The Protection and Enforcement of Intellectual Property in China since Accession to the WTO: Progress and Retreat
China is without a doubt the world’s leading infringer of intellectual property rights (IPRs). China’s factories produce counterfeit and pirated products for local and foreign consumption while China’s domestic industry infringes patent rights with relative impunity – this despite nearly 30 years of...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | China perspectives 2012-01, Vol.2012 (1 (89)), p.23-28 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 28 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 (89) |
| container_start_page | 23 |
| container_title | China perspectives |
| container_volume | 2012 |
| creator | Mercurio, Bryan |
| description | China is without a doubt the world’s leading infringer of intellectual property rights (IPRs). China’s factories produce counterfeit and pirated products for local and foreign consumption while China’s domestic industry infringes patent rights with relative impunity – this despite nearly 30 years of improving laws for the protection and enforcement of IPRs as well as accession to the World Trade Organization in 2001. This brief article seeks to understand the reasons behind China’s apparent failure to adequately enforce its IPRs. Finding local protectionism a major impediment to enforcement efforts, the article further analyses whether the central government has the power to enforce IPRs or whether it is powerless to confront and challenge local interests. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.4000/chinaperspectives.5795 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1496998730</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/informit.211809226496969</informt_id><jstor_id>24055441</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24055441</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3715-9b87cd58750bdbb341ea580ae14507a840ece54a91c63aafa88781f5fb33e93e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF9LHDEUxYO04Nb6ESyBPo9NJv9LX2SxrSBYypY-hkz2js4ym6xJVvDbm7jii_gUyD2_c-49CH2h5JwTQr75uym4HaS8A1-mB8jnQhlxhBbUGNlxSdUHtOiJIh3j3ByjTzlvCJFEa7lA96s7wH9SLI2NAbuwxpdhjMnDFkLBccRXocA81_nezU1ao8ojngJetmCcp-ABX3gPOTeHEnGpnv9XN9-b-jbV_2fbv1ASuPIZfRzdnOH05T1B_35erpa_u-ubX1fLi-vOM0VFZwat_FpoJciwHgbGKTihiQPKBVFOcwIeBHeGesmcG53WStNRjANjYBiwE_T14LtL8X4PudhN3KdQIy3lRhqjFSNVJQ8qn2LOCUa7S9PWpUdLiW312jf12lZvBX8cwLSdivXxuaF6f964khvMGJV2alU2QU-pJqbvZYuWpuJnB3yTS0yvoT0nQnBO69y87DVDfB1HN9kED_UaG9Pte6s9AbLlqCU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1496998730</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Protection and Enforcement of Intellectual Property in China since Accession to the WTO: Progress and Retreat</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>OpenEdition Journals</source><creator>Mercurio, Bryan</creator><creatorcontrib>Mercurio, Bryan</creatorcontrib><description>China is without a doubt the world’s leading infringer of intellectual property rights (IPRs). China’s factories produce counterfeit and pirated products for local and foreign consumption while China’s domestic industry infringes patent rights with relative impunity – this despite nearly 30 years of improving laws for the protection and enforcement of IPRs as well as accession to the World Trade Organization in 2001. This brief article seeks to understand the reasons behind China’s apparent failure to adequately enforce its IPRs. Finding local protectionism a major impediment to enforcement efforts, the article further analyses whether the central government has the power to enforce IPRs or whether it is powerless to confront and challenge local interests.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2070-3449</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-4617</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4000/chinaperspectives.5795</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hong Kong: Centre d'étude français sur la Chine contemporaine</publisher><subject>Agreements ; Competition ; Conventions ; Copyright ; Copyright infringement ; Counterfeiting ; Decades ; Economic growth ; Enforcement ; Factories ; Infringement ; Innovations ; Intellectual property ; Intellectual property law ; International law ; Law enforcement ; Patent law ; Piracy ; Protectionism ; Provincial government ; Software piracy ; Special feature : China's WTO Decade ; Subsidies ; Trade policy ; Trademark infringement ; Trademarks ; Treaties</subject><ispartof>China perspectives, 2012-01, Vol.2012 (1 (89)), p.23-28</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 China Perspectives</rights><rights>Copyright CEFC 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3715-9b87cd58750bdbb341ea580ae14507a840ece54a91c63aafa88781f5fb33e93e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24055441$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24055441$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,11574,12824,27843,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mercurio, Bryan</creatorcontrib><title>The Protection and Enforcement of Intellectual Property in China since Accession to the WTO: Progress and Retreat</title><title>China perspectives</title><description>China is without a doubt the world’s leading infringer of intellectual property rights (IPRs). China’s factories produce counterfeit and pirated products for local and foreign consumption while China’s domestic industry infringes patent rights with relative impunity – this despite nearly 30 years of improving laws for the protection and enforcement of IPRs as well as accession to the World Trade Organization in 2001. This brief article seeks to understand the reasons behind China’s apparent failure to adequately enforce its IPRs. Finding local protectionism a major impediment to enforcement efforts, the article further analyses whether the central government has the power to enforce IPRs or whether it is powerless to confront and challenge local interests.</description><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Conventions</subject><subject>Copyright</subject><subject>Copyright infringement</subject><subject>Counterfeiting</subject><subject>Decades</subject><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Enforcement</subject><subject>Factories</subject><subject>Infringement</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Intellectual property</subject><subject>Intellectual property law</subject><subject>International law</subject><subject>Law enforcement</subject><subject>Patent law</subject><subject>Piracy</subject><subject>Protectionism</subject><subject>Provincial government</subject><subject>Software piracy</subject><subject>Special feature : China's WTO Decade</subject><subject>Subsidies</subject><subject>Trade policy</subject><subject>Trademark infringement</subject><subject>Trademarks</subject><subject>Treaties</subject><issn>2070-3449</issn><issn>1996-4617</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kF9LHDEUxYO04Nb6ESyBPo9NJv9LX2SxrSBYypY-hkz2js4ym6xJVvDbm7jii_gUyD2_c-49CH2h5JwTQr75uym4HaS8A1-mB8jnQhlxhBbUGNlxSdUHtOiJIh3j3ByjTzlvCJFEa7lA96s7wH9SLI2NAbuwxpdhjMnDFkLBccRXocA81_nezU1ao8ojngJetmCcp-ABX3gPOTeHEnGpnv9XN9-b-jbV_2fbv1ASuPIZfRzdnOH05T1B_35erpa_u-ubX1fLi-vOM0VFZwat_FpoJciwHgbGKTihiQPKBVFOcwIeBHeGesmcG53WStNRjANjYBiwE_T14LtL8X4PudhN3KdQIy3lRhqjFSNVJQ8qn2LOCUa7S9PWpUdLiW312jf12lZvBX8cwLSdivXxuaF6f964khvMGJV2alU2QU-pJqbvZYuWpuJnB3yTS0yvoT0nQnBO69y87DVDfB1HN9kED_UaG9Pte6s9AbLlqCU</recordid><startdate>20120101</startdate><enddate>20120101</enddate><creator>Mercurio, Bryan</creator><general>Centre d'étude français sur la Chine contemporaine</general><general>cefc French Centre for Research on Contemporary China</general><general>CEFC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RO</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AI</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BVBZV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FREBS</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120101</creationdate><title>The Protection and Enforcement of Intellectual Property in China since Accession to the WTO: Progress and Retreat</title><author>Mercurio, Bryan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3715-9b87cd58750bdbb341ea580ae14507a840ece54a91c63aafa88781f5fb33e93e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Conventions</topic><topic>Copyright</topic><topic>Copyright infringement</topic><topic>Counterfeiting</topic><topic>Decades</topic><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Enforcement</topic><topic>Factories</topic><topic>Infringement</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Intellectual property</topic><topic>Intellectual property law</topic><topic>International law</topic><topic>Law enforcement</topic><topic>Patent law</topic><topic>Piracy</topic><topic>Protectionism</topic><topic>Provincial government</topic><topic>Software piracy</topic><topic>Special feature : China's WTO Decade</topic><topic>Subsidies</topic><topic>Trade policy</topic><topic>Trademark infringement</topic><topic>Trademarks</topic><topic>Treaties</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mercurio, Bryan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>East & South Asia Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>China perspectives</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mercurio, Bryan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Protection and Enforcement of Intellectual Property in China since Accession to the WTO: Progress and Retreat</atitle><jtitle>China perspectives</jtitle><date>2012-01-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>2012</volume><issue>1 (89)</issue><spage>23</spage><epage>28</epage><pages>23-28</pages><issn>2070-3449</issn><eissn>1996-4617</eissn><abstract>China is without a doubt the world’s leading infringer of intellectual property rights (IPRs). China’s factories produce counterfeit and pirated products for local and foreign consumption while China’s domestic industry infringes patent rights with relative impunity – this despite nearly 30 years of improving laws for the protection and enforcement of IPRs as well as accession to the World Trade Organization in 2001. This brief article seeks to understand the reasons behind China’s apparent failure to adequately enforce its IPRs. Finding local protectionism a major impediment to enforcement efforts, the article further analyses whether the central government has the power to enforce IPRs or whether it is powerless to confront and challenge local interests.</abstract><cop>Hong Kong</cop><pub>Centre d'étude français sur la Chine contemporaine</pub><doi>10.4000/chinaperspectives.5795</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2070-3449 |
| ispartof | China perspectives, 2012-01, Vol.2012 (1 (89)), p.23-28 |
| issn | 2070-3449 1996-4617 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1496998730 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection; OpenEdition Journals |
| subjects | Agreements Competition Conventions Copyright Copyright infringement Counterfeiting Decades Economic growth Enforcement Factories Infringement Innovations Intellectual property Intellectual property law International law Law enforcement Patent law Piracy Protectionism Provincial government Software piracy Special feature : China's WTO Decade Subsidies Trade policy Trademark infringement Trademarks Treaties |
| title | The Protection and Enforcement of Intellectual Property in China since Accession to the WTO: Progress and Retreat |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T04%3A38%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Protection%20and%20Enforcement%20of%20Intellectual%20Property%20in%20China%20since%20Accession%20to%20the%20WTO:%20Progress%20and%20Retreat&rft.jtitle=China%20perspectives&rft.au=Mercurio,%20Bryan&rft.date=2012-01-01&rft.volume=2012&rft.issue=1%20(89)&rft.spage=23&rft.epage=28&rft.pages=23-28&rft.issn=2070-3449&rft.eissn=1996-4617&rft_id=info:doi/10.4000/chinaperspectives.5795&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24055441%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1496998730&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/informit.211809226496969&rft_jstor_id=24055441&rfr_iscdi=true |