Citizens' Views About Fault in Property Division

The law provides rules for dividing the property spouses own when they divorce. In the US, the matter is largely governed by state law, but many differences that once existed among the states have lessened in the last few decades, and some principles are followed nationwide. All these rules would se...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Family law quarterly 2013-09, Vol.47 (3), p.419-435
Hauptverfasser: BRAVER, SANFORD L., ELLMAN, IRA MARK
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 435
container_issue 3
container_start_page 419
container_title Family law quarterly
container_volume 47
creator BRAVER, SANFORD L.
ELLMAN, IRA MARK
description The law provides rules for dividing the property spouses own when they divorce. In the US, the matter is largely governed by state law, but many differences that once existed among the states have lessened in the last few decades, and some principles are followed nationwide. All these rules would seem necessary to implement some idea of fairness in spousal relationships, and one can ask whether the fairness principles now embodied in the law are consistent with those that citizens currently believe in. The authors explored that question by asking respondents how they believed accumulated marital property should be divided in each of a series of cases with varying fact patterns. Answers were given by choosing a number on a seven-point scale, in which four indicated an equal division of the assets, and one and seven indicated allocations of all the assets to the lower- or higher-earning spouse.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1490970680</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A356142050</galeid><jstor_id>24576136</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A356142050</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g240t-e5936631015d0ff29b80033d69b337732b7456110cf48589878ac848fefb09fb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptzU1LAzEQBuAgCtbqTxAWPHhamXxsPo6l2ioU9KDibcluk5KyTWqSVeqvd6WCCGUOA8PzvnOERgRzUgql8DEaAWBWCqLeTtFZSmsAohSFEYKpy-7L-HRdvDrzmYpJE_pczHTf5cL54imGrYl5V9y6D5dc8OfoxOoumYvfPUYvs7vn6X25eJw_TCeLckUY5NJUinJOMeBqCdYS1UgASpdcNZQKQUkjWMUxhtYyWUklhdStZNIa24CyDR2jq33vNob33qRcr0Mf_fCyxkyBEsAl_KmV7kztvA056nbjUltP6NDPCFQ_qjygVsabqLvgjXXD-Z-_OeCHWZqNaw8GLveBdcoh1tvoNjruasIqwTHl9Bt0tnMK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1490970680</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Citizens' Views About Fault in Property Division</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>BRAVER, SANFORD L. ; ELLMAN, IRA MARK</creator><creatorcontrib>BRAVER, SANFORD L. ; ELLMAN, IRA MARK</creatorcontrib><description>The law provides rules for dividing the property spouses own when they divorce. In the US, the matter is largely governed by state law, but many differences that once existed among the states have lessened in the last few decades, and some principles are followed nationwide. All these rules would seem necessary to implement some idea of fairness in spousal relationships, and one can ask whether the fairness principles now embodied in the law are consistent with those that citizens currently believe in. The authors explored that question by asking respondents how they believed accumulated marital property should be divided in each of a series of cases with varying fact patterns. Answers were given by choosing a number on a seven-point scale, in which four indicated an equal division of the assets, and one and seven indicated allocations of all the assets to the lower- or higher-earning spouse.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-729X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2162-7991</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: Section of Family Law American Bar Association</publisher><subject>Adultery ; Alimony ; Beliefs ; Community property ; Divorce ; Divorce law ; Domestic violence ; Equitable distribution of marital property ; Fairness ; Family law ; Federal legislation ; Husbands ; Law ; Marital property ; Marital status ; Marriage ; No-fault divorce ; Palimony ; Political Affiliation ; Property rights ; Property titles ; Public opinion ; Spouses ; Studies ; Wives</subject><ispartof>Family law quarterly, 2013-09, Vol.47 (3), p.419-435</ispartof><rights>2013 American Bar Association</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 American Bar Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Bar Association Fall 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24576136$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24576136$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,58016,58249</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>BRAVER, SANFORD L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ELLMAN, IRA MARK</creatorcontrib><title>Citizens' Views About Fault in Property Division</title><title>Family law quarterly</title><description>The law provides rules for dividing the property spouses own when they divorce. In the US, the matter is largely governed by state law, but many differences that once existed among the states have lessened in the last few decades, and some principles are followed nationwide. All these rules would seem necessary to implement some idea of fairness in spousal relationships, and one can ask whether the fairness principles now embodied in the law are consistent with those that citizens currently believe in. The authors explored that question by asking respondents how they believed accumulated marital property should be divided in each of a series of cases with varying fact patterns. Answers were given by choosing a number on a seven-point scale, in which four indicated an equal division of the assets, and one and seven indicated allocations of all the assets to the lower- or higher-earning spouse.</description><subject>Adultery</subject><subject>Alimony</subject><subject>Beliefs</subject><subject>Community property</subject><subject>Divorce</subject><subject>Divorce law</subject><subject>Domestic violence</subject><subject>Equitable distribution of marital property</subject><subject>Fairness</subject><subject>Family law</subject><subject>Federal legislation</subject><subject>Husbands</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Marital property</subject><subject>Marital status</subject><subject>Marriage</subject><subject>No-fault divorce</subject><subject>Palimony</subject><subject>Political Affiliation</subject><subject>Property rights</subject><subject>Property titles</subject><subject>Public opinion</subject><subject>Spouses</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Wives</subject><issn>0014-729X</issn><issn>2162-7991</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>QXPDG</sourceid><recordid>eNptzU1LAzEQBuAgCtbqTxAWPHhamXxsPo6l2ioU9KDibcluk5KyTWqSVeqvd6WCCGUOA8PzvnOERgRzUgql8DEaAWBWCqLeTtFZSmsAohSFEYKpy-7L-HRdvDrzmYpJE_pczHTf5cL54imGrYl5V9y6D5dc8OfoxOoumYvfPUYvs7vn6X25eJw_TCeLckUY5NJUinJOMeBqCdYS1UgASpdcNZQKQUkjWMUxhtYyWUklhdStZNIa24CyDR2jq33vNob33qRcr0Mf_fCyxkyBEsAl_KmV7kztvA056nbjUltP6NDPCFQ_qjygVsabqLvgjXXD-Z-_OeCHWZqNaw8GLveBdcoh1tvoNjruasIqwTHl9Bt0tnMK</recordid><startdate>20130922</startdate><enddate>20130922</enddate><creator>BRAVER, SANFORD L.</creator><creator>ELLMAN, IRA MARK</creator><general>Section of Family Law American Bar Association</general><general>American Bar Association</general><scope>ILT</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7R6</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X5</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>888</scope><scope>8A3</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGEN</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>QXPDG</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130922</creationdate><title>Citizens' Views About Fault in Property Division</title><author>BRAVER, SANFORD L. ; ELLMAN, IRA MARK</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g240t-e5936631015d0ff29b80033d69b337732b7456110cf48589878ac848fefb09fb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adultery</topic><topic>Alimony</topic><topic>Beliefs</topic><topic>Community property</topic><topic>Divorce</topic><topic>Divorce law</topic><topic>Domestic violence</topic><topic>Equitable distribution of marital property</topic><topic>Fairness</topic><topic>Family law</topic><topic>Federal legislation</topic><topic>Husbands</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Marital property</topic><topic>Marital status</topic><topic>Marriage</topic><topic>No-fault divorce</topic><topic>Palimony</topic><topic>Political Affiliation</topic><topic>Property rights</topic><topic>Property titles</topic><topic>Public opinion</topic><topic>Spouses</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Wives</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BRAVER, SANFORD L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ELLMAN, IRA MARK</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>GenderWatch</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>GenderWatch (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest Women's &amp; Gender Studies</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Diversity Collection</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Family law quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BRAVER, SANFORD L.</au><au>ELLMAN, IRA MARK</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Citizens' Views About Fault in Property Division</atitle><jtitle>Family law quarterly</jtitle><date>2013-09-22</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>419</spage><epage>435</epage><pages>419-435</pages><issn>0014-729X</issn><eissn>2162-7991</eissn><abstract>The law provides rules for dividing the property spouses own when they divorce. In the US, the matter is largely governed by state law, but many differences that once existed among the states have lessened in the last few decades, and some principles are followed nationwide. All these rules would seem necessary to implement some idea of fairness in spousal relationships, and one can ask whether the fairness principles now embodied in the law are consistent with those that citizens currently believe in. The authors explored that question by asking respondents how they believed accumulated marital property should be divided in each of a series of cases with varying fact patterns. Answers were given by choosing a number on a seven-point scale, in which four indicated an equal division of the assets, and one and seven indicated allocations of all the assets to the lower- or higher-earning spouse.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>Section of Family Law American Bar Association</pub><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0014-729X
ispartof Family law quarterly, 2013-09, Vol.47 (3), p.419-435
issn 0014-729X
2162-7991
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1490970680
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Adultery
Alimony
Beliefs
Community property
Divorce
Divorce law
Domestic violence
Equitable distribution of marital property
Fairness
Family law
Federal legislation
Husbands
Law
Marital property
Marital status
Marriage
No-fault divorce
Palimony
Political Affiliation
Property rights
Property titles
Public opinion
Spouses
Studies
Wives
title Citizens' Views About Fault in Property Division
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T12%3A53%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Citizens'%20Views%20About%20Fault%20in%20Property%20Division&rft.jtitle=Family%20law%20quarterly&rft.au=BRAVER,%20SANFORD%20L.&rft.date=2013-09-22&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=419&rft.epage=435&rft.pages=419-435&rft.issn=0014-729X&rft.eissn=2162-7991&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA356142050%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1490970680&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A356142050&rft_jstor_id=24576136&rfr_iscdi=true