Beneficial effects of Neotyphodium tembladerae and Neotyphodium pampeanum on a wild forage grass
Asexual, vertically transmitted fungal endophytes of the genus Neotyphodium are considered to enhance growth, stress resistance and competitiveness of agronomic grasses, but have been suggested to have neutral or deleterious effects on wild grasses. We studied whether the associations between Bromus...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Grass and forage science 2012-09, Vol.67 (3), p.382-390 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 390 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 382 |
container_title | Grass and forage science |
container_volume | 67 |
creator | Iannone, L. J. Pinget, A. D. Nagabhyru, P. Schardl, C. L. De Battista, J. P. |
description | Asexual, vertically transmitted fungal endophytes of the genus Neotyphodium are considered to enhance growth, stress resistance and competitiveness of agronomic grasses, but have been suggested to have neutral or deleterious effects on wild grasses. We studied whether the associations between Bromus auleticus and their endophytes, Neotyphodium pampeanum and Neotyphodium tembladerae, are beneficial for this wild forage grass native to South America. In a greenhouse experiment, 3‐month‐old endophyte‐infected plants (E+) showed enhanced growth relative to their endophyte‐free counterparts (E−). In a one‐year‐long experiment in the field, E+ plants showed higher survival and regrowth rate, and produced more biomass and seeds than E− plants. Only with respect to the seed output did N. tembladerae seem to be detrimental, whereas N. pampeanum did not affect this parameter. No differences were observed with respect to the germination of seeds produced by E+ or E− plants. Loline alkaloids were detected in N. pampeanum‐infected plants. Our results show that, similar to results with agronomic grasses, in wild grasses, the symbiosis with Neotyphodium species could be mutualistic. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1365-2494.2012.00855.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1517348415</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3278281321</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3785-2079d5ae3ff24aeeff12e0810dad273e51237d7b78081871829ab512068c1f5c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1PwzAMhiMEEmPwHyJxbslHs2QSFzZYQRpDCNCOIWud0bK1JenE9u_JKELihi-2bD_OmxchTElMQ1yUMeUDEbFkmMSMUBYTooSItweo9zs4RD1CExYJlrBjdOJ9SQiRQ8576HUEFdgiK8wKg7WQtR7XFs-gbnfNW50XmzVuYb1YmRycAWyq_O-wMesGTBWqusIGfxarHNvamSXgpTPen6Ija1Yezn5yH71Mbp7Ht9H0Ib0bX02jjEsVZAY9uTDArWWJgSCFMiCKktzkTHIQlHGZy4VUoakkVWxoFqFJBiqjVmS8j867u42rPzbgW13WG1eFJzUVVPJEJVSELdVtZa723oHVjSvWxu00JXrvpy713ja9t03v_dTffuptQC87NHwRdv_mdDp5CkXAow4vfAvbX9y4dz2QXAo9n6WaTe9Hj9fzVA_4F360irg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1517348415</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Beneficial effects of Neotyphodium tembladerae and Neotyphodium pampeanum on a wild forage grass</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Iannone, L. J. ; Pinget, A. D. ; Nagabhyru, P. ; Schardl, C. L. ; De Battista, J. P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Iannone, L. J. ; Pinget, A. D. ; Nagabhyru, P. ; Schardl, C. L. ; De Battista, J. P.</creatorcontrib><description>Asexual, vertically transmitted fungal endophytes of the genus Neotyphodium are considered to enhance growth, stress resistance and competitiveness of agronomic grasses, but have been suggested to have neutral or deleterious effects on wild grasses. We studied whether the associations between Bromus auleticus and their endophytes, Neotyphodium pampeanum and Neotyphodium tembladerae, are beneficial for this wild forage grass native to South America. In a greenhouse experiment, 3‐month‐old endophyte‐infected plants (E+) showed enhanced growth relative to their endophyte‐free counterparts (E−). In a one‐year‐long experiment in the field, E+ plants showed higher survival and regrowth rate, and produced more biomass and seeds than E− plants. Only with respect to the seed output did N. tembladerae seem to be detrimental, whereas N. pampeanum did not affect this parameter. No differences were observed with respect to the germination of seeds produced by E+ or E− plants. Loline alkaloids were detected in N. pampeanum‐infected plants. Our results show that, similar to results with agronomic grasses, in wild grasses, the symbiosis with Neotyphodium species could be mutualistic.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0142-5242</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2494</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.2012.00855.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GFSCDW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Bromus ; endophytes ; growth ; reproduction ; wild grasses</subject><ispartof>Grass and forage science, 2012-09, Vol.67 (3), p.382-390</ispartof><rights>2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3785-2079d5ae3ff24aeeff12e0810dad273e51237d7b78081871829ab512068c1f5c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3785-2079d5ae3ff24aeeff12e0810dad273e51237d7b78081871829ab512068c1f5c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2494.2012.00855.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2494.2012.00855.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Iannone, L. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinget, A. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagabhyru, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schardl, C. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Battista, J. P.</creatorcontrib><title>Beneficial effects of Neotyphodium tembladerae and Neotyphodium pampeanum on a wild forage grass</title><title>Grass and forage science</title><description>Asexual, vertically transmitted fungal endophytes of the genus Neotyphodium are considered to enhance growth, stress resistance and competitiveness of agronomic grasses, but have been suggested to have neutral or deleterious effects on wild grasses. We studied whether the associations between Bromus auleticus and their endophytes, Neotyphodium pampeanum and Neotyphodium tembladerae, are beneficial for this wild forage grass native to South America. In a greenhouse experiment, 3‐month‐old endophyte‐infected plants (E+) showed enhanced growth relative to their endophyte‐free counterparts (E−). In a one‐year‐long experiment in the field, E+ plants showed higher survival and regrowth rate, and produced more biomass and seeds than E− plants. Only with respect to the seed output did N. tembladerae seem to be detrimental, whereas N. pampeanum did not affect this parameter. No differences were observed with respect to the germination of seeds produced by E+ or E− plants. Loline alkaloids were detected in N. pampeanum‐infected plants. Our results show that, similar to results with agronomic grasses, in wild grasses, the symbiosis with Neotyphodium species could be mutualistic.</description><subject>Bromus</subject><subject>endophytes</subject><subject>growth</subject><subject>reproduction</subject><subject>wild grasses</subject><issn>0142-5242</issn><issn>1365-2494</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1PwzAMhiMEEmPwHyJxbslHs2QSFzZYQRpDCNCOIWud0bK1JenE9u_JKELihi-2bD_OmxchTElMQ1yUMeUDEbFkmMSMUBYTooSItweo9zs4RD1CExYJlrBjdOJ9SQiRQ8576HUEFdgiK8wKg7WQtR7XFs-gbnfNW50XmzVuYb1YmRycAWyq_O-wMesGTBWqusIGfxarHNvamSXgpTPen6Ija1Yezn5yH71Mbp7Ht9H0Ib0bX02jjEsVZAY9uTDArWWJgSCFMiCKktzkTHIQlHGZy4VUoakkVWxoFqFJBiqjVmS8j867u42rPzbgW13WG1eFJzUVVPJEJVSELdVtZa723oHVjSvWxu00JXrvpy713ja9t03v_dTffuptQC87NHwRdv_mdDp5CkXAow4vfAvbX9y4dz2QXAo9n6WaTe9Hj9fzVA_4F360irg</recordid><startdate>201209</startdate><enddate>201209</enddate><creator>Iannone, L. J.</creator><creator>Pinget, A. D.</creator><creator>Nagabhyru, P.</creator><creator>Schardl, C. L.</creator><creator>De Battista, J. P.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201209</creationdate><title>Beneficial effects of Neotyphodium tembladerae and Neotyphodium pampeanum on a wild forage grass</title><author>Iannone, L. J. ; Pinget, A. D. ; Nagabhyru, P. ; Schardl, C. L. ; De Battista, J. P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3785-2079d5ae3ff24aeeff12e0810dad273e51237d7b78081871829ab512068c1f5c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Bromus</topic><topic>endophytes</topic><topic>growth</topic><topic>reproduction</topic><topic>wild grasses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Iannone, L. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinget, A. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagabhyru, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schardl, C. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Battista, J. P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Grass and forage science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Iannone, L. J.</au><au>Pinget, A. D.</au><au>Nagabhyru, P.</au><au>Schardl, C. L.</au><au>De Battista, J. P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Beneficial effects of Neotyphodium tembladerae and Neotyphodium pampeanum on a wild forage grass</atitle><jtitle>Grass and forage science</jtitle><date>2012-09</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>382</spage><epage>390</epage><pages>382-390</pages><issn>0142-5242</issn><eissn>1365-2494</eissn><coden>GFSCDW</coden><abstract>Asexual, vertically transmitted fungal endophytes of the genus Neotyphodium are considered to enhance growth, stress resistance and competitiveness of agronomic grasses, but have been suggested to have neutral or deleterious effects on wild grasses. We studied whether the associations between Bromus auleticus and their endophytes, Neotyphodium pampeanum and Neotyphodium tembladerae, are beneficial for this wild forage grass native to South America. In a greenhouse experiment, 3‐month‐old endophyte‐infected plants (E+) showed enhanced growth relative to their endophyte‐free counterparts (E−). In a one‐year‐long experiment in the field, E+ plants showed higher survival and regrowth rate, and produced more biomass and seeds than E− plants. Only with respect to the seed output did N. tembladerae seem to be detrimental, whereas N. pampeanum did not affect this parameter. No differences were observed with respect to the germination of seeds produced by E+ or E− plants. Loline alkaloids were detected in N. pampeanum‐infected plants. Our results show that, similar to results with agronomic grasses, in wild grasses, the symbiosis with Neotyphodium species could be mutualistic.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2494.2012.00855.x</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0142-5242 |
ispartof | Grass and forage science, 2012-09, Vol.67 (3), p.382-390 |
issn | 0142-5242 1365-2494 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1517348415 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Bromus endophytes growth reproduction wild grasses |
title | Beneficial effects of Neotyphodium tembladerae and Neotyphodium pampeanum on a wild forage grass |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T15%3A09%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Beneficial%20effects%20of%20Neotyphodium%20tembladerae%20and%20Neotyphodium%20pampeanum%20on%20a%20wild%20forage%20grass&rft.jtitle=Grass%20and%20forage%20science&rft.au=Iannone,%20L.%20J.&rft.date=2012-09&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=382&rft.epage=390&rft.pages=382-390&rft.issn=0142-5242&rft.eissn=1365-2494&rft.coden=GFSCDW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2494.2012.00855.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3278281321%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1517348415&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |