Lightened Taxpayer Burdens in the Sale of Personal Goodwill After H&M, Inc. v. Commissioner
In any negotiation for the purchase of a business, the valuation of the various assets of the business is likely to be a contentious issue. Tax professionals advise that the best way to protect against a reallocation action by the Service is to obtain a professional valuation of the business' a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Tax lawyer 2014-01, Vol.67 (2), p.363-378 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 378 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 363 |
container_title | The Tax lawyer |
container_volume | 67 |
creator | Shin, Mona |
description | In any negotiation for the purchase of a business, the valuation of the various assets of the business is likely to be a contentious issue. Tax professionals advise that the best way to protect against a reallocation action by the Service is to obtain a professional valuation of the business' assets. A recent Tax Court case, however, casts some doubt on this conservative wisdom. The case shows that the parties to a business purchase transaction may have significantly more freedom to value a business' assets than previously thought. In H&M, Inc. v. Commissioner, the Tax Court dismissed the Service's contention that the parties to an asset purchase agreement had inaccurately valued the assets of the business in an effort to receive more advantageous tax treatment. This note argues that the H&M, Inc. court came to the correct conclusion in upholding the parties' purchase price allocations, but that its analysis was flawed because the court failed to impose a higher evidentiary burden on the taxpayer in support of those values. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1513230630</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A364576274</galeid><jstor_id>24247753</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A364576274</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g1550-73abe3419eb8d0fa61c7d5f96d5f7f00d684da6c9430c46b1eef9555ccddcfd53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkG9LwzAQxosoOKcfQQgIvrLj2vzp-nIO3QYTBScIvihZcqkZXTOTTt23NzBBhHFwB8fvOZ7njpJeTvMyFTAsj5MeAIMUgL-eJmchrAAoZFD2kre5rd87bFGThfzeyB16crv1GttAbEu6dyTPskHiDHlCH1wrGzJxTn_ZpiEj00V8ev1wQ2atGpDPARm79dqGYF2L_jw5MbIJePE7-8nL_d1iPE3nj5PZeDRP64xzSAsql0hZVuJyqMFIkalCc1OK2AoDoMWQaSlUySgoJpYZoik550pprYzmtJ9c7e9uvPvYYuiqldv66DRUGc9oTkFQ-KPqmKeyrXGdlyqaVdWICsYLkRcsUukBqo4P8rKJoYyN63_84AAfS-PaqoOCy71gFTrnq423a-l3Vc5yVhSc0h8Um4OM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1513230630</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lightened Taxpayer Burdens in the Sale of Personal Goodwill After H&M, Inc. v. Commissioner</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Shin, Mona</creator><creatorcontrib>Shin, Mona</creatorcontrib><description>In any negotiation for the purchase of a business, the valuation of the various assets of the business is likely to be a contentious issue. Tax professionals advise that the best way to protect against a reallocation action by the Service is to obtain a professional valuation of the business' assets. A recent Tax Court case, however, casts some doubt on this conservative wisdom. The case shows that the parties to a business purchase transaction may have significantly more freedom to value a business' assets than previously thought. In H&M, Inc. v. Commissioner, the Tax Court dismissed the Service's contention that the parties to an asset purchase agreement had inaccurately valued the assets of the business in an effort to receive more advantageous tax treatment. This note argues that the H&M, Inc. court came to the correct conclusion in upholding the parties' purchase price allocations, but that its analysis was flawed because the court failed to impose a higher evidentiary burden on the taxpayer in support of those values.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0040-005X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2329-6089</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: American Bar Association Section of Taxation</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Agreements ; Allocation (Taxation) ; Asset acquisitions ; Business ; Business valuation ; C corporations ; Close corporations ; Corporate taxes ; Customer services ; Employees ; Employment ; Goodwill ; Goodwill (Business) ; Income taxes ; Insurance industry ; Intangible assets ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Noncompetition agreements ; Personal relationships ; Purchase price ; Reputations ; Shareholders ; State court decisions ; Stockholders ; Tax allocation ; Tax attorneys ; Tax court decisions ; Tax courts ; Taxpaying ; Valuation</subject><ispartof>The Tax lawyer, 2014-01, Vol.67 (2), p.363-378</ispartof><rights>2014 American Bar Association</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 American Bar Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Bar Association Winter 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24247753$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24247753$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shin, Mona</creatorcontrib><title>Lightened Taxpayer Burdens in the Sale of Personal Goodwill After H&M, Inc. v. Commissioner</title><title>The Tax lawyer</title><description>In any negotiation for the purchase of a business, the valuation of the various assets of the business is likely to be a contentious issue. Tax professionals advise that the best way to protect against a reallocation action by the Service is to obtain a professional valuation of the business' assets. A recent Tax Court case, however, casts some doubt on this conservative wisdom. The case shows that the parties to a business purchase transaction may have significantly more freedom to value a business' assets than previously thought. In H&M, Inc. v. Commissioner, the Tax Court dismissed the Service's contention that the parties to an asset purchase agreement had inaccurately valued the assets of the business in an effort to receive more advantageous tax treatment. This note argues that the H&M, Inc. court came to the correct conclusion in upholding the parties' purchase price allocations, but that its analysis was flawed because the court failed to impose a higher evidentiary burden on the taxpayer in support of those values.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Allocation (Taxation)</subject><subject>Asset acquisitions</subject><subject>Business</subject><subject>Business valuation</subject><subject>C corporations</subject><subject>Close corporations</subject><subject>Corporate taxes</subject><subject>Customer services</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Goodwill</subject><subject>Goodwill (Business)</subject><subject>Income taxes</subject><subject>Insurance industry</subject><subject>Intangible assets</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Noncompetition agreements</subject><subject>Personal relationships</subject><subject>Purchase price</subject><subject>Reputations</subject><subject>Shareholders</subject><subject>State court decisions</subject><subject>Stockholders</subject><subject>Tax allocation</subject><subject>Tax attorneys</subject><subject>Tax court decisions</subject><subject>Tax courts</subject><subject>Taxpaying</subject><subject>Valuation</subject><issn>0040-005X</issn><issn>2329-6089</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkG9LwzAQxosoOKcfQQgIvrLj2vzp-nIO3QYTBScIvihZcqkZXTOTTt23NzBBhHFwB8fvOZ7njpJeTvMyFTAsj5MeAIMUgL-eJmchrAAoZFD2kre5rd87bFGThfzeyB16crv1GttAbEu6dyTPskHiDHlCH1wrGzJxTn_ZpiEj00V8ev1wQ2atGpDPARm79dqGYF2L_jw5MbIJePE7-8nL_d1iPE3nj5PZeDRP64xzSAsql0hZVuJyqMFIkalCc1OK2AoDoMWQaSlUySgoJpYZoik550pprYzmtJ9c7e9uvPvYYuiqldv66DRUGc9oTkFQ-KPqmKeyrXGdlyqaVdWICsYLkRcsUukBqo4P8rKJoYyN63_84AAfS-PaqoOCy71gFTrnq423a-l3Vc5yVhSc0h8Um4OM</recordid><startdate>20140101</startdate><enddate>20140101</enddate><creator>Shin, Mona</creator><general>American Bar Association Section of Taxation</general><general>American Bar Association</general><scope>ILT</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8A9</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140101</creationdate><title>Lightened Taxpayer Burdens in the Sale of Personal Goodwill After H&M, Inc. v. Commissioner</title><author>Shin, Mona</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1550-73abe3419eb8d0fa61c7d5f96d5f7f00d684da6c9430c46b1eef9555ccddcfd53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Allocation (Taxation)</topic><topic>Asset acquisitions</topic><topic>Business</topic><topic>Business valuation</topic><topic>C corporations</topic><topic>Close corporations</topic><topic>Corporate taxes</topic><topic>Customer services</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Goodwill</topic><topic>Goodwill (Business)</topic><topic>Income taxes</topic><topic>Insurance industry</topic><topic>Intangible assets</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Noncompetition agreements</topic><topic>Personal relationships</topic><topic>Purchase price</topic><topic>Reputations</topic><topic>Shareholders</topic><topic>State court decisions</topic><topic>Stockholders</topic><topic>Tax allocation</topic><topic>Tax attorneys</topic><topic>Tax court decisions</topic><topic>Tax courts</topic><topic>Taxpaying</topic><topic>Valuation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shin, Mona</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The Tax lawyer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shin, Mona</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lightened Taxpayer Burdens in the Sale of Personal Goodwill After H&M, Inc. v. Commissioner</atitle><jtitle>The Tax lawyer</jtitle><date>2014-01-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>363</spage><epage>378</epage><pages>363-378</pages><issn>0040-005X</issn><eissn>2329-6089</eissn><abstract>In any negotiation for the purchase of a business, the valuation of the various assets of the business is likely to be a contentious issue. Tax professionals advise that the best way to protect against a reallocation action by the Service is to obtain a professional valuation of the business' assets. A recent Tax Court case, however, casts some doubt on this conservative wisdom. The case shows that the parties to a business purchase transaction may have significantly more freedom to value a business' assets than previously thought. In H&M, Inc. v. Commissioner, the Tax Court dismissed the Service's contention that the parties to an asset purchase agreement had inaccurately valued the assets of the business in an effort to receive more advantageous tax treatment. This note argues that the H&M, Inc. court came to the correct conclusion in upholding the parties' purchase price allocations, but that its analysis was flawed because the court failed to impose a higher evidentiary burden on the taxpayer in support of those values.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>American Bar Association Section of Taxation</pub><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0040-005X |
ispartof | The Tax lawyer, 2014-01, Vol.67 (2), p.363-378 |
issn | 0040-005X 2329-6089 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1513230630 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Accuracy Agreements Allocation (Taxation) Asset acquisitions Business Business valuation C corporations Close corporations Corporate taxes Customer services Employees Employment Goodwill Goodwill (Business) Income taxes Insurance industry Intangible assets Laws, regulations and rules Noncompetition agreements Personal relationships Purchase price Reputations Shareholders State court decisions Stockholders Tax allocation Tax attorneys Tax court decisions Tax courts Taxpaying Valuation |
title | Lightened Taxpayer Burdens in the Sale of Personal Goodwill After H&M, Inc. v. Commissioner |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T12%3A36%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lightened%20Taxpayer%20Burdens%20in%20the%20Sale%20of%20Personal%20Goodwill%20After%20H&M,%20Inc.%20v.%20Commissioner&rft.jtitle=The%20Tax%20lawyer&rft.au=Shin,%20Mona&rft.date=2014-01-01&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=363&rft.epage=378&rft.pages=363-378&rft.issn=0040-005X&rft.eissn=2329-6089&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA364576274%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1513230630&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A364576274&rft_jstor_id=24247753&rfr_iscdi=true |