Plastic collapse load prediction and failure assessment diagram analysis of cracked circular hollow section T-joint and Y-joint

ABSTRACT This paper concerns the validation of standard safety assessment procedure given in BS 7910 for cracked circular hollow section T‐joint and Y‐joint, using the finite element (FE) results. A robust and efficient FE mesh generator is developed to produce the 3D models of the cracked joints an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Fatigue & fracture of engineering materials & structures 2014-03, Vol.37 (3), p.314-324
Hauptverfasser: Lie, S. T., Li, T., Shao, Y. B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 324
container_issue 3
container_start_page 314
container_title Fatigue & fracture of engineering materials & structures
container_volume 37
creator Lie, S. T.
Li, T.
Shao, Y. B.
description ABSTRACT This paper concerns the validation of standard safety assessment procedure given in BS 7910 for cracked circular hollow section T‐joint and Y‐joint, using the finite element (FE) results. A robust and efficient FE mesh generator is developed to produce the 3D models of the cracked joints and to calculate the elastic J‐integral (Je) and elastic–plastic J‐integral (Jep) values of the crack respectively. In order to verify its accuracy and convergence, the plastic collapse loads (Pc) obtained from experimental tests and FE predictions are compared; they agree very well with each other. It is also found from experimental tests that the plastic collapse loads (Pc) predicted using the BS 7910 reduction factor (FAR) are safe and conservative. Subsequently, the failure assessment diagrams (FADs) of five cracked T‐joints and three cracked Y‐joints are constructed using the FE results, following the J‐integral method, which is classified as Level 3C in BS 7910. Thereafter, a comparison between the constructed FAD curves and the standard Level 2A curve is carried out, and it is observed that the safety assessment results using the standard Level 2A curve might be unsafe because some parts of the constructed FAD curves fall inside of the standard one. A penalty factor of 1.15 working on both the elastic–plastic J‐integral and plastic collapse load (Pc) is proposed to move all the constructed FAD curves just outside of the standard Level 2A curve.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ffe.12115
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1495448621</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3208771631</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3655-11a1739ad888c263b6463e8d29c44ac5a9ecd6bfab39c8f7afa24ce8409413693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1PGzEQhi3USqS0B_6BpaoHDgvr9cd6jxARWgmlrUS_uFgTr10cnDh4NqI58dcxXcqtc_FIft5Ho5eQQ1YfszIn3rtj1jAm98iECVVXjerkKzLRrVRVK_XPffIGcVnXTAnOJ-ThSwQcgqU2xQgbdDQm6Okmuz7YIaQ1hXVPPYS4zY4CokNcufVA-wC_M6zKN8QdBqTJU5vB3rqe2pDtNkKmN0Wa7im6UXVVLVMo2Sflr3F_S157iOjePb8H5Nvs_Gr6sbr8fPFpenpZWa6krBgD1vIOeq21bRRfKKG4033TWSHASuic7dXCw4J3VvsWPDTCOi3qTjCuOn5A3o_eTU53W4eDWaZtLrejYaKTQmjVsEIdjZTNCTE7bzY5rCDvDKvNU7-m9Gv-9lvYD89GQAvRZ1jbgC-BRjOlZVsX7mTk7kN0u_8LzWx2_s9cjYmAg_vzkoB8a1TLW2l-zC_M2Xc5r-fXU_OVPwK22JoX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1495448621</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Plastic collapse load prediction and failure assessment diagram analysis of cracked circular hollow section T-joint and Y-joint</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Lie, S. T. ; Li, T. ; Shao, Y. B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lie, S. T. ; Li, T. ; Shao, Y. B.</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT This paper concerns the validation of standard safety assessment procedure given in BS 7910 for cracked circular hollow section T‐joint and Y‐joint, using the finite element (FE) results. A robust and efficient FE mesh generator is developed to produce the 3D models of the cracked joints and to calculate the elastic J‐integral (Je) and elastic–plastic J‐integral (Jep) values of the crack respectively. In order to verify its accuracy and convergence, the plastic collapse loads (Pc) obtained from experimental tests and FE predictions are compared; they agree very well with each other. It is also found from experimental tests that the plastic collapse loads (Pc) predicted using the BS 7910 reduction factor (FAR) are safe and conservative. Subsequently, the failure assessment diagrams (FADs) of five cracked T‐joints and three cracked Y‐joints are constructed using the FE results, following the J‐integral method, which is classified as Level 3C in BS 7910. Thereafter, a comparison between the constructed FAD curves and the standard Level 2A curve is carried out, and it is observed that the safety assessment results using the standard Level 2A curve might be unsafe because some parts of the constructed FAD curves fall inside of the standard one. A penalty factor of 1.15 working on both the elastic–plastic J‐integral and plastic collapse load (Pc) is proposed to move all the constructed FAD curves just outside of the standard Level 2A curve.</description><identifier>ISSN: 8756-758X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2695</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ffe.12115</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FFESEY</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; cracked tubular T-joint and Y-joint ; Cracks ; Exact sciences and technology ; Failure analysis ; failure assessment diagram ; Finite element analysis ; finite element mesh generator ; Joints ; Load ; Materials science ; Mechanical properties and methods of testing. Rheology. Fracture mechanics. Tribology ; Metals. Metallurgy ; plastic collapse load ; semielliptical surface crack</subject><ispartof>Fatigue &amp; fracture of engineering materials &amp; structures, 2014-03, Vol.37 (3), p.314-324</ispartof><rights>2013 Wiley Publishing Ltd.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2014 Wiley Publishing Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3655-11a1739ad888c263b6463e8d29c44ac5a9ecd6bfab39c8f7afa24ce8409413693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3655-11a1739ad888c263b6463e8d29c44ac5a9ecd6bfab39c8f7afa24ce8409413693</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fffe.12115$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fffe.12115$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28168570$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lie, S. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shao, Y. B.</creatorcontrib><title>Plastic collapse load prediction and failure assessment diagram analysis of cracked circular hollow section T-joint and Y-joint</title><title>Fatigue &amp; fracture of engineering materials &amp; structures</title><addtitle>Fatigue Fract Engng Mater Struct</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT This paper concerns the validation of standard safety assessment procedure given in BS 7910 for cracked circular hollow section T‐joint and Y‐joint, using the finite element (FE) results. A robust and efficient FE mesh generator is developed to produce the 3D models of the cracked joints and to calculate the elastic J‐integral (Je) and elastic–plastic J‐integral (Jep) values of the crack respectively. In order to verify its accuracy and convergence, the plastic collapse loads (Pc) obtained from experimental tests and FE predictions are compared; they agree very well with each other. It is also found from experimental tests that the plastic collapse loads (Pc) predicted using the BS 7910 reduction factor (FAR) are safe and conservative. Subsequently, the failure assessment diagrams (FADs) of five cracked T‐joints and three cracked Y‐joints are constructed using the FE results, following the J‐integral method, which is classified as Level 3C in BS 7910. Thereafter, a comparison between the constructed FAD curves and the standard Level 2A curve is carried out, and it is observed that the safety assessment results using the standard Level 2A curve might be unsafe because some parts of the constructed FAD curves fall inside of the standard one. A penalty factor of 1.15 working on both the elastic–plastic J‐integral and plastic collapse load (Pc) is proposed to move all the constructed FAD curves just outside of the standard Level 2A curve.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>cracked tubular T-joint and Y-joint</subject><subject>Cracks</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Failure analysis</subject><subject>failure assessment diagram</subject><subject>Finite element analysis</subject><subject>finite element mesh generator</subject><subject>Joints</subject><subject>Load</subject><subject>Materials science</subject><subject>Mechanical properties and methods of testing. Rheology. Fracture mechanics. Tribology</subject><subject>Metals. Metallurgy</subject><subject>plastic collapse load</subject><subject>semielliptical surface crack</subject><issn>8756-758X</issn><issn>1460-2695</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1PGzEQhi3USqS0B_6BpaoHDgvr9cd6jxARWgmlrUS_uFgTr10cnDh4NqI58dcxXcqtc_FIft5Ho5eQQ1YfszIn3rtj1jAm98iECVVXjerkKzLRrVRVK_XPffIGcVnXTAnOJ-ThSwQcgqU2xQgbdDQm6Okmuz7YIaQ1hXVPPYS4zY4CokNcufVA-wC_M6zKN8QdBqTJU5vB3rqe2pDtNkKmN0Wa7im6UXVVLVMo2Sflr3F_S157iOjePb8H5Nvs_Gr6sbr8fPFpenpZWa6krBgD1vIOeq21bRRfKKG4033TWSHASuic7dXCw4J3VvsWPDTCOi3qTjCuOn5A3o_eTU53W4eDWaZtLrejYaKTQmjVsEIdjZTNCTE7bzY5rCDvDKvNU7-m9Gv-9lvYD89GQAvRZ1jbgC-BRjOlZVsX7mTk7kN0u_8LzWx2_s9cjYmAg_vzkoB8a1TLW2l-zC_M2Xc5r-fXU_OVPwK22JoX</recordid><startdate>201403</startdate><enddate>201403</enddate><creator>Lie, S. T.</creator><creator>Li, T.</creator><creator>Shao, Y. B.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201403</creationdate><title>Plastic collapse load prediction and failure assessment diagram analysis of cracked circular hollow section T-joint and Y-joint</title><author>Lie, S. T. ; Li, T. ; Shao, Y. B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3655-11a1739ad888c263b6463e8d29c44ac5a9ecd6bfab39c8f7afa24ce8409413693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>cracked tubular T-joint and Y-joint</topic><topic>Cracks</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Failure analysis</topic><topic>failure assessment diagram</topic><topic>Finite element analysis</topic><topic>finite element mesh generator</topic><topic>Joints</topic><topic>Load</topic><topic>Materials science</topic><topic>Mechanical properties and methods of testing. Rheology. Fracture mechanics. Tribology</topic><topic>Metals. Metallurgy</topic><topic>plastic collapse load</topic><topic>semielliptical surface crack</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lie, S. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shao, Y. B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Fatigue &amp; fracture of engineering materials &amp; structures</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lie, S. T.</au><au>Li, T.</au><au>Shao, Y. B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Plastic collapse load prediction and failure assessment diagram analysis of cracked circular hollow section T-joint and Y-joint</atitle><jtitle>Fatigue &amp; fracture of engineering materials &amp; structures</jtitle><addtitle>Fatigue Fract Engng Mater Struct</addtitle><date>2014-03</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>314</spage><epage>324</epage><pages>314-324</pages><issn>8756-758X</issn><eissn>1460-2695</eissn><coden>FFESEY</coden><abstract>ABSTRACT This paper concerns the validation of standard safety assessment procedure given in BS 7910 for cracked circular hollow section T‐joint and Y‐joint, using the finite element (FE) results. A robust and efficient FE mesh generator is developed to produce the 3D models of the cracked joints and to calculate the elastic J‐integral (Je) and elastic–plastic J‐integral (Jep) values of the crack respectively. In order to verify its accuracy and convergence, the plastic collapse loads (Pc) obtained from experimental tests and FE predictions are compared; they agree very well with each other. It is also found from experimental tests that the plastic collapse loads (Pc) predicted using the BS 7910 reduction factor (FAR) are safe and conservative. Subsequently, the failure assessment diagrams (FADs) of five cracked T‐joints and three cracked Y‐joints are constructed using the FE results, following the J‐integral method, which is classified as Level 3C in BS 7910. Thereafter, a comparison between the constructed FAD curves and the standard Level 2A curve is carried out, and it is observed that the safety assessment results using the standard Level 2A curve might be unsafe because some parts of the constructed FAD curves fall inside of the standard one. A penalty factor of 1.15 working on both the elastic–plastic J‐integral and plastic collapse load (Pc) is proposed to move all the constructed FAD curves just outside of the standard Level 2A curve.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/ffe.12115</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 8756-758X
ispartof Fatigue & fracture of engineering materials & structures, 2014-03, Vol.37 (3), p.314-324
issn 8756-758X
1460-2695
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1495448621
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Applied sciences
cracked tubular T-joint and Y-joint
Cracks
Exact sciences and technology
Failure analysis
failure assessment diagram
Finite element analysis
finite element mesh generator
Joints
Load
Materials science
Mechanical properties and methods of testing. Rheology. Fracture mechanics. Tribology
Metals. Metallurgy
plastic collapse load
semielliptical surface crack
title Plastic collapse load prediction and failure assessment diagram analysis of cracked circular hollow section T-joint and Y-joint
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T14%3A16%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Plastic%20collapse%20load%20prediction%20and%20failure%20assessment%20diagram%20analysis%20of%20cracked%20circular%20hollow%20section%20T-joint%20and%20Y-joint&rft.jtitle=Fatigue%20&%20fracture%20of%20engineering%20materials%20&%20structures&rft.au=Lie,%20S.%20T.&rft.date=2014-03&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=314&rft.epage=324&rft.pages=314-324&rft.issn=8756-758X&rft.eissn=1460-2695&rft.coden=FFESEY&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ffe.12115&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3208771631%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1495448621&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true