Beneficial effects of Neotyphodium tembladerae and Neotyphodium pampeanum on a wild forage grass

Asexual, vertically transmitted fungal endophytes of the genus Neotyphodium are considered to enhance growth, stress resistance and competitiveness of agronomic grasses, but have been suggested to have neutral or deleterious effects on wild grasses. We studied whether the associations between Bromus...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Grass and forage science 2012-09, Vol.67 (3), p.382-390
Hauptverfasser: Iannone, L. J., Pinget, A. D., Nagabhyru, P., Schardl, C. L., De Battista, J. P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 390
container_issue 3
container_start_page 382
container_title Grass and forage science
container_volume 67
creator Iannone, L. J.
Pinget, A. D.
Nagabhyru, P.
Schardl, C. L.
De Battista, J. P.
description Asexual, vertically transmitted fungal endophytes of the genus Neotyphodium are considered to enhance growth, stress resistance and competitiveness of agronomic grasses, but have been suggested to have neutral or deleterious effects on wild grasses. We studied whether the associations between Bromus auleticus and their endophytes, Neotyphodium pampeanum and Neotyphodium tembladerae, are beneficial for this wild forage grass native to South America. In a greenhouse experiment, 3‐month‐old endophyte‐infected plants (E+) showed enhanced growth relative to their endophyte‐free counterparts (E−). In a one‐year‐long experiment in the field, E+ plants showed higher survival and regrowth rate, and produced more biomass and seeds than E− plants. Only with respect to the seed output did N. tembladerae seem to be detrimental, whereas N. pampeanum did not affect this parameter. No differences were observed with respect to the germination of seeds produced by E+ or E− plants. Loline alkaloids were detected in N. pampeanum‐infected plants. Our results show that, similar to results with agronomic grasses, in wild grasses, the symbiosis with Neotyphodium species could be mutualistic.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1365-2494.2012.00855.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1517348415</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3278281321</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3785-2079d5ae3ff24aeeff12e0810dad273e51237d7b78081871829ab512068c1f5c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1PwzAMhiMEEmPwHyJxbslHs2QSFzZYQRpDCNCOIWud0bK1JenE9u_JKELihi-2bD_OmxchTElMQ1yUMeUDEbFkmMSMUBYTooSItweo9zs4RD1CExYJlrBjdOJ9SQiRQ8576HUEFdgiK8wKg7WQtR7XFs-gbnfNW50XmzVuYb1YmRycAWyq_O-wMesGTBWqusIGfxarHNvamSXgpTPen6Ija1Yezn5yH71Mbp7Ht9H0Ib0bX02jjEsVZAY9uTDArWWJgSCFMiCKktzkTHIQlHGZy4VUoakkVWxoFqFJBiqjVmS8j867u42rPzbgW13WG1eFJzUVVPJEJVSELdVtZa723oHVjSvWxu00JXrvpy713ja9t03v_dTffuptQC87NHwRdv_mdDp5CkXAow4vfAvbX9y4dz2QXAo9n6WaTe9Hj9fzVA_4F360irg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1517348415</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Beneficial effects of Neotyphodium tembladerae and Neotyphodium pampeanum on a wild forage grass</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Iannone, L. J. ; Pinget, A. D. ; Nagabhyru, P. ; Schardl, C. L. ; De Battista, J. P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Iannone, L. J. ; Pinget, A. D. ; Nagabhyru, P. ; Schardl, C. L. ; De Battista, J. P.</creatorcontrib><description>Asexual, vertically transmitted fungal endophytes of the genus Neotyphodium are considered to enhance growth, stress resistance and competitiveness of agronomic grasses, but have been suggested to have neutral or deleterious effects on wild grasses. We studied whether the associations between Bromus auleticus and their endophytes, Neotyphodium pampeanum and Neotyphodium tembladerae, are beneficial for this wild forage grass native to South America. In a greenhouse experiment, 3‐month‐old endophyte‐infected plants (E+) showed enhanced growth relative to their endophyte‐free counterparts (E−). In a one‐year‐long experiment in the field, E+ plants showed higher survival and regrowth rate, and produced more biomass and seeds than E− plants. Only with respect to the seed output did N. tembladerae seem to be detrimental, whereas N. pampeanum did not affect this parameter. No differences were observed with respect to the germination of seeds produced by E+ or E− plants. Loline alkaloids were detected in N. pampeanum‐infected plants. Our results show that, similar to results with agronomic grasses, in wild grasses, the symbiosis with Neotyphodium species could be mutualistic.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0142-5242</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2494</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.2012.00855.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GFSCDW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Bromus ; endophytes ; growth ; reproduction ; wild grasses</subject><ispartof>Grass and forage science, 2012-09, Vol.67 (3), p.382-390</ispartof><rights>2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3785-2079d5ae3ff24aeeff12e0810dad273e51237d7b78081871829ab512068c1f5c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3785-2079d5ae3ff24aeeff12e0810dad273e51237d7b78081871829ab512068c1f5c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2494.2012.00855.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2494.2012.00855.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Iannone, L. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinget, A. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagabhyru, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schardl, C. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Battista, J. P.</creatorcontrib><title>Beneficial effects of Neotyphodium tembladerae and Neotyphodium pampeanum on a wild forage grass</title><title>Grass and forage science</title><description>Asexual, vertically transmitted fungal endophytes of the genus Neotyphodium are considered to enhance growth, stress resistance and competitiveness of agronomic grasses, but have been suggested to have neutral or deleterious effects on wild grasses. We studied whether the associations between Bromus auleticus and their endophytes, Neotyphodium pampeanum and Neotyphodium tembladerae, are beneficial for this wild forage grass native to South America. In a greenhouse experiment, 3‐month‐old endophyte‐infected plants (E+) showed enhanced growth relative to their endophyte‐free counterparts (E−). In a one‐year‐long experiment in the field, E+ plants showed higher survival and regrowth rate, and produced more biomass and seeds than E− plants. Only with respect to the seed output did N. tembladerae seem to be detrimental, whereas N. pampeanum did not affect this parameter. No differences were observed with respect to the germination of seeds produced by E+ or E− plants. Loline alkaloids were detected in N. pampeanum‐infected plants. Our results show that, similar to results with agronomic grasses, in wild grasses, the symbiosis with Neotyphodium species could be mutualistic.</description><subject>Bromus</subject><subject>endophytes</subject><subject>growth</subject><subject>reproduction</subject><subject>wild grasses</subject><issn>0142-5242</issn><issn>1365-2494</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1PwzAMhiMEEmPwHyJxbslHs2QSFzZYQRpDCNCOIWud0bK1JenE9u_JKELihi-2bD_OmxchTElMQ1yUMeUDEbFkmMSMUBYTooSItweo9zs4RD1CExYJlrBjdOJ9SQiRQ8576HUEFdgiK8wKg7WQtR7XFs-gbnfNW50XmzVuYb1YmRycAWyq_O-wMesGTBWqusIGfxarHNvamSXgpTPen6Ija1Yezn5yH71Mbp7Ht9H0Ib0bX02jjEsVZAY9uTDArWWJgSCFMiCKktzkTHIQlHGZy4VUoakkVWxoFqFJBiqjVmS8j867u42rPzbgW13WG1eFJzUVVPJEJVSELdVtZa723oHVjSvWxu00JXrvpy713ja9t03v_dTffuptQC87NHwRdv_mdDp5CkXAow4vfAvbX9y4dz2QXAo9n6WaTe9Hj9fzVA_4F360irg</recordid><startdate>201209</startdate><enddate>201209</enddate><creator>Iannone, L. J.</creator><creator>Pinget, A. D.</creator><creator>Nagabhyru, P.</creator><creator>Schardl, C. L.</creator><creator>De Battista, J. P.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201209</creationdate><title>Beneficial effects of Neotyphodium tembladerae and Neotyphodium pampeanum on a wild forage grass</title><author>Iannone, L. J. ; Pinget, A. D. ; Nagabhyru, P. ; Schardl, C. L. ; De Battista, J. P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3785-2079d5ae3ff24aeeff12e0810dad273e51237d7b78081871829ab512068c1f5c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Bromus</topic><topic>endophytes</topic><topic>growth</topic><topic>reproduction</topic><topic>wild grasses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Iannone, L. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinget, A. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagabhyru, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schardl, C. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Battista, J. P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Grass and forage science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Iannone, L. J.</au><au>Pinget, A. D.</au><au>Nagabhyru, P.</au><au>Schardl, C. L.</au><au>De Battista, J. P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Beneficial effects of Neotyphodium tembladerae and Neotyphodium pampeanum on a wild forage grass</atitle><jtitle>Grass and forage science</jtitle><date>2012-09</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>382</spage><epage>390</epage><pages>382-390</pages><issn>0142-5242</issn><eissn>1365-2494</eissn><coden>GFSCDW</coden><abstract>Asexual, vertically transmitted fungal endophytes of the genus Neotyphodium are considered to enhance growth, stress resistance and competitiveness of agronomic grasses, but have been suggested to have neutral or deleterious effects on wild grasses. We studied whether the associations between Bromus auleticus and their endophytes, Neotyphodium pampeanum and Neotyphodium tembladerae, are beneficial for this wild forage grass native to South America. In a greenhouse experiment, 3‐month‐old endophyte‐infected plants (E+) showed enhanced growth relative to their endophyte‐free counterparts (E−). In a one‐year‐long experiment in the field, E+ plants showed higher survival and regrowth rate, and produced more biomass and seeds than E− plants. Only with respect to the seed output did N. tembladerae seem to be detrimental, whereas N. pampeanum did not affect this parameter. No differences were observed with respect to the germination of seeds produced by E+ or E− plants. Loline alkaloids were detected in N. pampeanum‐infected plants. Our results show that, similar to results with agronomic grasses, in wild grasses, the symbiosis with Neotyphodium species could be mutualistic.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2494.2012.00855.x</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0142-5242
ispartof Grass and forage science, 2012-09, Vol.67 (3), p.382-390
issn 0142-5242
1365-2494
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1517348415
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Bromus
endophytes
growth
reproduction
wild grasses
title Beneficial effects of Neotyphodium tembladerae and Neotyphodium pampeanum on a wild forage grass
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T15%3A09%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Beneficial%20effects%20of%20Neotyphodium%20tembladerae%20and%20Neotyphodium%20pampeanum%20on%20a%20wild%20forage%20grass&rft.jtitle=Grass%20and%20forage%20science&rft.au=Iannone,%20L.%20J.&rft.date=2012-09&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=382&rft.epage=390&rft.pages=382-390&rft.issn=0142-5242&rft.eissn=1365-2494&rft.coden=GFSCDW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2494.2012.00855.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3278281321%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1517348415&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true