Learner Media Preferences in an Evidence-Based Practice Asynchronous Web Module
Evidence-based practice (EBP) is considered an integral element of healthcare education today. Using an asynchronous online tutorial may be an effective and efficient way to introduce EBP to students. The primary purpose of this case study was to identify student preference for delivery format of an...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of online learning and teaching 2009-09, Vol.5 (3), p.477 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 477 |
container_title | Journal of online learning and teaching |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | York, Ann Stumbo, Teri Nordengren, F R |
description | Evidence-based practice (EBP) is considered an integral element of healthcare education today. Using an asynchronous online tutorial may be an effective and efficient way to introduce EBP to students. The primary purpose of this case study was to identify student preference for delivery format of an online EBP tutorial by comparing interactive web modules with PDF text modules. The secondary purpose was to demonstrate student mastery of subject matter. A first year cohort (N=50) of doctor of physical therapy students was enrolled in a self-paced, online EBP tutorial consisting of five modules, each produced in both an interactive and a text format. The students were randomly allocated into two groups. A cross-over design alternated the module format between groups for the first four modules, then students chose their preferred format for module five. Pre/post surveys revealed most students preferred having both the interactive and text formats available, and accessed both when given a choice. Pre/post test scores indicated that all students achieved content mastery with no significant difference between groups. Students preferred having a choice of delivery methods. Type of delivery method did not significantly impact learning. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1497198452</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3216116921</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_14971984523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNiksKwjAUAIMgWD93eOC60E-izVKl4sKiC8FlickrppREk0bw9lbwAK6GYWZEopSxIuYsKyZk6n2bJDTndBWR0xGFM-igQqUFnB026NBI9KANCAPlS6uvx1vhUQ2DkL2WCBv_NvLurLHBwxVvUFkVOpyTcSM6j4sfZ2S5Ly-7Q_xw9hnQ93VrgzNDqlPK1ykvKMvy_64PWQY9fg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1497198452</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Learner Media Preferences in an Evidence-Based Practice Asynchronous Web Module</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>York, Ann ; Stumbo, Teri ; Nordengren, F R</creator><creatorcontrib>York, Ann ; Stumbo, Teri ; Nordengren, F R</creatorcontrib><description>Evidence-based practice (EBP) is considered an integral element of healthcare education today. Using an asynchronous online tutorial may be an effective and efficient way to introduce EBP to students. The primary purpose of this case study was to identify student preference for delivery format of an online EBP tutorial by comparing interactive web modules with PDF text modules. The secondary purpose was to demonstrate student mastery of subject matter. A first year cohort (N=50) of doctor of physical therapy students was enrolled in a self-paced, online EBP tutorial consisting of five modules, each produced in both an interactive and a text format. The students were randomly allocated into two groups. A cross-over design alternated the module format between groups for the first four modules, then students chose their preferred format for module five. Pre/post surveys revealed most students preferred having both the interactive and text formats available, and accessed both when given a choice. Pre/post test scores indicated that all students achieved content mastery with no significant difference between groups. Students preferred having a choice of delivery methods. Type of delivery method did not significantly impact learning.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1558-9528</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Long Beach: Multimedia Educational Resource for Learning and Online Teaching (MERLOT)</publisher><subject>Course Content ; Distance learning ; Education ; Instructional design ; Learner Engagement ; Learning Strategies ; Methods ; Online instruction ; Outcomes of Education ; Physical therapy ; Preferences ; Software ; Studies ; Teaching Methods ; Variables</subject><ispartof>Journal of online learning and teaching, 2009-09, Vol.5 (3), p.477</ispartof><rights>Copyright Multimedia Educational Resource for Learning and Online Teaching (MERLOT) Sep 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>York, Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stumbo, Teri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordengren, F R</creatorcontrib><title>Learner Media Preferences in an Evidence-Based Practice Asynchronous Web Module</title><title>Journal of online learning and teaching</title><description>Evidence-based practice (EBP) is considered an integral element of healthcare education today. Using an asynchronous online tutorial may be an effective and efficient way to introduce EBP to students. The primary purpose of this case study was to identify student preference for delivery format of an online EBP tutorial by comparing interactive web modules with PDF text modules. The secondary purpose was to demonstrate student mastery of subject matter. A first year cohort (N=50) of doctor of physical therapy students was enrolled in a self-paced, online EBP tutorial consisting of five modules, each produced in both an interactive and a text format. The students were randomly allocated into two groups. A cross-over design alternated the module format between groups for the first four modules, then students chose their preferred format for module five. Pre/post surveys revealed most students preferred having both the interactive and text formats available, and accessed both when given a choice. Pre/post test scores indicated that all students achieved content mastery with no significant difference between groups. Students preferred having a choice of delivery methods. Type of delivery method did not significantly impact learning.</description><subject>Course Content</subject><subject>Distance learning</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Instructional design</subject><subject>Learner Engagement</subject><subject>Learning Strategies</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Online instruction</subject><subject>Outcomes of Education</subject><subject>Physical therapy</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>1558-9528</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNiksKwjAUAIMgWD93eOC60E-izVKl4sKiC8FlickrppREk0bw9lbwAK6GYWZEopSxIuYsKyZk6n2bJDTndBWR0xGFM-igQqUFnB026NBI9KANCAPlS6uvx1vhUQ2DkL2WCBv_NvLurLHBwxVvUFkVOpyTcSM6j4sfZ2S5Ly-7Q_xw9hnQ93VrgzNDqlPK1ykvKMvy_64PWQY9fg</recordid><startdate>20090901</startdate><enddate>20090901</enddate><creator>York, Ann</creator><creator>Stumbo, Teri</creator><creator>Nordengren, F R</creator><general>Multimedia Educational Resource for Learning and Online Teaching (MERLOT)</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090901</creationdate><title>Learner Media Preferences in an Evidence-Based Practice Asynchronous Web Module</title><author>York, Ann ; Stumbo, Teri ; Nordengren, F R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_14971984523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Course Content</topic><topic>Distance learning</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Instructional design</topic><topic>Learner Engagement</topic><topic>Learning Strategies</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Online instruction</topic><topic>Outcomes of Education</topic><topic>Physical therapy</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>York, Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stumbo, Teri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordengren, F R</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of online learning and teaching</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>York, Ann</au><au>Stumbo, Teri</au><au>Nordengren, F R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Learner Media Preferences in an Evidence-Based Practice Asynchronous Web Module</atitle><jtitle>Journal of online learning and teaching</jtitle><date>2009-09-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>477</spage><pages>477-</pages><eissn>1558-9528</eissn><abstract>Evidence-based practice (EBP) is considered an integral element of healthcare education today. Using an asynchronous online tutorial may be an effective and efficient way to introduce EBP to students. The primary purpose of this case study was to identify student preference for delivery format of an online EBP tutorial by comparing interactive web modules with PDF text modules. The secondary purpose was to demonstrate student mastery of subject matter. A first year cohort (N=50) of doctor of physical therapy students was enrolled in a self-paced, online EBP tutorial consisting of five modules, each produced in both an interactive and a text format. The students were randomly allocated into two groups. A cross-over design alternated the module format between groups for the first four modules, then students chose their preferred format for module five. Pre/post surveys revealed most students preferred having both the interactive and text formats available, and accessed both when given a choice. Pre/post test scores indicated that all students achieved content mastery with no significant difference between groups. Students preferred having a choice of delivery methods. Type of delivery method did not significantly impact learning.</abstract><cop>Long Beach</cop><pub>Multimedia Educational Resource for Learning and Online Teaching (MERLOT)</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 1558-9528 |
ispartof | Journal of online learning and teaching, 2009-09, Vol.5 (3), p.477 |
issn | 1558-9528 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1497198452 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Course Content Distance learning Education Instructional design Learner Engagement Learning Strategies Methods Online instruction Outcomes of Education Physical therapy Preferences Software Studies Teaching Methods Variables |
title | Learner Media Preferences in an Evidence-Based Practice Asynchronous Web Module |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T15%3A33%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Learner%20Media%20Preferences%20in%20an%20Evidence-Based%20Practice%20Asynchronous%20Web%20Module&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20online%20learning%20and%20teaching&rft.au=York,%20Ann&rft.date=2009-09-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=477&rft.pages=477-&rft.eissn=1558-9528&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3216116921%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1497198452&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |