Understanding the "Why" as Well as the "How": Service Performance is a Function of Prosocial Motives and Emotional Labor
Which employees tend to better perform with customers? We suggest a combination of individual differences; specifically, we consider both why employees are working (prosocial motivation) and how (emotional labor). Deep acting should enhance the positive relationship between prosocial motivation and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Human performance 2014-01, Vol.27 (1), p.80-97 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 97 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 80 |
container_title | Human performance |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Maneotis, Sarina M. Grandey, Alicia A. Krauss, Autumn D. |
description | Which employees tend to better perform with customers? We suggest a combination of individual differences; specifically, we consider both why employees are working (prosocial motivation) and how (emotional labor). Deep acting should enhance the positive relationship between prosocial motivation and performance, while surface acting should dampen this relationship. Using a field sample of 214 grocery clerks and supervisor ratings of interpersonal performance with customers, we did not find the amplifying effect of deep acting. We do find the dampening effect for surface acting, such that surface acting buffers those with low prosocial motives, presumably by allowing them to "act" like they want to help others. This helps to explain the weak relationship of prosocial motives with performance and suggests implications for research and practice. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/08959285.2013.854366 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1491100636</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3188447111</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-6534c31dfff0f0703505dd04feffa4f0350c2c2143f242d3a856496f575c35493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PAjEQQBujiYj-Aw8Nnhen23bZ9WIMATHBSKKEY1O7rZQsW2wXkH9vV_TqaT76ZjJ9CF0T6BPI4RbyghdpzvspENrPOaNZdoI6hNM0GQCjp6jTIknLnKOLEFYAMOBp1kFf87rUPjSyLm39gZulxr3F8tDDMuCFrqo2_jQnbt-7w6_a76zSeKa9cX4t65jbgCUeb2vVWFdjZ_DMu-CUlRV-do3d6fhel3i0di0Qu1P57vwlOjOyCvrqN3bRfDx6G06S6cvj0_Bhmqj4iSbJOGWKktIYAwYGQDnwsgRmtDGSmbZWqUoJoyZlaUllzjNWZIYPuKKcFbSLbo57N959bnVoxMptfTwjCMIKQgAymkWKHSkVbw9eG7Hxdi39QRAQrWPx51i0jsXRcRy7P47Z-kfH3vmqFI08VM4bH-3YIOi_G74Bro6BaQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1491100636</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Understanding the "Why" as Well as the "How": Service Performance is a Function of Prosocial Motives and Emotional Labor</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Maneotis, Sarina M. ; Grandey, Alicia A. ; Krauss, Autumn D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Maneotis, Sarina M. ; Grandey, Alicia A. ; Krauss, Autumn D.</creatorcontrib><description>Which employees tend to better perform with customers? We suggest a combination of individual differences; specifically, we consider both why employees are working (prosocial motivation) and how (emotional labor). Deep acting should enhance the positive relationship between prosocial motivation and performance, while surface acting should dampen this relationship. Using a field sample of 214 grocery clerks and supervisor ratings of interpersonal performance with customers, we did not find the amplifying effect of deep acting. We do find the dampening effect for surface acting, such that surface acting buffers those with low prosocial motives, presumably by allowing them to "act" like they want to help others. This helps to explain the weak relationship of prosocial motives with performance and suggests implications for research and practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0895-9285</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7043</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/08959285.2013.854366</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia: Routledge</publisher><subject>Customer relations ; Employees ; Human performance ; Motivation ; Performance evaluation</subject><ispartof>Human performance, 2014-01, Vol.27 (1), p.80-97</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2014</rights><rights>Copyright Routledge 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-6534c31dfff0f0703505dd04feffa4f0350c2c2143f242d3a856496f575c35493</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-6534c31dfff0f0703505dd04feffa4f0350c2c2143f242d3a856496f575c35493</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maneotis, Sarina M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grandey, Alicia A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krauss, Autumn D.</creatorcontrib><title>Understanding the "Why" as Well as the "How": Service Performance is a Function of Prosocial Motives and Emotional Labor</title><title>Human performance</title><description>Which employees tend to better perform with customers? We suggest a combination of individual differences; specifically, we consider both why employees are working (prosocial motivation) and how (emotional labor). Deep acting should enhance the positive relationship between prosocial motivation and performance, while surface acting should dampen this relationship. Using a field sample of 214 grocery clerks and supervisor ratings of interpersonal performance with customers, we did not find the amplifying effect of deep acting. We do find the dampening effect for surface acting, such that surface acting buffers those with low prosocial motives, presumably by allowing them to "act" like they want to help others. This helps to explain the weak relationship of prosocial motives with performance and suggests implications for research and practice.</description><subject>Customer relations</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Human performance</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><issn>0895-9285</issn><issn>1532-7043</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1PAjEQQBujiYj-Aw8Nnhen23bZ9WIMATHBSKKEY1O7rZQsW2wXkH9vV_TqaT76ZjJ9CF0T6BPI4RbyghdpzvspENrPOaNZdoI6hNM0GQCjp6jTIknLnKOLEFYAMOBp1kFf87rUPjSyLm39gZulxr3F8tDDMuCFrqo2_jQnbt-7w6_a76zSeKa9cX4t65jbgCUeb2vVWFdjZ_DMu-CUlRV-do3d6fhel3i0di0Qu1P57vwlOjOyCvrqN3bRfDx6G06S6cvj0_Bhmqj4iSbJOGWKktIYAwYGQDnwsgRmtDGSmbZWqUoJoyZlaUllzjNWZIYPuKKcFbSLbo57N959bnVoxMptfTwjCMIKQgAymkWKHSkVbw9eG7Hxdi39QRAQrWPx51i0jsXRcRy7P47Z-kfH3vmqFI08VM4bH-3YIOi_G74Bro6BaQ</recordid><startdate>20140101</startdate><enddate>20140101</enddate><creator>Maneotis, Sarina M.</creator><creator>Grandey, Alicia A.</creator><creator>Krauss, Autumn D.</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140101</creationdate><title>Understanding the "Why" as Well as the "How": Service Performance is a Function of Prosocial Motives and Emotional Labor</title><author>Maneotis, Sarina M. ; Grandey, Alicia A. ; Krauss, Autumn D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-6534c31dfff0f0703505dd04feffa4f0350c2c2143f242d3a856496f575c35493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Customer relations</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Human performance</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maneotis, Sarina M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grandey, Alicia A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krauss, Autumn D.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><jtitle>Human performance</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maneotis, Sarina M.</au><au>Grandey, Alicia A.</au><au>Krauss, Autumn D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Understanding the "Why" as Well as the "How": Service Performance is a Function of Prosocial Motives and Emotional Labor</atitle><jtitle>Human performance</jtitle><date>2014-01-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>80</spage><epage>97</epage><pages>80-97</pages><issn>0895-9285</issn><eissn>1532-7043</eissn><abstract>Which employees tend to better perform with customers? We suggest a combination of individual differences; specifically, we consider both why employees are working (prosocial motivation) and how (emotional labor). Deep acting should enhance the positive relationship between prosocial motivation and performance, while surface acting should dampen this relationship. Using a field sample of 214 grocery clerks and supervisor ratings of interpersonal performance with customers, we did not find the amplifying effect of deep acting. We do find the dampening effect for surface acting, such that surface acting buffers those with low prosocial motives, presumably by allowing them to "act" like they want to help others. This helps to explain the weak relationship of prosocial motives with performance and suggests implications for research and practice.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/08959285.2013.854366</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0895-9285 |
ispartof | Human performance, 2014-01, Vol.27 (1), p.80-97 |
issn | 0895-9285 1532-7043 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1491100636 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Customer relations Employees Human performance Motivation Performance evaluation |
title | Understanding the "Why" as Well as the "How": Service Performance is a Function of Prosocial Motives and Emotional Labor |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T04%3A04%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Understanding%20the%20%22Why%22%20as%20Well%20as%20the%20%22How%22:%20Service%20Performance%20is%20a%20Function%20of%20Prosocial%20Motives%20and%20Emotional%20Labor&rft.jtitle=Human%20performance&rft.au=Maneotis,%20Sarina%20M.&rft.date=2014-01-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=80&rft.epage=97&rft.pages=80-97&rft.issn=0895-9285&rft.eissn=1532-7043&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/08959285.2013.854366&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3188447111%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1491100636&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |