Effectiveness of subsurface pressure monitoring for brine leakage detection in an uncertain CO2 sequestration system

This work evaluates the detection sensitivity of deep subsurface pressure monitoring within an uncertain carbon dioxide sequestration system by linking the output of an analytical reduced-order model and first-order uncertainty analysis. A baseline (non-leaky) modeling run was compared against 10 di...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment 2014-05, Vol.28 (4), p.895-909
Hauptverfasser: Azzolina, Nicholas A, Small, Mitchell J, Nakles, David V, Bromhal, Grant S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 909
container_issue 4
container_start_page 895
container_title Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment
container_volume 28
creator Azzolina, Nicholas A
Small, Mitchell J
Nakles, David V
Bromhal, Grant S
description This work evaluates the detection sensitivity of deep subsurface pressure monitoring within an uncertain carbon dioxide sequestration system by linking the output of an analytical reduced-order model and first-order uncertainty analysis. A baseline (non-leaky) modeling run was compared against 10 different leakage scenarios, where the cap rock permeability was increased by factors of 2–100 (cap rock permeability from 10⁻³to 10⁻¹millidarcy). The uncertainty variance outputs were used to develop percentile estimates and detection sensitivity for pressure throughout the deep subsurface as a function of space (lateral distance from the injection wells and vertical orientation within the reservoir) and time (years since injection), or P(x, z, t). Conditional probabilities were computed for combinations of x, z, and t, which were then used to generate power curves for detecting leakage scenarios. The results suggest that measurements of the absolute change in pressure within the target injection aquifer would not be able to distinguish small leakage rates (i.e., less than 50 × baseline) from baseline conditions, and that only large leakage rates (i.e., >100 × baseline) would be discriminated with sufficient statistical power (>99 %). Combining measurements, for example by taking the ratio of formation pressure in Aquifer 2/Aquifer 1, provides better statistical power for distinguishing smaller leakage rates at earlier times in the injection program. Detection sensitivity for pressure is a function of space and time. Therefore, design of an adequate monitoring network for subsurface pressure should account for this space–time variability to ensure that the monitoring system performs to the necessary design criteria, e.g., specific false-negative and false-positive rates.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00477-013-0788-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1513297358</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3268420611</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-cbbfbab502206dcf81b72630af4844b345f41dfe6f9a4c9a5b172883dae895573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9rFTEUxQexYKn9AK4Mup6avzPJUh5VC4UutOuQ5N08o33JMzcj9Ns30xFx5So3l985HO4ZhjeMXjFK5w9IqZznkTIx0lnr0bwYzpkU0yi4Mi__zpK-Gi4Rk-8aJYxh9Hxo1zFCaOk3ZEAkJRJcPC41ugDkVPtuqUCOJadWasoHEkslvk9AHsD9dAcge2irQ8kkZeIyWXKA2lz_7O44Qfi1ALbqngl8xAbH18NZdA8Il3_ei-H-0_W33Zfx9u7zze7j7RjENLcxeB-984pyTqd9iJr5mU-Cuii1lF5IFSXbR5iicTIYpzybudZi70AbpWZxMbzbfAu2ZDGkHvR7KDn3vJaxaT1Ch95v0KmW56j2R1lq7rksU0xwMwulO8U2KtSCWCHaU01HVx8to3YtwW4l2F6CXUuwqzPfNHhaTwf1H-f_iN5uouiKdYea0N5_5ZQpSpnhXDPxBGg3lKQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1513297358</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of subsurface pressure monitoring for brine leakage detection in an uncertain CO2 sequestration system</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Azzolina, Nicholas A ; Small, Mitchell J ; Nakles, David V ; Bromhal, Grant S</creator><creatorcontrib>Azzolina, Nicholas A ; Small, Mitchell J ; Nakles, David V ; Bromhal, Grant S ; National Energy Technology Lab. (NETL), Pittsburgh, PA, and Morgantown, WV (United States). In-house Research</creatorcontrib><description>This work evaluates the detection sensitivity of deep subsurface pressure monitoring within an uncertain carbon dioxide sequestration system by linking the output of an analytical reduced-order model and first-order uncertainty analysis. A baseline (non-leaky) modeling run was compared against 10 different leakage scenarios, where the cap rock permeability was increased by factors of 2–100 (cap rock permeability from 10⁻³to 10⁻¹millidarcy). The uncertainty variance outputs were used to develop percentile estimates and detection sensitivity for pressure throughout the deep subsurface as a function of space (lateral distance from the injection wells and vertical orientation within the reservoir) and time (years since injection), or P(x, z, t). Conditional probabilities were computed for combinations of x, z, and t, which were then used to generate power curves for detecting leakage scenarios. The results suggest that measurements of the absolute change in pressure within the target injection aquifer would not be able to distinguish small leakage rates (i.e., less than 50 × baseline) from baseline conditions, and that only large leakage rates (i.e., &gt;100 × baseline) would be discriminated with sufficient statistical power (&gt;99 %). Combining measurements, for example by taking the ratio of formation pressure in Aquifer 2/Aquifer 1, provides better statistical power for distinguishing smaller leakage rates at earlier times in the injection program. Detection sensitivity for pressure is a function of space and time. Therefore, design of an adequate monitoring network for subsurface pressure should account for this space–time variability to ensure that the monitoring system performs to the necessary design criteria, e.g., specific false-negative and false-positive rates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1436-3240</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1436-3259</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00477-013-0788-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Aquatic Pollution ; Aquifers ; carbon dioxide ; Carbon dioxide fixation ; Carbon sequestration ; Chemistry and Earth Sciences ; CO2 sequestration ; Computational Intelligence ; Computer Science ; Design criteria ; Detection sensitivity ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Effectiveness studies ; Environment ; Environmental monitoring ; Injection ; Injection wells ; Land use ; Leak detection ; Leakage ; Math. Appl. in Environmental Science ; monitoring ; Monitoring systems ; Original Paper ; Permeability ; Physics ; Pressure monitoring ; Probability Theory and Stochastic Processes ; Reduced order model ; Rocks ; space and time ; Statistical power ; Statistics for Engineering ; Sustainable development ; Uncertainty ; uncertainty analysis ; Urbanization ; variance ; Waste Water Technology ; Water Management ; Water Pollution Control ; wells</subject><ispartof>Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2014-05, Vol.28 (4), p.895-909</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-cbbfbab502206dcf81b72630af4844b345f41dfe6f9a4c9a5b172883dae895573</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-cbbfbab502206dcf81b72630af4844b345f41dfe6f9a4c9a5b172883dae895573</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00477-013-0788-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00477-013-0788-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,886,27929,27930,41493,42562,51324</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/1165399$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Azzolina, Nicholas A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Small, Mitchell J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakles, David V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bromhal, Grant S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>National Energy Technology Lab. (NETL), Pittsburgh, PA, and Morgantown, WV (United States). In-house Research</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of subsurface pressure monitoring for brine leakage detection in an uncertain CO2 sequestration system</title><title>Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment</title><addtitle>Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess</addtitle><description>This work evaluates the detection sensitivity of deep subsurface pressure monitoring within an uncertain carbon dioxide sequestration system by linking the output of an analytical reduced-order model and first-order uncertainty analysis. A baseline (non-leaky) modeling run was compared against 10 different leakage scenarios, where the cap rock permeability was increased by factors of 2–100 (cap rock permeability from 10⁻³to 10⁻¹millidarcy). The uncertainty variance outputs were used to develop percentile estimates and detection sensitivity for pressure throughout the deep subsurface as a function of space (lateral distance from the injection wells and vertical orientation within the reservoir) and time (years since injection), or P(x, z, t). Conditional probabilities were computed for combinations of x, z, and t, which were then used to generate power curves for detecting leakage scenarios. The results suggest that measurements of the absolute change in pressure within the target injection aquifer would not be able to distinguish small leakage rates (i.e., less than 50 × baseline) from baseline conditions, and that only large leakage rates (i.e., &gt;100 × baseline) would be discriminated with sufficient statistical power (&gt;99 %). Combining measurements, for example by taking the ratio of formation pressure in Aquifer 2/Aquifer 1, provides better statistical power for distinguishing smaller leakage rates at earlier times in the injection program. Detection sensitivity for pressure is a function of space and time. Therefore, design of an adequate monitoring network for subsurface pressure should account for this space–time variability to ensure that the monitoring system performs to the necessary design criteria, e.g., specific false-negative and false-positive rates.</description><subject>Aquatic Pollution</subject><subject>Aquifers</subject><subject>carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide fixation</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>Chemistry and Earth Sciences</subject><subject>CO2 sequestration</subject><subject>Computational Intelligence</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Design criteria</subject><subject>Detection sensitivity</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Effectiveness studies</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental monitoring</subject><subject>Injection</subject><subject>Injection wells</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Leak detection</subject><subject>Leakage</subject><subject>Math. Appl. in Environmental Science</subject><subject>monitoring</subject><subject>Monitoring systems</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Permeability</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Pressure monitoring</subject><subject>Probability Theory and Stochastic Processes</subject><subject>Reduced order model</subject><subject>Rocks</subject><subject>space and time</subject><subject>Statistical power</subject><subject>Statistics for Engineering</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>uncertainty analysis</subject><subject>Urbanization</subject><subject>variance</subject><subject>Waste Water Technology</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water Pollution Control</subject><subject>wells</subject><issn>1436-3240</issn><issn>1436-3259</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9rFTEUxQexYKn9AK4Mup6avzPJUh5VC4UutOuQ5N08o33JMzcj9Ns30xFx5So3l985HO4ZhjeMXjFK5w9IqZznkTIx0lnr0bwYzpkU0yi4Mi__zpK-Gi4Rk-8aJYxh9Hxo1zFCaOk3ZEAkJRJcPC41ugDkVPtuqUCOJadWasoHEkslvk9AHsD9dAcge2irQ8kkZeIyWXKA2lz_7O44Qfi1ALbqngl8xAbH18NZdA8Il3_ei-H-0_W33Zfx9u7zze7j7RjENLcxeB-984pyTqd9iJr5mU-Cuii1lF5IFSXbR5iicTIYpzybudZi70AbpWZxMbzbfAu2ZDGkHvR7KDn3vJaxaT1Ch95v0KmW56j2R1lq7rksU0xwMwulO8U2KtSCWCHaU01HVx8to3YtwW4l2F6CXUuwqzPfNHhaTwf1H-f_iN5uouiKdYea0N5_5ZQpSpnhXDPxBGg3lKQ</recordid><startdate>20140501</startdate><enddate>20140501</enddate><creator>Azzolina, Nicholas A</creator><creator>Small, Mitchell J</creator><creator>Nakles, David V</creator><creator>Bromhal, Grant S</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0W</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140501</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of subsurface pressure monitoring for brine leakage detection in an uncertain CO2 sequestration system</title><author>Azzolina, Nicholas A ; Small, Mitchell J ; Nakles, David V ; Bromhal, Grant S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-cbbfbab502206dcf81b72630af4844b345f41dfe6f9a4c9a5b172883dae895573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aquatic Pollution</topic><topic>Aquifers</topic><topic>carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide fixation</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>Chemistry and Earth Sciences</topic><topic>CO2 sequestration</topic><topic>Computational Intelligence</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Design criteria</topic><topic>Detection sensitivity</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Effectiveness studies</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental monitoring</topic><topic>Injection</topic><topic>Injection wells</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Leak detection</topic><topic>Leakage</topic><topic>Math. Appl. in Environmental Science</topic><topic>monitoring</topic><topic>Monitoring systems</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Permeability</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Pressure monitoring</topic><topic>Probability Theory and Stochastic Processes</topic><topic>Reduced order model</topic><topic>Rocks</topic><topic>space and time</topic><topic>Statistical power</topic><topic>Statistics for Engineering</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>uncertainty analysis</topic><topic>Urbanization</topic><topic>variance</topic><topic>Waste Water Technology</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water Pollution Control</topic><topic>wells</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Azzolina, Nicholas A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Small, Mitchell J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakles, David V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bromhal, Grant S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>National Energy Technology Lab. (NETL), Pittsburgh, PA, and Morgantown, WV (United States). In-house Research</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>DELNET Engineering &amp; Technology Collection</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Azzolina, Nicholas A</au><au>Small, Mitchell J</au><au>Nakles, David V</au><au>Bromhal, Grant S</au><aucorp>National Energy Technology Lab. (NETL), Pittsburgh, PA, and Morgantown, WV (United States). In-house Research</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness of subsurface pressure monitoring for brine leakage detection in an uncertain CO2 sequestration system</atitle><jtitle>Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment</jtitle><stitle>Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess</stitle><date>2014-05-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>895</spage><epage>909</epage><pages>895-909</pages><issn>1436-3240</issn><eissn>1436-3259</eissn><abstract>This work evaluates the detection sensitivity of deep subsurface pressure monitoring within an uncertain carbon dioxide sequestration system by linking the output of an analytical reduced-order model and first-order uncertainty analysis. A baseline (non-leaky) modeling run was compared against 10 different leakage scenarios, where the cap rock permeability was increased by factors of 2–100 (cap rock permeability from 10⁻³to 10⁻¹millidarcy). The uncertainty variance outputs were used to develop percentile estimates and detection sensitivity for pressure throughout the deep subsurface as a function of space (lateral distance from the injection wells and vertical orientation within the reservoir) and time (years since injection), or P(x, z, t). Conditional probabilities were computed for combinations of x, z, and t, which were then used to generate power curves for detecting leakage scenarios. The results suggest that measurements of the absolute change in pressure within the target injection aquifer would not be able to distinguish small leakage rates (i.e., less than 50 × baseline) from baseline conditions, and that only large leakage rates (i.e., &gt;100 × baseline) would be discriminated with sufficient statistical power (&gt;99 %). Combining measurements, for example by taking the ratio of formation pressure in Aquifer 2/Aquifer 1, provides better statistical power for distinguishing smaller leakage rates at earlier times in the injection program. Detection sensitivity for pressure is a function of space and time. Therefore, design of an adequate monitoring network for subsurface pressure should account for this space–time variability to ensure that the monitoring system performs to the necessary design criteria, e.g., specific false-negative and false-positive rates.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s00477-013-0788-9</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1436-3240
ispartof Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2014-05, Vol.28 (4), p.895-909
issn 1436-3240
1436-3259
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1513297358
source SpringerNature Journals
subjects Aquatic Pollution
Aquifers
carbon dioxide
Carbon dioxide fixation
Carbon sequestration
Chemistry and Earth Sciences
CO2 sequestration
Computational Intelligence
Computer Science
Design criteria
Detection sensitivity
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Effectiveness studies
Environment
Environmental monitoring
Injection
Injection wells
Land use
Leak detection
Leakage
Math. Appl. in Environmental Science
monitoring
Monitoring systems
Original Paper
Permeability
Physics
Pressure monitoring
Probability Theory and Stochastic Processes
Reduced order model
Rocks
space and time
Statistical power
Statistics for Engineering
Sustainable development
Uncertainty
uncertainty analysis
Urbanization
variance
Waste Water Technology
Water Management
Water Pollution Control
wells
title Effectiveness of subsurface pressure monitoring for brine leakage detection in an uncertain CO2 sequestration system
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T11%3A49%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20subsurface%20pressure%20monitoring%20for%20brine%20leakage%20detection%20in%20an%20uncertain%20CO2%20sequestration%20system&rft.jtitle=Stochastic%20Environmental%20Research%20and%20Risk%20Assessment&rft.au=Azzolina,%20Nicholas%20A&rft.aucorp=National%20Energy%20Technology%20Lab.%20(NETL),%20Pittsburgh,%20PA,%20and%20Morgantown,%20WV%20(United%20States).%20In-house%20Research&rft.date=2014-05-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=895&rft.epage=909&rft.pages=895-909&rft.issn=1436-3240&rft.eissn=1436-3259&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00477-013-0788-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E3268420611%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1513297358&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true