Impacts of different diffusion scenarios for mitigation technology options and of model representations regarding renewables intermittency on evaluations of CO₂ emissions reductions
This paper evaluated the impacts of climate change mitigation technology options on CO₂ emission reductions and the effects of model representations regarding renewable intermittency on the assessment of reduction by using a world energy systems model. First, different diffusion scenarios for carbon...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Climatic change 2014-04, Vol.123 (3-4), p.665-676 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 676 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3-4 |
container_start_page | 665 |
container_title | Climatic change |
container_volume | 123 |
creator | Sano, Fuminori Akimoto, Keigo Wada, Kenichi |
description | This paper evaluated the impacts of climate change mitigation technology options on CO₂ emission reductions and the effects of model representations regarding renewable intermittency on the assessment of reduction by using a world energy systems model. First, different diffusion scenarios for carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS), nuclear power, and wind power and solar PV are selected from EMF27 scenarios to analyze their impacts on CO₂ emission reductions. These technologies are important for reducing CO₂ intensity of electricity, and the impacts of their diffusion levels on mitigation costs are significant, according to the analyses. Availability of CCS in particular, among the three kinds of technologies, has a large impact on the marginal CO₂ abatement cost. In order to analyze effects of model representations regarding renewables intermittency, four different representations are assumed within the model. A simplistic model representation that does not take into consideration the intermittency of wind power and solar PV evaluates larger contributions of the energy sources than those evaluated by a model representation that takes intermittency into consideration. Appropriate consideration of renewables intermittency within global energy systems models will be important for realistic evaluations of climate change mitigation scenarios. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10584-013-0896-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1513296657</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3268403591</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-6137835b27fe834bbdba66269bcea37131e044c8121af5a5c1ac4186a0332f723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhS0EEpcLD8AKS6xD7fgnyRJd8VOpUhfQteU44-AqsYPtgNplX4r34Ulwmrtg1dUczZnzWfJB6C0lHyghzUWiRLS8IpRVpO1kdf8MHahoWEV5S56jA6FSVISQ7iV6ldLtpppaHtCfy3nRJiccLB6ctRDB50e1Jhc8Tga8ji4kbEPEs8tu1HkzMpgfPkxhvMNh2TYJaz9smDkMMOEIS4RUYHo3I4w6Ds6PRXn4rfsJEnY-QyzQDN4UjsfwS0_rOVFQp-u_Dw8YZpfSGTKs5tF9jV5YPSV4c55HdPP50_fT1-rq-svl6eNVZTjvciUpa1om-rqx0DLe90Ovpaxl1xvQrKGMAuHctLSm2gotDNWG01Zqwlhtm5od0fudu8Twc4WU1W1Yoy9PKiooqzspyy8fEd2vTAwpRbBqiW7W8U5RorZ-1N6PKv2orR91XzL1nknl1o8Q_yM_EXq3h6wOSo_RJXXzrSaUl0KFFIKzfw8zo1E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1513296657</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impacts of different diffusion scenarios for mitigation technology options and of model representations regarding renewables intermittency on evaluations of CO₂ emissions reductions</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Sano, Fuminori ; Akimoto, Keigo ; Wada, Kenichi</creator><creatorcontrib>Sano, Fuminori ; Akimoto, Keigo ; Wada, Kenichi</creatorcontrib><description>This paper evaluated the impacts of climate change mitigation technology options on CO₂ emission reductions and the effects of model representations regarding renewable intermittency on the assessment of reduction by using a world energy systems model. First, different diffusion scenarios for carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS), nuclear power, and wind power and solar PV are selected from EMF27 scenarios to analyze their impacts on CO₂ emission reductions. These technologies are important for reducing CO₂ intensity of electricity, and the impacts of their diffusion levels on mitigation costs are significant, according to the analyses. Availability of CCS in particular, among the three kinds of technologies, has a large impact on the marginal CO₂ abatement cost. In order to analyze effects of model representations regarding renewables intermittency, four different representations are assumed within the model. A simplistic model representation that does not take into consideration the intermittency of wind power and solar PV evaluates larger contributions of the energy sources than those evaluated by a model representation that takes intermittency into consideration. Appropriate consideration of renewables intermittency within global energy systems models will be important for realistic evaluations of climate change mitigation scenarios.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-0009</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1480</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10584-013-0896-z</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CLCHDX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Atmospheric Sciences ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon dioxide emissions ; Carbon sequestration ; Climate change ; Climate change mitigation ; Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts ; Climate policy ; Cost control ; Diffusion ; Discount rates ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Electricity ; Emission standards ; Emissions ; Emissions control ; Energy efficiency ; Energy sources ; Enhanced oil recovery ; Environmental impact ; Environmental policy ; Greenhouse gases ; Industrial plant emissions ; Linear programming ; Nuclear energy ; nuclear power ; Nuclear power plants ; Renewable resources ; solar energy ; Technology ; Wind power</subject><ispartof>Climatic change, 2014-04, Vol.123 (3-4), p.665-676</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-6137835b27fe834bbdba66269bcea37131e044c8121af5a5c1ac4186a0332f723</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-6137835b27fe834bbdba66269bcea37131e044c8121af5a5c1ac4186a0332f723</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10584-013-0896-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10584-013-0896-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sano, Fuminori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akimoto, Keigo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wada, Kenichi</creatorcontrib><title>Impacts of different diffusion scenarios for mitigation technology options and of model representations regarding renewables intermittency on evaluations of CO₂ emissions reductions</title><title>Climatic change</title><addtitle>Climatic Change</addtitle><description>This paper evaluated the impacts of climate change mitigation technology options on CO₂ emission reductions and the effects of model representations regarding renewable intermittency on the assessment of reduction by using a world energy systems model. First, different diffusion scenarios for carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS), nuclear power, and wind power and solar PV are selected from EMF27 scenarios to analyze their impacts on CO₂ emission reductions. These technologies are important for reducing CO₂ intensity of electricity, and the impacts of their diffusion levels on mitigation costs are significant, according to the analyses. Availability of CCS in particular, among the three kinds of technologies, has a large impact on the marginal CO₂ abatement cost. In order to analyze effects of model representations regarding renewables intermittency, four different representations are assumed within the model. A simplistic model representation that does not take into consideration the intermittency of wind power and solar PV evaluates larger contributions of the energy sources than those evaluated by a model representation that takes intermittency into consideration. Appropriate consideration of renewables intermittency within global energy systems models will be important for realistic evaluations of climate change mitigation scenarios.</description><subject>Atmospheric Sciences</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide emissions</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate change mitigation</subject><subject>Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts</subject><subject>Climate policy</subject><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Diffusion</subject><subject>Discount rates</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Emission standards</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Emissions control</subject><subject>Energy efficiency</subject><subject>Energy sources</subject><subject>Enhanced oil recovery</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Industrial plant emissions</subject><subject>Linear programming</subject><subject>Nuclear energy</subject><subject>nuclear power</subject><subject>Nuclear power plants</subject><subject>Renewable resources</subject><subject>solar energy</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Wind power</subject><issn>0165-0009</issn><issn>1573-1480</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhS0EEpcLD8AKS6xD7fgnyRJd8VOpUhfQteU44-AqsYPtgNplX4r34Ulwmrtg1dUczZnzWfJB6C0lHyghzUWiRLS8IpRVpO1kdf8MHahoWEV5S56jA6FSVISQ7iV6ldLtpppaHtCfy3nRJiccLB6ctRDB50e1Jhc8Tga8ji4kbEPEs8tu1HkzMpgfPkxhvMNh2TYJaz9smDkMMOEIS4RUYHo3I4w6Ds6PRXn4rfsJEnY-QyzQDN4UjsfwS0_rOVFQp-u_Dw8YZpfSGTKs5tF9jV5YPSV4c55HdPP50_fT1-rq-svl6eNVZTjvciUpa1om-rqx0DLe90Ovpaxl1xvQrKGMAuHctLSm2gotDNWG01Zqwlhtm5od0fudu8Twc4WU1W1Yoy9PKiooqzspyy8fEd2vTAwpRbBqiW7W8U5RorZ-1N6PKv2orR91XzL1nknl1o8Q_yM_EXq3h6wOSo_RJXXzrSaUl0KFFIKzfw8zo1E</recordid><startdate>20140401</startdate><enddate>20140401</enddate><creator>Sano, Fuminori</creator><creator>Akimoto, Keigo</creator><creator>Wada, Kenichi</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140401</creationdate><title>Impacts of different diffusion scenarios for mitigation technology options and of model representations regarding renewables intermittency on evaluations of CO₂ emissions reductions</title><author>Sano, Fuminori ; Akimoto, Keigo ; Wada, Kenichi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-6137835b27fe834bbdba66269bcea37131e044c8121af5a5c1ac4186a0332f723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Atmospheric Sciences</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide emissions</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate change mitigation</topic><topic>Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts</topic><topic>Climate policy</topic><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Diffusion</topic><topic>Discount rates</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Emission standards</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Emissions control</topic><topic>Energy efficiency</topic><topic>Energy sources</topic><topic>Enhanced oil recovery</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Industrial plant emissions</topic><topic>Linear programming</topic><topic>Nuclear energy</topic><topic>nuclear power</topic><topic>Nuclear power plants</topic><topic>Renewable resources</topic><topic>solar energy</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Wind power</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sano, Fuminori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akimoto, Keigo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wada, Kenichi</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Climatic change</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sano, Fuminori</au><au>Akimoto, Keigo</au><au>Wada, Kenichi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impacts of different diffusion scenarios for mitigation technology options and of model representations regarding renewables intermittency on evaluations of CO₂ emissions reductions</atitle><jtitle>Climatic change</jtitle><stitle>Climatic Change</stitle><date>2014-04-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>123</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>665</spage><epage>676</epage><pages>665-676</pages><issn>0165-0009</issn><eissn>1573-1480</eissn><coden>CLCHDX</coden><abstract>This paper evaluated the impacts of climate change mitigation technology options on CO₂ emission reductions and the effects of model representations regarding renewable intermittency on the assessment of reduction by using a world energy systems model. First, different diffusion scenarios for carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS), nuclear power, and wind power and solar PV are selected from EMF27 scenarios to analyze their impacts on CO₂ emission reductions. These technologies are important for reducing CO₂ intensity of electricity, and the impacts of their diffusion levels on mitigation costs are significant, according to the analyses. Availability of CCS in particular, among the three kinds of technologies, has a large impact on the marginal CO₂ abatement cost. In order to analyze effects of model representations regarding renewables intermittency, four different representations are assumed within the model. A simplistic model representation that does not take into consideration the intermittency of wind power and solar PV evaluates larger contributions of the energy sources than those evaluated by a model representation that takes intermittency into consideration. Appropriate consideration of renewables intermittency within global energy systems models will be important for realistic evaluations of climate change mitigation scenarios.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s10584-013-0896-z</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0165-0009 |
ispartof | Climatic change, 2014-04, Vol.123 (3-4), p.665-676 |
issn | 0165-0009 1573-1480 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1513296657 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Atmospheric Sciences Carbon dioxide Carbon dioxide emissions Carbon sequestration Climate change Climate change mitigation Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts Climate policy Cost control Diffusion Discount rates Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Electricity Emission standards Emissions Emissions control Energy efficiency Energy sources Enhanced oil recovery Environmental impact Environmental policy Greenhouse gases Industrial plant emissions Linear programming Nuclear energy nuclear power Nuclear power plants Renewable resources solar energy Technology Wind power |
title | Impacts of different diffusion scenarios for mitigation technology options and of model representations regarding renewables intermittency on evaluations of CO₂ emissions reductions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T13%3A52%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impacts%20of%20different%20diffusion%20scenarios%20for%20mitigation%20technology%20options%20and%20of%20model%20representations%20regarding%20renewables%20intermittency%20on%20evaluations%20of%20CO%E2%82%82%20emissions%20reductions&rft.jtitle=Climatic%20change&rft.au=Sano,%20Fuminori&rft.date=2014-04-01&rft.volume=123&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=665&rft.epage=676&rft.pages=665-676&rft.issn=0165-0009&rft.eissn=1573-1480&rft.coden=CLCHDX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10584-013-0896-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3268403591%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1513296657&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |