A subgroup analysis in hispanic patients with allergic rhinitis of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray for sinus pain and pressure caused by nasal congestion
Sinus pain and pressure (SP+P) is a common symptom of allergic rhinitis. Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray (FP) has been shown to reduce SP+P associated with allergies. Most research studies report findings for Caucasian and African American subgroups. Few research studies report findings f...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of allergy and clinical immunology 2004-02, Vol.113 (2), p.S199-S199 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Sinus pain and pressure (SP+P) is a common symptom of allergic rhinitis. Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray (FP) has been shown to reduce SP+P associated with allergies. Most research studies report findings for Caucasian and African American subgroups. Few research studies report findings for Hispanic patients, a growing population in the United States.
Two multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies compared daily dosing of FP 200μg (FP200QD) or placebo in 401 patients (age 12-74) with moderate-to-severe SP+P and nasal congestion. Of these, 115 Hispanic patients received either FP200QD (n=53) or placebo (n=62). Patients used a 100mm visual analog scale each evening to assess the severity of SP+P experienced over the day. Mean change from baseline for SP+P was determined over the 14-day treatment period. Descriptive statistics were displayed for the Hispanic subgroup and the magnitude of improvement was compared to the total population.
Mean (SE) SP+P scores at baseline were similar for the total populations and Hispanic subgroups ranging from 71.0 (1.98) to 80.3 (2.10). Over the 14-day treatment period, mean changes (SE) from baseline in Study FNM40184 and FNM40185, respectively, were -19.6 (2.41) and -17.8 (2.10) for placebo compared with -26.4 (2.20) and -27.8 (2.41) for FP200QD in the total population (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0091-6749 1097-6825 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.01.157 |