Electronic Textbooks: Antecedents of Students' Adoption and Learning Outcomes

ABSTRACT Faculty and students are increasingly faced with the opportunity to use electronic versions of textbooks (e‐texts). Despite the advantages of e‐texts and recent advances in technology, evidence suggests that students are still reluctant to adopt and use e‐texts. This situation leads us to i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Decision sciences journal of innovative education 2014-04, Vol.12 (2), p.149-173
Hauptverfasser: Terpend, Regis, Gattiker, Thomas F., Lowe, Scott E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 173
container_issue 2
container_start_page 149
container_title Decision sciences journal of innovative education
container_volume 12
creator Terpend, Regis
Gattiker, Thomas F.
Lowe, Scott E.
description ABSTRACT Faculty and students are increasingly faced with the opportunity to use electronic versions of textbooks (e‐texts). Despite the advantages of e‐texts and recent advances in technology, evidence suggests that students are still reluctant to adopt and use e‐texts. This situation leads us to investigate two research questions: What factors contribute to students’ acceptance of e‐texts? Are there differences between hardcopy texts and e‐texts when it comes to course grade? We draw on a variety of perspectives (i.e., psychology, management information systems, economics, environmental studies) to build a framework that allows us to determine the motivations of students for adopting e‐texts, and the learning outcomes of e‐text adoption. Data was collected via a survey administered in the business school of a metropolitan university with approximately 20,000 students, located in the western United States. Results suggest that perceived ease‐of‐use and the price of e‐texts relative to hardcopy texts are two key motivators in e‐text adoption, while perceived usefulness, Internet self‐efficacy and environmental concerns are not significant motivators. However, there was no significant difference in the grades of e‐text adopters compared to hardcopy adopters. We conclude this paper by discussing the implications of our findings for educators.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/dsji.12031
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1514693394</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1022891</ericid><sourcerecordid>3272048111</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3261-4e000bc7792cd8699b9f9763d357c8203b4a4e0dd648ebbdf51941fab87828783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UMlOwzAQtRBIlMKFO1IkDpxS7NhZzK0qXVXaQ4rgZiW2g9LFLrYj2r_HbaEjjeZJ894sD4B7BDvIx7Owy7qDIojRBWihmMCQJJBe_uOYxtfgxtolhFFEoqwF3vpryZ3RqubBQu5cqfXKvgRd5SSXQipnA10FuWuO-CnoCr11tVZBoUQwlYVRtfoK5o3jeiPtLbiqirWVd3-1Dd4H_UVvFE7nw3GvOw05jhIUEgkhLHma0oiLLKG0pBVNEyxwnPLMX1-SwnOESEgmy1JUMaIEVUWZpVnkE7fB42nu1ujvRlrHlroxyq9kKEYkoRhT4lkPJ5Y0NWdbU28Ks2f9CfLPZxT5Pjr1f-q13J8JCLKDl-zgJTt6yV7zyfiIvCY8aWrr5O6sKcyKJSlOY_YxG7IRmZHPfJKzAf4Fcil2mA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1514693394</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Electronic Textbooks: Antecedents of Students' Adoption and Learning Outcomes</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Terpend, Regis ; Gattiker, Thomas F. ; Lowe, Scott E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Terpend, Regis ; Gattiker, Thomas F. ; Lowe, Scott E.</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Faculty and students are increasingly faced with the opportunity to use electronic versions of textbooks (e‐texts). Despite the advantages of e‐texts and recent advances in technology, evidence suggests that students are still reluctant to adopt and use e‐texts. This situation leads us to investigate two research questions: What factors contribute to students’ acceptance of e‐texts? Are there differences between hardcopy texts and e‐texts when it comes to course grade? We draw on a variety of perspectives (i.e., psychology, management information systems, economics, environmental studies) to build a framework that allows us to determine the motivations of students for adopting e‐texts, and the learning outcomes of e‐text adoption. Data was collected via a survey administered in the business school of a metropolitan university with approximately 20,000 students, located in the western United States. Results suggest that perceived ease‐of‐use and the price of e‐texts relative to hardcopy texts are two key motivators in e‐text adoption, while perceived usefulness, Internet self‐efficacy and environmental concerns are not significant motivators. However, there was no significant difference in the grades of e‐text adopters compared to hardcopy adopters. We conclude this paper by discussing the implications of our findings for educators.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1540-4595</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-4609</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/dsji.12031</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Atlanta: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Academic Areas ; Administrative/Structure Leadership ; Adoption (Ideas) ; Business Administration Education ; Business schools ; College Students ; Content Areas ; Costs ; Differences ; E-books ; Electronic Publishing ; Grades (Scholastic) ; Influences ; Management Information Systems ; Motivation ; Operations Management ; Outcomes of Education ; Pedagogical Approaches ; Product acceptance ; Resistance (Psychology) ; Self Efficacy ; Student Motivation ; Student Surveys ; Studies ; Technology and Innovation ; Textbooks ; United States (West) ; Usability</subject><ispartof>Decision sciences journal of innovative education, 2014-04, Vol.12 (2), p.149-173</ispartof><rights>2014 Decision Sciences Institute</rights><rights>Decision Sciences © 2014 Decision Sciences Institute</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3261-4e000bc7792cd8699b9f9763d357c8203b4a4e0dd648ebbdf51941fab87828783</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fdsji.12031$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fdsji.12031$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1414,27907,27908,45557,45558</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1022891$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Terpend, Regis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gattiker, Thomas F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lowe, Scott E.</creatorcontrib><title>Electronic Textbooks: Antecedents of Students' Adoption and Learning Outcomes</title><title>Decision sciences journal of innovative education</title><addtitle>Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT Faculty and students are increasingly faced with the opportunity to use electronic versions of textbooks (e‐texts). Despite the advantages of e‐texts and recent advances in technology, evidence suggests that students are still reluctant to adopt and use e‐texts. This situation leads us to investigate two research questions: What factors contribute to students’ acceptance of e‐texts? Are there differences between hardcopy texts and e‐texts when it comes to course grade? We draw on a variety of perspectives (i.e., psychology, management information systems, economics, environmental studies) to build a framework that allows us to determine the motivations of students for adopting e‐texts, and the learning outcomes of e‐text adoption. Data was collected via a survey administered in the business school of a metropolitan university with approximately 20,000 students, located in the western United States. Results suggest that perceived ease‐of‐use and the price of e‐texts relative to hardcopy texts are two key motivators in e‐text adoption, while perceived usefulness, Internet self‐efficacy and environmental concerns are not significant motivators. However, there was no significant difference in the grades of e‐text adopters compared to hardcopy adopters. We conclude this paper by discussing the implications of our findings for educators.</description><subject>Academic Areas</subject><subject>Administrative/Structure Leadership</subject><subject>Adoption (Ideas)</subject><subject>Business Administration Education</subject><subject>Business schools</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Content Areas</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Differences</subject><subject>E-books</subject><subject>Electronic Publishing</subject><subject>Grades (Scholastic)</subject><subject>Influences</subject><subject>Management Information Systems</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Operations Management</subject><subject>Outcomes of Education</subject><subject>Pedagogical Approaches</subject><subject>Product acceptance</subject><subject>Resistance (Psychology)</subject><subject>Self Efficacy</subject><subject>Student Motivation</subject><subject>Student Surveys</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Technology and Innovation</subject><subject>Textbooks</subject><subject>United States (West)</subject><subject>Usability</subject><issn>1540-4595</issn><issn>1540-4609</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9UMlOwzAQtRBIlMKFO1IkDpxS7NhZzK0qXVXaQ4rgZiW2g9LFLrYj2r_HbaEjjeZJ894sD4B7BDvIx7Owy7qDIojRBWihmMCQJJBe_uOYxtfgxtolhFFEoqwF3vpryZ3RqubBQu5cqfXKvgRd5SSXQipnA10FuWuO-CnoCr11tVZBoUQwlYVRtfoK5o3jeiPtLbiqirWVd3-1Dd4H_UVvFE7nw3GvOw05jhIUEgkhLHma0oiLLKG0pBVNEyxwnPLMX1-SwnOESEgmy1JUMaIEVUWZpVnkE7fB42nu1ujvRlrHlroxyq9kKEYkoRhT4lkPJ5Y0NWdbU28Ks2f9CfLPZxT5Pjr1f-q13J8JCLKDl-zgJTt6yV7zyfiIvCY8aWrr5O6sKcyKJSlOY_YxG7IRmZHPfJKzAf4Fcil2mA</recordid><startdate>201404</startdate><enddate>201404</enddate><creator>Terpend, Regis</creator><creator>Gattiker, Thomas F.</creator><creator>Lowe, Scott E.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201404</creationdate><title>Electronic Textbooks: Antecedents of Students' Adoption and Learning Outcomes</title><author>Terpend, Regis ; Gattiker, Thomas F. ; Lowe, Scott E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3261-4e000bc7792cd8699b9f9763d357c8203b4a4e0dd648ebbdf51941fab87828783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Academic Areas</topic><topic>Administrative/Structure Leadership</topic><topic>Adoption (Ideas)</topic><topic>Business Administration Education</topic><topic>Business schools</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Content Areas</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Differences</topic><topic>E-books</topic><topic>Electronic Publishing</topic><topic>Grades (Scholastic)</topic><topic>Influences</topic><topic>Management Information Systems</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Operations Management</topic><topic>Outcomes of Education</topic><topic>Pedagogical Approaches</topic><topic>Product acceptance</topic><topic>Resistance (Psychology)</topic><topic>Self Efficacy</topic><topic>Student Motivation</topic><topic>Student Surveys</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Technology and Innovation</topic><topic>Textbooks</topic><topic>United States (West)</topic><topic>Usability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Terpend, Regis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gattiker, Thomas F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lowe, Scott E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><jtitle>Decision sciences journal of innovative education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Terpend, Regis</au><au>Gattiker, Thomas F.</au><au>Lowe, Scott E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1022891</ericid><atitle>Electronic Textbooks: Antecedents of Students' Adoption and Learning Outcomes</atitle><jtitle>Decision sciences journal of innovative education</jtitle><addtitle>Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education</addtitle><date>2014-04</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>149</spage><epage>173</epage><pages>149-173</pages><issn>1540-4595</issn><eissn>1540-4609</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT Faculty and students are increasingly faced with the opportunity to use electronic versions of textbooks (e‐texts). Despite the advantages of e‐texts and recent advances in technology, evidence suggests that students are still reluctant to adopt and use e‐texts. This situation leads us to investigate two research questions: What factors contribute to students’ acceptance of e‐texts? Are there differences between hardcopy texts and e‐texts when it comes to course grade? We draw on a variety of perspectives (i.e., psychology, management information systems, economics, environmental studies) to build a framework that allows us to determine the motivations of students for adopting e‐texts, and the learning outcomes of e‐text adoption. Data was collected via a survey administered in the business school of a metropolitan university with approximately 20,000 students, located in the western United States. Results suggest that perceived ease‐of‐use and the price of e‐texts relative to hardcopy texts are two key motivators in e‐text adoption, while perceived usefulness, Internet self‐efficacy and environmental concerns are not significant motivators. However, there was no significant difference in the grades of e‐text adopters compared to hardcopy adopters. We conclude this paper by discussing the implications of our findings for educators.</abstract><cop>Atlanta</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/dsji.12031</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1540-4595
ispartof Decision sciences journal of innovative education, 2014-04, Vol.12 (2), p.149-173
issn 1540-4595
1540-4609
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1514693394
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Business Source Complete; Education Source
subjects Academic Areas
Administrative/Structure Leadership
Adoption (Ideas)
Business Administration Education
Business schools
College Students
Content Areas
Costs
Differences
E-books
Electronic Publishing
Grades (Scholastic)
Influences
Management Information Systems
Motivation
Operations Management
Outcomes of Education
Pedagogical Approaches
Product acceptance
Resistance (Psychology)
Self Efficacy
Student Motivation
Student Surveys
Studies
Technology and Innovation
Textbooks
United States (West)
Usability
title Electronic Textbooks: Antecedents of Students' Adoption and Learning Outcomes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T20%3A26%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Electronic%20Textbooks:%20Antecedents%20of%20Students'%20Adoption%20and%20Learning%20Outcomes&rft.jtitle=Decision%20sciences%20journal%20of%20innovative%20education&rft.au=Terpend,%20Regis&rft.date=2014-04&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=149&rft.epage=173&rft.pages=149-173&rft.issn=1540-4595&rft.eissn=1540-4609&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/dsji.12031&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_eric_%3E3272048111%3C/proquest_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1514693394&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1022891&rfr_iscdi=true