Assessment of Carbon Dioxide Emission Metric Systems for an Aircraft Certification Standard
To mitigate aviation CO2 emissions, the International Civil Aviation Organization’s Committee on Aviation Environmental Protection is considering an aircraft CO2 emissions certification requirement. This paper presents an evaluation of potential CO2 metric systems for their suitability as a basis fo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of aircraft 2014-03, Vol.51 (2), p.559-570 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 570 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 559 |
container_title | Journal of aircraft |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Lim, Dongwook Kirby, Michelle Nam, Taewoo Burdette, Graham Yutko, Brian Hansman, R. John Mozdzanowska, Alex Bonnefoy, Philippe A |
description | To mitigate aviation CO2 emissions, the International Civil Aviation Organization’s Committee on Aviation Environmental Protection is considering an aircraft CO2 emissions certification requirement. This paper presents an evaluation of potential CO2 metric systems for their suitability as a basis for an aircraft CO2 certification requirement. Candidate CO2 metric systems, consisting of a metric, a correlating parameter, evaluation conditions, and a notional limit line are assessed against a set of key criteria. The metric systems were chosen to reflect aircraft fuel consumption, which directly correlates with CO2 emissions for a given fuel type. Key criteria were identified to represent desirable attributes of the metric system, that is the ability to represent fuel efficiency performance improvements, validity across a range of aircraft types, correlation with fuel efficiency in actual operations, fairness across stakeholders, ease of measurement, and robustness against unintended consequences. The analysis showed a metric system consisting of a metric based on the inverse of the specific air range correlated with the maximum takeoff weight evaluated at 85% of maximum takeoff weight reasonably satisfied the key criteria. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2514/1.C032279 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1512415861</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1530991722</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a309t-fa0b54c4510bef694ba61da05a0fde916c85466f37e9dbeceb9eacff01bf8f293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90U1LxDAQBuAgCq4fB_9BQBA9VGfSNm2OS_0ExYN68lCm6QQiu60mWdB_b2U9iIKngeHh5WVGiAOEU1VicYanDeRKVWZDzLDM8yyvdb0pZgAKs1prsy12YnwBgBqqaiae5zFyjEsekhydbCh04yDP_fjue5YXSx-jnxZ3nIK38uEjJl5G6cYgaZBzH2wgl2TDIXnnLaUv_JBo6Cn0e2LL0SLy_vfcFU-XF4_NdXZ7f3XTzG8zysGkzBF0ZWGLEqFjp03RkcaeoCRwPRvUti4LrV1esek7ttwZJuscYOdqp0y-K47Xua9hfFtxTO1U2_JiQQOPq9hOdwBjsFJqooe_6Mu4CsPUrlWFyVEXBuA_hSWqAsta46RO1sqGMcbArn0Nfknho0Vov57RYvv9jMkerS15oh9pf-AnXrOHKg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1512415861</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of Carbon Dioxide Emission Metric Systems for an Aircraft Certification Standard</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Lim, Dongwook ; Kirby, Michelle ; Nam, Taewoo ; Burdette, Graham ; Yutko, Brian ; Hansman, R. John ; Mozdzanowska, Alex ; Bonnefoy, Philippe A</creator><creatorcontrib>Lim, Dongwook ; Kirby, Michelle ; Nam, Taewoo ; Burdette, Graham ; Yutko, Brian ; Hansman, R. John ; Mozdzanowska, Alex ; Bonnefoy, Philippe A</creatorcontrib><description>To mitigate aviation CO2 emissions, the International Civil Aviation Organization’s Committee on Aviation Environmental Protection is considering an aircraft CO2 emissions certification requirement. This paper presents an evaluation of potential CO2 metric systems for their suitability as a basis for an aircraft CO2 certification requirement. Candidate CO2 metric systems, consisting of a metric, a correlating parameter, evaluation conditions, and a notional limit line are assessed against a set of key criteria. The metric systems were chosen to reflect aircraft fuel consumption, which directly correlates with CO2 emissions for a given fuel type. Key criteria were identified to represent desirable attributes of the metric system, that is the ability to represent fuel efficiency performance improvements, validity across a range of aircraft types, correlation with fuel efficiency in actual operations, fairness across stakeholders, ease of measurement, and robustness against unintended consequences. The analysis showed a metric system consisting of a metric based on the inverse of the specific air range correlated with the maximum takeoff weight evaluated at 85% of maximum takeoff weight reasonably satisfied the key criteria.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8669</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-3868</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2514/1.C032279</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Virginia: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</publisher><subject>Aerospace industry ; Aircraft ; Aircraft accidents & safety ; Aircraft fuels ; Aviation ; Aviation fuel ; Carbon dioxide ; Certification ; Civil aviation ; Correlation ; Criteria ; Emission analysis ; Emissions ; Energy efficiency ; Environmental protection ; Fuel consumption ; Fuel economy ; International System of Units ; Metric system ; Takeoff ; Weight</subject><ispartof>Journal of aircraft, 2014-03, Vol.51 (2), p.559-570</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 by the authors. Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., with permission. Copies of this paper may be made for personal or internal use, on condition that the copier pay the $10.00 per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923; include the code and $10.00 in correspondence with the CCC.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 by the authors. Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., with permission. Copies of this paper may be made for personal or internal use, on condition that the copier pay the $10.00 per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923; include the code 1542-3868/14 and $10.00 in correspondence with the CCC.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 by the authors. Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., with permission. Copies of this paper may be made for personal or internal use, on condition that the copier pay the $10.00 per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923; include the code 1533-3868/14 and $10.00 in correspondence with the CCC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a309t-fa0b54c4510bef694ba61da05a0fde916c85466f37e9dbeceb9eacff01bf8f293</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lim, Dongwook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirby, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nam, Taewoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burdette, Graham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yutko, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansman, R. John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mozdzanowska, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonnefoy, Philippe A</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of Carbon Dioxide Emission Metric Systems for an Aircraft Certification Standard</title><title>Journal of aircraft</title><description>To mitigate aviation CO2 emissions, the International Civil Aviation Organization’s Committee on Aviation Environmental Protection is considering an aircraft CO2 emissions certification requirement. This paper presents an evaluation of potential CO2 metric systems for their suitability as a basis for an aircraft CO2 certification requirement. Candidate CO2 metric systems, consisting of a metric, a correlating parameter, evaluation conditions, and a notional limit line are assessed against a set of key criteria. The metric systems were chosen to reflect aircraft fuel consumption, which directly correlates with CO2 emissions for a given fuel type. Key criteria were identified to represent desirable attributes of the metric system, that is the ability to represent fuel efficiency performance improvements, validity across a range of aircraft types, correlation with fuel efficiency in actual operations, fairness across stakeholders, ease of measurement, and robustness against unintended consequences. The analysis showed a metric system consisting of a metric based on the inverse of the specific air range correlated with the maximum takeoff weight evaluated at 85% of maximum takeoff weight reasonably satisfied the key criteria.</description><subject>Aerospace industry</subject><subject>Aircraft</subject><subject>Aircraft accidents & safety</subject><subject>Aircraft fuels</subject><subject>Aviation</subject><subject>Aviation fuel</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Certification</subject><subject>Civil aviation</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Emission analysis</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Energy efficiency</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Fuel consumption</subject><subject>Fuel economy</subject><subject>International System of Units</subject><subject>Metric system</subject><subject>Takeoff</subject><subject>Weight</subject><issn>0021-8669</issn><issn>1533-3868</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90U1LxDAQBuAgCq4fB_9BQBA9VGfSNm2OS_0ExYN68lCm6QQiu60mWdB_b2U9iIKngeHh5WVGiAOEU1VicYanDeRKVWZDzLDM8yyvdb0pZgAKs1prsy12YnwBgBqqaiae5zFyjEsekhydbCh04yDP_fjue5YXSx-jnxZ3nIK38uEjJl5G6cYgaZBzH2wgl2TDIXnnLaUv_JBo6Cn0e2LL0SLy_vfcFU-XF4_NdXZ7f3XTzG8zysGkzBF0ZWGLEqFjp03RkcaeoCRwPRvUti4LrV1esek7ttwZJuscYOdqp0y-K47Xua9hfFtxTO1U2_JiQQOPq9hOdwBjsFJqooe_6Mu4CsPUrlWFyVEXBuA_hSWqAsta46RO1sqGMcbArn0Nfknho0Vov57RYvv9jMkerS15oh9pf-AnXrOHKg</recordid><startdate>20140301</startdate><enddate>20140301</enddate><creator>Lim, Dongwook</creator><creator>Kirby, Michelle</creator><creator>Nam, Taewoo</creator><creator>Burdette, Graham</creator><creator>Yutko, Brian</creator><creator>Hansman, R. John</creator><creator>Mozdzanowska, Alex</creator><creator>Bonnefoy, Philippe A</creator><general>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140301</creationdate><title>Assessment of Carbon Dioxide Emission Metric Systems for an Aircraft Certification Standard</title><author>Lim, Dongwook ; Kirby, Michelle ; Nam, Taewoo ; Burdette, Graham ; Yutko, Brian ; Hansman, R. John ; Mozdzanowska, Alex ; Bonnefoy, Philippe A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a309t-fa0b54c4510bef694ba61da05a0fde916c85466f37e9dbeceb9eacff01bf8f293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aerospace industry</topic><topic>Aircraft</topic><topic>Aircraft accidents & safety</topic><topic>Aircraft fuels</topic><topic>Aviation</topic><topic>Aviation fuel</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Certification</topic><topic>Civil aviation</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Emission analysis</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Energy efficiency</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Fuel consumption</topic><topic>Fuel economy</topic><topic>International System of Units</topic><topic>Metric system</topic><topic>Takeoff</topic><topic>Weight</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lim, Dongwook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirby, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nam, Taewoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burdette, Graham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yutko, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansman, R. John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mozdzanowska, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonnefoy, Philippe A</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of aircraft</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lim, Dongwook</au><au>Kirby, Michelle</au><au>Nam, Taewoo</au><au>Burdette, Graham</au><au>Yutko, Brian</au><au>Hansman, R. John</au><au>Mozdzanowska, Alex</au><au>Bonnefoy, Philippe A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of Carbon Dioxide Emission Metric Systems for an Aircraft Certification Standard</atitle><jtitle>Journal of aircraft</jtitle><date>2014-03-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>559</spage><epage>570</epage><pages>559-570</pages><issn>0021-8669</issn><eissn>1533-3868</eissn><abstract>To mitigate aviation CO2 emissions, the International Civil Aviation Organization’s Committee on Aviation Environmental Protection is considering an aircraft CO2 emissions certification requirement. This paper presents an evaluation of potential CO2 metric systems for their suitability as a basis for an aircraft CO2 certification requirement. Candidate CO2 metric systems, consisting of a metric, a correlating parameter, evaluation conditions, and a notional limit line are assessed against a set of key criteria. The metric systems were chosen to reflect aircraft fuel consumption, which directly correlates with CO2 emissions for a given fuel type. Key criteria were identified to represent desirable attributes of the metric system, that is the ability to represent fuel efficiency performance improvements, validity across a range of aircraft types, correlation with fuel efficiency in actual operations, fairness across stakeholders, ease of measurement, and robustness against unintended consequences. The analysis showed a metric system consisting of a metric based on the inverse of the specific air range correlated with the maximum takeoff weight evaluated at 85% of maximum takeoff weight reasonably satisfied the key criteria.</abstract><cop>Virginia</cop><pub>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</pub><doi>10.2514/1.C032279</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8669 |
ispartof | Journal of aircraft, 2014-03, Vol.51 (2), p.559-570 |
issn | 0021-8669 1533-3868 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1512415861 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Aerospace industry Aircraft Aircraft accidents & safety Aircraft fuels Aviation Aviation fuel Carbon dioxide Certification Civil aviation Correlation Criteria Emission analysis Emissions Energy efficiency Environmental protection Fuel consumption Fuel economy International System of Units Metric system Takeoff Weight |
title | Assessment of Carbon Dioxide Emission Metric Systems for an Aircraft Certification Standard |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T16%3A02%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20Carbon%20Dioxide%20Emission%20Metric%20Systems%20for%20an%20Aircraft%20Certification%20Standard&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20aircraft&rft.au=Lim,%20Dongwook&rft.date=2014-03-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=559&rft.epage=570&rft.pages=559-570&rft.issn=0021-8669&rft.eissn=1533-3868&rft_id=info:doi/10.2514/1.C032279&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1530991722%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1512415861&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |