Do male poison frogs respond to modified calls of a Müllerian mimic?

We studied territorial interactions with respect to inter- and intraspecific communication of Ranitomeya imitator with the syntopic species Ranitomeya variabilis. These poison frogs (Dendrobatidae) are phenotypically very similar and are considered to be Müllerian mimics. Males of both species use c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Animal behaviour 2014-03, Vol.89, p.45-51
Hauptverfasser: Mayer, Michael, Schulte, Lisa M., Twomey, Evan, Lötters, Stefan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 51
container_issue
container_start_page 45
container_title Animal behaviour
container_volume 89
creator Mayer, Michael
Schulte, Lisa M.
Twomey, Evan
Lötters, Stefan
description We studied territorial interactions with respect to inter- and intraspecific communication of Ranitomeya imitator with the syntopic species Ranitomeya variabilis. These poison frogs (Dendrobatidae) are phenotypically very similar and are considered to be Müllerian mimics. Males of both species use calls for intraspecific communication, but only R. imitator males use calls to advertise and defend their territories. We hypothesized that, to avoid the risk of ‘wasting’ energy for territorial defence, R. imitator males should be able to discriminate between conspecifics and its model species R. variabilis by the structure of its call. We conducted phonotaxis field experiments attracting wild R. imitator males towards (1) an R. imitator advertisement call, (2) an R. variabilis call, (3) four modified calls with the temporal call parameters note length and internote interval substituted between the two species, and (4) two R. imitator calls at different dominant frequencies beyond the call's known natural range. Male R. imitator did not show responses towards any R. variabilis call (original or modified to match the R. imitator call), but did approach the sound source during playbacks of R. imitator calls with properties of R. variabilis. They also approached their own advertisement call when the dominant frequency was modified. This shows that modified call parameters did not have significant effects on R. imitator males' ability to discriminate their own call from that of R. variabilis. We conclude that the call parameters note length, internote interval or dominant frequency are not essential for call discrimination in R. imitator, perhaps suggesting that among Müllerian mimic anurans, discrimination of conspecifics and heterospecifics acts at a more complex level. •We studied inter- and intraspecific communication in two mimic poison frog species.•We performed phonotaxis field experiments with male Ranitomeya imitator.•R. imitator was able to discriminate its own call from that of its model species.•Frogs approached calls modified in attributes matching the model call.•Frogs also approached calls modified in dominant frequency beyond the known range.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.12.013
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1501591367</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0003347213005678</els_id><sourcerecordid>3228341851</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-e1fdd560fb244f0dd22b4aef39e9f410cb0e00029d87cdfb597111235f7988a03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUMtOwzAQtBBIlMInIFninOBHnMepQqU8pCIucLYcew2OkrjYaSX-jRs_hqv2zmm02pnZ2UHompKcElredrkaW_hUu5wRynPK8gQnaEZJI7Ka1ewUzQghPONFxc7RRYxdGktBxAyt7j0eVA944130I7bBf0QcIG78aPCUlt4468Bgrfo-Ym-xwi-_P30PwakRD25wenGJzqzqI1wdcY7eH1Zvy6ds_fr4vLxbZ5rzasqAWmNESWzLisISYxhrCwWWN9DYghLdEkjJWGPqShvbiqailDIubNXUtSJ8jm4Ovpvgv7YQJ9n5bRjTSUkFoaKhvKwSSxxYOvgYA1i5CW5Q4VtSIveNyU4eG5P7xiRlMkHSLQ46SC_sHAQZtYNRg3EB9CSNd_84_AF3YHZ1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1501591367</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do male poison frogs respond to modified calls of a Müllerian mimic?</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Mayer, Michael ; Schulte, Lisa M. ; Twomey, Evan ; Lötters, Stefan</creator><creatorcontrib>Mayer, Michael ; Schulte, Lisa M. ; Twomey, Evan ; Lötters, Stefan</creatorcontrib><description>We studied territorial interactions with respect to inter- and intraspecific communication of Ranitomeya imitator with the syntopic species Ranitomeya variabilis. These poison frogs (Dendrobatidae) are phenotypically very similar and are considered to be Müllerian mimics. Males of both species use calls for intraspecific communication, but only R. imitator males use calls to advertise and defend their territories. We hypothesized that, to avoid the risk of ‘wasting’ energy for territorial defence, R. imitator males should be able to discriminate between conspecifics and its model species R. variabilis by the structure of its call. We conducted phonotaxis field experiments attracting wild R. imitator males towards (1) an R. imitator advertisement call, (2) an R. variabilis call, (3) four modified calls with the temporal call parameters note length and internote interval substituted between the two species, and (4) two R. imitator calls at different dominant frequencies beyond the call's known natural range. Male R. imitator did not show responses towards any R. variabilis call (original or modified to match the R. imitator call), but did approach the sound source during playbacks of R. imitator calls with properties of R. variabilis. They also approached their own advertisement call when the dominant frequency was modified. This shows that modified call parameters did not have significant effects on R. imitator males' ability to discriminate their own call from that of R. variabilis. We conclude that the call parameters note length, internote interval or dominant frequency are not essential for call discrimination in R. imitator, perhaps suggesting that among Müllerian mimic anurans, discrimination of conspecifics and heterospecifics acts at a more complex level. •We studied inter- and intraspecific communication in two mimic poison frog species.•We performed phonotaxis field experiments with male Ranitomeya imitator.•R. imitator was able to discriminate its own call from that of its model species.•Frogs approached calls modified in attributes matching the model call.•Frogs also approached calls modified in dominant frequency beyond the known range.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-3472</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8282</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.12.013</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANBEA8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Animal communication ; bioacoustics ; Dendrobatidae ; Frogs ; phonotaxis experiments ; Ranitomeya imitator ; Ranitomeya variabilis</subject><ispartof>Animal behaviour, 2014-03, Vol.89, p.45-51</ispartof><rights>2013 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour</rights><rights>Copyright Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Ltd. Mar 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-e1fdd560fb244f0dd22b4aef39e9f410cb0e00029d87cdfb597111235f7988a03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-e1fdd560fb244f0dd22b4aef39e9f410cb0e00029d87cdfb597111235f7988a03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.12.013$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mayer, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulte, Lisa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Twomey, Evan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lötters, Stefan</creatorcontrib><title>Do male poison frogs respond to modified calls of a Müllerian mimic?</title><title>Animal behaviour</title><description>We studied territorial interactions with respect to inter- and intraspecific communication of Ranitomeya imitator with the syntopic species Ranitomeya variabilis. These poison frogs (Dendrobatidae) are phenotypically very similar and are considered to be Müllerian mimics. Males of both species use calls for intraspecific communication, but only R. imitator males use calls to advertise and defend their territories. We hypothesized that, to avoid the risk of ‘wasting’ energy for territorial defence, R. imitator males should be able to discriminate between conspecifics and its model species R. variabilis by the structure of its call. We conducted phonotaxis field experiments attracting wild R. imitator males towards (1) an R. imitator advertisement call, (2) an R. variabilis call, (3) four modified calls with the temporal call parameters note length and internote interval substituted between the two species, and (4) two R. imitator calls at different dominant frequencies beyond the call's known natural range. Male R. imitator did not show responses towards any R. variabilis call (original or modified to match the R. imitator call), but did approach the sound source during playbacks of R. imitator calls with properties of R. variabilis. They also approached their own advertisement call when the dominant frequency was modified. This shows that modified call parameters did not have significant effects on R. imitator males' ability to discriminate their own call from that of R. variabilis. We conclude that the call parameters note length, internote interval or dominant frequency are not essential for call discrimination in R. imitator, perhaps suggesting that among Müllerian mimic anurans, discrimination of conspecifics and heterospecifics acts at a more complex level. •We studied inter- and intraspecific communication in two mimic poison frog species.•We performed phonotaxis field experiments with male Ranitomeya imitator.•R. imitator was able to discriminate its own call from that of its model species.•Frogs approached calls modified in attributes matching the model call.•Frogs also approached calls modified in dominant frequency beyond the known range.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal communication</subject><subject>bioacoustics</subject><subject>Dendrobatidae</subject><subject>Frogs</subject><subject>phonotaxis experiments</subject><subject>Ranitomeya imitator</subject><subject>Ranitomeya variabilis</subject><issn>0003-3472</issn><issn>1095-8282</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUMtOwzAQtBBIlMInIFninOBHnMepQqU8pCIucLYcew2OkrjYaSX-jRs_hqv2zmm02pnZ2UHompKcElredrkaW_hUu5wRynPK8gQnaEZJI7Ka1ewUzQghPONFxc7RRYxdGktBxAyt7j0eVA944130I7bBf0QcIG78aPCUlt4468Bgrfo-Ym-xwi-_P30PwakRD25wenGJzqzqI1wdcY7eH1Zvy6ds_fr4vLxbZ5rzasqAWmNESWzLisISYxhrCwWWN9DYghLdEkjJWGPqShvbiqailDIubNXUtSJ8jm4Ovpvgv7YQJ9n5bRjTSUkFoaKhvKwSSxxYOvgYA1i5CW5Q4VtSIveNyU4eG5P7xiRlMkHSLQ46SC_sHAQZtYNRg3EB9CSNd_84_AF3YHZ1</recordid><startdate>201403</startdate><enddate>201403</enddate><creator>Mayer, Michael</creator><creator>Schulte, Lisa M.</creator><creator>Twomey, Evan</creator><creator>Lötters, Stefan</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201403</creationdate><title>Do male poison frogs respond to modified calls of a Müllerian mimic?</title><author>Mayer, Michael ; Schulte, Lisa M. ; Twomey, Evan ; Lötters, Stefan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-e1fdd560fb244f0dd22b4aef39e9f410cb0e00029d87cdfb597111235f7988a03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal communication</topic><topic>bioacoustics</topic><topic>Dendrobatidae</topic><topic>Frogs</topic><topic>phonotaxis experiments</topic><topic>Ranitomeya imitator</topic><topic>Ranitomeya variabilis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mayer, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulte, Lisa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Twomey, Evan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lötters, Stefan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Animal behaviour</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mayer, Michael</au><au>Schulte, Lisa M.</au><au>Twomey, Evan</au><au>Lötters, Stefan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do male poison frogs respond to modified calls of a Müllerian mimic?</atitle><jtitle>Animal behaviour</jtitle><date>2014-03</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>89</volume><spage>45</spage><epage>51</epage><pages>45-51</pages><issn>0003-3472</issn><eissn>1095-8282</eissn><coden>ANBEA8</coden><abstract>We studied territorial interactions with respect to inter- and intraspecific communication of Ranitomeya imitator with the syntopic species Ranitomeya variabilis. These poison frogs (Dendrobatidae) are phenotypically very similar and are considered to be Müllerian mimics. Males of both species use calls for intraspecific communication, but only R. imitator males use calls to advertise and defend their territories. We hypothesized that, to avoid the risk of ‘wasting’ energy for territorial defence, R. imitator males should be able to discriminate between conspecifics and its model species R. variabilis by the structure of its call. We conducted phonotaxis field experiments attracting wild R. imitator males towards (1) an R. imitator advertisement call, (2) an R. variabilis call, (3) four modified calls with the temporal call parameters note length and internote interval substituted between the two species, and (4) two R. imitator calls at different dominant frequencies beyond the call's known natural range. Male R. imitator did not show responses towards any R. variabilis call (original or modified to match the R. imitator call), but did approach the sound source during playbacks of R. imitator calls with properties of R. variabilis. They also approached their own advertisement call when the dominant frequency was modified. This shows that modified call parameters did not have significant effects on R. imitator males' ability to discriminate their own call from that of R. variabilis. We conclude that the call parameters note length, internote interval or dominant frequency are not essential for call discrimination in R. imitator, perhaps suggesting that among Müllerian mimic anurans, discrimination of conspecifics and heterospecifics acts at a more complex level. •We studied inter- and intraspecific communication in two mimic poison frog species.•We performed phonotaxis field experiments with male Ranitomeya imitator.•R. imitator was able to discriminate its own call from that of its model species.•Frogs approached calls modified in attributes matching the model call.•Frogs also approached calls modified in dominant frequency beyond the known range.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.12.013</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-3472
ispartof Animal behaviour, 2014-03, Vol.89, p.45-51
issn 0003-3472
1095-8282
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1501591367
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Animal behavior
Animal communication
bioacoustics
Dendrobatidae
Frogs
phonotaxis experiments
Ranitomeya imitator
Ranitomeya variabilis
title Do male poison frogs respond to modified calls of a Müllerian mimic?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T22%3A09%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20male%20poison%20frogs%20respond%20to%20modified%20calls%20of%20a%20M%C3%BCllerian%20mimic?&rft.jtitle=Animal%20behaviour&rft.au=Mayer,%20Michael&rft.date=2014-03&rft.volume=89&rft.spage=45&rft.epage=51&rft.pages=45-51&rft.issn=0003-3472&rft.eissn=1095-8282&rft.coden=ANBEA8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.12.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3228341851%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1501591367&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0003347213005678&rfr_iscdi=true