Field Evaluation of Open System Chambers for Measuring Whole Canopy Gas Exchanges

Field Evaluation of Open System Chambers for Measuring Whole Canopy Gas Exchanges

The ability to monitor whole canopy CO2 and H2O fluxes of crop plants in the field is needed for many research efforts ranging from plant breeding to the study of climate change effects on crops. Four portable, transparent, open system chambers for measuring canopy gas exchanges were field tested on...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Agronomy journal 2014-03, Vol.106 (2), p.537-544
Hauptverfasser: Baker, Jeffrey T., Gitz, Dennis C., Lascano, Robert J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Gas exchange
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 544
container_issue 2
container_start_page 537
container_title Agronomy journal
container_volume 106
creator Baker, Jeffrey T.
Gitz, Dennis C.
Lascano, Robert J.
description The ability to monitor whole canopy CO2 and H2O fluxes of crop plants in the field is needed for many research efforts ranging from plant breeding to the study of climate change effects on crops. Four portable, transparent, open system chambers for measuring canopy gas exchanges were field tested on well‐watered and fertilized cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) over 6 d at Lubbock, TX, in 2010. Our objective was to (i) characterize changes in canopy microclimate variables due to chamber enclosure and (ii) evaluate chamber‐to‐chamber variability in canopy gas‐exchange parameters on ground as well as leaf area basis. Chamber wall materials reduced photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) by about 13%. Programmable data loggers controlled variable speed fans and, with one minor exception, limited heat buildup in the chambers to a maximum of
doi_str_mv 10.2134/agronj2013.0449
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1509959037</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3255877001</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3259-bf26de60aa7faba8e1e93384879ed035043bc595d6a30f34b124d7acb57d52ed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLw0AUhQdRsFbXbgdcx955JZ2VlNBGS7X4wmWYJDdtSpqpM42af29rBZeuLhy-cy58hFwyuOZMyIFZONusODBxDVLqI9JjUqgAQqmOSQ8AeMB0yE_JmfcrAMa0ZD3yOKmwLuj4w9St2Va2obak8w029LnzW1zTeGnWGTpPS-voPRrfuqpZ0LelrZHGprGbjibG0_FXvjTNAv05OSlN7fHi9_bJ62T8Et8Gs3lyF49mQS640kFW8rDAEIyJSpOZITLUQgzlMNJYgFAgRZYrrYrQCCiFzBiXRWTyTEWF4liIPrk67G6cfW_Rb9OVbV2ze5kyBVorDSLaUYMDlTvrvcMy3bhqbVyXMkj33tI_b-ne265xc2h8VjV2_-HpKJnyUfI0f5jus5-Fb7r2dHc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1509959037</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Field Evaluation of Open System Chambers for Measuring Whole Canopy Gas Exchanges</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Baker, Jeffrey T. ; Gitz, Dennis C. ; Lascano, Robert J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Baker, Jeffrey T. ; Gitz, Dennis C. ; Lascano, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><description>The ability to monitor whole canopy CO2 and H2O fluxes of crop plants in the field is needed for many research efforts ranging from plant breeding to the study of climate change effects on crops. Four portable, transparent, open system chambers for measuring canopy gas exchanges were field tested on well‐watered and fertilized cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) over 6 d at Lubbock, TX, in 2010. Our objective was to (i) characterize changes in canopy microclimate variables due to chamber enclosure and (ii) evaluate chamber‐to‐chamber variability in canopy gas‐exchange parameters on ground as well as leaf area basis. Chamber wall materials reduced photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) by about 13%. Programmable data loggers controlled variable speed fans and, with one minor exception, limited heat buildup in the chambers to a maximum of &lt;1.0°C above ambient air temperature. Differentials between incoming and outgoing atmospheric CO2 and H2O concentrations were used to calculate canopy net assimilation (A) and transpiration (E) at 10‐s intervals using solenoid valve actuated sample lines connected to an infrared gas analyzer. Water use efficiency (WUE = A/E) was then calculated and these data were averaged over both 5‐min and hourly intervals. Coefficient of variation (CV) for midday A, E, and WUE averaged 12.3, 9.7, and 5.8%, respectively. Expressing these parameters on a canopy leaf area basis produced similar CV results. These results will help guide experimental design for future research using these or similar chambers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-1962</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0645</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2134/agronj2013.0449</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison: The American Society of Agronomy, Inc</publisher><subject>Gas exchange</subject><ispartof>Agronomy journal, 2014-03, Vol.106 (2), p.537-544</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2014 by the American Society of Agronomy, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Mar/Apr 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3259-bf26de60aa7faba8e1e93384879ed035043bc595d6a30f34b124d7acb57d52ed3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3259-bf26de60aa7faba8e1e93384879ed035043bc595d6a30f34b124d7acb57d52ed3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2134%2Fagronj2013.0449$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2134%2Fagronj2013.0449$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,27931,27932,45581,45582</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baker, Jeffrey T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gitz, Dennis C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lascano, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><title>Field Evaluation of Open System Chambers for Measuring Whole Canopy Gas Exchanges</title><title>Agronomy journal</title><description>The ability to monitor whole canopy CO2 and H2O fluxes of crop plants in the field is needed for many research efforts ranging from plant breeding to the study of climate change effects on crops. Four portable, transparent, open system chambers for measuring canopy gas exchanges were field tested on well‐watered and fertilized cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) over 6 d at Lubbock, TX, in 2010. Our objective was to (i) characterize changes in canopy microclimate variables due to chamber enclosure and (ii) evaluate chamber‐to‐chamber variability in canopy gas‐exchange parameters on ground as well as leaf area basis. Chamber wall materials reduced photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) by about 13%. Programmable data loggers controlled variable speed fans and, with one minor exception, limited heat buildup in the chambers to a maximum of &lt;1.0°C above ambient air temperature. Differentials between incoming and outgoing atmospheric CO2 and H2O concentrations were used to calculate canopy net assimilation (A) and transpiration (E) at 10‐s intervals using solenoid valve actuated sample lines connected to an infrared gas analyzer. Water use efficiency (WUE = A/E) was then calculated and these data were averaged over both 5‐min and hourly intervals. Coefficient of variation (CV) for midday A, E, and WUE averaged 12.3, 9.7, and 5.8%, respectively. Expressing these parameters on a canopy leaf area basis produced similar CV results. These results will help guide experimental design for future research using these or similar chambers.</description><subject>Gas exchange</subject><issn>0002-1962</issn><issn>1435-0645</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtLw0AUhQdRsFbXbgdcx955JZ2VlNBGS7X4wmWYJDdtSpqpM42af29rBZeuLhy-cy58hFwyuOZMyIFZONusODBxDVLqI9JjUqgAQqmOSQ8AeMB0yE_JmfcrAMa0ZD3yOKmwLuj4w9St2Va2obak8w029LnzW1zTeGnWGTpPS-voPRrfuqpZ0LelrZHGprGbjibG0_FXvjTNAv05OSlN7fHi9_bJ62T8Et8Gs3lyF49mQS640kFW8rDAEIyJSpOZITLUQgzlMNJYgFAgRZYrrYrQCCiFzBiXRWTyTEWF4liIPrk67G6cfW_Rb9OVbV2ze5kyBVorDSLaUYMDlTvrvcMy3bhqbVyXMkj33tI_b-ne265xc2h8VjV2_-HpKJnyUfI0f5jus5-Fb7r2dHc</recordid><startdate>201403</startdate><enddate>201403</enddate><creator>Baker, Jeffrey T.</creator><creator>Gitz, Dennis C.</creator><creator>Lascano, Robert J.</creator><general>The American Society of Agronomy, Inc</general><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201403</creationdate><title>Field Evaluation of Open System Chambers for Measuring Whole Canopy Gas Exchanges</title><author>Baker, Jeffrey T. ; Gitz, Dennis C. ; Lascano, Robert J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3259-bf26de60aa7faba8e1e93384879ed035043bc595d6a30f34b124d7acb57d52ed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Gas exchange</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baker, Jeffrey T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gitz, Dennis C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lascano, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baker, Jeffrey T.</au><au>Gitz, Dennis C.</au><au>Lascano, Robert J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Field Evaluation of Open System Chambers for Measuring Whole Canopy Gas Exchanges</atitle><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle><date>2014-03</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>106</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>537</spage><epage>544</epage><pages>537-544</pages><issn>0002-1962</issn><eissn>1435-0645</eissn><abstract>The ability to monitor whole canopy CO2 and H2O fluxes of crop plants in the field is needed for many research efforts ranging from plant breeding to the study of climate change effects on crops. Four portable, transparent, open system chambers for measuring canopy gas exchanges were field tested on well‐watered and fertilized cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) over 6 d at Lubbock, TX, in 2010. Our objective was to (i) characterize changes in canopy microclimate variables due to chamber enclosure and (ii) evaluate chamber‐to‐chamber variability in canopy gas‐exchange parameters on ground as well as leaf area basis. Chamber wall materials reduced photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) by about 13%. Programmable data loggers controlled variable speed fans and, with one minor exception, limited heat buildup in the chambers to a maximum of &lt;1.0°C above ambient air temperature. Differentials between incoming and outgoing atmospheric CO2 and H2O concentrations were used to calculate canopy net assimilation (A) and transpiration (E) at 10‐s intervals using solenoid valve actuated sample lines connected to an infrared gas analyzer. Water use efficiency (WUE = A/E) was then calculated and these data were averaged over both 5‐min and hourly intervals. Coefficient of variation (CV) for midday A, E, and WUE averaged 12.3, 9.7, and 5.8%, respectively. Expressing these parameters on a canopy leaf area basis produced similar CV results. These results will help guide experimental design for future research using these or similar chambers.</abstract><cop>Madison</cop><pub>The American Society of Agronomy, Inc</pub><doi>10.2134/agronj2013.0449</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-1962
ispartof Agronomy journal, 2014-03, Vol.106 (2), p.537-544
issn 0002-1962
1435-0645
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1509959037
source Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Gas exchange
title Field Evaluation of Open System Chambers for Measuring Whole Canopy Gas Exchanges
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-05T02%3A01%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Field%20Evaluation%20of%20Open%20System%20Chambers%20for%20Measuring%20Whole%20Canopy%20Gas%20Exchanges&rft.jtitle=Agronomy%20journal&rft.au=Baker,%20Jeffrey%20T.&rft.date=2014-03&rft.volume=106&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=537&rft.epage=544&rft.pages=537-544&rft.issn=0002-1962&rft.eissn=1435-0645&rft_id=info:doi/10.2134/agronj2013.0449&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3255877001%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1509959037&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true