Mostly Bark, Little Bite? Modeling US Arms Sales to Taiwan and the Chinese Response
US arms sales to Taiwan generate considerable anger in Beijing. Yet China has typically been reluctant to retaliate strongly in response to US arms sales; rather, Beijing has tended to take more symbolic, tem- porary, actions-such as freezing military exchanges and postponing official visits. Why, o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Issues and studies - Institute of International Relations 2013-09, Vol.49 (3), p.111-150 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 150 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 111 |
container_title | Issues and studies - Institute of International Relations |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | Kastner, Scott L Reed, William Chen, Ping-Kuei |
description | US arms sales to Taiwan generate considerable anger in Beijing. Yet China has typically been reluctant to retaliate strongly in response to US arms sales; rather, Beijing has tended to take more symbolic, tem- porary, actions-such as freezing military exchanges and postponing official visits. Why, on the issue of US arms sales to Taiwan, does the PRC response seem to be mostly bark, with little bite? In this article, we construct a formal model of US arms sales to Taiwan, and use the model to generate expectations about Chinese reactions to those sales. Our model suggests that China faces a tradeoff when responding to US arms sales. On the one hand, domestic pressures and concern that arms sales improve Taiwan's bargaining leverage vis-à-vis the PRC push China to retaliate against the US. By sanctioning the US, China both ameliorates domestic nationalists demanding strong action and at the same time raises the costs to Washington of continuing with arms sales. On the other hand, however, by responding strongly to US arms sales, Beijing runs the risk that the US will continue with the sales despite the high costs; in turn, the higher costs signal a stronger US commitment to Taiwan that could undercut the PRC's future bargaining leverage vis-?-vis the island. We show that several variables determine how China makes this tradeoff, including the magnitude of US arms sales to Taiwan, prior Chinese be- liefs about how strongly committed to Taiwan the US is, and how much additional leverage revealed US support for Taiwan provides the island in its bargaining with Beijing over sovereignty-related issues. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
doi_str_mv | 10.7033/ISE.201309_49(3).0004 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_airit</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1515299091</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><airiti_id>10132511_201309_201311190031_201311190031_111_150</airiti_id><sourcerecordid>3273185101</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a163t-37dd97b6000b5fae459a29af8d2daeb1ce6678fd5566cc31deff88c13e1596533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkFFLwzAUhfOg4Jz-BCHgi4Kduc2SNk-ylekGG4LdnkvW3LrM2s4mQ_z3ZmwP-nTuvRzOPXyE3AAbJIzzx1k-GcQMOFPFUN3x-wFjbHhGehBuUSwALsilc1vGuOIy6ZF80Tpf_9Cx7j4e6Nx6XyMdW49PdNEarG3zTlc5HXWfjua6Rkd9S5fafuuG6sZQv0GabWyDDukbul3bOLwi55WuHV6ftE9Wz5NlNo3mry-zbDSPNEjuI54Yo5K1DA3XotI4FErHSlepiY3GNZQoZZJWRggpy5KDwapK0xI4glBScN4nt8fcXdd-7dH5Ytvuuya8LECAiJViCoJrenRp21lv_3gCkgOR4sTrIACgAhv4v4QhJDL-C2UXY4M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1515299091</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mostly Bark, Little Bite? Modeling US Arms Sales to Taiwan and the Chinese Response</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><creator>Kastner, Scott L ; Reed, William ; Chen, Ping-Kuei</creator><creatorcontrib>Kastner, Scott L ; Reed, William ; Chen, Ping-Kuei</creatorcontrib><description>US arms sales to Taiwan generate considerable anger in Beijing. Yet China has typically been reluctant to retaliate strongly in response to US arms sales; rather, Beijing has tended to take more symbolic, tem- porary, actions-such as freezing military exchanges and postponing official visits. Why, on the issue of US arms sales to Taiwan, does the PRC response seem to be mostly bark, with little bite? In this article, we construct a formal model of US arms sales to Taiwan, and use the model to generate expectations about Chinese reactions to those sales. Our model suggests that China faces a tradeoff when responding to US arms sales. On the one hand, domestic pressures and concern that arms sales improve Taiwan's bargaining leverage vis-à-vis the PRC push China to retaliate against the US. By sanctioning the US, China both ameliorates domestic nationalists demanding strong action and at the same time raises the costs to Washington of continuing with arms sales. On the other hand, however, by responding strongly to US arms sales, Beijing runs the risk that the US will continue with the sales despite the high costs; in turn, the higher costs signal a stronger US commitment to Taiwan that could undercut the PRC's future bargaining leverage vis-?-vis the island. We show that several variables determine how China makes this tradeoff, including the magnitude of US arms sales to Taiwan, prior Chinese be- liefs about how strongly committed to Taiwan the US is, and how much additional leverage revealed US support for Taiwan provides the island in its bargaining with Beijing over sovereignty-related issues. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1013-2511</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7033/ISE.201309_49(3).0004</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taipei: 國立政治大學國際關係研究中心</publisher><subject>Bargaining ; Cooperation ; International relations-US ; Military sales ; Regulation of financial institutions ; Sanctions ; Sovereignty ; Studies ; Tariffs</subject><ispartof>Issues and studies - Institute of International Relations, 2013-09, Vol.49 (3), p.111-150</ispartof><rights>Copyright National Chengchi University Sep 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12844,27865,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kastner, Scott L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reed, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Ping-Kuei</creatorcontrib><title>Mostly Bark, Little Bite? Modeling US Arms Sales to Taiwan and the Chinese Response</title><title>Issues and studies - Institute of International Relations</title><description>US arms sales to Taiwan generate considerable anger in Beijing. Yet China has typically been reluctant to retaliate strongly in response to US arms sales; rather, Beijing has tended to take more symbolic, tem- porary, actions-such as freezing military exchanges and postponing official visits. Why, on the issue of US arms sales to Taiwan, does the PRC response seem to be mostly bark, with little bite? In this article, we construct a formal model of US arms sales to Taiwan, and use the model to generate expectations about Chinese reactions to those sales. Our model suggests that China faces a tradeoff when responding to US arms sales. On the one hand, domestic pressures and concern that arms sales improve Taiwan's bargaining leverage vis-à-vis the PRC push China to retaliate against the US. By sanctioning the US, China both ameliorates domestic nationalists demanding strong action and at the same time raises the costs to Washington of continuing with arms sales. On the other hand, however, by responding strongly to US arms sales, Beijing runs the risk that the US will continue with the sales despite the high costs; in turn, the higher costs signal a stronger US commitment to Taiwan that could undercut the PRC's future bargaining leverage vis-?-vis the island. We show that several variables determine how China makes this tradeoff, including the magnitude of US arms sales to Taiwan, prior Chinese be- liefs about how strongly committed to Taiwan the US is, and how much additional leverage revealed US support for Taiwan provides the island in its bargaining with Beijing over sovereignty-related issues. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Bargaining</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>International relations-US</subject><subject>Military sales</subject><subject>Regulation of financial institutions</subject><subject>Sanctions</subject><subject>Sovereignty</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tariffs</subject><issn>1013-2511</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkFFLwzAUhfOg4Jz-BCHgi4Kduc2SNk-ylekGG4LdnkvW3LrM2s4mQ_z3ZmwP-nTuvRzOPXyE3AAbJIzzx1k-GcQMOFPFUN3x-wFjbHhGehBuUSwALsilc1vGuOIy6ZF80Tpf_9Cx7j4e6Nx6XyMdW49PdNEarG3zTlc5HXWfjua6Rkd9S5fafuuG6sZQv0GabWyDDukbul3bOLwi55WuHV6ftE9Wz5NlNo3mry-zbDSPNEjuI54Yo5K1DA3XotI4FErHSlepiY3GNZQoZZJWRggpy5KDwapK0xI4glBScN4nt8fcXdd-7dH5Ytvuuya8LECAiJViCoJrenRp21lv_3gCkgOR4sTrIACgAhv4v4QhJDL-C2UXY4M</recordid><startdate>20130901</startdate><enddate>20130901</enddate><creator>Kastner, Scott L</creator><creator>Reed, William</creator><creator>Chen, Ping-Kuei</creator><general>國立政治大學國際關係研究中心</general><general>National Chengchi University</general><scope>188</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RO</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AI</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BVBZV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FREBS</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130901</creationdate><title>Mostly Bark, Little Bite? Modeling US Arms Sales to Taiwan and the Chinese Response</title><author>Kastner, Scott L ; Reed, William ; Chen, Ping-Kuei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a163t-37dd97b6000b5fae459a29af8d2daeb1ce6678fd5566cc31deff88c13e1596533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Bargaining</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>International relations-US</topic><topic>Military sales</topic><topic>Regulation of financial institutions</topic><topic>Sanctions</topic><topic>Sovereignty</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tariffs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kastner, Scott L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reed, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Ping-Kuei</creatorcontrib><collection>Airiti Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>East & South Asia Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Issues and studies - Institute of International Relations</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kastner, Scott L</au><au>Reed, William</au><au>Chen, Ping-Kuei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mostly Bark, Little Bite? Modeling US Arms Sales to Taiwan and the Chinese Response</atitle><jtitle>Issues and studies - Institute of International Relations</jtitle><date>2013-09-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>111</spage><epage>150</epage><pages>111-150</pages><issn>1013-2511</issn><abstract>US arms sales to Taiwan generate considerable anger in Beijing. Yet China has typically been reluctant to retaliate strongly in response to US arms sales; rather, Beijing has tended to take more symbolic, tem- porary, actions-such as freezing military exchanges and postponing official visits. Why, on the issue of US arms sales to Taiwan, does the PRC response seem to be mostly bark, with little bite? In this article, we construct a formal model of US arms sales to Taiwan, and use the model to generate expectations about Chinese reactions to those sales. Our model suggests that China faces a tradeoff when responding to US arms sales. On the one hand, domestic pressures and concern that arms sales improve Taiwan's bargaining leverage vis-à-vis the PRC push China to retaliate against the US. By sanctioning the US, China both ameliorates domestic nationalists demanding strong action and at the same time raises the costs to Washington of continuing with arms sales. On the other hand, however, by responding strongly to US arms sales, Beijing runs the risk that the US will continue with the sales despite the high costs; in turn, the higher costs signal a stronger US commitment to Taiwan that could undercut the PRC's future bargaining leverage vis-?-vis the island. We show that several variables determine how China makes this tradeoff, including the magnitude of US arms sales to Taiwan, prior Chinese be- liefs about how strongly committed to Taiwan the US is, and how much additional leverage revealed US support for Taiwan provides the island in its bargaining with Beijing over sovereignty-related issues. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Taipei</cop><pub>國立政治大學國際關係研究中心</pub><doi>10.7033/ISE.201309_49(3).0004</doi><tpages>40</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1013-2511 |
ispartof | Issues and studies - Institute of International Relations, 2013-09, Vol.49 (3), p.111-150 |
issn | 1013-2511 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1515299091 |
source | PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Political Science Complete |
subjects | Bargaining Cooperation International relations-US Military sales Regulation of financial institutions Sanctions Sovereignty Studies Tariffs |
title | Mostly Bark, Little Bite? Modeling US Arms Sales to Taiwan and the Chinese Response |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T10%3A27%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_airit&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mostly%20Bark,%20Little%20Bite?%20Modeling%20US%20Arms%20Sales%20to%20Taiwan%20and%20the%20Chinese%20Response&rft.jtitle=Issues%20and%20studies%20-%20Institute%20of%20International%20Relations&rft.au=Kastner,%20Scott%20L&rft.date=2013-09-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=111&rft.epage=150&rft.pages=111-150&rft.issn=1013-2511&rft_id=info:doi/10.7033/ISE.201309_49(3).0004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_airit%3E3273185101%3C/proquest_airit%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1515299091&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_airiti_id=10132511_201309_201311190031_201311190031_111_150&rfr_iscdi=true |