Effectiveness of subsurface pressure monitoring for brine leakage detection in an uncertain CO2 sequestration system
This work evaluates the detection sensitivity of deep subsurface pressure monitoring within an uncertain carbon dioxide sequestration system by linking the output of an analytical reduced-order model and first-order uncertainty analysis. A baseline (non-leaky) modeling run was compared against 10 di...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment 2014-05, Vol.28 (4), p.895-909 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 909 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 895 |
container_title | Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Azzolina, Nicholas A Small, Mitchell J Nakles, David V Bromhal, Grant S |
description | This work evaluates the detection sensitivity of deep subsurface pressure monitoring within an uncertain carbon dioxide sequestration system by linking the output of an analytical reduced-order model and first-order uncertainty analysis. A baseline (non-leaky) modeling run was compared against 10 different leakage scenarios, where the cap rock permeability was increased by factors of 2–100 (cap rock permeability from 10⁻³to 10⁻¹millidarcy). The uncertainty variance outputs were used to develop percentile estimates and detection sensitivity for pressure throughout the deep subsurface as a function of space (lateral distance from the injection wells and vertical orientation within the reservoir) and time (years since injection), or P(x, z, t). Conditional probabilities were computed for combinations of x, z, and t, which were then used to generate power curves for detecting leakage scenarios. The results suggest that measurements of the absolute change in pressure within the target injection aquifer would not be able to distinguish small leakage rates (i.e., less than 50 × baseline) from baseline conditions, and that only large leakage rates (i.e., >100 × baseline) would be discriminated with sufficient statistical power (>99 %). Combining measurements, for example by taking the ratio of formation pressure in Aquifer 2/Aquifer 1, provides better statistical power for distinguishing smaller leakage rates at earlier times in the injection program. Detection sensitivity for pressure is a function of space and time. Therefore, design of an adequate monitoring network for subsurface pressure should account for this space–time variability to ensure that the monitoring system performs to the necessary design criteria, e.g., specific false-negative and false-positive rates. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00477-013-0788-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1513297358</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3268420611</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-cbbfbab502206dcf81b72630af4844b345f41dfe6f9a4c9a5b172883dae895573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9rFTEUxQexYKn9AK4Mup6avzPJUh5VC4UutOuQ5N08o33JMzcj9Ns30xFx5So3l985HO4ZhjeMXjFK5w9IqZznkTIx0lnr0bwYzpkU0yi4Mi__zpK-Gi4Rk-8aJYxh9Hxo1zFCaOk3ZEAkJRJcPC41ugDkVPtuqUCOJadWasoHEkslvk9AHsD9dAcge2irQ8kkZeIyWXKA2lz_7O44Qfi1ALbqngl8xAbH18NZdA8Il3_ei-H-0_W33Zfx9u7zze7j7RjENLcxeB-984pyTqd9iJr5mU-Cuii1lF5IFSXbR5iicTIYpzybudZi70AbpWZxMbzbfAu2ZDGkHvR7KDn3vJaxaT1Ch95v0KmW56j2R1lq7rksU0xwMwulO8U2KtSCWCHaU01HVx8to3YtwW4l2F6CXUuwqzPfNHhaTwf1H-f_iN5uouiKdYea0N5_5ZQpSpnhXDPxBGg3lKQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1513297358</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of subsurface pressure monitoring for brine leakage detection in an uncertain CO2 sequestration system</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Azzolina, Nicholas A ; Small, Mitchell J ; Nakles, David V ; Bromhal, Grant S</creator><creatorcontrib>Azzolina, Nicholas A ; Small, Mitchell J ; Nakles, David V ; Bromhal, Grant S ; National Energy Technology Lab. (NETL), Pittsburgh, PA, and Morgantown, WV (United States). In-house Research</creatorcontrib><description>This work evaluates the detection sensitivity of deep subsurface pressure monitoring within an uncertain carbon dioxide sequestration system by linking the output of an analytical reduced-order model and first-order uncertainty analysis. A baseline (non-leaky) modeling run was compared against 10 different leakage scenarios, where the cap rock permeability was increased by factors of 2–100 (cap rock permeability from 10⁻³to 10⁻¹millidarcy). The uncertainty variance outputs were used to develop percentile estimates and detection sensitivity for pressure throughout the deep subsurface as a function of space (lateral distance from the injection wells and vertical orientation within the reservoir) and time (years since injection), or P(x, z, t). Conditional probabilities were computed for combinations of x, z, and t, which were then used to generate power curves for detecting leakage scenarios. The results suggest that measurements of the absolute change in pressure within the target injection aquifer would not be able to distinguish small leakage rates (i.e., less than 50 × baseline) from baseline conditions, and that only large leakage rates (i.e., >100 × baseline) would be discriminated with sufficient statistical power (>99 %). Combining measurements, for example by taking the ratio of formation pressure in Aquifer 2/Aquifer 1, provides better statistical power for distinguishing smaller leakage rates at earlier times in the injection program. Detection sensitivity for pressure is a function of space and time. Therefore, design of an adequate monitoring network for subsurface pressure should account for this space–time variability to ensure that the monitoring system performs to the necessary design criteria, e.g., specific false-negative and false-positive rates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1436-3240</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1436-3259</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00477-013-0788-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Aquatic Pollution ; Aquifers ; carbon dioxide ; Carbon dioxide fixation ; Carbon sequestration ; Chemistry and Earth Sciences ; CO2 sequestration ; Computational Intelligence ; Computer Science ; Design criteria ; Detection sensitivity ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Effectiveness studies ; Environment ; Environmental monitoring ; Injection ; Injection wells ; Land use ; Leak detection ; Leakage ; Math. Appl. in Environmental Science ; monitoring ; Monitoring systems ; Original Paper ; Permeability ; Physics ; Pressure monitoring ; Probability Theory and Stochastic Processes ; Reduced order model ; Rocks ; space and time ; Statistical power ; Statistics for Engineering ; Sustainable development ; Uncertainty ; uncertainty analysis ; Urbanization ; variance ; Waste Water Technology ; Water Management ; Water Pollution Control ; wells</subject><ispartof>Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2014-05, Vol.28 (4), p.895-909</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-cbbfbab502206dcf81b72630af4844b345f41dfe6f9a4c9a5b172883dae895573</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-cbbfbab502206dcf81b72630af4844b345f41dfe6f9a4c9a5b172883dae895573</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00477-013-0788-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00477-013-0788-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,886,27929,27930,41493,42562,51324</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/1165399$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Azzolina, Nicholas A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Small, Mitchell J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakles, David V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bromhal, Grant S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>National Energy Technology Lab. (NETL), Pittsburgh, PA, and Morgantown, WV (United States). In-house Research</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of subsurface pressure monitoring for brine leakage detection in an uncertain CO2 sequestration system</title><title>Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment</title><addtitle>Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess</addtitle><description>This work evaluates the detection sensitivity of deep subsurface pressure monitoring within an uncertain carbon dioxide sequestration system by linking the output of an analytical reduced-order model and first-order uncertainty analysis. A baseline (non-leaky) modeling run was compared against 10 different leakage scenarios, where the cap rock permeability was increased by factors of 2–100 (cap rock permeability from 10⁻³to 10⁻¹millidarcy). The uncertainty variance outputs were used to develop percentile estimates and detection sensitivity for pressure throughout the deep subsurface as a function of space (lateral distance from the injection wells and vertical orientation within the reservoir) and time (years since injection), or P(x, z, t). Conditional probabilities were computed for combinations of x, z, and t, which were then used to generate power curves for detecting leakage scenarios. The results suggest that measurements of the absolute change in pressure within the target injection aquifer would not be able to distinguish small leakage rates (i.e., less than 50 × baseline) from baseline conditions, and that only large leakage rates (i.e., >100 × baseline) would be discriminated with sufficient statistical power (>99 %). Combining measurements, for example by taking the ratio of formation pressure in Aquifer 2/Aquifer 1, provides better statistical power for distinguishing smaller leakage rates at earlier times in the injection program. Detection sensitivity for pressure is a function of space and time. Therefore, design of an adequate monitoring network for subsurface pressure should account for this space–time variability to ensure that the monitoring system performs to the necessary design criteria, e.g., specific false-negative and false-positive rates.</description><subject>Aquatic Pollution</subject><subject>Aquifers</subject><subject>carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide fixation</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>Chemistry and Earth Sciences</subject><subject>CO2 sequestration</subject><subject>Computational Intelligence</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Design criteria</subject><subject>Detection sensitivity</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Effectiveness studies</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental monitoring</subject><subject>Injection</subject><subject>Injection wells</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Leak detection</subject><subject>Leakage</subject><subject>Math. Appl. in Environmental Science</subject><subject>monitoring</subject><subject>Monitoring systems</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Permeability</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Pressure monitoring</subject><subject>Probability Theory and Stochastic Processes</subject><subject>Reduced order model</subject><subject>Rocks</subject><subject>space and time</subject><subject>Statistical power</subject><subject>Statistics for Engineering</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>uncertainty analysis</subject><subject>Urbanization</subject><subject>variance</subject><subject>Waste Water Technology</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water Pollution Control</subject><subject>wells</subject><issn>1436-3240</issn><issn>1436-3259</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9rFTEUxQexYKn9AK4Mup6avzPJUh5VC4UutOuQ5N08o33JMzcj9Ns30xFx5So3l985HO4ZhjeMXjFK5w9IqZznkTIx0lnr0bwYzpkU0yi4Mi__zpK-Gi4Rk-8aJYxh9Hxo1zFCaOk3ZEAkJRJcPC41ugDkVPtuqUCOJadWasoHEkslvk9AHsD9dAcge2irQ8kkZeIyWXKA2lz_7O44Qfi1ALbqngl8xAbH18NZdA8Il3_ei-H-0_W33Zfx9u7zze7j7RjENLcxeB-984pyTqd9iJr5mU-Cuii1lF5IFSXbR5iicTIYpzybudZi70AbpWZxMbzbfAu2ZDGkHvR7KDn3vJaxaT1Ch95v0KmW56j2R1lq7rksU0xwMwulO8U2KtSCWCHaU01HVx8to3YtwW4l2F6CXUuwqzPfNHhaTwf1H-f_iN5uouiKdYea0N5_5ZQpSpnhXDPxBGg3lKQ</recordid><startdate>20140501</startdate><enddate>20140501</enddate><creator>Azzolina, Nicholas A</creator><creator>Small, Mitchell J</creator><creator>Nakles, David V</creator><creator>Bromhal, Grant S</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0W</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140501</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of subsurface pressure monitoring for brine leakage detection in an uncertain CO2 sequestration system</title><author>Azzolina, Nicholas A ; Small, Mitchell J ; Nakles, David V ; Bromhal, Grant S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-cbbfbab502206dcf81b72630af4844b345f41dfe6f9a4c9a5b172883dae895573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aquatic Pollution</topic><topic>Aquifers</topic><topic>carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide fixation</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>Chemistry and Earth Sciences</topic><topic>CO2 sequestration</topic><topic>Computational Intelligence</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Design criteria</topic><topic>Detection sensitivity</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Effectiveness studies</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental monitoring</topic><topic>Injection</topic><topic>Injection wells</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Leak detection</topic><topic>Leakage</topic><topic>Math. Appl. in Environmental Science</topic><topic>monitoring</topic><topic>Monitoring systems</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Permeability</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Pressure monitoring</topic><topic>Probability Theory and Stochastic Processes</topic><topic>Reduced order model</topic><topic>Rocks</topic><topic>space and time</topic><topic>Statistical power</topic><topic>Statistics for Engineering</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>uncertainty analysis</topic><topic>Urbanization</topic><topic>variance</topic><topic>Waste Water Technology</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water Pollution Control</topic><topic>wells</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Azzolina, Nicholas A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Small, Mitchell J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakles, David V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bromhal, Grant S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>National Energy Technology Lab. (NETL), Pittsburgh, PA, and Morgantown, WV (United States). In-house Research</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>DELNET Engineering & Technology Collection</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Azzolina, Nicholas A</au><au>Small, Mitchell J</au><au>Nakles, David V</au><au>Bromhal, Grant S</au><aucorp>National Energy Technology Lab. (NETL), Pittsburgh, PA, and Morgantown, WV (United States). In-house Research</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness of subsurface pressure monitoring for brine leakage detection in an uncertain CO2 sequestration system</atitle><jtitle>Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment</jtitle><stitle>Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess</stitle><date>2014-05-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>895</spage><epage>909</epage><pages>895-909</pages><issn>1436-3240</issn><eissn>1436-3259</eissn><abstract>This work evaluates the detection sensitivity of deep subsurface pressure monitoring within an uncertain carbon dioxide sequestration system by linking the output of an analytical reduced-order model and first-order uncertainty analysis. A baseline (non-leaky) modeling run was compared against 10 different leakage scenarios, where the cap rock permeability was increased by factors of 2–100 (cap rock permeability from 10⁻³to 10⁻¹millidarcy). The uncertainty variance outputs were used to develop percentile estimates and detection sensitivity for pressure throughout the deep subsurface as a function of space (lateral distance from the injection wells and vertical orientation within the reservoir) and time (years since injection), or P(x, z, t). Conditional probabilities were computed for combinations of x, z, and t, which were then used to generate power curves for detecting leakage scenarios. The results suggest that measurements of the absolute change in pressure within the target injection aquifer would not be able to distinguish small leakage rates (i.e., less than 50 × baseline) from baseline conditions, and that only large leakage rates (i.e., >100 × baseline) would be discriminated with sufficient statistical power (>99 %). Combining measurements, for example by taking the ratio of formation pressure in Aquifer 2/Aquifer 1, provides better statistical power for distinguishing smaller leakage rates at earlier times in the injection program. Detection sensitivity for pressure is a function of space and time. Therefore, design of an adequate monitoring network for subsurface pressure should account for this space–time variability to ensure that the monitoring system performs to the necessary design criteria, e.g., specific false-negative and false-positive rates.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s00477-013-0788-9</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1436-3240 |
ispartof | Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2014-05, Vol.28 (4), p.895-909 |
issn | 1436-3240 1436-3259 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1513297358 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Aquatic Pollution Aquifers carbon dioxide Carbon dioxide fixation Carbon sequestration Chemistry and Earth Sciences CO2 sequestration Computational Intelligence Computer Science Design criteria Detection sensitivity Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Effectiveness studies Environment Environmental monitoring Injection Injection wells Land use Leak detection Leakage Math. Appl. in Environmental Science monitoring Monitoring systems Original Paper Permeability Physics Pressure monitoring Probability Theory and Stochastic Processes Reduced order model Rocks space and time Statistical power Statistics for Engineering Sustainable development Uncertainty uncertainty analysis Urbanization variance Waste Water Technology Water Management Water Pollution Control wells |
title | Effectiveness of subsurface pressure monitoring for brine leakage detection in an uncertain CO2 sequestration system |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T11%3A49%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20subsurface%20pressure%20monitoring%20for%20brine%20leakage%20detection%20in%20an%20uncertain%20CO2%20sequestration%20system&rft.jtitle=Stochastic%20Environmental%20Research%20and%20Risk%20Assessment&rft.au=Azzolina,%20Nicholas%20A&rft.aucorp=National%20Energy%20Technology%20Lab.%20(NETL),%20Pittsburgh,%20PA,%20and%20Morgantown,%20WV%20(United%20States).%20In-house%20Research&rft.date=2014-05-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=895&rft.epage=909&rft.pages=895-909&rft.issn=1436-3240&rft.eissn=1436-3259&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00477-013-0788-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E3268420611%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1513297358&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |