"What Shall We Do with the Young Prostitute? Reform Her or Neglect Her?": Domestication as Reform at the New York State Reformatory for Women at Bedford, 1901-1913

Research conducted at the New York State Reformatory for Women at Bedford under the direction of founding superintendent Katharine Bernent Davis produced some of the most influential data on prostitution in the Progressive Era. While Davis and Bedford have figured prominently in histories of the wom...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of social history 2013-12, Vol.47 (2), p.458-481
Hauptverfasser: Bowler, Anne E., Leon, Chrysanthi S., Lilley, Terry G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 481
container_issue 2
container_start_page 458
container_title Journal of social history
container_volume 47
creator Bowler, Anne E.
Leon, Chrysanthi S.
Lilley, Terry G.
description Research conducted at the New York State Reformatory for Women at Bedford under the direction of founding superintendent Katharine Bernent Davis produced some of the most influential data on prostitution in the Progressive Era. While Davis and Bedford have figured prominently in histories of the women's prison reform movement, historical studies of the social response to prostitution in the Progressive Era, and feminist biographical accounts of women in early twentieth century reform crusades, the relationship between penal reform and the changing social organization of labor has been overhoked. This paper undertakes a critical reexamination of the Bedford data, demonstrating that while Davis advocated a social scientific approach to reform, she systematically displaced the significance structural factors at two crucial levels: her studies of inmates and her own philosophy and practice of reform. Studies of inmates discounted the role of economic factors for women's entry into prostitution in favor of exphnations that emphasized familial and personal weakness. The institutionalization, training, and parole of inmates functioned not simply to place inmates in domestic service but to effectively disqualify them from other sources of respectable emphyment. Viewed through the lens of a social organization of labor perspective, a previously neglected dimension of the fogic and practice of reform is illuminated.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jsh/sht080
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1490935899</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>43305922</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43305922</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-349d977f0235455a72735f5436a1df9677523af864c06bcc641d9135e19dbd333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkUtLAzEUhYMoWB8b90KoO3FsnpPGjfhWkCpWKa6GOJPpdGwbTTKU_h7_qHeoj1VyyTnfJecgtEfJMSWa9-pQ9UIVSZ-soQ6VTCW0r9U66hDCWCIk05toK4SaEEJVqjvoqzuqTMTDykyneGTxpcOLSaxwrCx-dc18jB-9C3ESm2hP8ZMtnZ_hW-ux83hgx1Obx3Y87Z6AdWZBmZs4cXNswq8a8C1tYBdA9O94GE20P48mOr_EcMMjcM9b7bktYC6OMNWEJlRTvoM2SjMNdvfn3EYv11fPF7fJ_cPN3cXZfZIzmcaEC11opUrCuBRSGsUUl6UUPDW0KHWqlGTclP1U5CR9y_NU0ALo0lJdvBWc8210sOJ-ePfZwF-y2jV-DiszKjTEK_tag-pwpcohmOBtmX34ycz4ZUZJ1paQQQnZqgQQiz9kDVnNmmD_qZITRdJs2BbV9kQ5g2KUANv-ylYHCOhvgeCcSM0Y_wavppJX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1490935899</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>"What Shall We Do with the Young Prostitute? Reform Her or Neglect Her?": Domestication as Reform at the New York State Reformatory for Women at Bedford, 1901-1913</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Bowler, Anne E. ; Leon, Chrysanthi S. ; Lilley, Terry G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bowler, Anne E. ; Leon, Chrysanthi S. ; Lilley, Terry G.</creatorcontrib><description>Research conducted at the New York State Reformatory for Women at Bedford under the direction of founding superintendent Katharine Bernent Davis produced some of the most influential data on prostitution in the Progressive Era. While Davis and Bedford have figured prominently in histories of the women's prison reform movement, historical studies of the social response to prostitution in the Progressive Era, and feminist biographical accounts of women in early twentieth century reform crusades, the relationship between penal reform and the changing social organization of labor has been overhoked. This paper undertakes a critical reexamination of the Bedford data, demonstrating that while Davis advocated a social scientific approach to reform, she systematically displaced the significance structural factors at two crucial levels: her studies of inmates and her own philosophy and practice of reform. Studies of inmates discounted the role of economic factors for women's entry into prostitution in favor of exphnations that emphasized familial and personal weakness. The institutionalization, training, and parole of inmates functioned not simply to place inmates in domestic service but to effectively disqualify them from other sources of respectable emphyment. Viewed through the lens of a social organization of labor perspective, a previously neglected dimension of the fogic and practice of reform is illuminated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4529</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-1897</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jsh/sht080</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JSHTAD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>20th century ; Economic factors ; Employment ; Female offenders ; Feminism ; Imprisonment ; Logic ; Penal reform ; Philosophy ; Prisoners ; Prostitution ; Reforms ; Section III: Gender ; Sex roles ; Social history ; Social response ; Social structure ; Women</subject><ispartof>Journal of social history, 2013-12, Vol.47 (2), p.458-481</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 Oxford University Press</rights><rights>Copyright © Peter N. Stearns.</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press Winter 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-349d977f0235455a72735f5436a1df9677523af864c06bcc641d9135e19dbd333</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43305922$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43305922$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904,33753,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bowler, Anne E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leon, Chrysanthi S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lilley, Terry G.</creatorcontrib><title>"What Shall We Do with the Young Prostitute? Reform Her or Neglect Her?": Domestication as Reform at the New York State Reformatory for Women at Bedford, 1901-1913</title><title>Journal of social history</title><description>Research conducted at the New York State Reformatory for Women at Bedford under the direction of founding superintendent Katharine Bernent Davis produced some of the most influential data on prostitution in the Progressive Era. While Davis and Bedford have figured prominently in histories of the women's prison reform movement, historical studies of the social response to prostitution in the Progressive Era, and feminist biographical accounts of women in early twentieth century reform crusades, the relationship between penal reform and the changing social organization of labor has been overhoked. This paper undertakes a critical reexamination of the Bedford data, demonstrating that while Davis advocated a social scientific approach to reform, she systematically displaced the significance structural factors at two crucial levels: her studies of inmates and her own philosophy and practice of reform. Studies of inmates discounted the role of economic factors for women's entry into prostitution in favor of exphnations that emphasized familial and personal weakness. The institutionalization, training, and parole of inmates functioned not simply to place inmates in domestic service but to effectively disqualify them from other sources of respectable emphyment. Viewed through the lens of a social organization of labor perspective, a previously neglected dimension of the fogic and practice of reform is illuminated.</description><subject>20th century</subject><subject>Economic factors</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Female offenders</subject><subject>Feminism</subject><subject>Imprisonment</subject><subject>Logic</subject><subject>Penal reform</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Prisoners</subject><subject>Prostitution</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>Section III: Gender</subject><subject>Sex roles</subject><subject>Social history</subject><subject>Social response</subject><subject>Social structure</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0022-4529</issn><issn>1527-1897</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkUtLAzEUhYMoWB8b90KoO3FsnpPGjfhWkCpWKa6GOJPpdGwbTTKU_h7_qHeoj1VyyTnfJecgtEfJMSWa9-pQ9UIVSZ-soQ6VTCW0r9U66hDCWCIk05toK4SaEEJVqjvoqzuqTMTDykyneGTxpcOLSaxwrCx-dc18jB-9C3ESm2hP8ZMtnZ_hW-ux83hgx1Obx3Y87Z6AdWZBmZs4cXNswq8a8C1tYBdA9O94GE20P48mOr_EcMMjcM9b7bktYC6OMNWEJlRTvoM2SjMNdvfn3EYv11fPF7fJ_cPN3cXZfZIzmcaEC11opUrCuBRSGsUUl6UUPDW0KHWqlGTclP1U5CR9y_NU0ALo0lJdvBWc8210sOJ-ePfZwF-y2jV-DiszKjTEK_tag-pwpcohmOBtmX34ycz4ZUZJ1paQQQnZqgQQiz9kDVnNmmD_qZITRdJs2BbV9kQ5g2KUANv-ylYHCOhvgeCcSM0Y_wavppJX</recordid><startdate>20131201</startdate><enddate>20131201</enddate><creator>Bowler, Anne E.</creator><creator>Leon, Chrysanthi S.</creator><creator>Lilley, Terry G.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131201</creationdate><title>"What Shall We Do with the Young Prostitute? Reform Her or Neglect Her?": Domestication as Reform at the New York State Reformatory for Women at Bedford, 1901-1913</title><author>Bowler, Anne E. ; Leon, Chrysanthi S. ; Lilley, Terry G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-349d977f0235455a72735f5436a1df9677523af864c06bcc641d9135e19dbd333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>20th century</topic><topic>Economic factors</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Female offenders</topic><topic>Feminism</topic><topic>Imprisonment</topic><topic>Logic</topic><topic>Penal reform</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Prisoners</topic><topic>Prostitution</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>Section III: Gender</topic><topic>Sex roles</topic><topic>Social history</topic><topic>Social response</topic><topic>Social structure</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bowler, Anne E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leon, Chrysanthi S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lilley, Terry G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of social history</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bowler, Anne E.</au><au>Leon, Chrysanthi S.</au><au>Lilley, Terry G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>"What Shall We Do with the Young Prostitute? Reform Her or Neglect Her?": Domestication as Reform at the New York State Reformatory for Women at Bedford, 1901-1913</atitle><jtitle>Journal of social history</jtitle><date>2013-12-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>458</spage><epage>481</epage><pages>458-481</pages><issn>0022-4529</issn><eissn>1527-1897</eissn><coden>JSHTAD</coden><abstract>Research conducted at the New York State Reformatory for Women at Bedford under the direction of founding superintendent Katharine Bernent Davis produced some of the most influential data on prostitution in the Progressive Era. While Davis and Bedford have figured prominently in histories of the women's prison reform movement, historical studies of the social response to prostitution in the Progressive Era, and feminist biographical accounts of women in early twentieth century reform crusades, the relationship between penal reform and the changing social organization of labor has been overhoked. This paper undertakes a critical reexamination of the Bedford data, demonstrating that while Davis advocated a social scientific approach to reform, she systematically displaced the significance structural factors at two crucial levels: her studies of inmates and her own philosophy and practice of reform. Studies of inmates discounted the role of economic factors for women's entry into prostitution in favor of exphnations that emphasized familial and personal weakness. The institutionalization, training, and parole of inmates functioned not simply to place inmates in domestic service but to effectively disqualify them from other sources of respectable emphyment. Viewed through the lens of a social organization of labor perspective, a previously neglected dimension of the fogic and practice of reform is illuminated.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/jsh/sht080</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-4529
ispartof Journal of social history, 2013-12, Vol.47 (2), p.458-481
issn 0022-4529
1527-1897
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1490935899
source Sociological Abstracts; Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects 20th century
Economic factors
Employment
Female offenders
Feminism
Imprisonment
Logic
Penal reform
Philosophy
Prisoners
Prostitution
Reforms
Section III: Gender
Sex roles
Social history
Social response
Social structure
Women
title "What Shall We Do with the Young Prostitute? Reform Her or Neglect Her?": Domestication as Reform at the New York State Reformatory for Women at Bedford, 1901-1913
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T00%3A23%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%22What%20Shall%20We%20Do%20with%20the%20Young%20Prostitute?%20Reform%20Her%20or%20Neglect%20Her?%22:%20Domestication%20as%20Reform%20at%20the%20New%20York%20State%20Reformatory%20for%20Women%20at%20Bedford,%201901-1913&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20social%20history&rft.au=Bowler,%20Anne%20E.&rft.date=2013-12-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=458&rft.epage=481&rft.pages=458-481&rft.issn=0022-4529&rft.eissn=1527-1897&rft.coden=JSHTAD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jsh/sht080&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E43305922%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1490935899&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=43305922&rfr_iscdi=true