Electronic Textbooks: Antecedents of Students' Adoption and Learning Outcomes
ABSTRACT Faculty and students are increasingly faced with the opportunity to use electronic versions of textbooks (e‐texts). Despite the advantages of e‐texts and recent advances in technology, evidence suggests that students are still reluctant to adopt and use e‐texts. This situation leads us to i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Decision sciences journal of innovative education 2014-04, Vol.12 (2), p.149-173 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 173 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 149 |
container_title | Decision sciences journal of innovative education |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Terpend, Regis Gattiker, Thomas F. Lowe, Scott E. |
description | ABSTRACT
Faculty and students are increasingly faced with the opportunity to use electronic versions of textbooks (e‐texts). Despite the advantages of e‐texts and recent advances in technology, evidence suggests that students are still reluctant to adopt and use e‐texts. This situation leads us to investigate two research questions: What factors contribute to students’ acceptance of e‐texts? Are there differences between hardcopy texts and e‐texts when it comes to course grade? We draw on a variety of perspectives (i.e., psychology, management information systems, economics, environmental studies) to build a framework that allows us to determine the motivations of students for adopting e‐texts, and the learning outcomes of e‐text adoption. Data was collected via a survey administered in the business school of a metropolitan university with approximately 20,000 students, located in the western United States. Results suggest that perceived ease‐of‐use and the price of e‐texts relative to hardcopy texts are two key motivators in e‐text adoption, while perceived usefulness, Internet self‐efficacy and environmental concerns are not significant motivators. However, there was no significant difference in the grades of e‐text adopters compared to hardcopy adopters. We conclude this paper by discussing the implications of our findings for educators. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/dsji.12031 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1514693394</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1022891</ericid><sourcerecordid>3272048111</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3261-4e000bc7792cd8699b9f9763d357c8203b4a4e0dd648ebbdf51941fab87828783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UMlOwzAQtRBIlMKFO1IkDpxS7NhZzK0qXVXaQ4rgZiW2g9LFLrYj2r_HbaEjjeZJ894sD4B7BDvIx7Owy7qDIojRBWihmMCQJJBe_uOYxtfgxtolhFFEoqwF3vpryZ3RqubBQu5cqfXKvgRd5SSXQipnA10FuWuO-CnoCr11tVZBoUQwlYVRtfoK5o3jeiPtLbiqirWVd3-1Dd4H_UVvFE7nw3GvOw05jhIUEgkhLHma0oiLLKG0pBVNEyxwnPLMX1-SwnOESEgmy1JUMaIEVUWZpVnkE7fB42nu1ujvRlrHlroxyq9kKEYkoRhT4lkPJ5Y0NWdbU28Ks2f9CfLPZxT5Pjr1f-q13J8JCLKDl-zgJTt6yV7zyfiIvCY8aWrr5O6sKcyKJSlOY_YxG7IRmZHPfJKzAf4Fcil2mA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1514693394</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Electronic Textbooks: Antecedents of Students' Adoption and Learning Outcomes</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Terpend, Regis ; Gattiker, Thomas F. ; Lowe, Scott E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Terpend, Regis ; Gattiker, Thomas F. ; Lowe, Scott E.</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT
Faculty and students are increasingly faced with the opportunity to use electronic versions of textbooks (e‐texts). Despite the advantages of e‐texts and recent advances in technology, evidence suggests that students are still reluctant to adopt and use e‐texts. This situation leads us to investigate two research questions: What factors contribute to students’ acceptance of e‐texts? Are there differences between hardcopy texts and e‐texts when it comes to course grade? We draw on a variety of perspectives (i.e., psychology, management information systems, economics, environmental studies) to build a framework that allows us to determine the motivations of students for adopting e‐texts, and the learning outcomes of e‐text adoption. Data was collected via a survey administered in the business school of a metropolitan university with approximately 20,000 students, located in the western United States. Results suggest that perceived ease‐of‐use and the price of e‐texts relative to hardcopy texts are two key motivators in e‐text adoption, while perceived usefulness, Internet self‐efficacy and environmental concerns are not significant motivators. However, there was no significant difference in the grades of e‐text adopters compared to hardcopy adopters. We conclude this paper by discussing the implications of our findings for educators.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1540-4595</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-4609</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/dsji.12031</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Atlanta: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Academic Areas ; Administrative/Structure Leadership ; Adoption (Ideas) ; Business Administration Education ; Business schools ; College Students ; Content Areas ; Costs ; Differences ; E-books ; Electronic Publishing ; Grades (Scholastic) ; Influences ; Management Information Systems ; Motivation ; Operations Management ; Outcomes of Education ; Pedagogical Approaches ; Product acceptance ; Resistance (Psychology) ; Self Efficacy ; Student Motivation ; Student Surveys ; Studies ; Technology and Innovation ; Textbooks ; United States (West) ; Usability</subject><ispartof>Decision sciences journal of innovative education, 2014-04, Vol.12 (2), p.149-173</ispartof><rights>2014 Decision Sciences Institute</rights><rights>Decision Sciences © 2014 Decision Sciences Institute</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3261-4e000bc7792cd8699b9f9763d357c8203b4a4e0dd648ebbdf51941fab87828783</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fdsji.12031$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fdsji.12031$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1414,27907,27908,45557,45558</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1022891$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Terpend, Regis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gattiker, Thomas F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lowe, Scott E.</creatorcontrib><title>Electronic Textbooks: Antecedents of Students' Adoption and Learning Outcomes</title><title>Decision sciences journal of innovative education</title><addtitle>Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT
Faculty and students are increasingly faced with the opportunity to use electronic versions of textbooks (e‐texts). Despite the advantages of e‐texts and recent advances in technology, evidence suggests that students are still reluctant to adopt and use e‐texts. This situation leads us to investigate two research questions: What factors contribute to students’ acceptance of e‐texts? Are there differences between hardcopy texts and e‐texts when it comes to course grade? We draw on a variety of perspectives (i.e., psychology, management information systems, economics, environmental studies) to build a framework that allows us to determine the motivations of students for adopting e‐texts, and the learning outcomes of e‐text adoption. Data was collected via a survey administered in the business school of a metropolitan university with approximately 20,000 students, located in the western United States. Results suggest that perceived ease‐of‐use and the price of e‐texts relative to hardcopy texts are two key motivators in e‐text adoption, while perceived usefulness, Internet self‐efficacy and environmental concerns are not significant motivators. However, there was no significant difference in the grades of e‐text adopters compared to hardcopy adopters. We conclude this paper by discussing the implications of our findings for educators.</description><subject>Academic Areas</subject><subject>Administrative/Structure Leadership</subject><subject>Adoption (Ideas)</subject><subject>Business Administration Education</subject><subject>Business schools</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Content Areas</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Differences</subject><subject>E-books</subject><subject>Electronic Publishing</subject><subject>Grades (Scholastic)</subject><subject>Influences</subject><subject>Management Information Systems</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Operations Management</subject><subject>Outcomes of Education</subject><subject>Pedagogical Approaches</subject><subject>Product acceptance</subject><subject>Resistance (Psychology)</subject><subject>Self Efficacy</subject><subject>Student Motivation</subject><subject>Student Surveys</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Technology and Innovation</subject><subject>Textbooks</subject><subject>United States (West)</subject><subject>Usability</subject><issn>1540-4595</issn><issn>1540-4609</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9UMlOwzAQtRBIlMKFO1IkDpxS7NhZzK0qXVXaQ4rgZiW2g9LFLrYj2r_HbaEjjeZJ894sD4B7BDvIx7Owy7qDIojRBWihmMCQJJBe_uOYxtfgxtolhFFEoqwF3vpryZ3RqubBQu5cqfXKvgRd5SSXQipnA10FuWuO-CnoCr11tVZBoUQwlYVRtfoK5o3jeiPtLbiqirWVd3-1Dd4H_UVvFE7nw3GvOw05jhIUEgkhLHma0oiLLKG0pBVNEyxwnPLMX1-SwnOESEgmy1JUMaIEVUWZpVnkE7fB42nu1ujvRlrHlroxyq9kKEYkoRhT4lkPJ5Y0NWdbU28Ks2f9CfLPZxT5Pjr1f-q13J8JCLKDl-zgJTt6yV7zyfiIvCY8aWrr5O6sKcyKJSlOY_YxG7IRmZHPfJKzAf4Fcil2mA</recordid><startdate>201404</startdate><enddate>201404</enddate><creator>Terpend, Regis</creator><creator>Gattiker, Thomas F.</creator><creator>Lowe, Scott E.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201404</creationdate><title>Electronic Textbooks: Antecedents of Students' Adoption and Learning Outcomes</title><author>Terpend, Regis ; Gattiker, Thomas F. ; Lowe, Scott E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3261-4e000bc7792cd8699b9f9763d357c8203b4a4e0dd648ebbdf51941fab87828783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Academic Areas</topic><topic>Administrative/Structure Leadership</topic><topic>Adoption (Ideas)</topic><topic>Business Administration Education</topic><topic>Business schools</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Content Areas</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Differences</topic><topic>E-books</topic><topic>Electronic Publishing</topic><topic>Grades (Scholastic)</topic><topic>Influences</topic><topic>Management Information Systems</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Operations Management</topic><topic>Outcomes of Education</topic><topic>Pedagogical Approaches</topic><topic>Product acceptance</topic><topic>Resistance (Psychology)</topic><topic>Self Efficacy</topic><topic>Student Motivation</topic><topic>Student Surveys</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Technology and Innovation</topic><topic>Textbooks</topic><topic>United States (West)</topic><topic>Usability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Terpend, Regis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gattiker, Thomas F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lowe, Scott E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><jtitle>Decision sciences journal of innovative education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Terpend, Regis</au><au>Gattiker, Thomas F.</au><au>Lowe, Scott E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1022891</ericid><atitle>Electronic Textbooks: Antecedents of Students' Adoption and Learning Outcomes</atitle><jtitle>Decision sciences journal of innovative education</jtitle><addtitle>Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education</addtitle><date>2014-04</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>149</spage><epage>173</epage><pages>149-173</pages><issn>1540-4595</issn><eissn>1540-4609</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT
Faculty and students are increasingly faced with the opportunity to use electronic versions of textbooks (e‐texts). Despite the advantages of e‐texts and recent advances in technology, evidence suggests that students are still reluctant to adopt and use e‐texts. This situation leads us to investigate two research questions: What factors contribute to students’ acceptance of e‐texts? Are there differences between hardcopy texts and e‐texts when it comes to course grade? We draw on a variety of perspectives (i.e., psychology, management information systems, economics, environmental studies) to build a framework that allows us to determine the motivations of students for adopting e‐texts, and the learning outcomes of e‐text adoption. Data was collected via a survey administered in the business school of a metropolitan university with approximately 20,000 students, located in the western United States. Results suggest that perceived ease‐of‐use and the price of e‐texts relative to hardcopy texts are two key motivators in e‐text adoption, while perceived usefulness, Internet self‐efficacy and environmental concerns are not significant motivators. However, there was no significant difference in the grades of e‐text adopters compared to hardcopy adopters. We conclude this paper by discussing the implications of our findings for educators.</abstract><cop>Atlanta</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/dsji.12031</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1540-4595 |
ispartof | Decision sciences journal of innovative education, 2014-04, Vol.12 (2), p.149-173 |
issn | 1540-4595 1540-4609 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1514693394 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Business Source Complete; Education Source |
subjects | Academic Areas Administrative/Structure Leadership Adoption (Ideas) Business Administration Education Business schools College Students Content Areas Costs Differences E-books Electronic Publishing Grades (Scholastic) Influences Management Information Systems Motivation Operations Management Outcomes of Education Pedagogical Approaches Product acceptance Resistance (Psychology) Self Efficacy Student Motivation Student Surveys Studies Technology and Innovation Textbooks United States (West) Usability |
title | Electronic Textbooks: Antecedents of Students' Adoption and Learning Outcomes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T20%3A26%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Electronic%20Textbooks:%20Antecedents%20of%20Students'%20Adoption%20and%20Learning%20Outcomes&rft.jtitle=Decision%20sciences%20journal%20of%20innovative%20education&rft.au=Terpend,%20Regis&rft.date=2014-04&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=149&rft.epage=173&rft.pages=149-173&rft.issn=1540-4595&rft.eissn=1540-4609&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/dsji.12031&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_eric_%3E3272048111%3C/proquest_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1514693394&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1022891&rfr_iscdi=true |