Development of a Preference-Based Index From the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25
Understanding how individuals value health states is central to patient-centered care and to health policy decision making. Generic preference-based measures of health may not effectively capture the impact of ocular diseases. Recently, 6 items from the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of ophthalmology (1960) 2014-03, Vol.132 (3), p.310 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 310 |
container_title | Archives of ophthalmology (1960) |
container_volume | 132 |
creator | Rentz, Anne M Kowalski, Jonathan W Walt, John G Hays, Ron D Brazier, John E Yu, Ren Lee, Paul Bressler, Neil Revicki, Dennis A |
description | Understanding how individuals value health states is central to patient-centered care and to health policy decision making. Generic preference-based measures of health may not effectively capture the impact of ocular diseases. Recently, 6 items from the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 were used to develop the Visual Function Questionnaire-Utility Index health state classification, which defines visual function health states. To describe elicitation of preferences for health states generated from the Visual Function Questionnaire-Utility Index health state classification and development of an algorithm to estimate health preference scores for any health state. Nonintervention, cross-sectional study of the general community in 4 countries (Australia, Canada, United Kingdom, and United States). A total of 607 adult participants were recruited from local newspaper advertisements. In the United Kingdom, an existing database of participants from previous studies was used for recruitment. Eight of 15 625 possible health states from the Visual Function Questionnaire-Utility Index were valued using time trade-off technique. A ... severity score was calculated for Visual Function Questionnaire-Utility Index-defined health states using item response theory analysis. Regression models were then used to develop an algorithm to assign health state preference values for all potential health states defined by the Visual Function Questionnaire-Utility Index. Health state preference values for the 8 states ranged from a mean (SD) of 0.343 (0.395) to 0.956 (0.124). As expected, preference values declined with worsening visual function. Results indicate that the Visual Function Questionnaire-Utility Index describes states that participants view as spanning most of the continuum from full health to dead. Visual Function Questionnaire-Utility Index health state classification produces health preference scores that can be estimated in vision-related studies that include the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25. These preference scores may be of value for estimating utilities in economic and health policy analyses. (ProQuest: ... denotes formulae/symbols omitted.) |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1509457657</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3254373721</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_15094576573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjMsKwjAURIMoWB__cMF1IKkm1a2PohtRELcS2lus1KTmIfr3tiCuXc1hzjAdEsVczqnkybT7Yyn6ZODcjTEmOVtE5LrGJ1amvqP2YApQcLBYoEWdIV0qhznsdI4vSK25g78i7JUvjVYVbN7YOOdLHzzCuXShKdOgs9bDMaBrQavSIo3FiPQKVTkcf3NIJunmtNrS2ppHu73cTLDNr7twwRYzkUiRTP9bfQAVsUh8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1509457657</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development of a Preference-Based Index From the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Rentz, Anne M ; Kowalski, Jonathan W ; Walt, John G ; Hays, Ron D ; Brazier, John E ; Yu, Ren ; Lee, Paul ; Bressler, Neil ; Revicki, Dennis A</creator><creatorcontrib>Rentz, Anne M ; Kowalski, Jonathan W ; Walt, John G ; Hays, Ron D ; Brazier, John E ; Yu, Ren ; Lee, Paul ; Bressler, Neil ; Revicki, Dennis A</creatorcontrib><description>Understanding how individuals value health states is central to patient-centered care and to health policy decision making. Generic preference-based measures of health may not effectively capture the impact of ocular diseases. Recently, 6 items from the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 were used to develop the Visual Function Questionnaire-Utility Index health state classification, which defines visual function health states. To describe elicitation of preferences for health states generated from the Visual Function Questionnaire-Utility Index health state classification and development of an algorithm to estimate health preference scores for any health state. Nonintervention, cross-sectional study of the general community in 4 countries (Australia, Canada, United Kingdom, and United States). A total of 607 adult participants were recruited from local newspaper advertisements. In the United Kingdom, an existing database of participants from previous studies was used for recruitment. Eight of 15 625 possible health states from the Visual Function Questionnaire-Utility Index were valued using time trade-off technique. A ... severity score was calculated for Visual Function Questionnaire-Utility Index-defined health states using item response theory analysis. Regression models were then used to develop an algorithm to assign health state preference values for all potential health states defined by the Visual Function Questionnaire-Utility Index. Health state preference values for the 8 states ranged from a mean (SD) of 0.343 (0.395) to 0.956 (0.124). As expected, preference values declined with worsening visual function. Results indicate that the Visual Function Questionnaire-Utility Index describes states that participants view as spanning most of the continuum from full health to dead. Visual Function Questionnaire-Utility Index health state classification produces health preference scores that can be estimated in vision-related studies that include the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25. These preference scores may be of value for estimating utilities in economic and health policy analyses. (ProQuest: ... denotes formulae/symbols omitted.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-6165</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-6173</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: American Medical Association</publisher><subject>Decision making ; Eyes & eyesight ; Health care policy ; International comparisons ; Ophthalmology ; Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Archives of ophthalmology (1960), 2014-03, Vol.132 (3), p.310</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Medical Association Mar 2014</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rentz, Anne M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kowalski, Jonathan W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walt, John G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hays, Ron D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brazier, John E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Ren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bressler, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Revicki, Dennis A</creatorcontrib><title>Development of a Preference-Based Index From the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25</title><title>Archives of ophthalmology (1960)</title><description>Understanding how individuals value health states is central to patient-centered care and to health policy decision making. Generic preference-based measures of health may not effectively capture the impact of ocular diseases. Recently, 6 items from the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 were used to develop the Visual Function Questionnaire-Utility Index health state classification, which defines visual function health states. To describe elicitation of preferences for health states generated from the Visual Function Questionnaire-Utility Index health state classification and development of an algorithm to estimate health preference scores for any health state. Nonintervention, cross-sectional study of the general community in 4 countries (Australia, Canada, United Kingdom, and United States). A total of 607 adult participants were recruited from local newspaper advertisements. In the United Kingdom, an existing database of participants from previous studies was used for recruitment. Eight of 15 625 possible health states from the Visual Function Questionnaire-Utility Index were valued using time trade-off technique. A ... severity score was calculated for Visual Function Questionnaire-Utility Index-defined health states using item response theory analysis. Regression models were then used to develop an algorithm to assign health state preference values for all potential health states defined by the Visual Function Questionnaire-Utility Index. Health state preference values for the 8 states ranged from a mean (SD) of 0.343 (0.395) to 0.956 (0.124). As expected, preference values declined with worsening visual function. Results indicate that the Visual Function Questionnaire-Utility Index describes states that participants view as spanning most of the continuum from full health to dead. Visual Function Questionnaire-Utility Index health state classification produces health preference scores that can be estimated in vision-related studies that include the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25. These preference scores may be of value for estimating utilities in economic and health policy analyses. (ProQuest: ... denotes formulae/symbols omitted.)</description><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Eyes & eyesight</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>International comparisons</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><issn>2168-6165</issn><issn>2168-6173</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNjMsKwjAURIMoWB__cMF1IKkm1a2PohtRELcS2lus1KTmIfr3tiCuXc1hzjAdEsVczqnkybT7Yyn6ZODcjTEmOVtE5LrGJ1amvqP2YApQcLBYoEWdIV0qhznsdI4vSK25g78i7JUvjVYVbN7YOOdLHzzCuXShKdOgs9bDMaBrQavSIo3FiPQKVTkcf3NIJunmtNrS2ppHu73cTLDNr7twwRYzkUiRTP9bfQAVsUh8</recordid><startdate>20140301</startdate><enddate>20140301</enddate><creator>Rentz, Anne M</creator><creator>Kowalski, Jonathan W</creator><creator>Walt, John G</creator><creator>Hays, Ron D</creator><creator>Brazier, John E</creator><creator>Yu, Ren</creator><creator>Lee, Paul</creator><creator>Bressler, Neil</creator><creator>Revicki, Dennis A</creator><general>American Medical Association</general><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140301</creationdate><title>Development of a Preference-Based Index From the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25</title><author>Rentz, Anne M ; Kowalski, Jonathan W ; Walt, John G ; Hays, Ron D ; Brazier, John E ; Yu, Ren ; Lee, Paul ; Bressler, Neil ; Revicki, Dennis A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_15094576573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Eyes & eyesight</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>International comparisons</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rentz, Anne M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kowalski, Jonathan W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walt, John G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hays, Ron D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brazier, John E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Ren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bressler, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Revicki, Dennis A</creatorcontrib><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Archives of ophthalmology (1960)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rentz, Anne M</au><au>Kowalski, Jonathan W</au><au>Walt, John G</au><au>Hays, Ron D</au><au>Brazier, John E</au><au>Yu, Ren</au><au>Lee, Paul</au><au>Bressler, Neil</au><au>Revicki, Dennis A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development of a Preference-Based Index From the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25</atitle><jtitle>Archives of ophthalmology (1960)</jtitle><date>2014-03-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>132</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>310</spage><pages>310-</pages><issn>2168-6165</issn><eissn>2168-6173</eissn><abstract>Understanding how individuals value health states is central to patient-centered care and to health policy decision making. Generic preference-based measures of health may not effectively capture the impact of ocular diseases. Recently, 6 items from the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 were used to develop the Visual Function Questionnaire-Utility Index health state classification, which defines visual function health states. To describe elicitation of preferences for health states generated from the Visual Function Questionnaire-Utility Index health state classification and development of an algorithm to estimate health preference scores for any health state. Nonintervention, cross-sectional study of the general community in 4 countries (Australia, Canada, United Kingdom, and United States). A total of 607 adult participants were recruited from local newspaper advertisements. In the United Kingdom, an existing database of participants from previous studies was used for recruitment. Eight of 15 625 possible health states from the Visual Function Questionnaire-Utility Index were valued using time trade-off technique. A ... severity score was calculated for Visual Function Questionnaire-Utility Index-defined health states using item response theory analysis. Regression models were then used to develop an algorithm to assign health state preference values for all potential health states defined by the Visual Function Questionnaire-Utility Index. Health state preference values for the 8 states ranged from a mean (SD) of 0.343 (0.395) to 0.956 (0.124). As expected, preference values declined with worsening visual function. Results indicate that the Visual Function Questionnaire-Utility Index describes states that participants view as spanning most of the continuum from full health to dead. Visual Function Questionnaire-Utility Index health state classification produces health preference scores that can be estimated in vision-related studies that include the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25. These preference scores may be of value for estimating utilities in economic and health policy analyses. (ProQuest: ... denotes formulae/symbols omitted.)</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>American Medical Association</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2168-6165 |
ispartof | Archives of ophthalmology (1960), 2014-03, Vol.132 (3), p.310 |
issn | 2168-6165 2168-6173 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1509457657 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Decision making Eyes & eyesight Health care policy International comparisons Ophthalmology Questionnaires |
title | Development of a Preference-Based Index From the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T16%3A59%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20of%20a%20Preference-Based%20Index%20From%20the%20National%20Eye%20Institute%20Visual%20Function%20Questionnaire-25&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20ophthalmology%20(1960)&rft.au=Rentz,%20Anne%20M&rft.date=2014-03-01&rft.volume=132&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=310&rft.pages=310-&rft.issn=2168-6165&rft.eissn=2168-6173&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3254373721%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1509457657&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |