Colorectal anastomosis facilitated by the use of the LigaSure^sup ^ sealing device: comparative study in an animal model
Recently, there has been speculation about the possibility of fusing intestinal tissue using bipolar sealing devices. In this study we compare in a porcine model the anastomoses created using the LigaSure^sup ^ device with those created with a stapler after section and closure of a rectal stump. Thi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Surgical endoscopy 2014-02, Vol.28 (2), p.508 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 508 |
container_title | Surgical endoscopy |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Sánchez-de Pedro, Francisco Moreno-sanz, Carlos Morandeira-rivas, Antonio Tenías-burillo, Jose María Alhambra-rodríguez De Guzmán, Cristina |
description | Recently, there has been speculation about the possibility of fusing intestinal tissue using bipolar sealing devices. In this study we compare in a porcine model the anastomoses created using the LigaSure^sup ^ device with those created with a stapler after section and closure of a rectal stump. Thirty pigs underwent laparoscopic colorectal anastomosis. In group A (n = 15), the division of the intestine and distal stump closure were done with a 10-mm LigaSure Atlas^sup ^ device. In group B, these steps were carried out using an endoscopic stapler. Subsequently, the colorectal anastomosis was performed using circular stapling in both groups. The 4-week follow-up included health status, weight gain, blood tests, X-rays, and colonoscopy. Anastomotic tissue was processed to study the mechanical tensile strength and histopathology. There was no difference in the rate of conversion to open surgery or in average operating time between the groups. In the sealing device group, there was a significantly higher rate of failure in rectal stump closure (p = 0.042). There was one death in group B due to anastomotic leak. There was no difference in adhesion formation or stenosis. Mid-section anastomosis area was 89.7 mm^sup 2^ in group A compared with 100 mm^sup 2^ in group B (p = 0.52). In tensile strength studies, the maximum load resisted by the sample was 13.8 ± 4.9 N (group A) versus 15.7 ± 4.4 N (group B) (p = 0.17). There was no difference between the groups in degree of reepithelialization, number of inflammatory cells, or the presence of microabscesses. Division and sealing of the rectal stump with the LigaSure^sup ^ device is feasible in the proposed experimental model, but it is less reliable than conventional closure with a stapler, since it has a significantly greater failure rate. Therefore, The LigaSure^sup ^ device should not be used for this purpose in the clinical setting as this could lead to serious and dramatic complications.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00464-013-3194-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1502239219</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3230679591</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_15022392193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjU9LAzEUxIMouFo_gLcHnqP5V2u8FsVDb3puSXff1pTsZs1LivvtDeIHEAZmYH7MMHYrxb0UYvVAQphHw4XUXEtr-HzGGmm04krJp3PWCKsFVytrLtkV0VFU3Mplw77XMcSEbXYB3OgoxyGSJ-hd64PPLmMH-xnyJ0IhhNj_xo0_uPeScEtlgi0QuuDHA3R48i0-QxuHySWX_QmBculm8GNdr_JD_Rlih2HBLnoXCG_-_Jrdvb58rN_4lOJXQcq7YyxprNVOLoVS2ipp9f-oH2zcVH4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1502239219</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Colorectal anastomosis facilitated by the use of the LigaSure^sup ^ sealing device: comparative study in an animal model</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Sánchez-de Pedro, Francisco ; Moreno-sanz, Carlos ; Morandeira-rivas, Antonio ; Tenías-burillo, Jose María ; Alhambra-rodríguez De Guzmán, Cristina</creator><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-de Pedro, Francisco ; Moreno-sanz, Carlos ; Morandeira-rivas, Antonio ; Tenías-burillo, Jose María ; Alhambra-rodríguez De Guzmán, Cristina</creatorcontrib><description>Recently, there has been speculation about the possibility of fusing intestinal tissue using bipolar sealing devices. In this study we compare in a porcine model the anastomoses created using the LigaSure^sup ^ device with those created with a stapler after section and closure of a rectal stump. Thirty pigs underwent laparoscopic colorectal anastomosis. In group A (n = 15), the division of the intestine and distal stump closure were done with a 10-mm LigaSure Atlas^sup ^ device. In group B, these steps were carried out using an endoscopic stapler. Subsequently, the colorectal anastomosis was performed using circular stapling in both groups. The 4-week follow-up included health status, weight gain, blood tests, X-rays, and colonoscopy. Anastomotic tissue was processed to study the mechanical tensile strength and histopathology. There was no difference in the rate of conversion to open surgery or in average operating time between the groups. In the sealing device group, there was a significantly higher rate of failure in rectal stump closure (p = 0.042). There was one death in group B due to anastomotic leak. There was no difference in adhesion formation or stenosis. Mid-section anastomosis area was 89.7 mm^sup 2^ in group A compared with 100 mm^sup 2^ in group B (p = 0.52). In tensile strength studies, the maximum load resisted by the sample was 13.8 ± 4.9 N (group A) versus 15.7 ± 4.4 N (group B) (p = 0.17). There was no difference between the groups in degree of reepithelialization, number of inflammatory cells, or the presence of microabscesses. Division and sealing of the rectal stump with the LigaSure^sup ^ device is feasible in the proposed experimental model, but it is less reliable than conventional closure with a stapler, since it has a significantly greater failure rate. Therefore, The LigaSure^sup ^ device should not be used for this purpose in the clinical setting as this could lead to serious and dramatic complications.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0930-2794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2218</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-3194-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Animals ; Appendectomy ; Blood tests ; Colonoscopy ; Dissection ; Endoscopy ; Laparoscopy ; Surgery ; Surgical anastomosis ; Tensile strength</subject><ispartof>Surgical endoscopy, 2014-02, Vol.28 (2), p.508</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-de Pedro, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreno-sanz, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morandeira-rivas, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tenías-burillo, Jose María</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alhambra-rodríguez De Guzmán, Cristina</creatorcontrib><title>Colorectal anastomosis facilitated by the use of the LigaSure^sup ^ sealing device: comparative study in an animal model</title><title>Surgical endoscopy</title><description>Recently, there has been speculation about the possibility of fusing intestinal tissue using bipolar sealing devices. In this study we compare in a porcine model the anastomoses created using the LigaSure^sup ^ device with those created with a stapler after section and closure of a rectal stump. Thirty pigs underwent laparoscopic colorectal anastomosis. In group A (n = 15), the division of the intestine and distal stump closure were done with a 10-mm LigaSure Atlas^sup ^ device. In group B, these steps were carried out using an endoscopic stapler. Subsequently, the colorectal anastomosis was performed using circular stapling in both groups. The 4-week follow-up included health status, weight gain, blood tests, X-rays, and colonoscopy. Anastomotic tissue was processed to study the mechanical tensile strength and histopathology. There was no difference in the rate of conversion to open surgery or in average operating time between the groups. In the sealing device group, there was a significantly higher rate of failure in rectal stump closure (p = 0.042). There was one death in group B due to anastomotic leak. There was no difference in adhesion formation or stenosis. Mid-section anastomosis area was 89.7 mm^sup 2^ in group A compared with 100 mm^sup 2^ in group B (p = 0.52). In tensile strength studies, the maximum load resisted by the sample was 13.8 ± 4.9 N (group A) versus 15.7 ± 4.4 N (group B) (p = 0.17). There was no difference between the groups in degree of reepithelialization, number of inflammatory cells, or the presence of microabscesses. Division and sealing of the rectal stump with the LigaSure^sup ^ device is feasible in the proposed experimental model, but it is less reliable than conventional closure with a stapler, since it has a significantly greater failure rate. Therefore, The LigaSure^sup ^ device should not be used for this purpose in the clinical setting as this could lead to serious and dramatic complications.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Appendectomy</subject><subject>Blood tests</subject><subject>Colonoscopy</subject><subject>Dissection</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical anastomosis</subject><subject>Tensile strength</subject><issn>0930-2794</issn><issn>1432-2218</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjU9LAzEUxIMouFo_gLcHnqP5V2u8FsVDb3puSXff1pTsZs1LivvtDeIHEAZmYH7MMHYrxb0UYvVAQphHw4XUXEtr-HzGGmm04krJp3PWCKsFVytrLtkV0VFU3Mplw77XMcSEbXYB3OgoxyGSJ-hd64PPLmMH-xnyJ0IhhNj_xo0_uPeScEtlgi0QuuDHA3R48i0-QxuHySWX_QmBculm8GNdr_JD_Rlih2HBLnoXCG_-_Jrdvb58rN_4lOJXQcq7YyxprNVOLoVS2ipp9f-oH2zcVH4</recordid><startdate>20140201</startdate><enddate>20140201</enddate><creator>Sánchez-de Pedro, Francisco</creator><creator>Moreno-sanz, Carlos</creator><creator>Morandeira-rivas, Antonio</creator><creator>Tenías-burillo, Jose María</creator><creator>Alhambra-rodríguez De Guzmán, Cristina</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140201</creationdate><title>Colorectal anastomosis facilitated by the use of the LigaSure^sup ^ sealing device: comparative study in an animal model</title><author>Sánchez-de Pedro, Francisco ; Moreno-sanz, Carlos ; Morandeira-rivas, Antonio ; Tenías-burillo, Jose María ; Alhambra-rodríguez De Guzmán, Cristina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_15022392193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Appendectomy</topic><topic>Blood tests</topic><topic>Colonoscopy</topic><topic>Dissection</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical anastomosis</topic><topic>Tensile strength</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-de Pedro, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreno-sanz, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morandeira-rivas, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tenías-burillo, Jose María</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alhambra-rodríguez De Guzmán, Cristina</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sánchez-de Pedro, Francisco</au><au>Moreno-sanz, Carlos</au><au>Morandeira-rivas, Antonio</au><au>Tenías-burillo, Jose María</au><au>Alhambra-rodríguez De Guzmán, Cristina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Colorectal anastomosis facilitated by the use of the LigaSure^sup ^ sealing device: comparative study in an animal model</atitle><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle><date>2014-02-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>508</spage><pages>508-</pages><issn>0930-2794</issn><eissn>1432-2218</eissn><abstract>Recently, there has been speculation about the possibility of fusing intestinal tissue using bipolar sealing devices. In this study we compare in a porcine model the anastomoses created using the LigaSure^sup ^ device with those created with a stapler after section and closure of a rectal stump. Thirty pigs underwent laparoscopic colorectal anastomosis. In group A (n = 15), the division of the intestine and distal stump closure were done with a 10-mm LigaSure Atlas^sup ^ device. In group B, these steps were carried out using an endoscopic stapler. Subsequently, the colorectal anastomosis was performed using circular stapling in both groups. The 4-week follow-up included health status, weight gain, blood tests, X-rays, and colonoscopy. Anastomotic tissue was processed to study the mechanical tensile strength and histopathology. There was no difference in the rate of conversion to open surgery or in average operating time between the groups. In the sealing device group, there was a significantly higher rate of failure in rectal stump closure (p = 0.042). There was one death in group B due to anastomotic leak. There was no difference in adhesion formation or stenosis. Mid-section anastomosis area was 89.7 mm^sup 2^ in group A compared with 100 mm^sup 2^ in group B (p = 0.52). In tensile strength studies, the maximum load resisted by the sample was 13.8 ± 4.9 N (group A) versus 15.7 ± 4.4 N (group B) (p = 0.17). There was no difference between the groups in degree of reepithelialization, number of inflammatory cells, or the presence of microabscesses. Division and sealing of the rectal stump with the LigaSure^sup ^ device is feasible in the proposed experimental model, but it is less reliable than conventional closure with a stapler, since it has a significantly greater failure rate. Therefore, The LigaSure^sup ^ device should not be used for this purpose in the clinical setting as this could lead to serious and dramatic complications.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1007/s00464-013-3194-y</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0930-2794 |
ispartof | Surgical endoscopy, 2014-02, Vol.28 (2), p.508 |
issn | 0930-2794 1432-2218 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1502239219 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Animals Appendectomy Blood tests Colonoscopy Dissection Endoscopy Laparoscopy Surgery Surgical anastomosis Tensile strength |
title | Colorectal anastomosis facilitated by the use of the LigaSure^sup ^ sealing device: comparative study in an animal model |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T14%3A12%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Colorectal%20anastomosis%20facilitated%20by%20the%20use%20of%20the%20LigaSure%5Esup%20%5E%20sealing%20device:%20comparative%20study%20in%20an%20animal%20model&rft.jtitle=Surgical%20endoscopy&rft.au=S%C3%A1nchez-de%20Pedro,%20Francisco&rft.date=2014-02-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=508&rft.pages=508-&rft.issn=0930-2794&rft.eissn=1432-2218&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00464-013-3194-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3230679591%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1502239219&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |