and 2006). Malaise traps were used as a passive sampling method to collect bees during coffee blooms. We collected 1012 bee individuals from three different site types: nonagricultural fields and shaded and unshaded coffee farms. Unshaded coffee farms had significantly higher species richness (S) and number of bee individuals (n) than did the shaded coffee farms and nonagricultural sites. Overall bee diversity did not differ among site types but evenness (J′) was significantly lower in unshaded coffee farms. Using a more detailed community analysis, there was a significant association between functional groups and habitat type with more species and individuals of small-bodied ground-nesting bees (Lasioglossum (Dialictus) Robertson) associated with unshaded coffee farms. A large proportion (49%) of bees collected were of this subgenus, which was never before reported as common in coffee agroecosystems. Further studies should establish whether Dialictus is important in coffee pollination. We propose strategies involving conservation of native bees through simple habitat management for small-scale coffee farms that may improve crop quality and quantity. Bien que le caféier d'Arabie (Coffea arabica Linnaeus, Rubiaceae) puisse s'autopolliniser, les abeilles sont d'importants pollinisateurs sans lesquels la qualité et la production des fruits sont moindres. Nous avons étudié la diversité des abeilles dans les agroécosystèmes de caféier au Costa Rica durant deux saisons de floraison du caféier (2005 et 2006). Des pièges Malaise ont été utilisés comme méthode passive d’échantillonnage afin de récolter les abeilles durant la floraison du caféier. Nous avons récolté 1012 individus sur trois différents types de sites : des champs non-agricoles et des plantations de caféiers ombragées ou non. Les plantations de caféiers sans ombre possédaient une richesse d'espèces (S) et un nombre d'individus d'abeilles (n) significativement plus grands que les plantations de caféiers ombragées et les sites non-agricoles. La diversité globale des abeilles ne différaient pas entre les différents types de sites, mais l’équitabilité (J′) était significativement plus basse dans les plantations de caféiers sans ombre. En utilisant des analyses de communauté plus détaillées, une association significative a été trouvée entre les groupes fonctionnels et le type d'habitat : plus d'espèces et d'individus de petites abeilles nichant au sol (Lasioglossum (Dialictus) Robertson) sont associés aux plantations de caféiers sans ombre. Une grande proportion (49%) des abeilles récoltées faisaient partie de ce sous-genre, qui n'a jamais été rapporté comme commun dans les agroécosystèmes de caféiers auparavant. Des études ultérieures devraient établir si Dialictus est important dans la pollinisation du caféier. Nous proposons une stratégie impliquant la conservation des abeilles natives par le biais d'une gestion de l'habitat simple qui pourrait améliorer la qualité et la quantité des récoltes pour des plantations de caféiers à petite échelle.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-347X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1918-3240</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4039/tce.2013.16</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CAENAF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Agricultural ecosystems ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Bees ; Biodiversity & Evolution ; Biological and medical sciences ; Coffee ; Conservation ; Dairy farms ; Ecosystem studies ; Farms ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agroecology ; General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping ; General agronomy. Plant production ; Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development ; Habitats ; Nesting ; Plant reproduction ; Pollination ; Pollinators ; Species richness ; Synecology ; Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><ispartof>Canadian entomologist, 2013-08, Vol.145 (4), p.435-453</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2013</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Entomological Society of Canada Aug 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-877fb45bbf5641428dc548657adfcb0bd7bd2a80f1b0b557da722af43a1e49323</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-877fb45bbf5641428dc548657adfcb0bd7bd2a80f1b0b557da722af43a1e49323</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0008347X13000163/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27579923$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ngo, H.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibbs, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griswold, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Packer, L.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating bee (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) diversity using Malaise traps in coffee landscapes of Costa Rica</title><title>Canadian entomologist</title><addtitle>Can Entomol</addtitle><description>Even though Arabica coffee (Coffea arabica Linnaeus, Rubiaceae) can self-pollinate, bees are important pollinators, without which there is lower fruit quality and yield. We studied bee diversity in coffee agroecosystems in Costa Rica during two coffee flowering seasons (2005 and 2006). Malaise traps were used as a passive sampling method to collect bees during coffee blooms. We collected 1012 bee individuals from three different site types: nonagricultural fields and shaded and unshaded coffee farms. Unshaded coffee farms had significantly higher species richness (S) and number of bee individuals (n) than did the shaded coffee farms and nonagricultural sites. Overall bee diversity did not differ among site types but evenness (J′) was significantly lower in unshaded coffee farms. Using a more detailed community analysis, there was a significant association between functional groups and habitat type with more species and individuals of small-bodied ground-nesting bees (Lasioglossum (Dialictus) Robertson) associated with unshaded coffee farms. A large proportion (49%) of bees collected were of this subgenus, which was never before reported as common in coffee agroecosystems. Further studies should establish whether Dialictus is important in coffee pollination. We propose strategies involving conservation of native bees through simple habitat management for small-scale coffee farms that may improve crop quality and quantity. Bien que le caféier d'Arabie (Coffea arabica Linnaeus, Rubiaceae) puisse s'autopolliniser, les abeilles sont d'importants pollinisateurs sans lesquels la qualité et la production des fruits sont moindres. Nous avons étudié la diversité des abeilles dans les agroécosystèmes de caféier au Costa Rica durant deux saisons de floraison du caféier (2005 et 2006). Des pièges Malaise ont été utilisés comme méthode passive d’échantillonnage afin de récolter les abeilles durant la floraison du caféier. Nous avons récolté 1012 individus sur trois différents types de sites : des champs non-agricoles et des plantations de caféiers ombragées ou non. Les plantations de caféiers sans ombre possédaient une richesse d'espèces (S) et un nombre d'individus d'abeilles (n) significativement plus grands que les plantations de caféiers ombragées et les sites non-agricoles. La diversité globale des abeilles ne différaient pas entre les différents types de sites, mais l’équitabilité (J′) était significativement plus basse dans les plantations de caféiers sans ombre. En utilisant des analyses de communauté plus détaillées, une association significative a été trouvée entre les groupes fonctionnels et le type d'habitat : plus d'espèces et d'individus de petites abeilles nichant au sol (Lasioglossum (Dialictus) Robertson) sont associés aux plantations de caféiers sans ombre. Une grande proportion (49%) des abeilles récoltées faisaient partie de ce sous-genre, qui n'a jamais été rapporté comme commun dans les agroécosystèmes de caféiers auparavant. Des études ultérieures devraient établir si Dialictus est important dans la pollinisation du caféier. Nous proposons une stratégie impliquant la conservation des abeilles natives par le biais d'une gestion de l'habitat simple qui pourrait améliorer la qualité et la quantité des récoltes pour des plantations de caféiers à petite échelle.</description><subject>Agricultural ecosystems</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Bees</subject><subject>Biodiversity & Evolution</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Coffee</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Dairy farms</subject><subject>Ecosystem studies</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agroecology</subject><subject>General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Nesting</subject><subject>Plant reproduction</subject><subject>Pollination</subject><subject>Pollinators</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><issn>0008-347X</issn><issn>1918-3240</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkFtLw0AQhRdRsF6e_AMLIiiSutds4lsp9QKKIAq-hcleZCVN4m5S6L93S4v44NPMwHfOYQ5CZ5RMBeHlzaDtlBHKpzTfQxNa0iLjTJB9NCGEpF2oj0N0FONXOiXl5QS5xQqaEQbffuLaWnz5sF7atusHG-AWz_rOGwtX2PiVDdEPazzGDfoMDfho8RCgj9i3WHfOJXkDrYkaehtx5_C8iwPgV6_hBB04aKI93c1j9H63eJs_ZE8v94_z2VOmeZ4PWaGUq4WsaydzQQUrjJaiyKUC43RNaqNqw6AgjqZDSmVAMQZOcKBWlJzxY3S-9e1D9z3aOFRf3RjaFFlRSQtKJRdFoq63lA5djMG6qg9-CWFdUVJtiqxSkdWmyIrmib7YeUJ6rXEBWu3jr4QpqcqS8cRlO1dY1sGbT_sn_B_fH3AWgj0</recordid><startdate>20130801</startdate><enddate>20130801</enddate><creator>Ngo, H.T.</creator><creator>Gibbs, J.</creator><creator>Griswold, T.</creator><creator>Packer, L.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Entomological Society of Canada</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130801</creationdate><title>Evaluating bee (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) diversity using Malaise traps in coffee landscapes of Costa Rica</title><author>Ngo, H.T. ; Gibbs, J. ; Griswold, T. ; Packer, L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-877fb45bbf5641428dc548657adfcb0bd7bd2a80f1b0b557da722af43a1e49323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Agricultural ecosystems</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Bees</topic><topic>Biodiversity & Evolution</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Coffee</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Dairy farms</topic><topic>Ecosystem studies</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agroecology</topic><topic>General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Nesting</topic><topic>Plant reproduction</topic><topic>Pollination</topic><topic>Pollinators</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ngo, H.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibbs, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griswold, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Packer, L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Canadian entomologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ngo, H.T.</au><au>Gibbs, J.</au><au>Griswold, T.</au><au>Packer, L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating bee (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) diversity using Malaise traps in coffee landscapes of Costa Rica</atitle><jtitle>Canadian entomologist</jtitle><addtitle>Can Entomol</addtitle><date>2013-08-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>145</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>435</spage><epage>453</epage><pages>435-453</pages><issn>0008-347X</issn><eissn>1918-3240</eissn><coden>CAENAF</coden><abstract>Even though Arabica coffee (Coffea arabica Linnaeus, Rubiaceae) can self-pollinate, bees are important pollinators, without which there is lower fruit quality and yield. We studied bee diversity in coffee agroecosystems in Costa Rica during two coffee flowering seasons (2005 and 2006). Malaise traps were used as a passive sampling method to collect bees during coffee blooms. We collected 1012 bee individuals from three different site types: nonagricultural fields and shaded and unshaded coffee farms. Unshaded coffee farms had significantly higher species richness (S) and number of bee individuals (n) than did the shaded coffee farms and nonagricultural sites. Overall bee diversity did not differ among site types but evenness (J′) was significantly lower in unshaded coffee farms. Using a more detailed community analysis, there was a significant association between functional groups and habitat type with more species and individuals of small-bodied ground-nesting bees (Lasioglossum (Dialictus) Robertson) associated with unshaded coffee farms. A large proportion (49%) of bees collected were of this subgenus, which was never before reported as common in coffee agroecosystems. Further studies should establish whether Dialictus is important in coffee pollination. We propose strategies involving conservation of native bees through simple habitat management for small-scale coffee farms that may improve crop quality and quantity. Bien que le caféier d'Arabie (Coffea arabica Linnaeus, Rubiaceae) puisse s'autopolliniser, les abeilles sont d'importants pollinisateurs sans lesquels la qualité et la production des fruits sont moindres. Nous avons étudié la diversité des abeilles dans les agroécosystèmes de caféier au Costa Rica durant deux saisons de floraison du caféier (2005 et 2006). Des pièges Malaise ont été utilisés comme méthode passive d’échantillonnage afin de récolter les abeilles durant la floraison du caféier. Nous avons récolté 1012 individus sur trois différents types de sites : des champs non-agricoles et des plantations de caféiers ombragées ou non. Les plantations de caféiers sans ombre possédaient une richesse d'espèces (S) et un nombre d'individus d'abeilles (n) significativement plus grands que les plantations de caféiers ombragées et les sites non-agricoles. La diversité globale des abeilles ne différaient pas entre les différents types de sites, mais l’équitabilité (J′) était significativement plus basse dans les plantations de caféiers sans ombre. En utilisant des analyses de communauté plus détaillées, une association significative a été trouvée entre les groupes fonctionnels et le type d'habitat : plus d'espèces et d'individus de petites abeilles nichant au sol (Lasioglossum (Dialictus) Robertson) sont associés aux plantations de caféiers sans ombre. Une grande proportion (49%) des abeilles récoltées faisaient partie de ce sous-genre, qui n'a jamais été rapporté comme commun dans les agroécosystèmes de caféiers auparavant. Des études ultérieures devraient établir si Dialictus est important dans la pollinisation du caféier. Nous proposons une stratégie impliquant la conservation des abeilles natives par le biais d'une gestion de l'habitat simple qui pourrait améliorer la qualité et la quantité des récoltes pour des plantations de caféiers à petite échelle.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.4039/tce.2013.16</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0008-347X |
ispartof | Canadian entomologist, 2013-08, Vol.145 (4), p.435-453 |
issn | 0008-347X 1918-3240 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1518115348 |
source | Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Agricultural ecosystems Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Bees Biodiversity & Evolution Biological and medical sciences Coffee Conservation Dairy farms Ecosystem studies Farms Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General agroecology General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping General agronomy. Plant production Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development Habitats Nesting Plant reproduction Pollination Pollinators Species richness Synecology Terrestrial ecosystems |
title | Evaluating bee (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) diversity using Malaise traps in coffee landscapes of Costa Rica |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T15%3A49%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20bee%20(Hymenoptera:%20Apoidea)%20diversity%20using%20Malaise%20traps%20in%20coffee%20landscapes%20of%20Costa%20Rica&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20entomologist&rft.au=Ngo,%20H.T.&rft.date=2013-08-01&rft.volume=145&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=435&rft.epage=453&rft.pages=435-453&rft.issn=0008-347X&rft.eissn=1918-3240&rft.coden=CAENAF&rft_id=info:doi/10.4039/tce.2013.16&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3281522751%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1518115348&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_4039_tce_2013_16&rfr_iscdi=true |