Mostly Bark, Little Bite? Modeling US Arms Sales to Taiwan and the Chinese Response

US arms sales to Taiwan generate considerable anger in Beijing. Yet China has typically been reluctant to retaliate strongly in response to US arms sales; rather, Beijing has tended to take more symbolic, tem- porary, actions-such as freezing military exchanges and postponing official visits. Why, o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Issues and studies - Institute of International Relations 2013-09, Vol.49 (3), p.111-150
Hauptverfasser: Kastner, Scott L, Reed, William, Chen, Ping-Kuei
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 150
container_issue 3
container_start_page 111
container_title Issues and studies - Institute of International Relations
container_volume 49
creator Kastner, Scott L
Reed, William
Chen, Ping-Kuei
description US arms sales to Taiwan generate considerable anger in Beijing. Yet China has typically been reluctant to retaliate strongly in response to US arms sales; rather, Beijing has tended to take more symbolic, tem- porary, actions-such as freezing military exchanges and postponing official visits. Why, on the issue of US arms sales to Taiwan, does the PRC response seem to be mostly bark, with little bite? In this article, we construct a formal model of US arms sales to Taiwan, and use the model to generate expectations about Chinese reactions to those sales. Our model suggests that China faces a tradeoff when responding to US arms sales. On the one hand, domestic pressures and concern that arms sales improve Taiwan's bargaining leverage vis-à-vis the PRC push China to retaliate against the US. By sanctioning the US, China both ameliorates domestic nationalists demanding strong action and at the same time raises the costs to Washington of continuing with arms sales. On the other hand, however, by responding strongly to US arms sales, Beijing runs the risk that the US will continue with the sales despite the high costs; in turn, the higher costs signal a stronger US commitment to Taiwan that could undercut the PRC's future bargaining leverage vis-?-vis the island. We show that several variables determine how China makes this tradeoff, including the magnitude of US arms sales to Taiwan, prior Chinese be- liefs about how strongly committed to Taiwan the US is, and how much additional leverage revealed US support for Taiwan provides the island in its bargaining with Beijing over sovereignty-related issues. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
doi_str_mv 10.7033/ISE.201309_49(3).0004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_airit</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1515299091</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><airiti_id>10132511_201309_201311190031_201311190031_111_150</airiti_id><sourcerecordid>3273185101</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a163t-37dd97b6000b5fae459a29af8d2daeb1ce6678fd5566cc31deff88c13e1596533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkFFLwzAUhfOg4Jz-BCHgi4Kduc2SNk-ylekGG4LdnkvW3LrM2s4mQ_z3ZmwP-nTuvRzOPXyE3AAbJIzzx1k-GcQMOFPFUN3x-wFjbHhGehBuUSwALsilc1vGuOIy6ZF80Tpf_9Cx7j4e6Nx6XyMdW49PdNEarG3zTlc5HXWfjua6Rkd9S5fafuuG6sZQv0GabWyDDukbul3bOLwi55WuHV6ftE9Wz5NlNo3mry-zbDSPNEjuI54Yo5K1DA3XotI4FErHSlepiY3GNZQoZZJWRggpy5KDwapK0xI4glBScN4nt8fcXdd-7dH5Ytvuuya8LECAiJViCoJrenRp21lv_3gCkgOR4sTrIACgAhv4v4QhJDL-C2UXY4M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1515299091</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mostly Bark, Little Bite? Modeling US Arms Sales to Taiwan and the Chinese Response</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><creator>Kastner, Scott L ; Reed, William ; Chen, Ping-Kuei</creator><creatorcontrib>Kastner, Scott L ; Reed, William ; Chen, Ping-Kuei</creatorcontrib><description>US arms sales to Taiwan generate considerable anger in Beijing. Yet China has typically been reluctant to retaliate strongly in response to US arms sales; rather, Beijing has tended to take more symbolic, tem- porary, actions-such as freezing military exchanges and postponing official visits. Why, on the issue of US arms sales to Taiwan, does the PRC response seem to be mostly bark, with little bite? In this article, we construct a formal model of US arms sales to Taiwan, and use the model to generate expectations about Chinese reactions to those sales. Our model suggests that China faces a tradeoff when responding to US arms sales. On the one hand, domestic pressures and concern that arms sales improve Taiwan's bargaining leverage vis-à-vis the PRC push China to retaliate against the US. By sanctioning the US, China both ameliorates domestic nationalists demanding strong action and at the same time raises the costs to Washington of continuing with arms sales. On the other hand, however, by responding strongly to US arms sales, Beijing runs the risk that the US will continue with the sales despite the high costs; in turn, the higher costs signal a stronger US commitment to Taiwan that could undercut the PRC's future bargaining leverage vis-?-vis the island. We show that several variables determine how China makes this tradeoff, including the magnitude of US arms sales to Taiwan, prior Chinese be- liefs about how strongly committed to Taiwan the US is, and how much additional leverage revealed US support for Taiwan provides the island in its bargaining with Beijing over sovereignty-related issues. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1013-2511</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7033/ISE.201309_49(3).0004</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taipei: 國立政治大學國際關係研究中心</publisher><subject>Bargaining ; Cooperation ; International relations-US ; Military sales ; Regulation of financial institutions ; Sanctions ; Sovereignty ; Studies ; Tariffs</subject><ispartof>Issues and studies - Institute of International Relations, 2013-09, Vol.49 (3), p.111-150</ispartof><rights>Copyright National Chengchi University Sep 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12844,27865,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kastner, Scott L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reed, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Ping-Kuei</creatorcontrib><title>Mostly Bark, Little Bite? Modeling US Arms Sales to Taiwan and the Chinese Response</title><title>Issues and studies - Institute of International Relations</title><description>US arms sales to Taiwan generate considerable anger in Beijing. Yet China has typically been reluctant to retaliate strongly in response to US arms sales; rather, Beijing has tended to take more symbolic, tem- porary, actions-such as freezing military exchanges and postponing official visits. Why, on the issue of US arms sales to Taiwan, does the PRC response seem to be mostly bark, with little bite? In this article, we construct a formal model of US arms sales to Taiwan, and use the model to generate expectations about Chinese reactions to those sales. Our model suggests that China faces a tradeoff when responding to US arms sales. On the one hand, domestic pressures and concern that arms sales improve Taiwan's bargaining leverage vis-à-vis the PRC push China to retaliate against the US. By sanctioning the US, China both ameliorates domestic nationalists demanding strong action and at the same time raises the costs to Washington of continuing with arms sales. On the other hand, however, by responding strongly to US arms sales, Beijing runs the risk that the US will continue with the sales despite the high costs; in turn, the higher costs signal a stronger US commitment to Taiwan that could undercut the PRC's future bargaining leverage vis-?-vis the island. We show that several variables determine how China makes this tradeoff, including the magnitude of US arms sales to Taiwan, prior Chinese be- liefs about how strongly committed to Taiwan the US is, and how much additional leverage revealed US support for Taiwan provides the island in its bargaining with Beijing over sovereignty-related issues. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Bargaining</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>International relations-US</subject><subject>Military sales</subject><subject>Regulation of financial institutions</subject><subject>Sanctions</subject><subject>Sovereignty</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tariffs</subject><issn>1013-2511</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkFFLwzAUhfOg4Jz-BCHgi4Kduc2SNk-ylekGG4LdnkvW3LrM2s4mQ_z3ZmwP-nTuvRzOPXyE3AAbJIzzx1k-GcQMOFPFUN3x-wFjbHhGehBuUSwALsilc1vGuOIy6ZF80Tpf_9Cx7j4e6Nx6XyMdW49PdNEarG3zTlc5HXWfjua6Rkd9S5fafuuG6sZQv0GabWyDDukbul3bOLwi55WuHV6ftE9Wz5NlNo3mry-zbDSPNEjuI54Yo5K1DA3XotI4FErHSlepiY3GNZQoZZJWRggpy5KDwapK0xI4glBScN4nt8fcXdd-7dH5Ytvuuya8LECAiJViCoJrenRp21lv_3gCkgOR4sTrIACgAhv4v4QhJDL-C2UXY4M</recordid><startdate>20130901</startdate><enddate>20130901</enddate><creator>Kastner, Scott L</creator><creator>Reed, William</creator><creator>Chen, Ping-Kuei</creator><general>國立政治大學國際關係研究中心</general><general>National Chengchi University</general><scope>188</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RO</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AI</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BVBZV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FREBS</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130901</creationdate><title>Mostly Bark, Little Bite? Modeling US Arms Sales to Taiwan and the Chinese Response</title><author>Kastner, Scott L ; Reed, William ; Chen, Ping-Kuei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a163t-37dd97b6000b5fae459a29af8d2daeb1ce6678fd5566cc31deff88c13e1596533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Bargaining</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>International relations-US</topic><topic>Military sales</topic><topic>Regulation of financial institutions</topic><topic>Sanctions</topic><topic>Sovereignty</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tariffs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kastner, Scott L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reed, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Ping-Kuei</creatorcontrib><collection>Airiti Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Asian &amp; European Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>East &amp; South Asia Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Asian &amp; European Business Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Issues and studies - Institute of International Relations</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kastner, Scott L</au><au>Reed, William</au><au>Chen, Ping-Kuei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mostly Bark, Little Bite? Modeling US Arms Sales to Taiwan and the Chinese Response</atitle><jtitle>Issues and studies - Institute of International Relations</jtitle><date>2013-09-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>111</spage><epage>150</epage><pages>111-150</pages><issn>1013-2511</issn><abstract>US arms sales to Taiwan generate considerable anger in Beijing. Yet China has typically been reluctant to retaliate strongly in response to US arms sales; rather, Beijing has tended to take more symbolic, tem- porary, actions-such as freezing military exchanges and postponing official visits. Why, on the issue of US arms sales to Taiwan, does the PRC response seem to be mostly bark, with little bite? In this article, we construct a formal model of US arms sales to Taiwan, and use the model to generate expectations about Chinese reactions to those sales. Our model suggests that China faces a tradeoff when responding to US arms sales. On the one hand, domestic pressures and concern that arms sales improve Taiwan's bargaining leverage vis-à-vis the PRC push China to retaliate against the US. By sanctioning the US, China both ameliorates domestic nationalists demanding strong action and at the same time raises the costs to Washington of continuing with arms sales. On the other hand, however, by responding strongly to US arms sales, Beijing runs the risk that the US will continue with the sales despite the high costs; in turn, the higher costs signal a stronger US commitment to Taiwan that could undercut the PRC's future bargaining leverage vis-?-vis the island. We show that several variables determine how China makes this tradeoff, including the magnitude of US arms sales to Taiwan, prior Chinese be- liefs about how strongly committed to Taiwan the US is, and how much additional leverage revealed US support for Taiwan provides the island in its bargaining with Beijing over sovereignty-related issues. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Taipei</cop><pub>國立政治大學國際關係研究中心</pub><doi>10.7033/ISE.201309_49(3).0004</doi><tpages>40</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1013-2511
ispartof Issues and studies - Institute of International Relations, 2013-09, Vol.49 (3), p.111-150
issn 1013-2511
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1515299091
source PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Political Science Complete
subjects Bargaining
Cooperation
International relations-US
Military sales
Regulation of financial institutions
Sanctions
Sovereignty
Studies
Tariffs
title Mostly Bark, Little Bite? Modeling US Arms Sales to Taiwan and the Chinese Response
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T10%3A27%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_airit&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mostly%20Bark,%20Little%20Bite?%20Modeling%20US%20Arms%20Sales%20to%20Taiwan%20and%20the%20Chinese%20Response&rft.jtitle=Issues%20and%20studies%20-%20Institute%20of%20International%20Relations&rft.au=Kastner,%20Scott%20L&rft.date=2013-09-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=111&rft.epage=150&rft.pages=111-150&rft.issn=1013-2511&rft_id=info:doi/10.7033/ISE.201309_49(3).0004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_airit%3E3273185101%3C/proquest_airit%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1515299091&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_airiti_id=10132511_201309_201311190031_201311190031_111_150&rfr_iscdi=true