Formative Assessment of Collaborative Teams (FACT): Development of a Grade-Level Instructional Team Checklist

Professional Learning Communities (PLCs) have become increasingly popular in schools. PLCs are groups of teachers, administrators, parents, and students who collaborate to improve their practices and focus on results (DuFour, 2004). Grade-level and department teachers participate in regularly schedu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:NASSP bulletin 2014-03, Vol.98 (1), p.26-52
Hauptverfasser: Taylor, Matthew J., Hallam, Pamela R., Charlton, Cade T., Wall, D. Gary
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 52
container_issue 1
container_start_page 26
container_title NASSP bulletin
container_volume 98
creator Taylor, Matthew J.
Hallam, Pamela R.
Charlton, Cade T.
Wall, D. Gary
description Professional Learning Communities (PLCs) have become increasingly popular in schools. PLCs are groups of teachers, administrators, parents, and students who collaborate to improve their practices and focus on results (DuFour, 2004). Grade-level and department teachers participate in regularly scheduled collaborative team meetings; however, many school leaders lack suitable tools to evaluate fidelity to the PLC model. To address this deficit, we developed a tutorial checklist called the Formative Assessment of Collaborative Teams (FACT) through an action research approach. This article discusses the context of grade-level and department collaborative teams where much of the work of implementing the PLC model takes place. Working alongside practitioners in this context, we developed, implemented, and validated the FACT tool. This article discusses practitioners’ reactions to the tool during these processes, including observations conducted using FACT at several schools. The results of this process suggest that FACT is consistent with the elements of effective PLCs, confirming that it discriminates among collaborative teams within and across schools.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0192636513514109
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1506147538</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1019003</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_0192636513514109</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3242478461</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c199t-ff3b3165a03b8396bb5065aeff111d2672a5c760a115e3cea2f817d00ac89b9d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLxDAUhYMoWEf3boSCG11E722atlmWMvXBgJu6LmmbSId2MiYdwX9vSkVEcHW5fOcBh5BLhDvENL0HFFHCEo6MY4wgjkiAggHFGPgxCWZMZ35KzpzbAgAiRgGJSmNHOfUfKsydU86NajeFRoeFGQbZGLuwSsnRhTdlXlS35-REy8Gpi--7Iq_luioe6ebl4anIN7RFISaqNWsYJlwCazImkqbh4D-ltW_uoiSNJG_TBCQiV6xVMtIZph2AbDPRiI6tyPWSu7fm_aDcVG_Nwe58ZY0-CuOUs8yrYFG11jhnla73th-l_awR6nmZ-u8y3nK1WJTt2x_5-hm9EoB5Thfu5Jv6Vfpf3heHuWl-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1506147538</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Formative Assessment of Collaborative Teams (FACT): Development of a Grade-Level Instructional Team Checklist</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>Taylor, Matthew J. ; Hallam, Pamela R. ; Charlton, Cade T. ; Wall, D. Gary</creator><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Matthew J. ; Hallam, Pamela R. ; Charlton, Cade T. ; Wall, D. Gary</creatorcontrib><description>Professional Learning Communities (PLCs) have become increasingly popular in schools. PLCs are groups of teachers, administrators, parents, and students who collaborate to improve their practices and focus on results (DuFour, 2004). Grade-level and department teachers participate in regularly scheduled collaborative team meetings; however, many school leaders lack suitable tools to evaluate fidelity to the PLC model. To address this deficit, we developed a tutorial checklist called the Formative Assessment of Collaborative Teams (FACT) through an action research approach. This article discusses the context of grade-level and department collaborative teams where much of the work of implementing the PLC model takes place. Working alongside practitioners in this context, we developed, implemented, and validated the FACT tool. This article discusses practitioners’ reactions to the tool during these processes, including observations conducted using FACT at several schools. The results of this process suggest that FACT is consistent with the elements of effective PLCs, confirming that it discriminates among collaborative teams within and across schools.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0192-6365</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1930-1405</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0192636513514109</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NASBBZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Academic Achievement ; Action Research ; Check Lists ; Collaboration ; Collegiality ; Communities of Practice ; Community Relations ; Community support ; Cooperation ; Correlation ; Definitions ; Departments ; Educational Change ; Educational Improvement ; Elementary School Teachers ; Elementary Schools ; Formative Evaluation ; Instructional Leadership ; Interprofessional Relationship ; Leaders ; Learning ; Learning Activities ; Measures (Individuals) ; Principals ; Professional Training ; Program Implementation ; Questionnaires ; R&amp;D ; Reliability ; Research &amp; development ; Research Methodology ; Responsibilities ; School Culture ; School districts ; School principals ; Student Attitudes ; Student Experience ; Student Improvement ; Surveys ; Teacher Collaboration ; Teacher Role ; Teachers ; Teaching ; Teaching Methods ; Team Teaching ; Teamwork ; Utah ; Validity</subject><ispartof>NASSP bulletin, 2014-03, Vol.98 (1), p.26-52</ispartof><rights>2013 SAGE Publications</rights><rights>Copyright National Association of Secondary School Principals Mar 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c199t-ff3b3165a03b8396bb5065aeff111d2672a5c760a115e3cea2f817d00ac89b9d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0192636513514109$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0192636513514109$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1019003$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Matthew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hallam, Pamela R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charlton, Cade T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wall, D. Gary</creatorcontrib><title>Formative Assessment of Collaborative Teams (FACT): Development of a Grade-Level Instructional Team Checklist</title><title>NASSP bulletin</title><description>Professional Learning Communities (PLCs) have become increasingly popular in schools. PLCs are groups of teachers, administrators, parents, and students who collaborate to improve their practices and focus on results (DuFour, 2004). Grade-level and department teachers participate in regularly scheduled collaborative team meetings; however, many school leaders lack suitable tools to evaluate fidelity to the PLC model. To address this deficit, we developed a tutorial checklist called the Formative Assessment of Collaborative Teams (FACT) through an action research approach. This article discusses the context of grade-level and department collaborative teams where much of the work of implementing the PLC model takes place. Working alongside practitioners in this context, we developed, implemented, and validated the FACT tool. This article discusses practitioners’ reactions to the tool during these processes, including observations conducted using FACT at several schools. The results of this process suggest that FACT is consistent with the elements of effective PLCs, confirming that it discriminates among collaborative teams within and across schools.</description><subject>Academic Achievement</subject><subject>Action Research</subject><subject>Check Lists</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Collegiality</subject><subject>Communities of Practice</subject><subject>Community Relations</subject><subject>Community support</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Definitions</subject><subject>Departments</subject><subject>Educational Change</subject><subject>Educational Improvement</subject><subject>Elementary School Teachers</subject><subject>Elementary Schools</subject><subject>Formative Evaluation</subject><subject>Instructional Leadership</subject><subject>Interprofessional Relationship</subject><subject>Leaders</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning Activities</subject><subject>Measures (Individuals)</subject><subject>Principals</subject><subject>Professional Training</subject><subject>Program Implementation</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>R&amp;D</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Research &amp; development</subject><subject>Research Methodology</subject><subject>Responsibilities</subject><subject>School Culture</subject><subject>School districts</subject><subject>School principals</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Student Experience</subject><subject>Student Improvement</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Teacher Collaboration</subject><subject>Teacher Role</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Team Teaching</subject><subject>Teamwork</subject><subject>Utah</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0192-6365</issn><issn>1930-1405</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLxDAUhYMoWEf3boSCG11E722atlmWMvXBgJu6LmmbSId2MiYdwX9vSkVEcHW5fOcBh5BLhDvENL0HFFHCEo6MY4wgjkiAggHFGPgxCWZMZ35KzpzbAgAiRgGJSmNHOfUfKsydU86NajeFRoeFGQbZGLuwSsnRhTdlXlS35-REy8Gpi--7Iq_luioe6ebl4anIN7RFISaqNWsYJlwCazImkqbh4D-ltW_uoiSNJG_TBCQiV6xVMtIZph2AbDPRiI6tyPWSu7fm_aDcVG_Nwe58ZY0-CuOUs8yrYFG11jhnla73th-l_awR6nmZ-u8y3nK1WJTt2x_5-hm9EoB5Thfu5Jv6Vfpf3heHuWl-</recordid><startdate>201403</startdate><enddate>201403</enddate><creator>Taylor, Matthew J.</creator><creator>Hallam, Pamela R.</creator><creator>Charlton, Cade T.</creator><creator>Wall, D. Gary</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201403</creationdate><title>Formative Assessment of Collaborative Teams (FACT)</title><author>Taylor, Matthew J. ; Hallam, Pamela R. ; Charlton, Cade T. ; Wall, D. Gary</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c199t-ff3b3165a03b8396bb5065aeff111d2672a5c760a115e3cea2f817d00ac89b9d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Academic Achievement</topic><topic>Action Research</topic><topic>Check Lists</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Collegiality</topic><topic>Communities of Practice</topic><topic>Community Relations</topic><topic>Community support</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Definitions</topic><topic>Departments</topic><topic>Educational Change</topic><topic>Educational Improvement</topic><topic>Elementary School Teachers</topic><topic>Elementary Schools</topic><topic>Formative Evaluation</topic><topic>Instructional Leadership</topic><topic>Interprofessional Relationship</topic><topic>Leaders</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning Activities</topic><topic>Measures (Individuals)</topic><topic>Principals</topic><topic>Professional Training</topic><topic>Program Implementation</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>R&amp;D</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Research &amp; development</topic><topic>Research Methodology</topic><topic>Responsibilities</topic><topic>School Culture</topic><topic>School districts</topic><topic>School principals</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Student Experience</topic><topic>Student Improvement</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Teacher Collaboration</topic><topic>Teacher Role</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Team Teaching</topic><topic>Teamwork</topic><topic>Utah</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Matthew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hallam, Pamela R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charlton, Cade T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wall, D. Gary</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>NASSP bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Taylor, Matthew J.</au><au>Hallam, Pamela R.</au><au>Charlton, Cade T.</au><au>Wall, D. Gary</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1019003</ericid><atitle>Formative Assessment of Collaborative Teams (FACT): Development of a Grade-Level Instructional Team Checklist</atitle><jtitle>NASSP bulletin</jtitle><date>2014-03</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>98</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>26</spage><epage>52</epage><pages>26-52</pages><issn>0192-6365</issn><eissn>1930-1405</eissn><coden>NASBBZ</coden><abstract>Professional Learning Communities (PLCs) have become increasingly popular in schools. PLCs are groups of teachers, administrators, parents, and students who collaborate to improve their practices and focus on results (DuFour, 2004). Grade-level and department teachers participate in regularly scheduled collaborative team meetings; however, many school leaders lack suitable tools to evaluate fidelity to the PLC model. To address this deficit, we developed a tutorial checklist called the Formative Assessment of Collaborative Teams (FACT) through an action research approach. This article discusses the context of grade-level and department collaborative teams where much of the work of implementing the PLC model takes place. Working alongside practitioners in this context, we developed, implemented, and validated the FACT tool. This article discusses practitioners’ reactions to the tool during these processes, including observations conducted using FACT at several schools. The results of this process suggest that FACT is consistent with the elements of effective PLCs, confirming that it discriminates among collaborative teams within and across schools.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0192636513514109</doi><tpages>27</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0192-6365
ispartof NASSP bulletin, 2014-03, Vol.98 (1), p.26-52
issn 0192-6365
1930-1405
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1506147538
source Access via SAGE
subjects Academic Achievement
Action Research
Check Lists
Collaboration
Collegiality
Communities of Practice
Community Relations
Community support
Cooperation
Correlation
Definitions
Departments
Educational Change
Educational Improvement
Elementary School Teachers
Elementary Schools
Formative Evaluation
Instructional Leadership
Interprofessional Relationship
Leaders
Learning
Learning Activities
Measures (Individuals)
Principals
Professional Training
Program Implementation
Questionnaires
R&D
Reliability
Research & development
Research Methodology
Responsibilities
School Culture
School districts
School principals
Student Attitudes
Student Experience
Student Improvement
Surveys
Teacher Collaboration
Teacher Role
Teachers
Teaching
Teaching Methods
Team Teaching
Teamwork
Utah
Validity
title Formative Assessment of Collaborative Teams (FACT): Development of a Grade-Level Instructional Team Checklist
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T23%3A25%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Formative%20Assessment%20of%20Collaborative%20Teams%20(FACT):%20Development%20of%20a%20Grade-Level%20Instructional%20Team%20Checklist&rft.jtitle=NASSP%20bulletin&rft.au=Taylor,%20Matthew%20J.&rft.date=2014-03&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=26&rft.epage=52&rft.pages=26-52&rft.issn=0192-6365&rft.eissn=1930-1405&rft.coden=NASBBZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0192636513514109&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3242478461%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1506147538&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1019003&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0192636513514109&rfr_iscdi=true