A note on the robustness of Card and Krueger (1994) and Neumark and Wascher (2000)
This note adds to the discussion originating from Card and Krueger (Am Econ Rev 84:772–793, 1994 ) and Neumark and Wascher (Am Econ Rev 90:1362–1396, 2000 ) by re-evaluating their results using the semiparametric difference-in-differences estimator introduced in Abadie (Rev Econ Stud 72:1–19, 2005 )...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Empirical economics 2014-02, Vol.46 (1), p.307-316 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 316 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 307 |
container_title | Empirical economics |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Ropponen, Olli |
description | This note adds to the discussion originating from Card and Krueger (Am Econ Rev 84:772–793,
1994
) and Neumark and Wascher (Am Econ Rev 90:1362–1396,
2000
) by re-evaluating their results using the semiparametric difference-in-differences estimator introduced in Abadie (Rev Econ Stud 72:1–19,
2005
). The note addresses the question of whether the differences in the original datasets can explain the differences in their conclusions. Although we observe heterogenous employment effects together with the differences in the distributions, the results show that the original findings on the overall employment effect of a minimum wage are fairly robust and just slightly changed when the differences in the distributions of the observed covariates are taken into account. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00181-012-0663-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1493979147</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3202424201</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-e1a6d093f5136d00ea61f2c6a40db91fbb7536e216895d24d4b95de416915b603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIHcLPEhR4Mu34lPlYVL4FAQiCOlpM4lAJxsZMDf4_bcODCaUe7M7O7Q8gxwhkCFOcJAEtkgJyB1oLJHTJBKRQrDcddMgFRFKwQgu-Tg5RWACBKJSfkcU670HsaOtovPY2hGlLf-ZRoaOnCxYa6rqG3cfCvPtJTNEbOtq17P3y6-L7FLy7Vy82YZ9_ZIdlr3UfyR791Sp4vL54W1-zu4epmMb9jtQLVM49ON2BEq1BkAN5pbHmtnYSmMthWVaGE9hx1aVTDZSOrXL1EbVBVGsSUnIy-6xi-Bp96uwpD7PJKi9IIUxiURWbhyKpjSCn61q7jW7782yLYTXR2jM7m6OwmOiuzho-alLldfvyP87-iH2K2bJw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1493979147</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A note on the robustness of Card and Krueger (1994) and Neumark and Wascher (2000)</title><source>EBSCO Business Source Complete</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Ropponen, Olli</creator><creatorcontrib>Ropponen, Olli</creatorcontrib><description>This note adds to the discussion originating from Card and Krueger (Am Econ Rev 84:772–793,
1994
) and Neumark and Wascher (Am Econ Rev 90:1362–1396,
2000
) by re-evaluating their results using the semiparametric difference-in-differences estimator introduced in Abadie (Rev Econ Stud 72:1–19,
2005
). The note addresses the question of whether the differences in the original datasets can explain the differences in their conclusions. Although we observe heterogenous employment effects together with the differences in the distributions, the results show that the original findings on the overall employment effect of a minimum wage are fairly robust and just slightly changed when the differences in the distributions of the observed covariates are taken into account.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0377-7332</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-8921</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00181-012-0663-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Datasets ; Econometrics ; Economic models ; Economic statistics ; Economic theory ; Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Employment ; Estimates ; Finance ; Food ; Insurance ; Labor economics ; Management ; Minimum wage ; Restaurants ; Statistics for Business ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Empirical economics, 2014-02, Vol.46 (1), p.307-316</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-e1a6d093f5136d00ea61f2c6a40db91fbb7536e216895d24d4b95de416915b603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00181-012-0663-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00181-012-0663-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ropponen, Olli</creatorcontrib><title>A note on the robustness of Card and Krueger (1994) and Neumark and Wascher (2000)</title><title>Empirical economics</title><addtitle>Empir Econ</addtitle><description>This note adds to the discussion originating from Card and Krueger (Am Econ Rev 84:772–793,
1994
) and Neumark and Wascher (Am Econ Rev 90:1362–1396,
2000
) by re-evaluating their results using the semiparametric difference-in-differences estimator introduced in Abadie (Rev Econ Stud 72:1–19,
2005
). The note addresses the question of whether the differences in the original datasets can explain the differences in their conclusions. Although we observe heterogenous employment effects together with the differences in the distributions, the results show that the original findings on the overall employment effect of a minimum wage are fairly robust and just slightly changed when the differences in the distributions of the observed covariates are taken into account.</description><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Econometrics</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Economic statistics</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Finance</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Insurance</subject><subject>Labor economics</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Minimum wage</subject><subject>Restaurants</subject><subject>Statistics for Business</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0377-7332</issn><issn>1435-8921</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIHcLPEhR4Mu34lPlYVL4FAQiCOlpM4lAJxsZMDf4_bcODCaUe7M7O7Q8gxwhkCFOcJAEtkgJyB1oLJHTJBKRQrDcddMgFRFKwQgu-Tg5RWACBKJSfkcU670HsaOtovPY2hGlLf-ZRoaOnCxYa6rqG3cfCvPtJTNEbOtq17P3y6-L7FLy7Vy82YZ9_ZIdlr3UfyR791Sp4vL54W1-zu4epmMb9jtQLVM49ON2BEq1BkAN5pbHmtnYSmMthWVaGE9hx1aVTDZSOrXL1EbVBVGsSUnIy-6xi-Bp96uwpD7PJKi9IIUxiURWbhyKpjSCn61q7jW7782yLYTXR2jM7m6OwmOiuzho-alLldfvyP87-iH2K2bJw</recordid><startdate>20140201</startdate><enddate>20140201</enddate><creator>Ropponen, Olli</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140201</creationdate><title>A note on the robustness of Card and Krueger (1994) and Neumark and Wascher (2000)</title><author>Ropponen, Olli</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-e1a6d093f5136d00ea61f2c6a40db91fbb7536e216895d24d4b95de416915b603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Econometrics</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Economic statistics</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Finance</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Insurance</topic><topic>Labor economics</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Minimum wage</topic><topic>Restaurants</topic><topic>Statistics for Business</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ropponen, Olli</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Empirical economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ropponen, Olli</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A note on the robustness of Card and Krueger (1994) and Neumark and Wascher (2000)</atitle><jtitle>Empirical economics</jtitle><stitle>Empir Econ</stitle><date>2014-02-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>307</spage><epage>316</epage><pages>307-316</pages><issn>0377-7332</issn><eissn>1435-8921</eissn><abstract>This note adds to the discussion originating from Card and Krueger (Am Econ Rev 84:772–793,
1994
) and Neumark and Wascher (Am Econ Rev 90:1362–1396,
2000
) by re-evaluating their results using the semiparametric difference-in-differences estimator introduced in Abadie (Rev Econ Stud 72:1–19,
2005
). The note addresses the question of whether the differences in the original datasets can explain the differences in their conclusions. Although we observe heterogenous employment effects together with the differences in the distributions, the results show that the original findings on the overall employment effect of a minimum wage are fairly robust and just slightly changed when the differences in the distributions of the observed covariates are taken into account.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00181-012-0663-4</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0377-7332 |
ispartof | Empirical economics, 2014-02, Vol.46 (1), p.307-316 |
issn | 0377-7332 1435-8921 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1493979147 |
source | EBSCO Business Source Complete; SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Datasets Econometrics Economic models Economic statistics Economic theory Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods Economics Economics and Finance Employment Estimates Finance Food Insurance Labor economics Management Minimum wage Restaurants Statistics for Business Studies |
title | A note on the robustness of Card and Krueger (1994) and Neumark and Wascher (2000) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T11%3A39%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20note%20on%20the%20robustness%20of%20Card%20and%20Krueger%20(1994)%20and%20Neumark%20and%20Wascher%20(2000)&rft.jtitle=Empirical%20economics&rft.au=Ropponen,%20Olli&rft.date=2014-02-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=307&rft.epage=316&rft.pages=307-316&rft.issn=0377-7332&rft.eissn=1435-8921&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00181-012-0663-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3202424201%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1493979147&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |